No you are the lowest here. Just not the lowest in this thread in terms of the level you'll sink to to negate my plays, and that's where DSN succeeds in playing the best version of the love child of Kojak and Inspector Gadget (more the latter as he ends up falling all over himself) with the wording of my posts.
Go DSN Go!
Living in your head rent free-
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Pick #12 -
Purdue -1 over Indiana (11/25/2017)
No you are the lowest here. Just not the lowest in this thread in terms of the level you'll sink to to negate my plays, and that's where DSN succeeds in playing the best version of the love child of Kojak and Inspector Gadget (more the latter as he ends up falling all over himself) with the wording of my posts.
Hugh, you do know Stump called the Bama future a 'good bet' at -110. He's on your side, not mine. Is it obvious? Yes. But I'm the guy who FINDS these bets. Who even has the foresight to make them. To have them on my radar. Not the pinball, bouncing ball, .5 point Charlotte's web sliver wins you have. Packers doesn't even know where to FIND the bet no less make it.
I'm playing WINNERS now or later. The Old Oaken Bucket game is huge this year for Purdue and outside of the rivalry may determine the unthinkable for Purdue, a BOWL. That is GIGANTIC at -1!
Wow. The more I cap off the cuff like this the more I realize how sophisticated my capping has become. You can all get here. I can help you get there.
0
65-75 Good lord. Oooooookay.
Hugh, you do know Stump called the Bama future a 'good bet' at -110. He's on your side, not mine. Is it obvious? Yes. But I'm the guy who FINDS these bets. Who even has the foresight to make them. To have them on my radar. Not the pinball, bouncing ball, .5 point Charlotte's web sliver wins you have. Packers doesn't even know where to FIND the bet no less make it.
I'm playing WINNERS now or later. The Old Oaken Bucket game is huge this year for Purdue and outside of the rivalry may determine the unthinkable for Purdue, a BOWL. That is GIGANTIC at -1!
Wow. The more I cap off the cuff like this the more I realize how sophisticated my capping has become. You can all get here. I can help you get there.
Hugh, you do know Stump called the Bama future a 'good bet' at -110. He's on your side, not mine. Is it obvious? Yes. But I'm the guy who FINDS these bets. Who even has the foresight to make them. To have them on my radar. Not the pinball, bouncing ball, .5 point Charlotte's web sliver wins you have. Packers doesn't even know where to FIND the bet no less make it.
I'm playing WINNERS now or later. The Old Oaken Bucket game is huge this year for Purdue and outside of the rivalry may determine the unthinkable for Purdue, a BOWL. That is GIGANTIC at -1!
Wow. The more I cap off the cuff like this the more I realize how sophisticated my capping has become. You can all get here. I can help you get there.
The Vols was genius...
Bet on a coach that will be lucky to finish the season- with an untested QB, coming off of a 41-0 throttling...
With the #1 team in the nation on deck, no less-
You need to release a few more like this...
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
65-75 Good lord. Oooooookay.
Hugh, you do know Stump called the Bama future a 'good bet' at -110. He's on your side, not mine. Is it obvious? Yes. But I'm the guy who FINDS these bets. Who even has the foresight to make them. To have them on my radar. Not the pinball, bouncing ball, .5 point Charlotte's web sliver wins you have. Packers doesn't even know where to FIND the bet no less make it.
I'm playing WINNERS now or later. The Old Oaken Bucket game is huge this year for Purdue and outside of the rivalry may determine the unthinkable for Purdue, a BOWL. That is GIGANTIC at -1!
Wow. The more I cap off the cuff like this the more I realize how sophisticated my capping has become. You can all get here. I can help you get there.
The Vols was genius...
Bet on a coach that will be lucky to finish the season- with an untested QB, coming off of a 41-0 throttling...
Bet on a coach that will be lucky to finish the season- with an untested QB, coming off of a 41-0 throttling...
With the #1 team in the nation on deck, no less-
You need to release a few more like this...
The bet was in before the untested QB was in you moron. The cap if you read it (which you can't because you are unable to cap in the terms I do) focused on Dormandy.
And they lead for 3 quarters you fool, all outside the number. You look at the final like a fool and go "Genius pick!??!?". Which is why you NEVER cap in the mains. You are not capable of writing anything up at any level.
Pick #13: Missouri -14 over Idaho
0
Quote Originally Posted by Dsn150:
The Vols was genius...
Bet on a coach that will be lucky to finish the season- with an untested QB, coming off of a 41-0 throttling...
With the #1 team in the nation on deck, no less-
You need to release a few more like this...
The bet was in before the untested QB was in you moron. The cap if you read it (which you can't because you are unable to cap in the terms I do) focused on Dormandy.
And they lead for 3 quarters you fool, all outside the number. You look at the final like a fool and go "Genius pick!??!?". Which is why you NEVER cap in the mains. You are not capable of writing anything up at any level.
Is IRONMikeSharpe a former member of the AWA or a different old school wrastling circuit?
I should turn my avatar back to the REAL Crusher..but who knows what he was famous for using? Hint,.... he used it on Chief Wahoo McDaniel and Mad Dog Vachon...
0
Is IRONMikeSharpe a former member of the AWA or a different old school wrastling circuit?
I should turn my avatar back to the REAL Crusher..but who knows what he was famous for using? Hint,.... he used it on Chief Wahoo McDaniel and Mad Dog Vachon...
The bet was in before the untested QB was in you moron. The cap if you read it (which you can't because you are unable to cap in the terms I do) focused on Dormandy.
And they lead for 3 quarters you fool, all outside the number. You look at the final like a fool and go "Genius pick!??!?". Which is why you NEVER cap in the mains. You are not capable of writing anything up at any level.
This article was written 9 days ago- the same day you posted your wager...
When a wager is for a full game, does it matter how many quarters you lead, or which quarter you lead?
My 3 sentence analysis made more sense than any number of pages of bullshit you could spew-
I sincerely hope that you are not risking actual dollars on your picks- because I never want to see anyone lose money on a wager-
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
The bet was in before the untested QB was in you moron. The cap if you read it (which you can't because you are unable to cap in the terms I do) focused on Dormandy.
And they lead for 3 quarters you fool, all outside the number. You look at the final like a fool and go "Genius pick!??!?". Which is why you NEVER cap in the mains. You are not capable of writing anything up at any level.
The bet was in before the untested QB was in you moron. The cap if you read it (which you can't because you are unable to cap in the terms I do) focused on Dormandy.
And they lead for 3 quarters you fool, all outside the number. You look at the final like a fool and go "Genius pick!??!?". Which is why you NEVER cap in the mains. You are not capable of writing anything up at any level.
Pick #13: Missouri -14 over Idaho
Scal, because this is your thread, and you had taken on the responsibility of updating the records with pending picks, I believe you should do so anytime a pick is added.
BTW, I like Idaho in this game, but in an attempt to slow done this death march you are on, I've gone to a Princeton-esque 4 Corners style of picking games.
This is way too much fun to let it end sooner than it has to
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
The bet was in before the untested QB was in you moron. The cap if you read it (which you can't because you are unable to cap in the terms I do) focused on Dormandy.
And they lead for 3 quarters you fool, all outside the number. You look at the final like a fool and go "Genius pick!??!?". Which is why you NEVER cap in the mains. You are not capable of writing anything up at any level.
Pick #13: Missouri -14 over Idaho
Scal, because this is your thread, and you had taken on the responsibility of updating the records with pending picks, I believe you should do so anytime a pick is added.
BTW, I like Idaho in this game, but in an attempt to slow done this death march you are on, I've gone to a Princeton-esque 4 Corners style of picking games.
This is way too much fun to let it end sooner than it has to
Gosh I love that he took the Raiders and in Pinball Wizard style it hit. BUT he never put in the bet!!!
Because he wants to play coy and sing Kelly Clarkson's "A Moment Like This!!!" (i.e, relishing his 6-4 record) in his bathroom mirror (which behind it, houses a massive stash of hemmerhoid medication. God help the woman who actually walked down the isle with this grotesque heathen...for better or worse. Truly she got the worst of it from the "bottom" up.)
0
Gosh I love that he took the Raiders and in Pinball Wizard style it hit. BUT he never put in the bet!!!
Because he wants to play coy and sing Kelly Clarkson's "A Moment Like This!!!" (i.e, relishing his 6-4 record) in his bathroom mirror (which behind it, houses a massive stash of hemmerhoid medication. God help the woman who actually walked down the isle with this grotesque heathen...for better or worse. Truly she got the worst of it from the "bottom" up.)
Good lord. Oooooookay.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
