Posted:
#601
Q: How do you know scal is lying?
A: His fingers are on his keyboard
bigreds daddy
0
SCALABRINE vs. PACKERSBACKERS - Loser Leaves Covers for Eternity
Posted:
#606
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:
Go play in traffic Scal...do yourself the favor...internet tough guy doesnt suit you well...i am sparing you the humiliation of losing...plus i dont want you to leave covers...this place needs your comedy and you need this place like oxygen to live.
Go play in traffic Scal...do yourself the favor...internet tough guy doesnt suit you well...i am sparing you the humiliation of losing...plus i dont want you to leave covers...this place needs your comedy and you need this place like oxygen to live.
But i will accept your gradeschool challenge on whatever terms you want and finally end your covers career...i would be my honor to save future sheep from your slaughterhouse...set it up
u fuukkin chicken sshiit
0
Posted:
#607
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Hugh
6-4
Packers +6 pending
Scal
4-5
Astros to win ALCS Pending
Bama to win it all Pending
Packers
9-9
Scal, you have made it clear that you fancy yourself an astute handicapper, so I will ask your opinion on a gambling related topic.
If for the balance of this competition I were to simply mimic your picks, what are the odds that you could win?
Looking forward to your response
Thanks,
Your pal Hugh 
bigreds daddy
0
Posted:
#609
You could do that at 1-0 with the other guy 0-1 in a contest with 10,000 picks. If you really think that's a rule that needs to be stated then lower yourself to DSN and Gimmee's level as they scour the OP like they are working for Jacoby and Myers Injury Attorneys as a paralegal.
Plus there's an easy out: I could just post a play the second before the opening tip or kick-off and you wouldn't be able to mimic it fast enough.
So how long did it take for me to think of a way out of your barstool bet charade? 2 minutes. Sad.
0
Posted:
#612
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
If you really think that's a rule that needs to be stated then lower yourself to DSN and Gimmee's level
So you're saying that I'm not the lowest person here ...
I know you would grow to love me!!!
It's a shame that it didn't happpen until your final months here 
bigreds daddy
0
Posted:
#613
Pick #12 -
Purdue -1 over Indiana (11/25/2017)
No you are the lowest here. Just not the lowest in this thread in terms of the level you'll sink to to negate my plays, and that's where DSN succeeds in playing the best version of the love child of Kojak and Inspector Gadget (more the latter as he ends up falling all over himself) with the wording of my posts.
Go DSN Go!
0
Posted:
#614
It doesn't have to be written that you can't just mimic someone's picks in a handicapping contest. That's the equivalent of having an IQ contest and saying, "Well gee golly, I could just look at your answers and write down the same thing." The sheer virtue of what's being challenged establishes that you can't just mimic each other's picks. This thing is going off the rails.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
0
Posted:
#619
You look it up you sniveling bowel excriment. Ive been posting your POS plays all contest.
It's under College Football Props section on 5 Dimes and that's the line.
And you're insults with Tony are completely disjoint with the fact I warned bettors here 5 Dimes is FAMOUS for credit card fraud.
Which I of course don't have to worry about since my bankroll only grows like the wart on your face I should pay a rat to gnaw off.
0
Posted:
#620
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
It doesn't have to be written that you can't just mimic someone's picks in a handicapping contest. That's the equivalent of having an IQ contest and saying, "Well gee golly, I could just look at your answers and write down the same thing." The sheer virtue of what's being challenged establishes that you can't just mimic each other's picks. This thing is going off the rails.
It doesn't have to be written that you can't just mimic someone's picks in a handicapping contest. That's the equivalent of having an IQ contest and saying, "Well gee golly, I could just look at your answers and write down the same thing." The sheer virtue of what's being challenged establishes that you can't just mimic each other's picks. This thing is going off the rails.
Did you really think that a response was necessary?
I knew scal would respond, so I pulled the strings and he danced for me.
Different day, same game.
Stu, you're better than that
bigreds daddy
0
Posted:
#621
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
To the posters here, even those who HATE me (even Stump who is shaming Packers right now for this), how cowardly is it of DSN and Packers, who will be leaving, to say NOTHING of my Astros bet for a WEEK, and then to wait and have it at -550 now, when they are up 2-0, to contest it. HOW YELLOW can you be???? Lol.
You were bellowing in big bold letters how your Astros bet, which you got at -105, was now at -550.
Care to post what that line is now?
No???
Ok, then I will.
Astros ALCS line is currently +210
bigreds daddy
0
Posted:
#622
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Pick #12 -
Pick #12 -
Purdue -1 over Indiana (11/25/2017)
Anyone else notice that many of scal's recent picks are well into the future ...
Obviously, he is trying to prolong the inevitable.
Scal, think of this contest as ripping off a bandaid ... it is less painful to do it quickly.
Throw 8 or 9 darts tonight to make your picks ... you shouldn't do any worse than your last 100+ picks with painfully long, totally irrelevant write-ups.
bigreds daddy
0
Hot Forum Topics
