another public bloodbath?

still a half to play

but lots of work to do for bama. down by 17 in wildcard game (eg first round cfp) but feels different, mateer is a chump compared to mendoza

hopefully public recoups some on trinidad and the rebs tonight as early posts seem to lean ole miss . . . 

Covers bloodbath part 2

Lol cute of you to think Bama is coming back. To many bets on them. Moneyline, spread, teasers, parlays, player props. ALL OF IT. Then money Vegas made on Texas Tech shitting the bed has got to be insane. Now Bama. Vegas never loses. Games have gotten crazy since the rise in player prop bets. 

People see Alabama getting points and there eyes light up…and see a Indiana of the past that would be getting 30 pts not this year baby

Even if the posts were OVERWHELMINGLY in favor of Ole Miss, in no world are they the so-called “public” play. People LOVE betting Georgia, especially when the line is under a TD. How many parlays will have the Georgia ML in them tonight? 

You’re not looking good enough

yup. line was sketch from the start. and the public took it "hook line sinker". public being us, the forum, of course.

not to say it happens all the time(bloodbath) but again, its uncanny how often it happens.

@DickTracy

 great point. but what im saying is "posts" (on this forum) is by definition the public.  

it's just an opinion, obvi. 

@Michigan_D

 respect - u on a heater of recent note across a few sports.

but im just speaking of consensus - i mean it's gambling 101 to consider*other* angles to wagering besides just what happens "within the lines", no? 

"joe public" v "sharp action" being one of those "angles"

who knows just having fun and appreciate all posters on this - even mr. "49er" J Gape! 

 peace bro

D

@dicodoco

I understood what you meant, but I was specifically talking about tonight’s game. Ole Miss isn’t a public play (no matter how many posters say they’re betting them) because Covers isn’t the majority, it’s just one gambling forum out of many