Posted:
#576
Nice hit! Hope you go on a run!
0
GIANTS @ REDSKINS: It's rare that I say I'm not worried about a cover at all but...I'm not worried.
Posted:
#578
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
No it's not. I have more than enough away from this PC.
But what I am trying to do is bring YOU the good life, yes, even you who defames because I do not charge for exclusive access to whatever I know, because I want everyone to have it to beat the books.
And this is in what is really a ragged economy (and we all know it. If you are not at the upper echelon of the corporate ladder, you are not enjoying this skyrocketing Dow in any substantive way) where the dollar continues to buy less as our lives continue.
I can give you more of those dollars. For nothing...I won't be perfect but in the end you'll get what you need.
Now who's pathetic again? Come on back and let me know if you didn't change your mind.
Sorry for the delay Scal. I check in here once a day, typically very early in the am.
Well. First off, I can certainly appreciate your intentions. However, your actions (well...words actually) are what do not impress me. I don't understand why anyone would intentionally make themselves unlikable the way that you do. You have done that to yourself by confronting every person here(that bashes you for a loss) with relentless hostility. You remind me of Bobmalog or whatever his name was.
Anyway, I have lived the life of a gambler and I gamble every day....but now only for entertainment purposes. I can't beat the juice. In the end nobody does really....maybe you, but who knows? I am retired, so my gambling occurs in your aforementioned stock market. On particularly volatile days, my swings can extend over 20k to the good or bad. Gambling on a game for big money where I am taking a 10% hit on the vig is just bad investing. I would suggest you invest in the markets and not waste so much time here. It's a better bet all the way around.
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
0
Posted:
#579
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:
Sorry for the delay Scal. I check in here once a day, typically very early in the am.
Well. First off, I can certainly appreciate your intentions. However, your actions (well...words actually) are what do not impress me. I don't understand why anyone would intentionally make themselves unlikable the way that you do. You have done that to yourself by confronting every person here(that bashes you for a loss) with relentless hostility. You remind me of Bobmalog or whatever his name was.
Anyway, I have lived the life of a gambler and I gamble every day....but now only for entertainment purposes. I can't beat the juice. In the end nobody does really....maybe you, but who knows? I am retired, so my gambling occurs in your aforementioned stock market. On particularly volatile days, my swings can extend over 20k to the good or bad. Gambling on a game for big money where I am taking a 10% hit on the vig is just bad investing. I would suggest you invest in the markets and not waste so much time here. It's a better bet all the way around.
I have heard this from other good gamblers who eventually gave up and turned to the stock market, because of the vig. They said it will catch up to you eventually. I never fully understood it, but then again I stopped gambling before it even came close to that.
0
Posted:
#580
Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:
I have heard this from other good gamblers who eventually gave up and turned to the stock market, because of the vig. They said it will catch up to you eventually. I never fully understood it, but then again I stopped gambling before it even came close to that.
The vig will not beat you BB. I Am living the life of a gambler too and the vig most definitely can be beat.
So for every gambleholic who says the vig will take you down, there's someone else saying the vig can be beat (and it can).
Of course, this is just Scal disagreeing again which makes that guy who posts all those picks and write-ups for free so unlikeable.
Winston Raiders Pk Teddy Shiek yourlife Jones
It took 599 posts but we shut them up the tried and true way that always works, with a win.
0
Posted:
#585
Quote Originally Posted by mbialowas:
Congratulations on your first win of the year
Congratulations on your first win of the year
Thanks MBialowas!
Considering I've only made 3 plays in 7 days, it's not that hard to believe it's the first win! But glad to have you on my side finally...
More importantly, you should go check on dimsum who makes a mind-blowing 2,500 bets a year. That's 7 bets each and every day!
He's on his 49th bet already! I think you'll find him down in the hole with Hugh Jorgan. Give 'em a phone call from behind the glass.
0
Posted:
#586
Well jr, it was only appropriate, that after 600 posts and 25 pages of thread for a SINGLE loss, that I end the post with a SINGLE win. It's the only was to exterminate the roaches of covers. And look, it works like a charm doesn't it?
Stat, santa sorry. Thought everyone was checking in but it's understandable if ya don't want to see what's going on in here.
But you both are good enough cappers to see the spot the knicks were in last night in a home and home against a somewhat good but nowhere near great Bucks team that the Knicks can snap a losing streak against. Standard capping spot.
0
Posted:
#588
Wow. Ben McAdoo literally says things like:
- “We have 53 [men] on the roster. We will active 46 of them. We’re playing to win the ball game,”\
- “Eli will play the [whole] ball game,”
- “If players are cleared to play and healthy, we’ll play them.”
and you bet based on speculation of the opposite? This was one of the easiest plus money bets in recent NFL memory.
Strange, very strange.
0
Posted:
#590
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Well jr, it was only appropriate, that after 600 posts and 25 pages of thread for a SINGLE loss, that I end the post with a SINGLE win. It's the only was to exterminate the roaches of covers. And look, it works like a charm doesn't it?
Stat, santa sorry. Thought everyone was checking in but it's understandable if ya don't want to see what's going on in here.
But you both are good enough cappers to see the spot the knicks were in last night in a home and home against a somewhat good but nowhere near great Bucks team that the Knicks can snap a losing streak against. Standard capping spot.
You had this capped as them being down what 13 going into 4Q and then Bucks scoring 15 in 4thQ? You are better then I thought.
Don’t tell me the law. Tell me the judge.
0
Posted:
#591
Quote Originally Posted by TwoLegParlay:
Wow. Ben McAdoo literally says things like:
Wow. Ben McAdoo literally says things like:
- “We have 53 [men] on the roster. We will active 46 of them. We’re playing to win the ball game,”\
- “Eli will play the [whole] ball game,”
- “If players are cleared to play and healthy, we’ll play them.”
and you bet based on speculation of the opposite? This was one of the easiest plus money bets in recent NFL memory.
Strange, very strange.
This was pointed out to scal by a few people, only to be met with personal attacks.
How dare anyone question the great scalabrine!!! 
bigreds daddy
0
Hot Forum Topics
