GIANTS @ REDSKINS: It's rare that I say I'm not worried about a cover at all but...I'm not worried.

Because folks....

The YOU ARE LOOKING LIVE threads are simply the best threads on covers.....

Go to them.... You'll see. When you find 70% winners in any year/65% winners over two years.

Let me know....

Who the hell are you to say what is a big sample size and what isn't.

If you are a high volume capper you CAN'T HIT 70%. Show me ONE CAPPER that hits at 70% with a sample size of 500/1,000.

I assume these are the sample sizes that you deem credible.

You trolls are all the same:

Win? Ah, it's one win. Come back to me when you win 500 games.

Lose? Ah, you're a disaster.

You're incredible.

I had a SINGLE bad month in TWO YEARS.

And there's the typical troll response saying to people "You're a 55% capper. You're a 50% capper".

You are a piece of Shi* kid. Just like you're slovenly brethren.

You hit 70%? Not ENOUGH. MORE SAMPLE.

You lose a few in row. You'll regress!

And you don't even have the reading comprehension skills to understand WHY I said I was 100% in UFC and CBB.

It is because that idiot is using 44% in the NFL this year to SEGREGATE my plays to TAKE AWAY from my overall winning percentage.

So I SARCASTICALLY gave him the other side of the coin to show him I could counter it with other MEANINGLESS percentages.

And who the hell cares about all of this anyway.

I posted on here once with NO RECORD and the trolls screamed WHERE's the RECORD? after all my wins.

So I post it FOR THEM.

The intelligent reader of any thread I write walks away with what they need after reading JUST THAT THREAD and could care less about my record or anything else except that pick like they did with the St. John's Tulane thread (and many there said JUST THAT).

Is there ANYTHING else because I feel like I am done wiping my feet on you.

Let me tell troll, you come at me, you will get it tenfold so don't think you'll walk away unscathed.   

57%! Uh, you can segregate any down streak you want BWS to make your record look comparable of which it is not. Why don't you just take the last 2 picks and call me a 0% capper!

This is the way of a troll.

But let's look at your record and let's not segregate.

Let's take the Bowl record of which there are a pretty significant amount of picks.

I don't use units so I don't get credit for hitting +ML's (which makes my record even better if counted and I've hit numerous ones). You do count them. And I don't use units for a reason: TRANSPARENCY because anyone can martingale their losses.

You attach monetary values to your record.

The standard unit is $100. You're 7-8 on the bowl season (effectively the reader is 6-9 because you posted a line a month last that was a loser to the reader), but you are down $1005. That's TEN units down on a 7-8 record (and again, I'm giving you Wisconsin which hurts the reader, not helps because it was a loser for them).

That's not 7-8. That's far worse. That's bankroll busting for many readers if they followed your bowl season.

So when you talk about helping or hurting, you didn't hurt them, with your unit posting, you f'd them hard. Real hard.

Nice job. And you're coming after me???

Think before you speak kid. You're attacking one loss and your year is inferior to mine, as is the past two years, and likely your entire tenure on covers if you want to keep going back. So keep segregating. Ya might convince someone you're a first rate capper on this site. Woohoo! Three cheers for BWS! He did it! He's #1.......000.

THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT:

People say, SCAL IS AN ATTENTION seeker!

Really? What does Scal do? I've said this in many posts, no matter what the line is, I post the line available TO YOU at posting and count that in my record.

Why? Because who the hell cares what line I got a month ago. That line is gone.

When I posted Thunder Sixer POY months in advance and won, I said, play it NOW it will go up. I underlined that in the thread. It was 5.5 for weeks and weeks all there for you, a winner. A POY. Didn't have the same value as it moved. I warned all the bettors.

If you listened, you won. I did that for the reader, guiding them to a win, telling them what line is good and posting the line available to all at the time of post.

Look at BWS, an alleged 'respected' poster:

He posts a Wisky -7.5 line from nearly a MONTH prior. That line closed at 8.5 in many places.

Did he mention this in this thread? No.

Did he care? Probably not.

Did he win for his own record and his own roll? YES.

Did he instruct the bettor, guide the bettor about that line and how it moved like I do? NO.

So he wins, and you....get f'cked.

Whatta guy....

His roll? A-OK. Your's if you followed at 8.5. You lost. His record +1 win.

And he goes on his merry way and says nothing. Tacks another win on his record and whistles a happy tune as he disappears into the alleyway.

Great poster.

What a contribution to the forum.

BUT SCAL is the attention seeker here.

Open your eyes people. It's the same posters/trolls year after year after year....You're assement of who is here to help, who is looking for attention, who cares about the reader....It's up to you.

Amazing isn't it. When you really look at it...