Michael Strahan has already said in the NY Post that he doesnt have an answer for Grant because:
"He is like a BULL and runs like one,I wish he was still on our team."
I bet you do jackass...
we'll see what jackass does to Favre Sunday. maybe he can roll over and play dead like the box did when he gave Strahan the sack record but I don't think he'll need two because he'll be running for his lfe just like Romo was
0
Quote Originally Posted by michaelpaul1:
Michael Strahan has already said in the NY Post that he doesnt have an answer for Grant because:
"He is like a BULL and runs like one,I wish he was still on our team."
I bet you do jackass...
we'll see what jackass does to Favre Sunday. maybe he can roll over and play dead like the box did when he gave Strahan the sack record but I don't think he'll need two because he'll be running for his lfe just like Romo was
so youre admitting to taking it in the ass? i think its more normal for my mom too than you. That would make u a homosexual. It would make her just a horny fuck.
0
Quote Originally Posted by michaelpaul1:
like you and shitforsports mom...
so youre admitting to taking it in the ass? i think its more normal for my mom too than you. That would make u a homosexual. It would make her just a horny fuck.
Giants are 1-4 against Greenbay in all playoffs dating back to 1962...Favre decapitated the Giants to the tune of 35-13.Giants are all banged up and Greenbay's starters are almost all back and healthy.The Packers fans are the loudest and the frozen Tundra is homefield is a lionsden...come in we will feast come Sunday...
Yup, a lot of those same players are playing in this gameThat type of stat is irrelevant.
0
Quote Originally Posted by michaelpaul1:
Giants are 1-4 against Greenbay in all playoffs dating back to 1962...Favre decapitated the Giants to the tune of 35-13.Giants are all banged up and Greenbay's starters are almost all back and healthy.The Packers fans are the loudest and the frozen Tundra is homefield is a lionsden...come in we will feast come Sunday...
Yup, a lot of those same players are playing in this gameThat type of stat is irrelevant.
so youre admitting to taking it in the ass? i think its more normal for my mom too than you. That would make u a homosexual. It would make her just a horny fuck.
or just a ho...I'll come over and superman her for you...
0
Quote Originally Posted by liveforsports:
so youre admitting to taking it in the ass? i think its more normal for my mom too than you. That would make u a homosexual. It would make her just a horny fuck.
or just a ho...I'll come over and superman her for you...
For all you players who think GB will roll over the G_Men, just remember the boys in Vegas that create the lines are usually pretty sharp when it comes to matching the lines with the appropriate teams.
There's a reason why the Packers are only layin 7 and not 9 like the Seattle game be careful you dont get snake-bit.
0
For all you players who think GB will roll over the G_Men, just remember the boys in Vegas that create the lines are usually pretty sharp when it comes to matching the lines with the appropriate teams.
There's a reason why the Packers are only layin 7 and not 9 like the Seattle game be careful you dont get snake-bit.
If the Giants can keep it close at the half, then they have a great shot at an upset. Their defensive coordinator, might be the best in the business at making adjustments at halftime. Either way, it should be a hell of a game!
0
If the Giants can keep it close at the half, then they have a great shot at an upset. Their defensive coordinator, might be the best in the business at making adjustments at halftime. Either way, it should be a hell of a game!
there is a reason why grant was cut by the giants and was their 5th string he is not as good as everyone thinks he is. besides even if he was the giants have seen enough of him over the years to know his strength and weeknesses. and then you have mister high and mighty brett farve. lets not forget he got beat by chicago twice this year he can be forced to make bad mistakes and his team is still young and inexperienced
0
there is a reason why grant was cut by the giants and was their 5th string he is not as good as everyone thinks he is. besides even if he was the giants have seen enough of him over the years to know his strength and weeknesses. and then you have mister high and mighty brett farve. lets not forget he got beat by chicago twice this year he can be forced to make bad mistakes and his team is still young and inexperienced
So building a case for GB is "overlooking" the giants? Give it up. This is a dream scenario for GB. Favre is 0-9 in Dallas. There is no reason in the world gb shouldnt win this game by big time double digits. If I am wrong feel free to mock my until next year. But....I am not.
homers really make me sick
no reason in the world? the giants are the best team in the nfl at getting pressure on the qb. favre willingly shits himself when he gets people in his face.
thats not a semi-good to decent reason? i think its sort of solid.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scoop82:
So building a case for GB is "overlooking" the giants? Give it up. This is a dream scenario for GB. Favre is 0-9 in Dallas. There is no reason in the world gb shouldnt win this game by big time double digits. If I am wrong feel free to mock my until next year. But....I am not.
homers really make me sick
no reason in the world? the giants are the best team in the nfl at getting pressure on the qb. favre willingly shits himself when he gets people in his face.
thats not a semi-good to decent reason? i think its sort of solid.
I am a Packer fan and to me what happened in week 2 is meaningless for the most part. Both these teams are a lot different now. Anything can happen on any week...you only need to be better than the team you are playing for 4 quarters on that day...glad the game is in Lambeau but it will mean nothing if the Packers don't come out play well, execute and get it done. The G-Men are playing well right now, their road record speaks for itself. Hoping the Packers find a way to get it done...
0
I am a Packer fan and to me what happened in week 2 is meaningless for the most part. Both these teams are a lot different now. Anything can happen on any week...you only need to be better than the team you are playing for 4 quarters on that day...glad the game is in Lambeau but it will mean nothing if the Packers don't come out play well, execute and get it done. The G-Men are playing well right now, their road record speaks for itself. Hoping the Packers find a way to get it done...
there is a reason why grant was cut by the giants and was their 5th string he is not as good as everyone thinks he is. besides even if he was the giants have seen enough of him over the years to know his strength and weeknesses. and then you have mister high and mighty brett farve. lets not forget he got beat by chicago twice this year he can be forced to make bad mistakes and his team is still young and inexperienced
This could be one of the dumbest posts I ever read. Its not that Grant is not that good, it is NYG management not being able to spot talent unless sportswriters are raving about someone.
GB being the youngest team in the NFL, even with the oldest QB in the league, and about to go to the super bowl should tell you that they have an eye for talent and great management. That why we got Grant for a steal. Like buying a 2006 corvette for 5 G's.
GB is young, but talented son.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rubberband-man:
there is a reason why grant was cut by the giants and was their 5th string he is not as good as everyone thinks he is. besides even if he was the giants have seen enough of him over the years to know his strength and weeknesses. and then you have mister high and mighty brett farve. lets not forget he got beat by chicago twice this year he can be forced to make bad mistakes and his team is still young and inexperienced
This could be one of the dumbest posts I ever read. Its not that Grant is not that good, it is NYG management not being able to spot talent unless sportswriters are raving about someone.
GB being the youngest team in the NFL, even with the oldest QB in the league, and about to go to the super bowl should tell you that they have an eye for talent and great management. That why we got Grant for a steal. Like buying a 2006 corvette for 5 G's.
This could be one of the dumbest posts I ever read. Its not that Grant is not that good, it is NYG management not being able to spot talent unless sportswriters are raving about someone.
GB being the youngest team in the NFL, even with the oldest QB in the league, and about to go to the super bowl should tell you that they have an eye for talent and great management. That why we got Grant for a steal. Like buying a 2006 corvette for 5 G's.
GB is young, but talented son.
Your an idiot. Their management was smart enough to grab bradshaw in the last round of the draft and he is gonna be a hell of alot better then Ryan Grant. Grant was undrafted free agent and was the Giants 4th best running back and then they stole a 6th round pick for a guy thy were prolly gonna have to cut.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rolemodel:
This could be one of the dumbest posts I ever read. Its not that Grant is not that good, it is NYG management not being able to spot talent unless sportswriters are raving about someone.
GB being the youngest team in the NFL, even with the oldest QB in the league, and about to go to the super bowl should tell you that they have an eye for talent and great management. That why we got Grant for a steal. Like buying a 2006 corvette for 5 G's.
GB is young, but talented son.
Your an idiot. Their management was smart enough to grab bradshaw in the last round of the draft and he is gonna be a hell of alot better then Ryan Grant. Grant was undrafted free agent and was the Giants 4th best running back and then they stole a 6th round pick for a guy thy were prolly gonna have to cut.
Your an idiot. Their management was smart enough to grab bradshaw in the last round of the draft and he is gonna be a hell of alot better then Ryan Grant. Grant was undrafted free agent and was the Giants 4th best running back and then they stole a 6th round pick for a guy thy were prolly gonna have to cut.
I like Ahmad Bradshaw,
but your terrible coach only let him run 23 times all year. They are blind to see real talent over there with terrible coaching decisions.
Now Ryan Grant in 8 games ran for 1157yds also counting Seattle game. More yards than most other running backs in 16 games. So for you to say that Bradshaw is better remains to be seen in the stat column since Tom Coughlin won't play him.
Like I said He makes terrible coaching decisions, and the players don't respect him. He also has that puzzled look all the time. He acts like a school teacher from 1900 who can’t relate to his students[players].
0
Quote Originally Posted by MR MACMAN:
Your an idiot. Their management was smart enough to grab bradshaw in the last round of the draft and he is gonna be a hell of alot better then Ryan Grant. Grant was undrafted free agent and was the Giants 4th best running back and then they stole a 6th round pick for a guy thy were prolly gonna have to cut.
I like Ahmad Bradshaw,
but your terrible coach only let him run 23 times all year. They are blind to see real talent over there with terrible coaching decisions.
Now Ryan Grant in 8 games ran for 1157yds also counting Seattle game. More yards than most other running backs in 16 games. So for you to say that Bradshaw is better remains to be seen in the stat column since Tom Coughlin won't play him.
Like I said He makes terrible coaching decisions, and the players don't respect him. He also has that puzzled look all the time. He acts like a school teacher from 1900 who can’t relate to his students[players].
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.