He trashes this thread but has a whopping 11 plays going last night and goes 6-4-1 (coin flip result over the average) and does the typical "unit play" to make it look like his record is better than what it is (as though anyone is going to tail his units exactly).
It's the old, don't look at my record, look at my UNITS!!!
10 unit plays will be forthcoming when he gets in a hole.
Anyhow, to the posters, would you rather a 3 sentence blurb on 11 games (some of which he didn't go into much detail on at all) or ONE GAME with a page of insight?
You will NEVER see units in my OP's, believe me.
The choice is yours...
Just opened shango's thread from last night.
He trashes this thread but has a whopping 11 plays going last night and goes 6-4-1 (coin flip result over the average) and does the typical "unit play" to make it look like his record is better than what it is (as though anyone is going to tail his units exactly).
It's the old, don't look at my record, look at my UNITS!!!
10 unit plays will be forthcoming when he gets in a hole.
Anyhow, to the posters, would you rather a 3 sentence blurb on 11 games (some of which he didn't go into much detail on at all) or ONE GAME with a page of insight?
Laying because the Knicks have Indiana tomorrow . But with Detroit otr x 4 one day at home and back on the road again next game I think Knicks if I had to play the game . But Indy on deck makes this a no play for me .
Laying because the Knicks have Indiana tomorrow . But with Detroit otr x 4 one day at home and back on the road again next game I think Knicks if I had to play the game . But Indy on deck makes this a no play for me .
the under look yummy line was 200 and drop 198.5. I took that bait last night when the lines came out.. knicks is weak up front and they back court is not that good .. they offense is 23 n pt 24 n fg% 19 n 3pt% 12 n ft% and 28 n rebound%.. and they have problems in the locker room.. Rebounds are going to kill them no Tyson Chandler no second chance shots.. That's your pick and your thinking g/l
the under look yummy line was 200 and drop 198.5. I took that bait last night when the lines came out.. knicks is weak up front and they back court is not that good .. they offense is 23 n pt 24 n fg% 19 n 3pt% 12 n ft% and 28 n rebound%.. and they have problems in the locker room.. Rebounds are going to kill them no Tyson Chandler no second chance shots.. That's your pick and your thinking g/l
Laying because the Knicks have Indiana tomorrow . But with Detroit otr x 4 one day at home and back on the road again next game I think Knicks if I had to play the game . But Indy on deck makes this a no play for me .
Pistons is a easier game than Pacers. Don't forget Pacers just suffer a humiliating defeat to Bulls. I seriously doubt Knicks will give up an easier game to win and then feel that they can beat 1 of the strongest team in the league.
Quote Originally Posted by Flush1:
Laying because the Knicks have Indiana tomorrow . But with Detroit otr x 4 one day at home and back on the road again next game I think Knicks if I had to play the game . But Indy on deck makes this a no play for me .
Pistons is a easier game than Pacers. Don't forget Pacers just suffer a humiliating defeat to Bulls. I seriously doubt Knicks will give up an easier game to win and then feel that they can beat 1 of the strongest team in the league.
No clue who covers the game and Knicks aren't a bad play but one thing I would be concerned about is they gave up 48 points in the paint last game. Detroit bigs should do whatever they want on the boards. GL today Scal because this forum is better when you post.
No clue who covers the game and Knicks aren't a bad play but one thing I would be concerned about is they gave up 48 points in the paint last game. Detroit bigs should do whatever they want on the boards. GL today Scal because this forum is better when you post.
He trashes this thread but has a whopping 11 plays going last night and goes 6-4-1 (coin flip result over the average) and does the typical "unit play" to make it look like his record is better than what it is (as though anyone is going to tail his units exactly).
It's the old, don't look at my record, look at my UNITS!!!
10 unit plays will be forthcoming when he gets in a hole.
Anyhow, to the posters, would you rather a 3 sentence blurb on 11 games (some of which he didn't go into much detail on at all) or ONE GAME with a page of insight?
You will NEVER see units in my OP's, believe me.
The choice is yours...
You do realize that I play big ML dogs, right? You're a fuckking clown. I was already in a hole and got out of it without using 10 unit plays. I'm 81-60 in my last 141 plays, which include ML dogs. Keep picking games out of a hat and trying to justify them by giving one sided write-ups.
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Just opened shango's thread from last night.
He trashes this thread but has a whopping 11 plays going last night and goes 6-4-1 (coin flip result over the average) and does the typical "unit play" to make it look like his record is better than what it is (as though anyone is going to tail his units exactly).
It's the old, don't look at my record, look at my UNITS!!!
10 unit plays will be forthcoming when he gets in a hole.
Anyhow, to the posters, would you rather a 3 sentence blurb on 11 games (some of which he didn't go into much detail on at all) or ONE GAME with a page of insight?
You will NEVER see units in my OP's, believe me.
The choice is yours...
You do realize that I play big ML dogs, right? You're a fuckking clown. I was already in a hole and got out of it without using 10 unit plays. I'm 81-60 in my last 141 plays, which include ML dogs. Keep picking games out of a hat and trying to justify them by giving one sided write-ups.
the under look yummy line was 200 and drop 198.5. I took that bait last night when the lines came out.. knicks is weak up front and they back court is not that good .. they offense is 23 n pt 24 n fg% 19 n 3pt% 12 n ft% and 28 n rebound%.. and they have problems in the locker room.. Rebounds are going to kill them no Tyson Chandler no second chance shots.. That's your pick and your thinking g/l
All valid stats but this is a situational play. If you start reading stats off for the Nets before you play them you'll never pull the trigger on them (or always fade them).
Quote Originally Posted by catera123:
the under look yummy line was 200 and drop 198.5. I took that bait last night when the lines came out.. knicks is weak up front and they back court is not that good .. they offense is 23 n pt 24 n fg% 19 n 3pt% 12 n ft% and 28 n rebound%.. and they have problems in the locker room.. Rebounds are going to kill them no Tyson Chandler no second chance shots.. That's your pick and your thinking g/l
All valid stats but this is a situational play. If you start reading stats off for the Nets before you play them you'll never pull the trigger on them (or always fade them).
Pistons is a easier game than Pacers. Don't forget Pacers just suffer a humiliating defeat to Bulls. I seriously doubt Knicks will give up an easier game to win and then feel that they can beat 1 of the strongest team in the league.
Read my mind and saved me the response.
Quote Originally Posted by vasilli07:
Pistons is a easier game than Pacers. Don't forget Pacers just suffer a humiliating defeat to Bulls. I seriously doubt Knicks will give up an easier game to win and then feel that they can beat 1 of the strongest team in the league.
No clue who covers the game and Knicks aren't a bad play but one thing I would be concerned about is they gave up 48 points in the paint last game. Detroit bigs should do whatever they want on the boards. GL today Scal because this forum is better when you post.
They will give up a lot tonight as well. I think will hit enough high percentage shots tonight, given the urgency for a win and if JR can only get hot for once like the JR of yesteryear, they can put this one away at the half.
Thanks. Just trying to help others out. Who the hell cares about an anonymous avatar and handle? This is about winning money and spreading it around.
Quote Originally Posted by 165yds:
No clue who covers the game and Knicks aren't a bad play but one thing I would be concerned about is they gave up 48 points in the paint last game. Detroit bigs should do whatever they want on the boards. GL today Scal because this forum is better when you post.
They will give up a lot tonight as well. I think will hit enough high percentage shots tonight, given the urgency for a win and if JR can only get hot for once like the JR of yesteryear, they can put this one away at the half.
Thanks. Just trying to help others out. Who the hell cares about an anonymous avatar and handle? This is about winning money and spreading it around.
You do realize that I play big ML dogs, right? You're a fuckking clown. I was already in a hole and got out of it without using 10 unit plays. I'm 81-60 in my last 141 plays, which include ML dogs. Keep picking games out of a hat and trying to justify them by giving one sided write-ups.
I haven't made 141 plays in all my years on covers and you casually say 'in my last 141'. Boy oh boy...
Quote Originally Posted by PapaShango:
You do realize that I play big ML dogs, right? You're a fuckking clown. I was already in a hole and got out of it without using 10 unit plays. I'm 81-60 in my last 141 plays, which include ML dogs. Keep picking games out of a hat and trying to justify them by giving one sided write-ups.
I haven't made 141 plays in all my years on covers and you casually say 'in my last 141'. Boy oh boy...
All valid stats but this is a situational play. If you start reading stats off for the Nets before you play them you'll never pull the trigger on them (or always fade them).
I know they is valid stats cause I worte them... I always hear this spot and fishy lines.. look dude every player that plays in the NBA is human.. so what u is saying is u playing the knicks cause its a situational spot get real anything can happen.. I don't play sides cause its real tricky to win.. I only play totals and I got that knicks under 200 and now its at 198.5 bol
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
All valid stats but this is a situational play. If you start reading stats off for the Nets before you play them you'll never pull the trigger on them (or always fade them).
I know they is valid stats cause I worte them... I always hear this spot and fishy lines.. look dude every player that plays in the NBA is human.. so what u is saying is u playing the knicks cause its a situational spot get real anything can happen.. I don't play sides cause its real tricky to win.. I only play totals and I got that knicks under 200 and now its at 198.5 bol
Knicks are always gonna give up about 1 to 1.5 just as a public favorite even in lean years. Public have no reason to love or even know about what kind of team Detroit is.
When it opened at 4, it was eyebrow raising and others apparently agree.
Why would vegas open it at 4? Knowing that Knicks will be the public play here? Think you are on the wrong side here.
We should stop eating bananas.
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Knicks are always gonna give up about 1 to 1.5 just as a public favorite even in lean years. Public have no reason to love or even know about what kind of team Detroit is.
When it opened at 4, it was eyebrow raising and others apparently agree.
Why would vegas open it at 4? Knowing that Knicks will be the public play here? Think you are on the wrong side here.
Have to be honest with you... when I looked at the NBA games today, I thought the only one really worth playing is the Pistons once the line drops from obvious public money on the Knicks. I'll wait and consider but Detroit will definitely have more boards and thus it's likely they'll have more shot attempts overall.
That matters to me because it means if I back the Knicks, I'm probably going to require a more efficient performance from the team in order to cover/win. Good luck either way though.
Have to be honest with you... when I looked at the NBA games today, I thought the only one really worth playing is the Pistons once the line drops from obvious public money on the Knicks. I'll wait and consider but Detroit will definitely have more boards and thus it's likely they'll have more shot attempts overall.
That matters to me because it means if I back the Knicks, I'm probably going to require a more efficient performance from the team in order to cover/win. Good luck either way though.
I am a bit surprised by the seeming large public support of the Knicks right now especially with meta world peace out on top of chandler...makes this a tricky one
while i understand the look ahead angle people play, when you are a team in the type of shape (injured and playing bad) that the knicks are in you aren't looking ahead thinking we have a chance to take down the pacers next, you are thinking we need to win tonight because the pacers will be tough to win with our limited roster right now...
either way no play for me right now GL either way
I am a bit surprised by the seeming large public support of the Knicks right now especially with meta world peace out on top of chandler...makes this a tricky one
while i understand the look ahead angle people play, when you are a team in the type of shape (injured and playing bad) that the knicks are in you aren't looking ahead thinking we have a chance to take down the pacers next, you are thinking we need to win tonight because the pacers will be tough to win with our limited roster right now...
line was 200 and drop 198.5. I took that bait last night when the lines came out.. knicks is weak up front and they back court is not that good .. they offense is 23 n pt 24 n fg% 19 n 3pt% 12 n ft% and 28 n rebound%.. and they have problems in the locker room.. Rebounds are going to kill them no Tyson Chandler no second chance shots.. That's your pick and your thinking g/l
. Boy oh boy...
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
