• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 3
      NFL Week 3
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NBA Betting Forum

    LAKERS @ BLAZERS: Back from the dead to bring you an HISTORIC ANGLE that may never be seen again!

    «First Previous 456 ... 789 Next Last»
    swanbomb
    SBTheGhost
    Rolexsports
    chaloots
    Jrod6
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 17945
    Posts: 201
    «First Previous 456 ... 789 Next Last»
     
    swanbomb
    swanbomb
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2012
    Posts: 1855
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 10:07 AM ET #76

    Seems early money is pouring in on the Lakers, dropping that line to 9.5 and now 9. 


    I'm looking forward to it going as low as as 7.5 or 8 and having people pound the Blazers. 


    Reply
    Seems early money is pouring in on the Lakers, dropping that line to 9.5 and now 9. 


    I'm looking forward to it going as low as as 7.5 or 8 and having people pound the Blazers. 


     
    SBTheGhost
    SBTheGhost
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2016
    Posts: 113
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 10:38 AM ET #77

    Got it at +10 and a wee bit of moneyline too for fun. 

    Thanks for the insight and your write-up
    Reply
    Got it at +10 and a wee bit of moneyline too for fun. 

    Thanks for the insight and your write-up
     
    Rolexsports
    Rolexsports
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2015
    Posts: 2610
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 10:45 AM ET #78

    Blazers plays absolutely no defense just like Lakers, can't believe this line after what just happened to the Lakers. Vegas knows better. Love when they make these type of mistakes. On Lakers with two of my books for good money. + 10 and some on the over 220. They both play no defense but, they both can score and a really fast pace. Let's go !
    Reply
    Blazers plays absolutely no defense just like Lakers, can't believe this line after what just happened to the Lakers. Vegas knows better. Love when they make these type of mistakes. On Lakers with two of my books for good money. + 10 and some on the over 220. They both play no defense but, they both can score and a really fast pace. Let's go !
     
    chaloots
    chaloots
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2013
    Posts: 3267
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 11:58 AM ET #79

    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

    All we need is EFFORT because we will be getting points on the road in Portland. All we need is for this team to be competitive. Off a historic backbreaking loss, maybe never to be seen again, I am selling you the fact we will get that.

    A bruised ego like this does not come along often. It has several times in the past three years with the worst Laker teams in their history. But a 49 point loss is not a 50 point loss. That indignity of '50' may very well make this the largest loss ever to be seen in Lakers history.

    Teams fight to get under that 50. Just don't lose by FIFTY (after we loafed through the entire game) and it'll be ok. We as cappers HAVE to capitalize on this angle because we won't get it back.

    And remember this: Unlike the past several years, THIS TEAM IS NOT TANKING.

    The Lakers draft pick is protected in the top three but it is clear this team is done losing. Scott was sent away and Walton was brought in precisely because of this. 

    While the Lakers are tip-toeing around falling into the top 3, there is no guarantee they wouldn't be bumped to the fourth spot and lose their pick to the Sixers. This is a team screaming "The rebuild is over" after Kobe has left the building (and he, and his ball hogging ways a major key to their losing the past several seasons). Now he is gone. Now this team is responding. Now it is time to win. A team that is guaranteed not to tank is a team, at a minimum, you can trust in this spot.

    But amazingly, because of the bruised NBA egos, you can trust even TANKING teams! Specifically the Lakers! Don't believe me?

    I have the evidence:


    Jesus, you will create a fake non existing angle about anything. If the Lakers win or cover it will have ZERO/NOTHING to do with the fact that they avoided losing by 50 and only lost by 49 in there last game.

    Can here the conversation on the plane back from Dallas in your head now.

    Walton "Guys, that was a terrible effort, we turned the ball over, played no defense and missed shot, but the encouraging part was that we only lost by 49 points to one of the worst teams in the NBA,no tanking fellas, we are playing to win up in Portland and because we survived the dreaded 50 we will win this game and not feel dejected, Fellas, big difference losing by 49 and not 50 now keep your heads up...way to go "

    Nothing wrong with liking the Lakers but once again please stop with the fake made up angles, you sound silly.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

    All we need is EFFORT because we will be getting points on the road in Portland. All we need is for this team to be competitive. Off a historic backbreaking loss, maybe never to be seen again, I am selling you the fact we will get that.

    A bruised ego like this does not come along often. It has several times in the past three years with the worst Laker teams in their history. But a 49 point loss is not a 50 point loss. That indignity of '50' may very well make this the largest loss ever to be seen in Lakers history.

    Teams fight to get under that 50. Just don't lose by FIFTY (after we loafed through the entire game) and it'll be ok. We as cappers HAVE to capitalize on this angle because we won't get it back.

    And remember this: Unlike the past several years, THIS TEAM IS NOT TANKING.

    The Lakers draft pick is protected in the top three but it is clear this team is done losing. Scott was sent away and Walton was brought in precisely because of this. 

    While the Lakers are tip-toeing around falling into the top 3, there is no guarantee they wouldn't be bumped to the fourth spot and lose their pick to the Sixers. This is a team screaming "The rebuild is over" after Kobe has left the building (and he, and his ball hogging ways a major key to their losing the past several seasons). Now he is gone. Now this team is responding. Now it is time to win. A team that is guaranteed not to tank is a team, at a minimum, you can trust in this spot.

    But amazingly, because of the bruised NBA egos, you can trust even TANKING teams! Specifically the Lakers! Don't believe me?

    I have the evidence:


    Jesus, you will create a fake non existing angle about anything. If the Lakers win or cover it will have ZERO/NOTHING to do with the fact that they avoided losing by 50 and only lost by 49 in there last game.

    Can here the conversation on the plane back from Dallas in your head now.

    Walton "Guys, that was a terrible effort, we turned the ball over, played no defense and missed shot, but the encouraging part was that we only lost by 49 points to one of the worst teams in the NBA,no tanking fellas, we are playing to win up in Portland and because we survived the dreaded 50 we will win this game and not feel dejected, Fellas, big difference losing by 49 and not 50 now keep your heads up...way to go "

    Nothing wrong with liking the Lakers but once again please stop with the fake made up angles, you sound silly.
     
    Jrod6
    Jrod6
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2015
    Posts: 4252
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 12:09 PM ET #80

    My book opened at 9.5 now down to 8.5, looks like the lower the line gets the more money will come in on blazers 
    Reply
    My book opened at 9.5 now down to 8.5, looks like the lower the line gets the more money will come in on blazers 
     
    foxhound
    foxhound
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2009
    Posts: 746
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 12:22 PM ET #81

    Welcome back Scal. Liking the angle here. I'll bite tonight
    Reply
    Welcome back Scal. Liking the angle here. I'll bite tonight
     
    Racerxtc
    Racerxtc
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2016
    Posts: 1985
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 12:24 PM ET #82

    Read this thread yesterday
    Gooooooo Lakers !!!!! Gooooooo!!!!!
    Reply
    Read this thread yesterday
    Gooooooo Lakers !!!!! Gooooooo!!!!!
     
    lbckhmersk8er
    lbckhmersk8er
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2013
    Posts: 588
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 12:25 PM ET #83

    Reply
     
    Pacinko
    Pacinko
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2016
    Posts: 468
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 12:27 PM ET #84

    Grabbed it at +8.5 -115 just now....figured I'd grab it as I think it'll drop even more today.
    Reply
    Grabbed it at +8.5 -115 just now....figured I'd grab it as I think it'll drop even more today.
     
    statfreak
    statfreak
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2007
    Posts: 2241
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 12:42 PM ET #85

    damn,, 8.5 dont know if to grab it now or hope for it to go a little back up
    Reply
    damn,, 8.5 dont know if to grab it now or hope for it to go a little back up
     
    Racerxtc
    Racerxtc
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2016
    Posts: 1985
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 12:44 PM ET #86

    Gooooooo
    Gooooooo
    Lakers gooooooooooo
    I'm get excited
    Goooooooo
    Reply
    Gooooooo
    Gooooooo
    Lakers gooooooooooo
    I'm get excited
    Goooooooo
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 1:04 PM ET #87

    Quote Originally Posted by chaloots:


    Jesus, you will create a fake non existing angle about anything. If the Lakers win or cover it will have ZERO/NOTHING to do with the fact that they avoided losing by 50 and only lost by 49 in there last game.

    Can here the conversation on the plane back from Dallas in your head now.

    Walton "Guys, that was a terrible effort, we turned the ball over, played no defense and missed shot, but the encouraging part was that we only lost by 49 points to one of the worst teams in the NBA,no tanking fellas, we are playing to win up in Portland and because we survived the dreaded 50 we will win this game and not feel dejected, Fellas, big difference losing by 49 and not 50 now keep your heads up...way to go "

    Nothing wrong with liking the Lakers but once again please stop with the fake made up angles, you sound silly.

    The only one here who looks silly is you because everyone here, decades and even centuries of capping experience collectively, LOVES this angle and you're the only one who completely disregards it!


    All you have to do to trolls is expose them with their own ridiculous counter-theories:

    Hey Chaloots,

    Did the Wizards dropping 123 last night on the Celtics last night, playing very physical and motivated ball, slamming home statement dunks, playing to the crowd on razzle-dazzle finishes at the hoop to throw it up to Boston players, have ANYTHING to do with the fact the Wizards regarded that game as "The Funeral" and wore all black as a statement of solidarity, all to avenge the Crowder finger to the face of Wall and subsequent scuffles the previous Celtics Wiz game?

    Or were the Wizards completely disconnected from all of that and just the "better team" playing like auto-bots devoid of all the off the court motivation, hence you could simply cap the game on its face, with aggregate stats input into a black box excel spreadsheet to get 1,000 simulated results which would have of course said the Wiz would cover?

    I mean who here, ONE NON-TROLL, JUST ONE agrees with the latter instead of the former????

    IF you agree with the "autobot player theory" devoid of off the court emotion and motivation well then head over to Chaloot's thread where he has your pick.

    Oh wait, he hasn't posted diddly squat about this game tonight (or any other). Never mind. Carry on Chaloots, we all are waiting with baited breath on your "humans are dead as a doornail inside" angles tonight!

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by chaloots:


    Jesus, you will create a fake non existing angle about anything. If the Lakers win or cover it will have ZERO/NOTHING to do with the fact that they avoided losing by 50 and only lost by 49 in there last game.

    Can here the conversation on the plane back from Dallas in your head now.

    Walton "Guys, that was a terrible effort, we turned the ball over, played no defense and missed shot, but the encouraging part was that we only lost by 49 points to one of the worst teams in the NBA,no tanking fellas, we are playing to win up in Portland and because we survived the dreaded 50 we will win this game and not feel dejected, Fellas, big difference losing by 49 and not 50 now keep your heads up...way to go "

    Nothing wrong with liking the Lakers but once again please stop with the fake made up angles, you sound silly.

    The only one here who looks silly is you because everyone here, decades and even centuries of capping experience collectively, LOVES this angle and you're the only one who completely disregards it!


    All you have to do to trolls is expose them with their own ridiculous counter-theories:

    Hey Chaloots,

    Did the Wizards dropping 123 last night on the Celtics last night, playing very physical and motivated ball, slamming home statement dunks, playing to the crowd on razzle-dazzle finishes at the hoop to throw it up to Boston players, have ANYTHING to do with the fact the Wizards regarded that game as "The Funeral" and wore all black as a statement of solidarity, all to avenge the Crowder finger to the face of Wall and subsequent scuffles the previous Celtics Wiz game?

    Or were the Wizards completely disconnected from all of that and just the "better team" playing like auto-bots devoid of all the off the court motivation, hence you could simply cap the game on its face, with aggregate stats input into a black box excel spreadsheet to get 1,000 simulated results which would have of course said the Wiz would cover?

    I mean who here, ONE NON-TROLL, JUST ONE agrees with the latter instead of the former????

    IF you agree with the "autobot player theory" devoid of off the court emotion and motivation well then head over to Chaloot's thread where he has your pick.

    Oh wait, he hasn't posted diddly squat about this game tonight (or any other). Never mind. Carry on Chaloots, we all are waiting with baited breath on your "humans are dead as a doornail inside" angles tonight!

     
    wmi799
    wmi799
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2010
    Posts: 33652
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 1:19 PM ET #88

    Good luck on your play Scal, but why is when someone does not agree with you or your plays, they are trolls? 

    Hope the play wins 
    Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
    Reply
    Good luck on your play Scal, but why is when someone does not agree with you or your plays, they are trolls? 

    Hope the play wins 
     
    runstopper52
    runstopper52
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 211
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 1:26 PM ET #89

    Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:

    Good luck on your play Scal, but why is when someone does not agree with you or your plays, they are trolls? 

    Hope the play wins 

    I don't think it's a matter of disagreeing, but the way they approach the discussion. It's one thing to counter and provide substance as to why you don't agree, but it's child's play to simply respond back and say something to the effect of, "that's dumb, you're a moron>"

    Scal I tend to agree with your thinking here, only reservation is the PG matchup is lopsided with Russell out, but Blazers lack of D should keep this within the spread.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:

    Good luck on your play Scal, but why is when someone does not agree with you or your plays, they are trolls? 

    Hope the play wins 

    I don't think it's a matter of disagreeing, but the way they approach the discussion. It's one thing to counter and provide substance as to why you don't agree, but it's child's play to simply respond back and say something to the effect of, "that's dumb, you're a moron>"

    Scal I tend to agree with your thinking here, only reservation is the PG matchup is lopsided with Russell out, but Blazers lack of D should keep this within the spread.
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 1:39 PM ET #90

    Quote Originally Posted by runstopper52:


    I don't think it's a matter of disagreeing, but the way they approach the discussion. It's one thing to counter and provide substance as to why you don't agree, but it's child's play to simply respond back and say something to the effect of, "that's dumb, you're a moron>"

    Scal I tend to agree with your thinking here, only reservation is the PG matchup is lopsided with Russell out, but Blazers lack of D should keep this within the spread.


    Exactly. That is my response WMI.

    He provides some non-existent skit of Walton addressing the players about losing by 50, which completely misses the boat (and everything else).

    The FIFTY is not the focus. The FIFTY as stated many times in the OP is simply an upper bound which teams can lose by. Hence the Lakers went through hell and high water to get under 50 (as ridiculous as that may seem that loss total carries a stigma for these mega-millionaires).

    Hence, we may never see the Lakers lose by a historic margin again. And historic margins be it, 35,40,45, or any other number is the focus since these players now have to answer questions for several days as being the team that lost by the most points in team history.

    And that team has had Magic, and Kareem and Worthy and Kobe and Shaq and... Nick Van Exel, and now this team is the team that, possibly forever will be remembered as the team that lost the worst in the worst way possible against a terrible team. Since the 50 may never be eclipsed.

    And THAT is why against an underwhelming Blazer team I am endorsing the pick with a boatload of insurance on the spread.

    And road games in this spot are great since you get all the points for the road swing but no less motivation to remove the stain of the historic loss, which must be done ASAP, and which the Lakers, as recent history has dictated with this hapless team, occurs not only on the spread but also on the ML. Which makes 10 points at the opening here ridiculously high and completely ignores anything I'm saying here.

    So he can take his Walton locker room skits and have a blast with them while we all do what we came here to do: make money.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by runstopper52:


    I don't think it's a matter of disagreeing, but the way they approach the discussion. It's one thing to counter and provide substance as to why you don't agree, but it's child's play to simply respond back and say something to the effect of, "that's dumb, you're a moron>"

    Scal I tend to agree with your thinking here, only reservation is the PG matchup is lopsided with Russell out, but Blazers lack of D should keep this within the spread.


    Exactly. That is my response WMI.

    He provides some non-existent skit of Walton addressing the players about losing by 50, which completely misses the boat (and everything else).

    The FIFTY is not the focus. The FIFTY as stated many times in the OP is simply an upper bound which teams can lose by. Hence the Lakers went through hell and high water to get under 50 (as ridiculous as that may seem that loss total carries a stigma for these mega-millionaires).

    Hence, we may never see the Lakers lose by a historic margin again. And historic margins be it, 35,40,45, or any other number is the focus since these players now have to answer questions for several days as being the team that lost by the most points in team history.

    And that team has had Magic, and Kareem and Worthy and Kobe and Shaq and... Nick Van Exel, and now this team is the team that, possibly forever will be remembered as the team that lost the worst in the worst way possible against a terrible team. Since the 50 may never be eclipsed.

    And THAT is why against an underwhelming Blazer team I am endorsing the pick with a boatload of insurance on the spread.

    And road games in this spot are great since you get all the points for the road swing but no less motivation to remove the stain of the historic loss, which must be done ASAP, and which the Lakers, as recent history has dictated with this hapless team, occurs not only on the spread but also on the ML. Which makes 10 points at the opening here ridiculously high and completely ignores anything I'm saying here.

    So he can take his Walton locker room skits and have a blast with them while we all do what we came here to do: make money.

     
    Gocash33
    Gocash33
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2016
    Posts: 81
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 1:54 PM ET #91

    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

    Quote Originally Posted by Gocash33:

    So does this theory work for Pitt in College basketball after getting blown out by Louisville tonight. When they play Clemson on Saturday?? :)
    Absolutely NOT.You can't be playing a team that is far superior to yours the next game that can drill you regardless (e.g., Spurs Warriors Cavs) OR a team that is desperate in its own right. Clemson is that desperate team having just lost a self-proclaimed must-win to Virginia Tech at home. Clemson will come in fighting for a more than necessary conference win just as hard as Pitt on a bounce back (although this was a historic loss in terms of ACC road team margin of victory). No advantage there. Don't apply this theory to that game.Coffee - I like it more. 10 is the maximum possible spread is have even dreamed of requesting.Ok police princeWardell - they could have lost every game to the blazers in the past five years by 20+ and is still make this play.


    Ok makes sense. Thanks for response!!
    Cheers and GL
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

    Quote Originally Posted by Gocash33:

    So does this theory work for Pitt in College basketball after getting blown out by Louisville tonight. When they play Clemson on Saturday?? :)
    Absolutely NOT.You can't be playing a team that is far superior to yours the next game that can drill you regardless (e.g., Spurs Warriors Cavs) OR a team that is desperate in its own right. Clemson is that desperate team having just lost a self-proclaimed must-win to Virginia Tech at home. Clemson will come in fighting for a more than necessary conference win just as hard as Pitt on a bounce back (although this was a historic loss in terms of ACC road team margin of victory). No advantage there. Don't apply this theory to that game.Coffee - I like it more. 10 is the maximum possible spread is have even dreamed of requesting.Ok police princeWardell - they could have lost every game to the blazers in the past five years by 20+ and is still make this play.


    Ok makes sense. Thanks for response!!
    Cheers and GL
     
    wmi799
    wmi799
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2010
    Posts: 33652
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 2:06 PM ET #92

    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

     

    Exactly. That is my response WMI.

       


    Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

     

    Exactly. That is my response WMI.

       


     
    HollanderRules
    HollanderRules
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2017
    Posts: 102
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 2:53 PM ET #93

    Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:

    Good luck on your play Scal, but why is when someone does not agree with you or your plays, they are trolls?


    No play for me. But, good luck! 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:

    Good luck on your play Scal, but why is when someone does not agree with you or your plays, they are trolls?


    No play for me. But, good luck! 
     
    ILLWILL2WIN1
    ILLWILL2WIN1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2017
    Posts: 5991
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 3:36 PM ET #94

    Got to remember one thing  Crap teams show up for big games its there trophy for the year lets us not look at the teams we lost to but the teams we beat aka teams to beat for that trophy are GSW , Rockets ,Raptors , Grizz , Blazers, CLippers  
    Reply
    Got to remember one thing  Crap teams show up for big games its there trophy for the year lets us not look at the teams we lost to but the teams we beat aka teams to beat for that trophy are GSW , Rockets ,Raptors , Grizz , Blazers, CLippers  
     
    HotCheetos
    HotCheetos
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2016
    Posts: 22
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 4:17 PM ET #95

    BOL bro
    Reply
    BOL bro
     
    chungnuoc
    chungnuoc
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2008
    Posts: 9351
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 4:29 PM ET #96

    Im on since yday buddy!! Gl to us!! Kinda nervous that there a low percentage on betting portland..

    And experts are shouTing portland to win and cover..
    Reply
    Im on since yday buddy!! Gl to us!! Kinda nervous that there a low percentage on betting portland..

    And experts are shouTing portland to win and cover..
     
    umgmu
    umgmu
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 47719
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 4:39 PM ET #97

    I was at that game in DC, Kobe went nuts 31 points...he was stroking J's
    Reply
    I was at that game in DC, Kobe went nuts 31 points...he was stroking J's
     
    Raps03
    Raps03
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2017
    Posts: 286
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 4:47 PM ET #98

    Great angle Scal glad to see you're back! LETS GET THIS!!!!!!!

    Reply
    Great angle Scal glad to see you're back! LETS GET THIS!!!!!!!

     
    Pendo
    Pendo
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 3644
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 4:48 PM ET #99


    Came back from the dead, I'm glad!!
    Pitt got killed by 55 vs. Louisville =>
    So Scal knows what this means next...

    Reply

    Came back from the dead, I'm glad!!
    Pitt got killed by 55 vs. Louisville =>
    So Scal knows what this means next...

     
     
    mdelvalle
    mdelvalle
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2006
    Posts: 4312
    Posted: Jan. 25, 2017 - 4:48 PM ET #100

    MDV
    Reply
    All Forums | NBA Betting Forum
    «First Previous 456 ... 789 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 450,472
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 265,132
    • Sunday 09/27/2026 504
    • Rams vs Broncos in game live SNF 2,718
    • Sunday 3,124
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 101,943
    • HELP PLEASE 1,520
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 13,604
    • NFL Sunday 7,480
    • PART DEUX 220

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.