I did want to argue that last year the Lakers got blown out by the Warriors on TNT and their next game 4 days later they did not cover in Portland as 8.5 underdogs.
I wouldn't bet on this team right now, but best of luck.
Love your posts Scal!
I did want to argue that last year the Lakers got blown out by the Warriors on TNT and their next game 4 days later they did not cover in Portland as 8.5 underdogs.
I wouldn't bet on this team right now, but best of luck.
Scal...much respect as always...play makes sense most of the time, just a really bad spot this time where the good Lakers teams got killed up there...that has to be considered...almost any other city, you're on to it as they will definitely bounce back...I took them in the 1H +4.5 like last trip up there...
Scal...much respect as always...play makes sense most of the time, just a really bad spot this time where the good Lakers teams got killed up there...that has to be considered...almost any other city, you're on to it as they will definitely bounce back...I took them in the 1H +4.5 like last trip up there...
The only one here who looks silly is you because everyone here, decades and even centuries of capping experience collectively, LOVES this angle and you're the only one who completely disregards it!
All you have to do to trolls is expose them with their own ridiculous counter-theories:
Hey Chaloots,
Did the Wizards dropping 123 last night on the Celtics last night, playing very physical and motivated ball, slamming home statement dunks, playing to the crowd on razzle-dazzle finishes at the hoop to throw it up to Boston players, have ANYTHING to do with the fact the Wizards regarded that game as "The Funeral" and wore all black as a statement of solidarity, all to avenge the Crowder finger to the face of Wall and subsequent scuffles the previous Celtics Wiz game?
Or were the Wizards completely disconnected from all of that and just the "better team" playing like auto-bots devoid of all the off the court motivation, hence you could simply cap the game on its face, with aggregate stats input into a black box excel spreadsheet to get 1,000 simulated results which would have of course said the Wiz would cover?
I mean who here, ONE NON-TROLL, JUST ONE agrees with the latter instead of the former????
IF you agree with the "autobot player theory" devoid of off the court emotion and motivation well then head over to Chaloot's thread where he has your pick.
Oh wait, he hasn't posted diddly squat about this game tonight (or any other). Never mind. Carry on Chaloots, we all are waiting with baited breath on your "humans are dead as a doornail inside" angles tonight!
For every time an angle like this works there is one that doesn't, most recent off the top of my head was Ravens at Cincy when Baltimore was going to play for Steve Smith and send him out a winner..blah blah blah...
Keep betting on bad teams that are playing bad and hope to catch lightning in a bottle on the road. Good Luck.
BTW I am 34-16 posted this year, how you doing?
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
The only one here who looks silly is you because everyone here, decades and even centuries of capping experience collectively, LOVES this angle and you're the only one who completely disregards it!
All you have to do to trolls is expose them with their own ridiculous counter-theories:
Hey Chaloots,
Did the Wizards dropping 123 last night on the Celtics last night, playing very physical and motivated ball, slamming home statement dunks, playing to the crowd on razzle-dazzle finishes at the hoop to throw it up to Boston players, have ANYTHING to do with the fact the Wizards regarded that game as "The Funeral" and wore all black as a statement of solidarity, all to avenge the Crowder finger to the face of Wall and subsequent scuffles the previous Celtics Wiz game?
Or were the Wizards completely disconnected from all of that and just the "better team" playing like auto-bots devoid of all the off the court motivation, hence you could simply cap the game on its face, with aggregate stats input into a black box excel spreadsheet to get 1,000 simulated results which would have of course said the Wiz would cover?
I mean who here, ONE NON-TROLL, JUST ONE agrees with the latter instead of the former????
IF you agree with the "autobot player theory" devoid of off the court emotion and motivation well then head over to Chaloot's thread where he has your pick.
Oh wait, he hasn't posted diddly squat about this game tonight (or any other). Never mind. Carry on Chaloots, we all are waiting with baited breath on your "humans are dead as a doornail inside" angles tonight!
For every time an angle like this works there is one that doesn't, most recent off the top of my head was Ravens at Cincy when Baltimore was going to play for Steve Smith and send him out a winner..blah blah blah...
Keep betting on bad teams that are playing bad and hope to catch lightning in a bottle on the road. Good Luck.
Oh wait, he hasn't posted diddly squat about this game tonight (or any other). Never mind. Carry on Chaloots, we all are waiting with baited breath on your "humans are dead as a doornail inside" angles tonight!
No opinion on the game, I post all my games in the P-Box, feel free to come visit and talk trash, the fellas in there will love to see you.
Oh wait, he hasn't posted diddly squat about this game tonight (or any other). Never mind. Carry on Chaloots, we all are waiting with baited breath on your "humans are dead as a doornail inside" angles tonight!
No opinion on the game, I post all my games in the P-Box, feel free to come visit and talk trash, the fellas in there will love to see you.