Quote Originally Posted by OtisR: Big public money swooped in on LAD thinking they can't lose twice. Public money is not on the Dodgers today, not with the awful way they’re playing and certainly not at this very high price.
Public money is indeed on the Dodgers tonight....
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:
Quote Originally Posted by OtisR: Big public money swooped in on LAD thinking they can't lose twice. Public money is not on the Dodgers today, not with the awful way they’re playing and certainly not at this very high price.
What are you talking about? You are using the Covers "consensus" which is essentially a 50/50 split as evidence that the public is on the Cubs? You knw there are sites that actually lrack where public money is...legitimately. And its not on teh Cubs...
1
@MrBator
What are you talking about? You are using the Covers "consensus" which is essentially a 50/50 split as evidence that the public is on the Cubs? You knw there are sites that actually lrack where public money is...legitimately. And its not on teh Cubs...
The Covers community is a different story. Generally consider this site more informed and generally sharp leaning - at least the regulars...
To me it seemed pretty split in the forum, although a large number of Covers Forum brethren are on the Cubs, so maybe that's what youre referring to...
1
The Covers community is a different story. Generally consider this site more informed and generally sharp leaning - at least the regulars...
To me it seemed pretty split in the forum, although a large number of Covers Forum brethren are on the Cubs, so maybe that's what youre referring to...
@MrBator What are you talking about? You are using the Covers "consensus" which is essentially a 50/50 split as evidence that the public is on the Cubs?
I didn’t say that the public is on the Cubs.
0
Quote Originally Posted by CaridadDelCobre:
@MrBator What are you talking about? You are using the Covers "consensus" which is essentially a 50/50 split as evidence that the public is on the Cubs?