Always hav the edge at Miller, offensively they might hav finally turned the corner, hittin Zito wasnt easy and SF bullpen been worn down. Lohse has a big edge here to cool off SF, while the dreaded bullpen has been much much better as of late gaining confidence from STL series. Vogel jus hasnt been cutting it, his splits as well indicates it and he says hes not comfortable on mound.
0
MikeTizzy 18-14-1 $521
MIL Brewers ML -116
Always hav the edge at Miller, offensively they might hav finally turned the corner, hittin Zito wasnt easy and SF bullpen been worn down. Lohse has a big edge here to cool off SF, while the dreaded bullpen has been much much better as of late gaining confidence from STL series. Vogel jus hasnt been cutting it, his splits as well indicates it and he says hes not comfortable on mound.
id like to give u some scouting portman9. AJ actually has great consistency at home, and doesnt really fair all that badly vs that potent lineup. Also with all the metrics Shelby has out for all the scouts of his minors and spring and to startint this season. He has top of the line stuff and big time prospect. He has shown it as well in spring and early season. Also Pitt bp has been lights out, w/out Hannrahan still hav deep talent there. So that doesnt necessarily help the overs, on the other side cards have bad struggles there with no achor Motte on back end.
0
id like to give u some scouting portman9. AJ actually has great consistency at home, and doesnt really fair all that badly vs that potent lineup. Also with all the metrics Shelby has out for all the scouts of his minors and spring and to startint this season. He has top of the line stuff and big time prospect. He has shown it as well in spring and early season. Also Pitt bp has been lights out, w/out Hannrahan still hav deep talent there. So that doesnt necessarily help the overs, on the other side cards have bad struggles there with no achor Motte on back end.
Yeh I severely miscapped the pirates game. Lesson learned. I'm thankful for the ARI/NYY staying under first 5. Avoided an 0-3 day.
lets focus and stay consistent mr. Pedroia , baseball is all calculations then u have some intangibles. Ive been to MLB Sabrmetrics analytics conference, so this is what all the young guns are winning with these days. Leave all old ideology of the game behind pls. Thats why all the old scouts dont have jobs anymore.
0
Quote Originally Posted by natalieportman9:
Yeh I severely miscapped the pirates game. Lesson learned. I'm thankful for the ARI/NYY staying under first 5. Avoided an 0-3 day.
lets focus and stay consistent mr. Pedroia , baseball is all calculations then u have some intangibles. Ive been to MLB Sabrmetrics analytics conference, so this is what all the young guns are winning with these days. Leave all old ideology of the game behind pls. Thats why all the old scouts dont have jobs anymore.
lets focus and stay consistent mr. Pedroia , baseball is all calculations then u have some intangibles. Ive been to MLB Sabrmetrics analytics conference, so this is what all the young guns are winning with these days. Leave all old ideology of the game behind pls. Thats why all the old scouts dont have jobs anymore.
I've always wondered what you meant when you say, "has all the metrics."
I'd like to know more about this. How can this data be used to predict day to day? My understanding is that it is a measurement of the entire season but I'm obviously not an expert.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MikeTizzy:
lets focus and stay consistent mr. Pedroia , baseball is all calculations then u have some intangibles. Ive been to MLB Sabrmetrics analytics conference, so this is what all the young guns are winning with these days. Leave all old ideology of the game behind pls. Thats why all the old scouts dont have jobs anymore.
I've always wondered what you meant when you say, "has all the metrics."
I'd like to know more about this. How can this data be used to predict day to day? My understanding is that it is a measurement of the entire season but I'm obviously not an expert.
its a vast array of data obviously, Epstein knows it, Hoyer, Beane, all of them. Pitch f/x, era+, true WHIPs, and vice versa for hitters with their BAbip, OBP, OPS+ and such. Ballpark dynamics, lefty/righty dynamics, etc. Of course you and plenty wonder when i say that. And its quite simple mr. matt, day to day u ask? it can be broken down to lineup vs pitchers with added defense metrics. Once the calculations in there in short relevant spans, like past 40 ABs or past 3 starts/relief outings. Advantages can be glaring, does not matter what paper lines are oddsmakers make according to public perception. True odds lies within the game itself, a +180 can easily be a 70%+ fave to win the game out right, and since we only need to win by 1 if ML, very very sound investing for anyone who understands.
for example. tonite -250 for Dodgers way overvalued, the padres can win this given their lineup dynamics.
0
its a vast array of data obviously, Epstein knows it, Hoyer, Beane, all of them. Pitch f/x, era+, true WHIPs, and vice versa for hitters with their BAbip, OBP, OPS+ and such. Ballpark dynamics, lefty/righty dynamics, etc. Of course you and plenty wonder when i say that. And its quite simple mr. matt, day to day u ask? it can be broken down to lineup vs pitchers with added defense metrics. Once the calculations in there in short relevant spans, like past 40 ABs or past 3 starts/relief outings. Advantages can be glaring, does not matter what paper lines are oddsmakers make according to public perception. True odds lies within the game itself, a +180 can easily be a 70%+ fave to win the game out right, and since we only need to win by 1 if ML, very very sound investing for anyone who understands.
for example. tonite -250 for Dodgers way overvalued, the padres can win this given their lineup dynamics.
its a vast array of data obviously, Epstein knows it, Hoyer, Beane, all of them. Pitch f/x, era+, true WHIPs, and vice versa for hitters with their BAbip, OBP, OPS+ and such. Ballpark dynamics, lefty/righty dynamics, etc. Of course you and plenty wonder when i say that. And its quite simple mr. matt, day to day u ask? it can be broken down to lineup vs pitchers with added defense metrics. Once the calculations in there in short relevant spans, like past 40 ABs or past 3 starts/relief outings. Advantages can be glaring, does not matter what paper lines are oddsmakers make according to public perception. True odds lies within the game itself, a +180 can easily be a 70%+ fave to win the game out right, and since we only need to win by 1 if ML, very very sound investing for anyone who understands.
for example. tonite -250 for Dodgers way overvalued, the padres can win this given their lineup dynamics.
great info Mike!
0
Quote Originally Posted by MikeTizzy:
its a vast array of data obviously, Epstein knows it, Hoyer, Beane, all of them. Pitch f/x, era+, true WHIPs, and vice versa for hitters with their BAbip, OBP, OPS+ and such. Ballpark dynamics, lefty/righty dynamics, etc. Of course you and plenty wonder when i say that. And its quite simple mr. matt, day to day u ask? it can be broken down to lineup vs pitchers with added defense metrics. Once the calculations in there in short relevant spans, like past 40 ABs or past 3 starts/relief outings. Advantages can be glaring, does not matter what paper lines are oddsmakers make according to public perception. True odds lies within the game itself, a +180 can easily be a 70%+ fave to win the game out right, and since we only need to win by 1 if ML, very very sound investing for anyone who understands.
for example. tonite -250 for Dodgers way overvalued, the padres can win this given their lineup dynamics.
that was close fellas, almost blew a 3 run lead with Lohse, but my calculations late innings was good enough for brews to win it at Miller. , now im up against an angry King Felix. Prolly should of jus taken under, but it was quite sharp. Hope it works out, i need a 2-0 to gain ground here.
0
that was close fellas, almost blew a 3 run lead with Lohse, but my calculations late innings was good enough for brews to win it at Miller. , now im up against an angry King Felix. Prolly should of jus taken under, but it was quite sharp. Hope it works out, i need a 2-0 to gain ground here.
wow.. the dodgers are bad! i knew they were, but this bad is amusing. kershaw just a blip outing, but if you can't hit tyson ross you truly can't hit anyone
0
wow.. the dodgers are bad! i knew they were, but this bad is amusing. kershaw just a blip outing, but if you can't hit tyson ross you truly can't hit anyone
anyone play Starcraft 2 here? ima go get a game on battle.net, i play it to help my multitasking and helps me think. ill check back later, and see if these 2 scenarios play out the way i think it should.
0
anyone play Starcraft 2 here? ima go get a game on battle.net, i play it to help my multitasking and helps me think. ill check back later, and see if these 2 scenarios play out the way i think it should.
Washington Lost Yesterday .. SportsMavin may have given MusicMatt a win for that game..when it was a loss. with as much as he does.. its forgivable..lol
0
Washington Lost Yesterday .. SportsMavin may have given MusicMatt a win for that game..when it was a loss. with as much as he does.. its forgivable..lol
Hot Forum Topics
