September 11, 2001 (long read)

so we are done debating and moved on to name calling.....

MUSIC TIME sorry i've got it stuck in my head now....

Yes, they all testified before the Library of Congress just a few short weeks after 9/11/2001.  This would be under oath, since anytime you speak to a Congressional Committee, you get sworn in

Is that the best you can do?           Enlighten me   who else has testified before the library of congress?

Yes, they all testified before the Library of Congress just a few short weeks after 9/11/2001.  This would be under oath, since anytime you speak to a Congressional Committee, you get sworn in

Is that the best you can do?

Sorry that I missed this question before Drizle.  I'm doing my best to answer everyones questions and I guess sometimes I miss one along the way.  Great question though, but I do have an answer.

Immediately after 9/11 (I believe it was in the first few weeks), both Brooks and Lagasse were interviewed by the Library of Congress to recount their recollections of the day.  I don't have the link anymore but it is indeed on the internet somewhere.  Both Brooks and Lagasse admitted that they did not see the plane hit the Pentagon, but did see a huge explosion in the same direction that the plane was traveling.

I believe the CIT team chose to let out the part of the interview in which Brooks and Lagasse say they saw the plane strike the building, because it completely contradicted what they went on record saying.  Ranke and his team from CIT viewed this as a lie, and intentionally omitted it from the interview, but I don't believe it was to mislead people. The point of the CIT interview with these people was to confirm a NoC (North of Columbia) approach that Flight 77 took en route to the Pentagon.  If it did indeed take the NoC approach, it is 100% scientifically impossible that the plane hit the downed light poles, and more importantly, caused the very specific damage to the Pentagon on 9/11

Also, there is only ONE PERSON on record saying that they say the plane actually hit the Pentagon.  When under oath, all of the people that tillyo quoted above would not admitt to seeing the plane strike.  Why you ask?  Because they didn't see it.  The only person to go on record saying that he saw the plane fly INTO the building was Mike Walter.  I can get into another 3-4 pages of debate as to why Walter is a lying sack of shit, if you want.  I've spent hours picking his story apart, starting with the fact that he ALSO says the plane take a NoC approach, but then goes on to say that he witnessed the light poles being hit (impossible).

Once again, an NoC approach (north of Columbia Pike, North of Citgo gas station, and directly over the Navy Annex) makes it 100% physically impossible for the plane to strike a single light pole, as well as cause the very specific damage to the Pentagon building. After watching this video, I find it hard to believe that anyone in this thread can admit that any plane hit the Pentagon on 9/11

Yes, they all testified before the Library of Congress just a few short weeks after 9/11/2001.  This would be under oath, since anytime you speak to a Congressional Committee, you get sworn in

Is that the best you can do?

Yes, they all testified before the Library of Congress just a few short weeks after 9/11/2001.  This would be under oath, since anytime you speak to a Congressional Committee, you get sworn in

Is that the best you can do?