All Forums | College Football

week 4 system plays including a midweek play

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 15975
Posts: 106
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 5927
Posted: #76

so what is his record???

 

thanks

Quote Originally Posted by king-olaf:

IMPRESSIVE RECORD..BOL,
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 155
Posted: #77
The research didnt win last week...
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 699
Posted: #78
Quote Originally Posted by SM_pick-em420:

DOES THIS SYS WORK FOR NFL AS WELL????

 

 

       One NFL system that I found over the years that works well is.....when a dog wins outright on the road, then comes home getting points, take that team plus the points.  Last week, it was the Jets.  This week, it's Cincinnati.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #79

Quote Originally Posted by dick747:

 

if you want to follow, then only follow my system plays, those are 7-5-1 in college football and 8-4 in the nfl (15-9-1) for 62.5%. all other plays i post are small non-system plays. had several of those so far like a team total early on. not good with those non system plays. i play some of my system plays for more money, not because of better systems but because i like the matchups a lot. the systems are just additional tools for me.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #80
Quote Originally Posted by HeyDog:

The research didnt win last week...

 

do you win every week ? thanks for your honest answer. guys, i'm posting to help other people here, if you dont like my posts then dont read them. or better yet, i'll keep my work for myself.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 22824
Posted: #81
.......gl today
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 3071
Posted: #82
research to let those tools get you worked up.  You do a fine job..
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 813
Posted: #83
Perhaps you failed to include the fact that Missouri was 37-3-2 ATS when they win S/U on the road, or the fact that Missouri is simply a better team than Nevada.  If you are going to be a technical player, I suggest you learn the rules.  Rule #1 is that the teams strengths and weaknesses are much more important that some off the wall technical start you may have come up with. Obviously my Missouri state neutralized your Nevada stat.  Good Luck the rest of the way.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 404
Posted: #84
BOL
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 1889
Posted: #85
Quote Originally Posted by BigdaddyQH:

Perhaps you failed to include the fact that Missouri was 37-3-2 ATS when they win S/U on the road, or the fact that Missouri is simply a better team than Nevada.  If you are going to be a technical player, I suggest you learn the rules.  Rule #1 is that the teams strengths and weaknesses are much more important that some off the wall technical start you may have come up with. Obviously my Missouri state neutralized your Nevada stat.  Good Luck the rest of the way.


u are a true idiot.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 6088
Posted: #86
Thank you Research for your great work!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 722
Posted: #87
Quote Originally Posted by BigdaddyQH:

Perhaps you failed to include the fact that Missouri was 37-3-2 ATS when they win S/U on the road, or the fact that Missouri is simply a better team than Nevada.  If you are going to be a technical player, I suggest you learn the rules.  Rule #1 is that the teams strengths and weaknesses are much more important that some off the wall technical start you may have come up with. Obviously my Missouri state neutralized your Nevada stat.  Good Luck the rest of the way.


Bigdaddy is one of the reasons decent cappers leave this site. Nice job you fucking retard.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 146
Posted: #88
Keep up the good work research.

(HATERS LOVE ME)
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 896
Posted: #89
I bet $25 on each of ur picks research, lets get it. 
 
Nice call  on south florida +14...they are winning 14-0 against florida st.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 896
Posted: #90
Is ncst still a play? they are +1 now
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #91
Quote Originally Posted by Jalaclipse06:

Is ncst still a play? they are +1 now

 

i never change my plays because of a line change

 

gl

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 553
Posted: #92
nice job.  looking good.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 896
Posted: #93
that ML for South florida would have looked nice
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 29
Posted: #94
so the plays are nc st. oregon, and clemson correct?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 896
Posted: #95
great start 2-0 so far, nice research
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 3859
Posted: #96
Quote Originally Posted by research:

South Florida +15 (37-6 system)  WON

Virginia Tech +3 B 0.5 (44-7 system) WINNING

Nevada +7.5 (75-36 ATS system)(26-1-1 system) LOST

Kentucky +22 (29-5 system) PENDING

Colorado State +17 (30-3 system) PENDING

S.Mississippi +14 (26-3 system) WON

Purdue +7 (33-7 system) PENDING

NCST -1 (70-32 system) PENDING - TIED

Oregon +7 (26-8 system) WINNING - Easy

Clemson moneyline (17-2 system) LOSING

Stanford -7 buying 1 pt (26-4 system) PENDING

 

4-2

amazing

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 413
Posted: #97
Someone is having a great day. Thanks a lot research !
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 185
Posted: #98
Quote Originally Posted by HeyDog:

The research didnt win last week...

Last week was a square week that's why, this is a contrarian type system.  buying low and selling high if I'm not mistaken.

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #99
7-3 today
 
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 185
Posted: #100
Nice!  The Oregon and Stanford games were no brainers. 
 
Do you use the same one for NFL?
 
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.