All Forums | College Football

week 4 system plays including a midweek play

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 15975
Posts: 106
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 2054
Posted: #26
G.L
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 3859
Posted: #27

South Florida +15 (37-6 system)

Virginia Tech +3 B 0.5 (44-7 system)

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #28

So far I have:

 

South Florida +15 (37-6 system)

Virginia Tech +3 B 0.5 (44-7 system)

Nevada +7.5 (75-36 ATS system)(26-1-1 system)

Kentucky +22 (29-5 system)

Colorado State +17 (30-3 system)

S.Mississippi +14 (26-3 system)

Purdue +7 (33-7 system)

NCST -1 (70-32 system)

Oregon +7 (26-8 system) buying 1.5 point here

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 25392
Posted: #29
GL research
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by TampaCane2:

Like your plays and ur ahead on the season, so keep em coming
 

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by Beechernic:

So the trend Criteria is:
 
Home Game
Game Line:  (Favored) or (Dog of +1 to +14)
Against Team with better record
Previous game result:  (W by 0-10) or  (L)
 
Seems simple, calculated, and successful.
 
TY

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:

Ive been foolowing your system plays & they are successful but I see Missouri destroying Nevada! Nevada had no business being a favorite at Colorado St last week, this team is a joke & this game should be over by halftime! I still like knowing what you like, keep them rolling bro, good luck!

 

gl man

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #33

Quote Originally Posted by BoKemp:



I'm interested in your system and trying to validate it.  Can you clarify the last part about "winning by 10 or less or losing".  Does that apply to the home team or the visiting team?

tx

 

to the home team

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by BoKemp:

And do you discount when the previous opponent was 1aa?

 

if i cant find the line, then yes

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by JMon:

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by MEaazy:

Nevada sucks....nothing changes this week...Mizzou rolls I got 5 hundy on it!!!!

 

i have a lot more on nevada. one of us will win

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by ksuwins:

I am not an MU alum either, and I like the Nevada pick.  And I too, love those tits.

 

nice tits indeed

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by schust06:

like the VA Tech play... especially after seeing this trend Head-to-Head
 
MIAMI are 1-7 ATS in their last 8 meetings.

 

i'm more looking into the lookahead angle

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by AtlFader:

trends are cool....
but MATCHUPS are more important.

 

i agree 100%. and thats why i never base my plays only on systems

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by JettNole:

Vtech and Nevada so far

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by SM_pick-em420:

DOES THIS SYS WORK FOR NFL AS WELL????

 

which one ?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by target_9:

GL

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 7423
Posted: #43
I understand trends, being a numbers guy myself, but
I hate Nevada in this spot.  This is a classic example why numbers can lead you down the wrong path.  The offseason losses to the Nevada squad, simply are not reflected in the numbers. 
 
Nevada gets whipped in this spot.
 
Missou 44 Nevada 24
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #44
Quote Originally Posted by softballmaniac:

Sent a friend request. Thanx... Been checking out ur threads for a couple weeks now. Great job. Thanx for posting and keep up the great work. It's much appreciated...

 

 

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by kimats:

G.L
 

 

same to you bud

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by schust06:

South Florida +15 (37-6 system)

Virginia Tech +3 B 0.5 (44-7 system)

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by BigEastExpert:

GL research

 

same to you bud

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by swizzol:

I understand trends, being a numbers guy myself, but
I hate Nevada in this spot.  This is a classic example why numbers can lead you down the wrong path.  The offseason losses to the Nevada squad, simply are not reflected in the numbers. 
 
Nevada gets whipped in this spot.
 
Missou 44 Nevada 24

 

not saying that it can't happen. this is why gambling is fun. we can all look at the same matchup and have a different opinion. gl

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 3883
Posted: #49
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #50
getting lots of private messages, sorry but cant respond to all of them...this  is a much better waY to communicate, so that everyone can see...sharing is important
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.