All Forums | College Football

week 4 system plays including a midweek play

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 15975
Posts: 106
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #51
Quote Originally Posted by Billystick13:

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 7423
Posted: #52
With respect research.  I know you know your stuff.  I'd bet you and I have many of the same beliefs regarding math and capping.
 
BOL 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #53
Quote Originally Posted by swizzol:

With respect research.  I know you know your stuff.  I'd bet you and I have many of the same beliefs regarding math and capping.
 
BOL 

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 413
Posted: #54
Tailing you this week, good luck to us !
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 8005
Posted: #55
gluck!! i hope your only loss is vtech!! 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 142
Posted: #56
Quote Originally Posted by research:

So far I have:

 

South Florida +15 (37-6 system)

Virginia Tech +3 B 0.5 (44-7 system)

Nevada +7.5 (75-36 ATS system)(26-1-1 system)

How many different systems are you using?  Iwith the system you posted here I went through and I came up with 12 games this weekend.  But South Florida is a road team?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #57

So far I have:

 

South Florida +15 (37-6 system)

Virginia Tech +3 B 0.5 (44-7 system)

Nevada +7.5 (75-36 ATS system)(26-1-1 system)

Kentucky +22 (29-5 system)

Colorado State +17 (30-3 system)

S.Mississippi +14 (26-3 system)

Purdue +7 (33-7 system)

NCST -1 (70-32 system)

Oregon +7 (26-8 system) buying 1.5 point here

Clemson moneyline (17-2 system)

Stanford -7 buying 1 pt (26-4 system)

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 81
Posted: #58
been following you all season....lets keep it going....
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 3738
Posted: #59
unreal....I have never seen this on covers....I am on every one of those picks before seeing your thread....We must have similar systems...Good luck
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 3978
Posted: #60
Interesting...agree with quite a few. Do u mind sharing your YTD results ? Thx. GL.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 142
Posted: #61
Are each one of your picks a different system?  all the different records?  What are they?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 629
Posted: #62
Quote Originally Posted by research:

So far I have:

 

South Florida +15 (37-6 system)

Virginia Tech +3 B 0.5 (44-7 system)

Nevada +7.5 (75-36 ATS system)(26-1-1 system)

Kentucky +22 (29-5 system)

Colorado State +17 (30-3 system)

S.Mississippi +14 (26-3 system)

Purdue +7 (33-7 system)

NCST -1 (70-32 system)

Oregon +7 (26-8 system) buying 1.5 point here

Clemson moneyline (17-2 system)

Stanford -7 buying 1 pt (26-4 system)

research

card looks great!! bol

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 3235
Posted: #63
Quote Originally Posted by research:

So far I have:

 

South Florida +15 (37-6 system)

Virginia Tech +3 B 0.5 (44-7 system)

Nevada +7.5 (75-36 ATS system)(26-1-1 system)

Kentucky +22 (29-5 system)

Colorado State +17 (30-3 system)

S.Mississippi +14 (26-3 system)

Purdue +7 (33-7 system)

NCST -1 (70-32 system)

Oregon +7 (26-8 system) buying 1.5 point here

Clemson moneyline (17-2 system)

Stanford -7 buying 1 pt (26-4 system)

We like many of the same picks. BOL my frind

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 168
Posted: #64
Great work Research! 

Should i buy point on South Florida if current line is +14 or is +14 still a play?

Thanks for all of your work!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 402
Posted: #65
IMPRESSIVE RECORD..BOL,
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 553
Posted: #66
I was first leaning on mizzoo here thinking they were just the better team. After reading this thread and seeing almost all the money being played on mizzoo and no line change?? smells like fish to me.  Also, this is Nevada's first home game.  and it's gonna be a hot one.  I was on S. Carolina last nite and I think another dog day today.

GL all and thanks for the info research.  keep up the good work.

oh, liking the va tech play and the under.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 606
Posted: #67
On Them!!.....   LOVE STANFORD!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 3859
Posted: #68
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 414
Posted: #69
Hi research, you do good work.  Do you also do NFL or just College?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 444
Posted: #70
Wish you a great day boys !
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 18
Posted: #71
Good luck Research.  I see some of your plays qualifying for this system too!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 2897
Posted: #72
research
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 413
Posted: #73
here's to a great day research
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 5386
Posted: #74
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 6134
Posted: #75
Well I got to see the system lose for only the 2nd time and I bet against it
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.