• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Moneyline Picks
      • NFL AI Predictions
      • NFL Underdogs
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | College Football

    N. Carolina at S. Carolina

    «First Previous 123 Next Last»
    mws
    speak2truth
    MEGALOCKS
    motowner
    -29-
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 3913
    Posts: 57
    «First Previous 123 Next Last»
     
    mws
    mws
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 7191
    Posted: Jul. 27, 2013 - 9:07 PM ET #26

    UNC abandoning a pro-style run-heavy offense?  I don't think that's quite right.  Larry Fedora brought the running game BACK to Chapel Hill.  It had been missing for 30 years, since Ethan Horton, Kelvin Bryant, and Famous Amos. 

    Fedora's spread offense definitely isn't what they were running at UNC before they got there, but they've been relying on the QB to throw it or run it for a long, long time, which isn't a pro-style run-heavy offense, either.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    UNC abandoning a pro-style run-heavy offense?  I don't think that's quite right.  Larry Fedora brought the running game BACK to Chapel Hill.  It had been missing for 30 years, since Ethan Horton, Kelvin Bryant, and Famous Amos. 

    Fedora's spread offense definitely isn't what they were running at UNC before they got there, but they've been relying on the QB to throw it or run it for a long, long time, which isn't a pro-style run-heavy offense, either.

     
    speak2truth
    speak2truth
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2011
    Posts: 2008
    Posted: Jul. 27, 2013 - 9:13 PM ET #27

    spurrier hasn't done all THAT at SC--until the past two seasons.  he was only 11 games over .500 after 6 seasons and was 1-4 in bowl games during that run.

    until he wins at least an SEC champ, he may be god in SC and FL, but not elsewhere.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    spurrier hasn't done all THAT at SC--until the past two seasons.  he was only 11 games over .500 after 6 seasons and was 1-4 in bowl games during that run.

    until he wins at least an SEC champ, he may be god in SC and FL, but not elsewhere.

     
    MEGALOCKS
    MEGALOCKS
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2003
    Posts: 18138
    Posted: Jul. 27, 2013 - 9:53 PM ET #28

    I just think its nice somebody cracked open the UNC discussion. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I just think its nice somebody cracked open the UNC discussion. 
     
    motowner
    motowner
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2012
    Posts: 6618
    Posted: Jul. 27, 2013 - 10:03 PM ET #29

    UNC's defense was absolutely atrocious last year. i don't see how losing its best talent will help that unit out at all.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    UNC's defense was absolutely atrocious last year. i don't see how losing its best talent will help that unit out at all.
     
    -29-
    -29-
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 3307
    Posted: Jul. 27, 2013 - 10:05 PM ET #30

    Quote Originally Posted by mws:

    UNC abandoning a pro-style run-heavy offense?  I don't think that's quite right.  Larry Fedora brought the running game BACK to Chapel Hill.  It had been missing for 30 years, since Ethan Horton, Kelvin Bryant, and Famous Amos. 

    Fedora's spread offense definitely isn't what they were running at UNC before they got there, but they've been relying on the QB to throw it or run it for a long, long time, which isn't a pro-style run-heavy offense, either.

     I respect your opinion mws and have enjoyed reading your contributions over the years but I'm not sure what point that you are trying to make here.

     As far as Fedora bringing the run back to UNC, that is a laughable assertation. Fedora inherited Giovanni Bernard perhaps the best TB to play in Chapel Hill since Kelvin Bryant. Bernard actually had less yards under Fedora as a sophmore (1228) then he did as a freshman (1253). As far as a missing running game for the last 30 years, ALL of the following have eclipsed the 1,000 yard mark since Ethan Horton did it; Derrick Fenner, Kennard Martin, Natrone Means (twice), Leon Johnson, Curtis Johnson, Jonathan Linton, and Gio (twice). Gio is also the first back since Mike Voight in 1976 to run for back to back 1200 yard seasons.

     Can you name a former Tarheel QB that was drafted in the NFL and has thrown a TD in an NFL game? There has only been ONE T.J. Yates and he would have never seen the field if Schaub wasn't injured. That is because UNC football has been pound the ball and supplement it with some passes every now and then. The Tarheels have NEVER run a spread offense that favors the passing game like this year's offense does. Sure you could tell me about Darian Durant and Ronald Curry but they were both "dual purpose" QBs and were not NFL type talent that could run this system like Renner can.

     Do you think that Fedora has the "43 Dive" in mind when he suggests that UNC will eclipse 900 offensive plays this season? There is no way that the 'Heels will abandon the running game, that simply would never work plus as mentioned they have some real talent there. But UNC will be a pass first, up-tempo team this year. and I think that they will be fun to watch and I expect Renner to be spectacular.   

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by mws:

    UNC abandoning a pro-style run-heavy offense?  I don't think that's quite right.  Larry Fedora brought the running game BACK to Chapel Hill.  It had been missing for 30 years, since Ethan Horton, Kelvin Bryant, and Famous Amos. 

    Fedora's spread offense definitely isn't what they were running at UNC before they got there, but they've been relying on the QB to throw it or run it for a long, long time, which isn't a pro-style run-heavy offense, either.

     I respect your opinion mws and have enjoyed reading your contributions over the years but I'm not sure what point that you are trying to make here.

     As far as Fedora bringing the run back to UNC, that is a laughable assertation. Fedora inherited Giovanni Bernard perhaps the best TB to play in Chapel Hill since Kelvin Bryant. Bernard actually had less yards under Fedora as a sophmore (1228) then he did as a freshman (1253). As far as a missing running game for the last 30 years, ALL of the following have eclipsed the 1,000 yard mark since Ethan Horton did it; Derrick Fenner, Kennard Martin, Natrone Means (twice), Leon Johnson, Curtis Johnson, Jonathan Linton, and Gio (twice). Gio is also the first back since Mike Voight in 1976 to run for back to back 1200 yard seasons.

     Can you name a former Tarheel QB that was drafted in the NFL and has thrown a TD in an NFL game? There has only been ONE T.J. Yates and he would have never seen the field if Schaub wasn't injured. That is because UNC football has been pound the ball and supplement it with some passes every now and then. The Tarheels have NEVER run a spread offense that favors the passing game like this year's offense does. Sure you could tell me about Darian Durant and Ronald Curry but they were both "dual purpose" QBs and were not NFL type talent that could run this system like Renner can.

     Do you think that Fedora has the "43 Dive" in mind when he suggests that UNC will eclipse 900 offensive plays this season? There is no way that the 'Heels will abandon the running game, that simply would never work plus as mentioned they have some real talent there. But UNC will be a pass first, up-tempo team this year. and I think that they will be fun to watch and I expect Renner to be spectacular.   

     
    -29-
    -29-
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 3307
    Posted: Jul. 27, 2013 - 11:31 PM ET #31

     After reading my above post, I feel that I oversimplified things and would like to add some additional info.

     "That is because UNC football has been pound the ball and supplement it with some passes every now and then"  I should have said UNC has always set up the pass with the run. They would typically recruit TBs from NC and O lineman from VA,OH,and PA. and pound the ball until you loaded "the box" then they would throw it.

     With Fedora/Renner they simply pick you apart with the pass until you drop back in coverage and then they gash you with the run. It's the complete opposite of traditional Carolina football. For example, Renner set all-time team records last year for Passing yards (3501), Passing attempts (441), and Passing completions (287) AND  he had a 1200 yard rusher!  For comparison,when UNC had Kelvin Bryant, Tyrone Anthony, and Ethan Horton, QBs Stankavage/Elkins combined for 1835 yards passing, 256 attempts, and 132 completions.

    The Tarheels were ranked in the top 5 that year in the preseason poll and lost their opener to Pitt 7-6.  It's a pretty safe wager that this offense led by Renner will not be held to 6 points.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

     After reading my above post, I feel that I oversimplified things and would like to add some additional info.

     "That is because UNC football has been pound the ball and supplement it with some passes every now and then"  I should have said UNC has always set up the pass with the run. They would typically recruit TBs from NC and O lineman from VA,OH,and PA. and pound the ball until you loaded "the box" then they would throw it.

     With Fedora/Renner they simply pick you apart with the pass until you drop back in coverage and then they gash you with the run. It's the complete opposite of traditional Carolina football. For example, Renner set all-time team records last year for Passing yards (3501), Passing attempts (441), and Passing completions (287) AND  he had a 1200 yard rusher!  For comparison,when UNC had Kelvin Bryant, Tyrone Anthony, and Ethan Horton, QBs Stankavage/Elkins combined for 1835 yards passing, 256 attempts, and 132 completions.

    The Tarheels were ranked in the top 5 that year in the preseason poll and lost their opener to Pitt 7-6.  It's a pretty safe wager that this offense led by Renner will not be held to 6 points.

     
    -29-
    -29-
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 3307
    Posted: Jul. 28, 2013 - 12:30 AM ET #32

    I've been drinkin' tonight boys so I aplologize for multiple posts it's definitely not my normal style but I keep forgetting to mention relevant points.

    In UNC football pre-Fedora, 60% of the passes were "play action". I dare anyone to count more than a small handful of "play action" passes in the current Tarheel offense on any given saturday. And those that are will probably be fake swing passes in the flats to the TB rather than handoffs. I will say it for the final time, Chapel Hill has never seen anything like this offense. 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    I've been drinkin' tonight boys so I aplologize for multiple posts it's definitely not my normal style but I keep forgetting to mention relevant points.

    In UNC football pre-Fedora, 60% of the passes were "play action". I dare anyone to count more than a small handful of "play action" passes in the current Tarheel offense on any given saturday. And those that are will probably be fake swing passes in the flats to the TB rather than handoffs. I will say it for the final time, Chapel Hill has never seen anything like this offense. 

     
    ksuwins
    ksuwins
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2004
    Posts: 4081
    Posted: Jul. 28, 2013 - 1:14 AM ET #33

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

    Love the 1st half UNDER.



    Ditto.  I think there will be plenty of first half opportunities early in the season (and throughout the entire season, now that I'm a huge fan of first half Unders, thanks to jimmy)...given the high hopes of offenses that will be good, but will need time to click. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

    Love the 1st half UNDER.



    Ditto.  I think there will be plenty of first half opportunities early in the season (and throughout the entire season, now that I'm a huge fan of first half Unders, thanks to jimmy)...given the high hopes of offenses that will be good, but will need time to click. 
     
    FreePickWinners
    FreePickWinners
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2007
    Posts: 291
    Posted: Jul. 28, 2013 - 1:57 AM ET #34

    [Quote: Originally Posted by speak2truth]

    spurrier hasn't done all THAT at SC--until the past two seasons.  he was only 11 games over .500 after 6 seasons and was 1-4 in bowl games during that run.

    until he wins at least an SEC champ, he may be god in SC and FL, but not elsewhere.

    Spurrier made SC relevant, please go back and look how many games they were winning before he came to SC?  He has put SC on the map as a solid SEC contender.  Really don't understand how you can bash this guy?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    [Quote: Originally Posted by speak2truth]

    spurrier hasn't done all THAT at SC--until the past two seasons.  he was only 11 games over .500 after 6 seasons and was 1-4 in bowl games during that run.

    until he wins at least an SEC champ, he may be god in SC and FL, but not elsewhere.

    Spurrier made SC relevant, please go back and look how many games they were winning before he came to SC?  He has put SC on the map as a solid SEC contender.  Really don't understand how you can bash this guy?
     
    ksuwins
    ksuwins
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2004
    Posts: 4081
    Posted: Jul. 28, 2013 - 2:03 AM ET #35

    Quote Originally Posted by speak2truth:

    spurrier hasn't done all THAT at SC--until the past two seasons.  he was only 11 games over .500 after 6 seasons and was 1-4 in bowl games during that run.

    until he wins at least an SEC champ, he may be god in SC and FL, but not elsewhere.


    Fate has it's own way.  I'd take him in a heart beat.  How many coaches can brag Spurrier's record?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by speak2truth:

    spurrier hasn't done all THAT at SC--until the past two seasons.  he was only 11 games over .500 after 6 seasons and was 1-4 in bowl games during that run.

    until he wins at least an SEC champ, he may be god in SC and FL, but not elsewhere.


    Fate has it's own way.  I'd take him in a heart beat.  How many coaches can brag Spurrier's record?
     
    nc1capper
    nc1capper
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 16348
    Posted: Jul. 28, 2013 - 7:47 AM ET #36

    Quote Originally Posted by -29-:

    I've been drinkin' tonight boys so I aplologize for multiple posts it's definitely not my normal style but I keep forgetting to mention relevant points.

    In UNC football pre-Fedora, 60% of the passes were "play action". I dare anyone to count more than a small handful of "play action" passes in the current Tarheel offense on any given saturday. And those that are will probably be fake swing passes in the flats to the TB rather than handoffs. I will say it for the final time, Chapel Hill has never seen anything like this offense. 

    agreed , still not certain this will translate to success as far as points on board goes - still crunching this one 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by -29-:

    I've been drinkin' tonight boys so I aplologize for multiple posts it's definitely not my normal style but I keep forgetting to mention relevant points.

    In UNC football pre-Fedora, 60% of the passes were "play action". I dare anyone to count more than a small handful of "play action" passes in the current Tarheel offense on any given saturday. And those that are will probably be fake swing passes in the flats to the TB rather than handoffs. I will say it for the final time, Chapel Hill has never seen anything like this offense. 

    agreed , still not certain this will translate to success as far as points on board goes - still crunching this one 
     
    speak2truth
    speak2truth
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2011
    Posts: 2008
    Posted: Jul. 28, 2013 - 12:10 PM ET #37

    SC is relevant but sure as hell not a contender.  now LSU is different--richt made THAT program into a champion after it had languished since the mid-70s'.  when spurrier does the same with SC, he'll be something.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    SC is relevant but sure as hell not a contender.  now LSU is different--richt made THAT program into a champion after it had languished since the mid-70s'.  when spurrier does the same with SC, he'll be something.
     
    speak2truth
    speak2truth
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2011
    Posts: 2008
    Posted: Jul. 28, 2013 - 12:11 PM ET #38

    ^ meant miles, not richt.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    ^ meant miles, not richt.
     
    FreePickWinners
    FreePickWinners
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2007
    Posts: 291
    Posted: Jul. 28, 2013 - 2:22 PM ET #39

    Not get to off topic about the game, but Nick Saban got LSU back on the map nationally. Not Les Miles.  Miles won a National Championship with all of Sabans recruits.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Not get to off topic about the game, but Nick Saban got LSU back on the map nationally. Not Les Miles.  Miles won a National Championship with all of Sabans recruits.
     
    jwheels86
    jwheels86
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 16181
    Posted: Jul. 28, 2013 - 4:05 PM ET #40

    Quote Originally Posted by -29-:

     I respect the opinions of those favoring the under here but .

    Has anyone been paying attention to what Larry Fedora and Bryn Renner are doing in Chapel Hill? For the first time in decades or maybe ever, the 'Heels have scrapped their pro-style run heavy offense for the "spread" and it's showing a lot of promise.

     Carolina averaged over 10 more offensive plays per game in '12 over '11 and now Fedora predicts that UNC will join the 900+ offensive plays club in '13. Not only did UNC increase their offensive output LY but they averaged over 1 yard more per play and Brenner cut his INTs in half to 7 despite throwing 72 more passes in the previous season. Oh, and Brenner was very uncomfortable in the new system LY until the very end  of the season as stats would support. In his last 4 games Brenner was 111-157 (71%), 1328 yards (332 ypg.), 11 TDs, and just 2 int.

     Well Brenner now says that he feels that he now can play by reaction instead of having to try and think about everything before he makes a play. I think that Renner is the best QB to ever play at UNC and I predict a 3600 yard-36 TD type of season for him.

     I loved Giovanni Bernard and he will be missed, but UNC has 2 backs that fit this offense perfectly. Romar Morris can fly and A.J. Blue is a good receiver and like Bernard should have a good YAC rating. Carolina will also be ok at WR and O-line.

     On the defensive side is where I have some question marks for the Tarheels.For the first time in decades the D line is only average and although there is a ton of athleticism and potential at LB, they are unproven. They should be fine in the secondary with four very productive starters returning.

     The fifteen lost scholarships could eventually take their toll on the depth in Chapel Hill before the season is over but should not be a factor in this game. I am strongly leaning to UNC and the over here.

    Even though I would love to see the 'Cocks represent the SEC and start the season strong with a decisive victory here, this game makes me very nervous as an outright Tarheel victory would not be terribly surprising to me.


    Yes, but you also realize how many teams run this spread attack against the top SEC defenses and how their tempo just hurries itself into the ground.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by -29-:

     I respect the opinions of those favoring the under here but .

    Has anyone been paying attention to what Larry Fedora and Bryn Renner are doing in Chapel Hill? For the first time in decades or maybe ever, the 'Heels have scrapped their pro-style run heavy offense for the "spread" and it's showing a lot of promise.

     Carolina averaged over 10 more offensive plays per game in '12 over '11 and now Fedora predicts that UNC will join the 900+ offensive plays club in '13. Not only did UNC increase their offensive output LY but they averaged over 1 yard more per play and Brenner cut his INTs in half to 7 despite throwing 72 more passes in the previous season. Oh, and Brenner was very uncomfortable in the new system LY until the very end  of the season as stats would support. In his last 4 games Brenner was 111-157 (71%), 1328 yards (332 ypg.), 11 TDs, and just 2 int.

     Well Brenner now says that he feels that he now can play by reaction instead of having to try and think about everything before he makes a play. I think that Renner is the best QB to ever play at UNC and I predict a 3600 yard-36 TD type of season for him.

     I loved Giovanni Bernard and he will be missed, but UNC has 2 backs that fit this offense perfectly. Romar Morris can fly and A.J. Blue is a good receiver and like Bernard should have a good YAC rating. Carolina will also be ok at WR and O-line.

     On the defensive side is where I have some question marks for the Tarheels.For the first time in decades the D line is only average and although there is a ton of athleticism and potential at LB, they are unproven. They should be fine in the secondary with four very productive starters returning.

     The fifteen lost scholarships could eventually take their toll on the depth in Chapel Hill before the season is over but should not be a factor in this game. I am strongly leaning to UNC and the over here.

    Even though I would love to see the 'Cocks represent the SEC and start the season strong with a decisive victory here, this game makes me very nervous as an outright Tarheel victory would not be terribly surprising to me.


    Yes, but you also realize how many teams run this spread attack against the top SEC defenses and how their tempo just hurries itself into the ground.
     
    jwheels86
    jwheels86
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 16181
    Posted: Jul. 28, 2013 - 4:07 PM ET #41

    Quote Originally Posted by speak2truth:

    spurrier hasn't done all THAT at SC--until the past two seasons.  he was only 11 games over .500 after 6 seasons and was 1-4 in bowl games during that run.

    until he wins at least an SEC champ, he may be god in SC and FL, but not elsewhere.


    Are you serious?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by speak2truth:

    spurrier hasn't done all THAT at SC--until the past two seasons.  he was only 11 games over .500 after 6 seasons and was 1-4 in bowl games during that run.

    until he wins at least an SEC champ, he may be god in SC and FL, but not elsewhere.


    Are you serious?
     
    ineverwinbutitry
    ineverwinbutitry
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2013
    Posts: 578
    Posted: Jul. 28, 2013 - 11:52 PM ET #42

    I have to say the -10 is only that low because they expect a first game slugging start since a lot of teams do not get pre season games. Clemson is the class of the ACC along with Florida State and South Carolina has handled them with ease I think going back 4 years now? North Carolina is a middle tier ACC school in terms of football. South Carolina money line is a LOCK and against the spread I think they should win this by 2 tds. At home the team will be more fired up to start strong to keep justifying their top 10 ranking.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I have to say the -10 is only that low because they expect a first game slugging start since a lot of teams do not get pre season games. Clemson is the class of the ACC along with Florida State and South Carolina has handled them with ease I think going back 4 years now? North Carolina is a middle tier ACC school in terms of football. South Carolina money line is a LOCK and against the spread I think they should win this by 2 tds. At home the team will be more fired up to start strong to keep justifying their top 10 ranking.
     
    -29-
    -29-
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 3307
    Posted: Jul. 28, 2013 - 11:53 PM ET #43

    Quote Originally Posted by jwheels86:


    Yes, but you also realize how many teams run this spread attack against the top SEC defenses and how their tempo just hurries itself into the ground.

     I've seen it myself and agree with you 100%.  As a Vol fan I hope that Butch Jones realizes that he'll have to use a slower paced version of his Cincinnati style spread O or risk killing his defense.

     Honestly the term "spread" is so generic that I hate to even use it. In Urban's Gainesville version the Gators were only passing 40% of the time. When Mumme/Leach were in Lexington they threw it 70% of the time. Technically Georgia Tech runs a spread offense and they only throw it less than 20% of the time.

     I can think of a couple of occasions where a spread team played a top level SEC defense and moved the ball very effectively even though neither team could win their game. When LSU played for the NC in 2012 they had one of the best defenses in the nation yet they gave up 463 passing yards and 533 total yards to WVU and in 2008 Ole Miss had one of the top defenses in the SEC but they let Graham Harrell throw for nearly 400 yards and 4 TDs in the '09 Cotton Bowl. And looking at South Carolina's game LY against ECU, the 'Cocks won easily on the scoreboard but the Pirates did complete 30 passes for 333 yards. The one thing that the above losing teams had in common were multiple interceptions.

    That's where I think that UNC will be different, Renner is far and away better than either of the two QBs that ECU used last year against SC and Larry Fedora coached QBs throw an amazingly low percentage of interceptions. In his five year HC career, his teams have thrown 128 Tds against only 38 Ints. That's a ratio of 25.6 / 7.6 and that is very impressive.

     I know that I sound like a UNC fan in this thread but the truth is I do not even like them. I just think that this could be a good spot for them here, but betting against SC is a very scary proposition and one that I may ultimately decide against. I do know that in week 3  I will almost certainly be wagering against the 'Heels vs. Ga.Tech because that is a terrible spot for UNC and almost an unwinnable game imo.

    GL this season wheels. 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by jwheels86:


    Yes, but you also realize how many teams run this spread attack against the top SEC defenses and how their tempo just hurries itself into the ground.

     I've seen it myself and agree with you 100%.  As a Vol fan I hope that Butch Jones realizes that he'll have to use a slower paced version of his Cincinnati style spread O or risk killing his defense.

     Honestly the term "spread" is so generic that I hate to even use it. In Urban's Gainesville version the Gators were only passing 40% of the time. When Mumme/Leach were in Lexington they threw it 70% of the time. Technically Georgia Tech runs a spread offense and they only throw it less than 20% of the time.

     I can think of a couple of occasions where a spread team played a top level SEC defense and moved the ball very effectively even though neither team could win their game. When LSU played for the NC in 2012 they had one of the best defenses in the nation yet they gave up 463 passing yards and 533 total yards to WVU and in 2008 Ole Miss had one of the top defenses in the SEC but they let Graham Harrell throw for nearly 400 yards and 4 TDs in the '09 Cotton Bowl. And looking at South Carolina's game LY against ECU, the 'Cocks won easily on the scoreboard but the Pirates did complete 30 passes for 333 yards. The one thing that the above losing teams had in common were multiple interceptions.

    That's where I think that UNC will be different, Renner is far and away better than either of the two QBs that ECU used last year against SC and Larry Fedora coached QBs throw an amazingly low percentage of interceptions. In his five year HC career, his teams have thrown 128 Tds against only 38 Ints. That's a ratio of 25.6 / 7.6 and that is very impressive.

     I know that I sound like a UNC fan in this thread but the truth is I do not even like them. I just think that this could be a good spot for them here, but betting against SC is a very scary proposition and one that I may ultimately decide against. I do know that in week 3  I will almost certainly be wagering against the 'Heels vs. Ga.Tech because that is a terrible spot for UNC and almost an unwinnable game imo.

    GL this season wheels. 

     
    speak2truth
    speak2truth
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2011
    Posts: 2008
    Posted: Jul. 29, 2013 - 7:34 PM ET #44

    yes I am.  stop licking old man scrotum and accept the numbers.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    yes I am.  stop licking old man scrotum and accept the numbers.
     
    nickeydyme
    nickeydyme
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2012
    Posts: 764
    Posted: Jul. 29, 2013 - 8:18 PM ET #45

    @29--UNC QB Renner not THAT much better than ECU QB Carden.

    Renner is 6'3" 225lbs and Carden is 6'2" 218lbs

    Renner ly 65% completion for 3556yds 28tds 7ints; preseason davey obrien candidate, will set most of UNC's qb records 

    Carden who didnt win starting job til wk 3 ly 66% completion for 3116 yds 23tds 10ints; ran the 6th most efficient offense in redzone ly.

    Obviously ACC is tougher than ConfUSA but talent is talent.

    Also, S. Carolina returns 3/4 starters from #17 pass def.  They dominated an even better qb and team at home in Georgia.  only thing against S. Carolina is they tend to start slow in first games but this is if not his best team one of Spurriers best teams he's had there in 9 seasons.               

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @29--UNC QB Renner not THAT much better than ECU QB Carden.

    Renner is 6'3" 225lbs and Carden is 6'2" 218lbs

    Renner ly 65% completion for 3556yds 28tds 7ints; preseason davey obrien candidate, will set most of UNC's qb records 

    Carden who didnt win starting job til wk 3 ly 66% completion for 3116 yds 23tds 10ints; ran the 6th most efficient offense in redzone ly.

    Obviously ACC is tougher than ConfUSA but talent is talent.

    Also, S. Carolina returns 3/4 starters from #17 pass def.  They dominated an even better qb and team at home in Georgia.  only thing against S. Carolina is they tend to start slow in first games but this is if not his best team one of Spurriers best teams he's had there in 9 seasons.               

     

     
    -29-
    -29-
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 3307
    Posted: Jul. 29, 2013 - 9:29 PM ET #46

    Quote Originally Posted by nickeydyme:

    @29--UNC QB Renner not THAT much better than ECU QB Carden.

    Renner is 6'3" 225lbs and Carden is 6'2" 218lbs

    Renner ly 65% completion for 3556yds 28tds 7ints; preseason davey obrien candidate, will set most of UNC's qb records 

    Carden who didnt win starting job til wk 3 ly 66% completion for 3116 yds 23tds 10ints; ran the 6th most efficient offense in redzone ly.

    Obviously ACC is tougher than ConfUSA but talent is talent.

    Also, S. Carolina returns 3/4 starters from #17 pass def.  They dominated an even better qb and team at home in Georgia.  only thing against S. Carolina is they tend to start slow in first games but this is if not his best team one of Spurriers best teams he's had there in 9 seasons.               

     

     

     First off, I love SC's team this year and out of all of the preseason Top 10 teams I would prefer the Gamecocks to win the final BCS Championship. My original post was about the over 55 total that was posted for this game.

     Renner played in 12 games LY (no Bowl game) and Carden played in 12 games LY. If the basis for your argument is that Carden's numbers were almost as good as Renner's were in 2012 it is a tenuous one at best. C-USA was the worst conference defending the pass last year. If UNC had played ECU's schedule (S.Miss, UAB, Memphis, Tulane, Houston, Marshall, ULL, UTEP, App.St., etc.), Renner would have had 4000 yards and 40 TDs.

      Another important factor is that last year was year number three for Lincoln Riley's "Air Raid" system and for Carden in Greenville (he redshirted as a FR. and ran the scout squad). Meanwhile Renner was in a completely different system and he said that he never felt comfortable in it until the final few games of the season. Now this season he says that he will be able to make plays on reaction without having to think about how he's going to execute each play.

     And finally Renner's Tarheels played Carden's Pirates last year and the Renner was CLEARLY the much better QB as UNC won 27-6.

    Renner - 27/43 - 321yds. - 2 TDs - 0 Ints - and 3 rushes for 19 yards.

    Carden - 17/30 - 124yds. - 0 TDs - 0 Ints. - and 9 rushes for -40 yrds.

     

     Do you really think that Shane Carden is in the same class as Bryn Renner?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by nickeydyme:

    @29--UNC QB Renner not THAT much better than ECU QB Carden.

    Renner is 6'3" 225lbs and Carden is 6'2" 218lbs

    Renner ly 65% completion for 3556yds 28tds 7ints; preseason davey obrien candidate, will set most of UNC's qb records 

    Carden who didnt win starting job til wk 3 ly 66% completion for 3116 yds 23tds 10ints; ran the 6th most efficient offense in redzone ly.

    Obviously ACC is tougher than ConfUSA but talent is talent.

    Also, S. Carolina returns 3/4 starters from #17 pass def.  They dominated an even better qb and team at home in Georgia.  only thing against S. Carolina is they tend to start slow in first games but this is if not his best team one of Spurriers best teams he's had there in 9 seasons.               

     

     

     First off, I love SC's team this year and out of all of the preseason Top 10 teams I would prefer the Gamecocks to win the final BCS Championship. My original post was about the over 55 total that was posted for this game.

     Renner played in 12 games LY (no Bowl game) and Carden played in 12 games LY. If the basis for your argument is that Carden's numbers were almost as good as Renner's were in 2012 it is a tenuous one at best. C-USA was the worst conference defending the pass last year. If UNC had played ECU's schedule (S.Miss, UAB, Memphis, Tulane, Houston, Marshall, ULL, UTEP, App.St., etc.), Renner would have had 4000 yards and 40 TDs.

      Another important factor is that last year was year number three for Lincoln Riley's "Air Raid" system and for Carden in Greenville (he redshirted as a FR. and ran the scout squad). Meanwhile Renner was in a completely different system and he said that he never felt comfortable in it until the final few games of the season. Now this season he says that he will be able to make plays on reaction without having to think about how he's going to execute each play.

     And finally Renner's Tarheels played Carden's Pirates last year and the Renner was CLEARLY the much better QB as UNC won 27-6.

    Renner - 27/43 - 321yds. - 2 TDs - 0 Ints - and 3 rushes for 19 yards.

    Carden - 17/30 - 124yds. - 0 TDs - 0 Ints. - and 9 rushes for -40 yrds.

     

     Do you really think that Shane Carden is in the same class as Bryn Renner?

     
    nickeydyme
    nickeydyme
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2012
    Posts: 764
    Posted: Jul. 30, 2013 - 10:21 AM ET #47

    @29---good points, no i dont think Carden is close to the caliber qb that Renner is but he's not bad or average, he's a very good qb for his conference. 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @29---good points, no i dont think Carden is close to the caliber qb that Renner is but he's not bad or average, he's a very good qb for his conference. 

     
    -29-
    -29-
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 3307
    Posted: Jul. 31, 2013 - 12:00 AM ET #48

    Quote Originally Posted by nickeydyme:

    @29---good points, no i dont think Carden is close to the caliber qb that Renner is but he's not bad or average, he's a very good qb for his conference. 

     

    Thanks nickey. I didn't mean for post #47 to come off so harsh.  

    I think that Carden is great for ECU's system and he should have a very productive year. Lincoln Riley is great with QBs and this will be the fourth season that he has worked with Shane. Dominique Davis threw for 3967 yards and 37 TDs in his junior year. But with three ACC schools and a tougher C-USA slate on the schedule it probably isn't realistic to expect those kind of numbers from Carden this year but he will be better.

    I need to get back to Greenville for a game this season, I love that place. 

    GOOD LlCK to you this season!   

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by nickeydyme:

    @29---good points, no i dont think Carden is close to the caliber qb that Renner is but he's not bad or average, he's a very good qb for his conference. 

     

    Thanks nickey. I didn't mean for post #47 to come off so harsh.  

    I think that Carden is great for ECU's system and he should have a very productive year. Lincoln Riley is great with QBs and this will be the fourth season that he has worked with Shane. Dominique Davis threw for 3967 yards and 37 TDs in his junior year. But with three ACC schools and a tougher C-USA slate on the schedule it probably isn't realistic to expect those kind of numbers from Carden this year but he will be better.

    I need to get back to Greenville for a game this season, I love that place. 

    GOOD LlCK to you this season!   

     
    Pdriver
    Pdriver
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2012
    Posts: 192
    Posted: Jul. 31, 2013 - 4:41 PM ET #49

    I followed all of UNC games last year....terrible defense , fantastic offense....fedora's offensive game plan was helpful but I can't trust him in a big spot....take spurrier, clowney and lay the points...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I followed all of UNC games last year....terrible defense , fantastic offense....fedora's offensive game plan was helpful but I can't trust him in a big spot....take spurrier, clowney and lay the points...
     
     
    -29-
    -29-
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 3307
    Posted: Aug. 25, 2013 - 6:45 PM ET #50

     Officially takin' 'Heels +11 and Over 56'.   
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
     Officially takin' 'Heels +11 and Over 56'.   
    All Forums | College Football
    «First Previous 123 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,155 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 258,498 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 254 Covers arrow
    • Saturday 09/19/2026 621 Covers arrow
    • The Three-Day Money Train 4,798 Covers arrow
    • Trump's legacy? 25,449 Covers arrow
    • Week 3 Money 10,166 Covers arrow
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 22,448 Covers arrow
    • Public Indicator Calculations 2026 13,592 Covers arrow
    • Week 3 5,747 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.