Gents above - sorry I'm not responding. I have to crush these trolls into oblivion before I can get back to you.
Here's the great irony. The trolls are actually on Memphis. How could they not be? The one guy who appeared to have a substantive arugument for an SMU side, Motower, has been debunked. But they are still here to harass me even though I'll make them money. Such is life.
I have news for you nobody's betting this game or has any interest except you
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Gents above - sorry I'm not responding. I have to crush these trolls into oblivion before I can get back to you.
Here's the great irony. The trolls are actually on Memphis. How could they not be? The one guy who appeared to have a substantive arugument for an SMU side, Motower, has been debunked. But they are still here to harass me even though I'll make them money. Such is life.
I have news for you nobody's betting this game or has any interest except you
The last time Memphis covered a point spread was week #3 vs Bowling Green since then 5 straight ATS loses
And this is the team and game you picked for your play of the year
Seems kinda silly nobody cares about this game
Right because Rutgers didn't cover a spread for around 15 games and I picked them too LAYING points and won by 25 in CFB last year.
How can you have such a shortsighted capping mentality? You need your teams to be playing well for you to side with them? How is this any different than the way a BILLION other gamblers cap?? The BEST time to take a team is when they are playing their worst (example: we won with the Jets over Baltimore after two putrid performances against Pittsburgh and Arizona LAYING POINTS), as long as you are sure they have bottomed out and are about to climb out of that hole.
And it seems like a hell of a lot of people care about this game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrScampy:
The last time Memphis covered a point spread was week #3 vs Bowling Green since then 5 straight ATS loses
And this is the team and game you picked for your play of the year
Seems kinda silly nobody cares about this game
Right because Rutgers didn't cover a spread for around 15 games and I picked them too LAYING points and won by 25 in CFB last year.
How can you have such a shortsighted capping mentality? You need your teams to be playing well for you to side with them? How is this any different than the way a BILLION other gamblers cap?? The BEST time to take a team is when they are playing their worst (example: we won with the Jets over Baltimore after two putrid performances against Pittsburgh and Arizona LAYING POINTS), as long as you are sure they have bottomed out and are about to climb out of that hole.
And it seems like a hell of a lot of people care about this game.
Last year, his "play of the year", was on SMU at home as a favorite when they were 1-9 going into the game. They won.
So at least he has been consistent with making his "play of the year" picks, random games that nobody cares about.
Yes nobody cares about the Thunder over Sixers POY that won.
No one cared about the Penguins over Rangers POY that won.
Would you like all the other POY's I've won? Maybe I'll stop at the last 4 like these that hit.
I mean guys, the game has to be Bama LSU to warrant a POY.
Because well ....Bama.
It's pretty plain to see why so many cappers lose their shirt in this game. Look at their approach. It's so vanilla you could put whip cream, sprinkles and a cherry on top of it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jdr016:
Last year, his "play of the year", was on SMU at home as a favorite when they were 1-9 going into the game. They won.
So at least he has been consistent with making his "play of the year" picks, random games that nobody cares about.
Yes nobody cares about the Thunder over Sixers POY that won.
No one cared about the Penguins over Rangers POY that won.
Would you like all the other POY's I've won? Maybe I'll stop at the last 4 like these that hit.
I mean guys, the game has to be Bama LSU to warrant a POY.
Because well ....Bama.
It's pretty plain to see why so many cappers lose their shirt in this game. Look at their approach. It's so vanilla you could put whip cream, sprinkles and a cherry on top of it.
Scalabrine, you must be the most interesting capper on this forum. Never have a such seen so much argument against you. I don't understand it. I enjoy your capping. Don't let the haters change you.
0
Scalabrine, you must be the most interesting capper on this forum. Never have a such seen so much argument against you. I don't understand it. I enjoy your capping. Don't let the haters change you.
All these pathetic whiny bi*** es coming to your thread is laughable. They've ran off some great posters because well that's what this site wants. 70% win rate and people are trashing your picks? Smh. Most of you losers post your "picks" AFTER a game is over and you still couldn't show a 70% win rate. What incentive do you get for being such d-bags? Bookies give you $50 in free play for running people off? Lol. I bet the majority of you can't sleep on Saturday nights because you can't afford to pay a couple hundred bucks that you lost. Most of you strike me as kids that drive Honda accords with loud pipes. Just saying. That's the way I see you a$$-hats in my mind.
0
All these pathetic whiny bi*** es coming to your thread is laughable. They've ran off some great posters because well that's what this site wants. 70% win rate and people are trashing your picks? Smh. Most of you losers post your "picks" AFTER a game is over and you still couldn't show a 70% win rate. What incentive do you get for being such d-bags? Bookies give you $50 in free play for running people off? Lol. I bet the majority of you can't sleep on Saturday nights because you can't afford to pay a couple hundred bucks that you lost. Most of you strike me as kids that drive Honda accords with loud pipes. Just saying. That's the way I see you a$$-hats in my mind.
Joined in October, posted in 20 threads of which 4 were started by Scal (20%), haven't started one thread. Haven't posted any winning picks... Who is worthless? Lol fool
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrScampy:
Legend of worthless nonsense
Joined in October, posted in 20 threads of which 4 were started by Scal (20%), haven't started one thread. Haven't posted any winning picks... Who is worthless? Lol fool
Just don't respond to the trolls. You choose to respond. Can't be smart and dumb at the same time. It doesn't work that way. Others have said you enjoy it. Hard to disagree.
It's like banging your head against a wall. You don't like banging your head against a wall, do you?
I don't know much about either of these teams and haven't read anything good in here to justify a tail. As I mentioned earlier, you laid out all your POY criteria, yet this pick has so much contradiction to said criteria. I would've rather read some equivocation than watch you stumble over your own feet trying to justify how the same info on both sides only applies to one side.
Good luck on your play.
0
Just don't respond to the trolls. You choose to respond. Can't be smart and dumb at the same time. It doesn't work that way. Others have said you enjoy it. Hard to disagree.
It's like banging your head against a wall. You don't like banging your head against a wall, do you?
I don't know much about either of these teams and haven't read anything good in here to justify a tail. As I mentioned earlier, you laid out all your POY criteria, yet this pick has so much contradiction to said criteria. I would've rather read some equivocation than watch you stumble over your own feet trying to justify how the same info on both sides only applies to one side.
Just don't respond to the trolls. You choose to respond. Can't be smart and dumb at the same time. It doesn't work that way. Others have said you enjoy it. Hard to disagree.
It's like banging your head against a wall. You don't like banging your head against a wall, do you?
I don't know much about either of these teams and haven't read anything good in here to justify a tail. As I mentioned earlier, you laid out all your POY criteria, yet this pick has so much contradiction to said criteria. I would've rather read some equivocation than watch you stumble over your own feet trying to justify how the same info on both sides only applies to one side.
Good luck on your play.
Then you haven't read the thread.
If I can't convince you the point of the bowl aspirations are far different on both sides based on the way this season has progressed then I can't help you.
It's like the undecided voter THREE days before the election: if what has transpired thus far hasn't convinced them to choose a candidate. What will?
0
Quote Originally Posted by YouLikeThat:
Just don't respond to the trolls. You choose to respond. Can't be smart and dumb at the same time. It doesn't work that way. Others have said you enjoy it. Hard to disagree.
It's like banging your head against a wall. You don't like banging your head against a wall, do you?
I don't know much about either of these teams and haven't read anything good in here to justify a tail. As I mentioned earlier, you laid out all your POY criteria, yet this pick has so much contradiction to said criteria. I would've rather read some equivocation than watch you stumble over your own feet trying to justify how the same info on both sides only applies to one side.
Good luck on your play.
Then you haven't read the thread.
If I can't convince you the point of the bowl aspirations are far different on both sides based on the way this season has progressed then I can't help you.
It's like the undecided voter THREE days before the election: if what has transpired thus far hasn't convinced them to choose a candidate. What will?