Just because the SEC has the best teams overall doesn't mean they have the best teams.
There are at least 3 teams outside the SEC that are better than LSU.
Just because the SEC has the best teams overall doesn't mean they have the best teams.
There are at least 3 teams outside the SEC that are better than LSU.
Just because the SEC has the best teams overall doesn't mean they have the best teams.
There are at least 3 teams outside the SEC that are better than LSU.
Also just for a comparison: #2 Michigan dropped to #3 after they lost to #1 Ohio State.
Also just for a comparison: #2 Michigan dropped to #3 after they lost to #1 Ohio State.
3 teams
Stanford (9-0 ATS) Nobody can believe how good they are.
Oregon (play in Eugene) First game of the year is like the first pancake. Do over.
USC (stop laughing) They love away games east of the Mississippi.
Alas, talk is cheap.
3 teams
Stanford (9-0 ATS) Nobody can believe how good they are.
Oregon (play in Eugene) First game of the year is like the first pancake. Do over.
USC (stop laughing) They love away games east of the Mississippi.
Alas, talk is cheap.
Stanford is THE best team in the country, period. USC played with all they got and felt short. Stanford WILL beat LSU in the NC game.
If Oklahoma State somehow gets out of it's slaughterfest undefeated, then it'll be the best team in the country with Stanford a close 2nd.
Stanford is THE best team in the country, period. USC played with all they got and felt short. Stanford WILL beat LSU in the NC game.
If Oklahoma State somehow gets out of it's slaughterfest undefeated, then it'll be the best team in the country with Stanford a close 2nd.
First off, I’m not sure why you edited out my entire post save for a single sentence if you were going to talk about pretty much the whole thing.
Bama has played a tougher schedule and they have the best loss in the country. Losing to the #1 team in the country by 3 points in OT.
The reason OU lost to Texas Tech at home as a 30 point favorite is because “games are played on the football field and not on paper”?
That is one of the weakest and most bizarre excuses I’ve ever seen for a loss.
So LSU beat Oregon by 20 points (save for a BS TD with 10 seconds left) because LSU only had to travel 400 miles and Oregon had to travel 2,200 miles?
So if they played somewhere halfway Oregon would have won?
Again the reason the SEC gets the benefit of the doubt is because they are 7-0 in the BCS championship game and all the other conferences are 5-12.
First off, I’m not sure why you edited out my entire post save for a single sentence if you were going to talk about pretty much the whole thing.
Bama has played a tougher schedule and they have the best loss in the country. Losing to the #1 team in the country by 3 points in OT.
The reason OU lost to Texas Tech at home as a 30 point favorite is because “games are played on the football field and not on paper”?
That is one of the weakest and most bizarre excuses I’ve ever seen for a loss.
So LSU beat Oregon by 20 points (save for a BS TD with 10 seconds left) because LSU only had to travel 400 miles and Oregon had to travel 2,200 miles?
So if they played somewhere halfway Oregon would have won?
Again the reason the SEC gets the benefit of the doubt is because they are 7-0 in the BCS championship game and all the other conferences are 5-12.
3 teams
Stanford (9-0 ATS) Nobody can believe how good they are.
Oregon (play in Eugene) First game of the year is like the first pancake. Do over.
USC (stop laughing) They love away games east of the Mississippi.
Alas, talk is cheap.
You can't be serious.
3 teams
Stanford (9-0 ATS) Nobody can believe how good they are.
Oregon (play in Eugene) First game of the year is like the first pancake. Do over.
USC (stop laughing) They love away games east of the Mississippi.
Alas, talk is cheap.
You can't be serious.
First off, I’m not sure why you edited out my entire post save for a single sentence if you were going to talk about pretty much the whole thing.
Bama has played a tougher schedule and they have the best loss in the country. Losing to the #1 team in the country by 3 points in OT.
The reason OU lost to Texas Tech at home as a 30 point favorite is because “games are played on the football field and not on paper”?
That is one of the weakest and most bizarre excuses I’ve ever seen for a loss.
So LSU beat Oregon by 20 points (save for a BS TD with 10 seconds left) because LSU only had to travel 400 miles and Oregon had to travel 2,200 miles?
So if they played somewhere halfway Oregon would have won?
Again the reason the SEC gets the benefit of the doubt is because they are 7-0 in the BCS championship game and all the other conferences are 5-12.
First off, I’m not sure why you edited out my entire post save for a single sentence if you were going to talk about pretty much the whole thing.
Bama has played a tougher schedule and they have the best loss in the country. Losing to the #1 team in the country by 3 points in OT.
The reason OU lost to Texas Tech at home as a 30 point favorite is because “games are played on the football field and not on paper”?
That is one of the weakest and most bizarre excuses I’ve ever seen for a loss.
So LSU beat Oregon by 20 points (save for a BS TD with 10 seconds left) because LSU only had to travel 400 miles and Oregon had to travel 2,200 miles?
So if they played somewhere halfway Oregon would have won?
Again the reason the SEC gets the benefit of the doubt is because they are 7-0 in the BCS championship game and all the other conferences are 5-12.
The only team with a harder schedule than Bama’s is LSU.
Of course anything can happen on game day. And when you’re the #3 team in the country and get beat SU at home as a 30 point favorite to an unranked team you are going to drop further than a team that lost in OT to the #1 team in the country.
Who disregarded the advantage of playing closer to home? You’re making it sound like that was the only reason LSU beat Oregon and if they had played closer to West coast Oregon would have won by DD instead of losing by them.
When your conference is 7-0 in BCS Championship games winning the last 5 in a row with 4 different teams with an average margin of victory of 14 points the benefit of the doubt is not overly generous.
Until someone finally beats them that will continue.
The only team with a harder schedule than Bama’s is LSU.
Of course anything can happen on game day. And when you’re the #3 team in the country and get beat SU at home as a 30 point favorite to an unranked team you are going to drop further than a team that lost in OT to the #1 team in the country.
Who disregarded the advantage of playing closer to home? You’re making it sound like that was the only reason LSU beat Oregon and if they had played closer to West coast Oregon would have won by DD instead of losing by them.
When your conference is 7-0 in BCS Championship games winning the last 5 in a row with 4 different teams with an average margin of victory of 14 points the benefit of the doubt is not overly generous.
Until someone finally beats them that will continue.
Excellant points all.
Plus the computers are responsible for 'Bama being ranked #3 not humans. Each team is graded on individual merit by the computers and conference affiliation does not enter into the equation.
who controlling the computer?
Excellant points all.
Plus the computers are responsible for 'Bama being ranked #3 not humans. Each team is graded on individual merit by the computers and conference affiliation does not enter into the equation.
who controlling the computer?
First off, I’m not sure why you edited out my entire post save for a single sentence if you were going to talk about pretty much the whole thing.
Bama has played a tougher schedule and they have the best loss in the country. Losing to the #1 team in the country by 3 points in OT. They were shown to be vulnerable and couldnt score, Stanford is better
The reason OU lost to Texas Tech at home as a 30 point favorite is because “games are played on the football field and not on paper”? Computers decide the the fate of the teams in the rankings dont they? I'd call that paper
That is one of the weakest and most bizarre excuses I’ve ever seen for a loss.
So LSU beat Oregon by 20 points (save for a BS TD with 10 seconds left) because LSU only had to travel 400 miles and Oregon had to travel 2,200 miles? A neturel field would have a diferent result, i watched that homer game and the refs clearly called some bullshit.
So if they played somewhere halfway Oregon would have won? yes, oregon has the speed needed for the win. those calls were bad and stoped the momentum of oregons attack. Football is a fragile flag away from changing the outcome of the game. especially when your 2,200 miles awy from home and the opposing teams confrence refs are giving the home cooking.
Again the reason the SEC gets the benefit of the doubt is because they are 7-0 in the BCS championship game and all the other conferences are 5-12. 7-0 in BSC games, but obviously with the current television coverages they have the largest pull for talent. who doesnt want to play for an sec team and be seen on Saturday primetime college footbal game ? if the playing field were leveled as the original poster suggested we would see more competition from ohter confrences and much better chances for teams like Boise st to get in the mix. Should a team or confrence be allowed to bogart the NCG? in mho no, this is the only time in a young mans football career that you can be seen on a national level, every team should have a shot if the system was done right. CAse keenem will no doubtly go down as the most yarrds in the histroy of college football, will he win the heiseman trophy? No, why? cause we have to talk about the guys who play in the SEC, could keenum throw passes like he does against top calibur talent like Alabama and LSU, absolutely. So why does an SEC team who cant score on another sec team deserve to be considered a national champion? LSU is a scrub of a team, they are the elite of the college world and could'nt score a fricken TD all game until overtime. Saban gave them the game by kicking foeldgoals instead of punting, and you want to tout LSU as the prize jewel of college football? Save your explinations for another homer that you sit next to on Saturday at your favorite watering hole talking about glory days when you play pop warner. Shit needs to change,NOW!!
First off, I’m not sure why you edited out my entire post save for a single sentence if you were going to talk about pretty much the whole thing.
Bama has played a tougher schedule and they have the best loss in the country. Losing to the #1 team in the country by 3 points in OT. They were shown to be vulnerable and couldnt score, Stanford is better
The reason OU lost to Texas Tech at home as a 30 point favorite is because “games are played on the football field and not on paper”? Computers decide the the fate of the teams in the rankings dont they? I'd call that paper
That is one of the weakest and most bizarre excuses I’ve ever seen for a loss.
So LSU beat Oregon by 20 points (save for a BS TD with 10 seconds left) because LSU only had to travel 400 miles and Oregon had to travel 2,200 miles? A neturel field would have a diferent result, i watched that homer game and the refs clearly called some bullshit.
So if they played somewhere halfway Oregon would have won? yes, oregon has the speed needed for the win. those calls were bad and stoped the momentum of oregons attack. Football is a fragile flag away from changing the outcome of the game. especially when your 2,200 miles awy from home and the opposing teams confrence refs are giving the home cooking.
Again the reason the SEC gets the benefit of the doubt is because they are 7-0 in the BCS championship game and all the other conferences are 5-12. 7-0 in BSC games, but obviously with the current television coverages they have the largest pull for talent. who doesnt want to play for an sec team and be seen on Saturday primetime college footbal game ? if the playing field were leveled as the original poster suggested we would see more competition from ohter confrences and much better chances for teams like Boise st to get in the mix. Should a team or confrence be allowed to bogart the NCG? in mho no, this is the only time in a young mans football career that you can be seen on a national level, every team should have a shot if the system was done right. CAse keenem will no doubtly go down as the most yarrds in the histroy of college football, will he win the heiseman trophy? No, why? cause we have to talk about the guys who play in the SEC, could keenum throw passes like he does against top calibur talent like Alabama and LSU, absolutely. So why does an SEC team who cant score on another sec team deserve to be considered a national champion? LSU is a scrub of a team, they are the elite of the college world and could'nt score a fricken TD all game until overtime. Saban gave them the game by kicking foeldgoals instead of punting, and you want to tout LSU as the prize jewel of college football? Save your explinations for another homer that you sit next to on Saturday at your favorite watering hole talking about glory days when you play pop warner. Shit needs to change,NOW!!
We were talking about SOS. Bama has the 2nd hardest schedule in college football (behind only LSU), but that doesn’t matter because they are vulnerable?
“Games are played on the football field and not on paper” has absolutely nothing to do with “computers deciding the fate of the teams.” I have no idea how you came up with that.
If it was a close game you might be able to play the “the refs screwed us over” card. That’s not really applicable when they are losing by 20 points with about 10 seconds to go in the game.
For the better half of a decade the SEC has dominated college football. 7-0 in BCS championship games winning the last 5 in a row with 4 different teams with an average margin of victory of 14 points.
They will continue to get the benefit of the doubt and they deserve it.
If the other conferences don’t like it and want it to change, it’s simple. Send a team to the title game and beat them.
No bitching, no moaning, no excuses. Just beat them.
Also no offense, but is English not your first language?
We were talking about SOS. Bama has the 2nd hardest schedule in college football (behind only LSU), but that doesn’t matter because they are vulnerable?
“Games are played on the football field and not on paper” has absolutely nothing to do with “computers deciding the fate of the teams.” I have no idea how you came up with that.
If it was a close game you might be able to play the “the refs screwed us over” card. That’s not really applicable when they are losing by 20 points with about 10 seconds to go in the game.
For the better half of a decade the SEC has dominated college football. 7-0 in BCS championship games winning the last 5 in a row with 4 different teams with an average margin of victory of 14 points.
They will continue to get the benefit of the doubt and they deserve it.
If the other conferences don’t like it and want it to change, it’s simple. Send a team to the title game and beat them.
No bitching, no moaning, no excuses. Just beat them.
Also no offense, but is English not your first language?
It's very clear that some of you hate the SEC, without looking at the big picture. Every team, every conference, every season, their #1 goal is to "WIN THE BCS CHAMPIONSHIP". Period!!!!!
As Shooter stated earlier. "WHEN YOUR CONFERENCE IS 7-0 IN BCS CHAMPIONSHIP GAMES, WINNING THE LAST 5 IN A ROW, WITH 4 DIFFERENT TEAMS, WITH AN AVERAGE MARGIN OF VICTORY OF 14 PTS".
Plus the fact that 1969USC made this fucked up statement..... "Just because the SEC has the best teams overall doesn't mean they have the best teams". WTF is that????? I'm going to have a drink.
It's very clear that some of you hate the SEC, without looking at the big picture. Every team, every conference, every season, their #1 goal is to "WIN THE BCS CHAMPIONSHIP". Period!!!!!
As Shooter stated earlier. "WHEN YOUR CONFERENCE IS 7-0 IN BCS CHAMPIONSHIP GAMES, WINNING THE LAST 5 IN A ROW, WITH 4 DIFFERENT TEAMS, WITH AN AVERAGE MARGIN OF VICTORY OF 14 PTS".
Plus the fact that 1969USC made this fucked up statement..... "Just because the SEC has the best teams overall doesn't mean they have the best teams". WTF is that????? I'm going to have a drink.
3 teams
Stanford (9-0 ATS) Nobody can believe how good they are. - No... They have played no one, in a weaker conference... They would get destroyed by LSU/Bama... Sorry...
Oregon (play in Eugene) First game of the year is like the first pancake. Do over. - Yeah, I actually think they would get beat a lot worse by LSU/Bama right now... That rematch won't happen though.
USC (stop laughing) They love away games east of the Mississippi. - LMFAO! They wouldn't score once...
Alas, talk is cheap.
3 teams
Stanford (9-0 ATS) Nobody can believe how good they are. - No... They have played no one, in a weaker conference... They would get destroyed by LSU/Bama... Sorry...
Oregon (play in Eugene) First game of the year is like the first pancake. Do over. - Yeah, I actually think they would get beat a lot worse by LSU/Bama right now... That rematch won't happen though.
USC (stop laughing) They love away games east of the Mississippi. - LMFAO! They wouldn't score once...
Alas, talk is cheap.
Stanford is THE best team in the country, period. USC played with all they got and felt short. Stanford WILL beat LSU in the NC game.
If Oklahoma State somehow gets out of it's slaughterfest undefeated, then it'll be the best team in the country with Stanford a close 2nd.
Stanford is THE best team in the country, period. USC played with all they got and felt short. Stanford WILL beat LSU in the NC game.
If Oklahoma State somehow gets out of it's slaughterfest undefeated, then it'll be the best team in the country with Stanford a close 2nd.
DAAKING-
You obviously hate LSU for some reason- to quote you " LSU is a scrub of a team, they are the elite of the college world and could'nt score a fricken TD all game until overtime. "
You are an abosolute idiot- Scrub of a team- even LSU haters aren't dumb enough to say that- They beat Oregons ass plain and simple- Give credit where it is due- You act like the refs gave them the game- obviously you didn't watch it-
Obviously you didn't watch the LSU/Bama game either because they didn't score a TD in overtime you dipshit- they won by kicking a FG in overtime!
Some people are just jealous and you sound like you are jealous of the SEC and it's success as well as being a sore loser.
Fact is LSU is #1 and deserves that ranking. Fact is LSU beat Oregon 40-27. Fact is the SEC keeps winning National Championships. Don't hate these facts. And they don't do it on paper. They win the game on the field.
Get a clue.
DAAKING-
You obviously hate LSU for some reason- to quote you " LSU is a scrub of a team, they are the elite of the college world and could'nt score a fricken TD all game until overtime. "
You are an abosolute idiot- Scrub of a team- even LSU haters aren't dumb enough to say that- They beat Oregons ass plain and simple- Give credit where it is due- You act like the refs gave them the game- obviously you didn't watch it-
Obviously you didn't watch the LSU/Bama game either because they didn't score a TD in overtime you dipshit- they won by kicking a FG in overtime!
Some people are just jealous and you sound like you are jealous of the SEC and it's success as well as being a sore loser.
Fact is LSU is #1 and deserves that ranking. Fact is LSU beat Oregon 40-27. Fact is the SEC keeps winning National Championships. Don't hate these facts. And they don't do it on paper. They win the game on the field.
Get a clue.
Are you guys kidding me??? WHo won the last 5 National TItles??? THE SEC
They are well beyond anyone other conf and teams in college football.
This is a joke how people dont see this.
They currently have 3 teams in the top 8. Two of those teams have only 1 loss each. #3 Bama lost to #1 LSU and #8 Arkansas lost to #3 Bama.
You think Ok St or Oklahoma or Standford belong???
Oklahom lost as a 30 point favorite at home. Ok St just gave up over 50 points at home in 1 game. I dont think LSU or Bama have given up 60 points THIS ENTIRE season.
Stanford should have lost to USC, and will lose to Oregon this week.
And, dont even bring in Boise. What high-school team do they play this week??? New Mexico St??? Come on. That team is a joke and so is their schedule. They would lose to Bama or LSU by 30+, and we will finally see it this year.
Georgia is the 5th best SEC team, not 3rd.
As for the Oregon loss to LSU by over 20. You say freshman and first game jitters and turnovers. Well, LSU has freshman. They didnt have their QB. Why was Oregon fumbling??? BEcause they were getting SMACKED in the mouth. Instead of running for 30 yds before getting touched like they do in the Pac-10, they were slower and gettting CRUSHED!!!!
If people dont see how much better the SEC is they dont understand football.
LSU will win the National Championship by 14+ and wont allow more than 17 points in that game.
Bama will destroy Boise, I hope they make that match-up. Boise will be lucky to score 10 points.
Okk St and Oklahoma are a joke. Giving up 40 points a game. The other day watching Ok St/Kan St. Ok St scored, i went to the bathroom, grab a snack from upstairs and came back down and K St was already kicking the PAT.
LSU will destroy any team they play besides Bama or Arkansas.
Are you guys kidding me??? WHo won the last 5 National TItles??? THE SEC
They are well beyond anyone other conf and teams in college football.
This is a joke how people dont see this.
They currently have 3 teams in the top 8. Two of those teams have only 1 loss each. #3 Bama lost to #1 LSU and #8 Arkansas lost to #3 Bama.
You think Ok St or Oklahoma or Standford belong???
Oklahom lost as a 30 point favorite at home. Ok St just gave up over 50 points at home in 1 game. I dont think LSU or Bama have given up 60 points THIS ENTIRE season.
Stanford should have lost to USC, and will lose to Oregon this week.
And, dont even bring in Boise. What high-school team do they play this week??? New Mexico St??? Come on. That team is a joke and so is their schedule. They would lose to Bama or LSU by 30+, and we will finally see it this year.
Georgia is the 5th best SEC team, not 3rd.
As for the Oregon loss to LSU by over 20. You say freshman and first game jitters and turnovers. Well, LSU has freshman. They didnt have their QB. Why was Oregon fumbling??? BEcause they were getting SMACKED in the mouth. Instead of running for 30 yds before getting touched like they do in the Pac-10, they were slower and gettting CRUSHED!!!!
If people dont see how much better the SEC is they dont understand football.
LSU will win the National Championship by 14+ and wont allow more than 17 points in that game.
Bama will destroy Boise, I hope they make that match-up. Boise will be lucky to score 10 points.
Okk St and Oklahoma are a joke. Giving up 40 points a game. The other day watching Ok St/Kan St. Ok St scored, i went to the bathroom, grab a snack from upstairs and came back down and K St was already kicking the PAT.
LSU will destroy any team they play besides Bama or Arkansas.
1969USC-
Another SEC hater.
Your 3 teams that are better than LSU:
Oregon - ranked #7 and lost 40-27 to LSU at a neutral site
USC - ranked #18 in the AP poll- not ranked in the BCS standings
Stanford - Ranked #4 in BCS and #3 in AP poll
I will give an objective opinion on these 3 teams:
Oregon- good team speed but not physical enough to handle LSU as PROVEN ON THE FIELD IN A 40-27 LOSS!!! NEXT
USC- improved team- lots of athletes- gave Stanford all they wanted- better than LSU- NOPE- NEXT
Stanford- great QB- good running game-great offensive line great coached team- they should be ranked ahead of Alabama in the BCS- that should change if they beat Oregon- NOT AS PHYSICAL AS LSU- ATHLETES WOULD NOT MATCHUP WELL WITH LSU- ADVANTAGE AT QB AGAINST LSU
I believe Oregon will give Stanford fits with their speed and have a good chance to win-
Best matchup for National Championship game: LSU vs. Stanford
Oklahoma St. does not know how to play defense- Stanford matches up better but i think LSU would win that game- but we will just have to wait and see
1969USC-
Another SEC hater.
Your 3 teams that are better than LSU:
Oregon - ranked #7 and lost 40-27 to LSU at a neutral site
USC - ranked #18 in the AP poll- not ranked in the BCS standings
Stanford - Ranked #4 in BCS and #3 in AP poll
I will give an objective opinion on these 3 teams:
Oregon- good team speed but not physical enough to handle LSU as PROVEN ON THE FIELD IN A 40-27 LOSS!!! NEXT
USC- improved team- lots of athletes- gave Stanford all they wanted- better than LSU- NOPE- NEXT
Stanford- great QB- good running game-great offensive line great coached team- they should be ranked ahead of Alabama in the BCS- that should change if they beat Oregon- NOT AS PHYSICAL AS LSU- ATHLETES WOULD NOT MATCHUP WELL WITH LSU- ADVANTAGE AT QB AGAINST LSU
I believe Oregon will give Stanford fits with their speed and have a good chance to win-
Best matchup for National Championship game: LSU vs. Stanford
Oklahoma St. does not know how to play defense- Stanford matches up better but i think LSU would win that game- but we will just have to wait and see
Bama has played a tougher schedule and they have the best loss in the country. Losing to the #1 team in the country by 3 points in OT. They were shown to be vulnerable and couldnt score, Stanford is better - Ummm, and why couldn't they score? Because these defenses ARE THE BEST IN THE COUNTRY, and TWO OF THE BEST DEFENSES IN THE RECENT CENTURY! This Bama defense is just as good as the one in 92, and LSU's isn't far behind... So sure these offenses look better... And you think because Stanford looks good passing against a bunch of nobody teams in a nobody conference they can compete against that? You are smoking some GOOD shit pal.
So LSU beat Oregon by 20 points (save for a BS TD with 10 seconds left) because LSU only had to travel 400 miles and Oregon had to travel 2,200 miles? A neturel field would have a diferent result, i watched that homer game and the refs clearly called some bullshit. - I watched the game as well, and the game would have probably been closer because of them... I don't think they were BAD penalties though, and if you watch, the calls were right. You probably won't agree though, seeing as how it goes against what you think. If these teams play again right now on a neutral field, LSU would make a complete joke out of them. LSU has improved every week, and Oregon has not.
So if they played somewhere halfway Oregon would have won? yes, oregon has the speed needed for the win. those calls were bad and stoped the momentum of oregons attack. Football is a fragile flag away from changing the outcome of the game. especially when your 2,200 miles awy from home and the opposing teams confrence refs are giving the home cooking. - Wow... This is just funny to me... LSU would destroy Oregon, here there, or anywhere right now...
Again the reason the SEC gets the benefit of the doubt is because they are 7-0 in the BCS championship game and all the other conferences are 5-12. 7-0 in BSC games, but obviously with the current television coverages they have the largest pull for talent. who doesnt want to play for an sec team and be seen on Saturday primetime college footbal game ? if the playing field were leveled as the original poster suggested we would see more competition from ohter confrences and much better chances for teams like Boise st to get in the mix. Should a team or confrence be allowed to bogart the NCG? in mho no, this is the only time in a young mans football career that you can be seen on a national level, every team should have a shot if the system was done right. CAse keenem will no doubtly go down as the most yarrds in the histroy of college football, will he win the heiseman trophy? No, why? cause we have to talk about the guys who play in the SEC, could keenum throw passes like he does against top calibur talent like Alabama and LSU, absolutely. So why does an SEC team who cant score on another sec team deserve to be considered a national champion? LSU is a scrub of a team, they are the elite of the college world and could'nt score a fricken TD all game until overtime. Saban gave them the game by kicking foeldgoals instead of punting, and you want to tout LSU as the prize jewel of college football? Save your explinations for another homer that you sit next to on Saturday at your favorite watering hole talking about glory days when you play pop warner. Shit needs to change,NOW!! - More like, NO... He would get SHUT DOWN by those SEC secondaries... These boys are big, physical, and fast, and are the top NFL draft prospects in the nation. No offense would stand a chance, sorry... You call what was the top passing offense, with the top QB in the SEC, and the 3rd ranked defense in in the nation, before the Bama game a scrub team? Man I don't know if that is just idiocy, homerism, jealousy, or what... And they didn't score a TD in overtime, so I am not sure what you are talking about?
Bama has played a tougher schedule and they have the best loss in the country. Losing to the #1 team in the country by 3 points in OT. They were shown to be vulnerable and couldnt score, Stanford is better - Ummm, and why couldn't they score? Because these defenses ARE THE BEST IN THE COUNTRY, and TWO OF THE BEST DEFENSES IN THE RECENT CENTURY! This Bama defense is just as good as the one in 92, and LSU's isn't far behind... So sure these offenses look better... And you think because Stanford looks good passing against a bunch of nobody teams in a nobody conference they can compete against that? You are smoking some GOOD shit pal.
So LSU beat Oregon by 20 points (save for a BS TD with 10 seconds left) because LSU only had to travel 400 miles and Oregon had to travel 2,200 miles? A neturel field would have a diferent result, i watched that homer game and the refs clearly called some bullshit. - I watched the game as well, and the game would have probably been closer because of them... I don't think they were BAD penalties though, and if you watch, the calls were right. You probably won't agree though, seeing as how it goes against what you think. If these teams play again right now on a neutral field, LSU would make a complete joke out of them. LSU has improved every week, and Oregon has not.
So if they played somewhere halfway Oregon would have won? yes, oregon has the speed needed for the win. those calls were bad and stoped the momentum of oregons attack. Football is a fragile flag away from changing the outcome of the game. especially when your 2,200 miles awy from home and the opposing teams confrence refs are giving the home cooking. - Wow... This is just funny to me... LSU would destroy Oregon, here there, or anywhere right now...
Again the reason the SEC gets the benefit of the doubt is because they are 7-0 in the BCS championship game and all the other conferences are 5-12. 7-0 in BSC games, but obviously with the current television coverages they have the largest pull for talent. who doesnt want to play for an sec team and be seen on Saturday primetime college footbal game ? if the playing field were leveled as the original poster suggested we would see more competition from ohter confrences and much better chances for teams like Boise st to get in the mix. Should a team or confrence be allowed to bogart the NCG? in mho no, this is the only time in a young mans football career that you can be seen on a national level, every team should have a shot if the system was done right. CAse keenem will no doubtly go down as the most yarrds in the histroy of college football, will he win the heiseman trophy? No, why? cause we have to talk about the guys who play in the SEC, could keenum throw passes like he does against top calibur talent like Alabama and LSU, absolutely. So why does an SEC team who cant score on another sec team deserve to be considered a national champion? LSU is a scrub of a team, they are the elite of the college world and could'nt score a fricken TD all game until overtime. Saban gave them the game by kicking foeldgoals instead of punting, and you want to tout LSU as the prize jewel of college football? Save your explinations for another homer that you sit next to on Saturday at your favorite watering hole talking about glory days when you play pop warner. Shit needs to change,NOW!! - More like, NO... He would get SHUT DOWN by those SEC secondaries... These boys are big, physical, and fast, and are the top NFL draft prospects in the nation. No offense would stand a chance, sorry... You call what was the top passing offense, with the top QB in the SEC, and the 3rd ranked defense in in the nation, before the Bama game a scrub team? Man I don't know if that is just idiocy, homerism, jealousy, or what... And they didn't score a TD in overtime, so I am not sure what you are talking about?
Tappy-
those two idiots are Pac-12 homers and can't see clearly-
Do i think LSU could lose? Yes, always a possibility. I'm a homer but i am a realist as well. DAAKING and 1969USC have their blinders on and refuse to take them off.
Tappy-
those two idiots are Pac-12 homers and can't see clearly-
Do i think LSU could lose? Yes, always a possibility. I'm a homer but i am a realist as well. DAAKING and 1969USC have their blinders on and refuse to take them off.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.