Why Not Michigan Against Oklahoma This Week?

Chris Vasile - Betting Analyst at Covers.com
Chris Vasile • Betting Analyst 13+ years betting experience
Updated: Sep 9, 2026 , 03:08 PM ET • 4 min read

Chris Vasile isn't ready to bury Michigan after one ugly Saturday, especially when the Wolverines' defense gave him plenty of reasons to believe they can hang with Oklahoma.

Michigan quarterback Bryce Underwood (19) tries to avoid the tackle.
Photo By - Reuters Connect. Michigan quarterback Bryce Underwood (19) tries to avoid the tackle.

Apparently, everything we thought we knew about Michigan disappeared in 60 minutes.

The Wolverines needed a Hail Mary to escape Western Michigan 13-12, Oklahoma blasted UTEP 51-0, and suddenly the Sooners are laying 5.5 points in the Big House.

If your entire handicap is "51-0 good, 13-12 bad," congratulations — you successfully read two final scores.

I'm betting against the Week 1 overreaction and taking Michigan +5.5 as one of my favorite college football picks for Week 2.

Oklahoma vs Michigan live odds

Enjoying Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account Add as a preferred source on Google

Michigan's offense was bad. Its defense wasn't.

Let's get the obvious part out of the way: Bryce Underwood was awful in Week 1, and Michigan's offense deserves every bit of criticism it's getting. But one terrible offensive performance shouldn't automatically mean the entire team is broken, especially when the Wolverines' defense spent Saturday doing everything it could to keep them alive.

Western Michigan was +3 in turnover margin, ran 67 offensive plays, and possessed the football for 40:08. That's about as ugly a game script as you can hand a defense, yet the Broncos managed just 221 total yards and settled for four field goals. Michigan didn't allow a touchdown despite having its defense on the field for two-thirds of the game.

Western Michigan offense vs. Michigan defense Week 1
Points 12
Touchdowns 0
Total yards 221
Yards per play 3.3
Passing yards 89
Rushing yards 132
Offensive plays 67
Time of possession 40:08

That's the part of Saturday everyone seems to be conveniently ignoring.

I don't need Underwood to suddenly become a superstar for Michigan to cover 5.5 points. I need him to be better than 12-for-22 for 170 yards while the defense continues to give the Wolverines a chance to hang around.

There's also something to be said for surviving a game like that. Since 2013, I found 10 teams that won on an insane walk-off play with 0:00 remaining before Michigan, and those teams went 7-3 straight up and 6-3-1 ATS in their next game.

So spare me the automatic letdown angle. A miracle win doesn't mean a team is doomed the following week. In the 10 examples I found, history has actually pointed the other way.

We've already seen Underwood vs Mateer

We also have a useful reference point because Underwood and John Mateer played this matchup last season. Michigan went to Norman and lost 24-13 despite Underwood completing just 9 of 24 passes for 142 yards. The Wolverines still outrushed Oklahoma 146-138 and entered the fourth quarter down only eight before the Sooners finally put the game away with a late field goal.

2025 matchup Bryce Underwood John Mateer
Comp-Att 9-24 21-34
Passing yards 142 270
Pass TD-INT 0-0 1-1
Rushing yards -1 74
Rushing TD 0 2
Final score Michigan 13 Oklahoma 24

Now the rematch moves to Ann Arbor, and I'm being asked to lay 5.5 with Oklahoma immediately after the Sooners beat UTEP 51-0 and Michigan played about as poorly as it possibly could offensively.

That's buying Oklahoma at its most expensive and selling Michigan at its cheapest.

Maybe Oklahoma proves that Saturday really exposed Michigan. But the biggest reason I thought the Wolverines could compete in this matchup before the season — their defense — actually showed up.

I'm not throwing out an entire offseason of expectations because of 60 ugly minutes. And I'm sure as hell not buying an eight-point swing because Oklahoma beat the brakes off UTEP.

Give me Michigan +5.5 at Kalshi.

Odds are correct at the time of publishing and are subject to change.
Not intended for use in MA.
Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.

Pages related to this topic

Chris Vasile Covers.com
Betting Analyst

Chris Vasile is a betting analyst with over 13 years of experience breaking down soccer betting markets, with additional coverage across the WNBA and NFL. He focuses on finding numbers that are slow to adjust — whether it’s due to scheduling spots, player usage, or recent form — and explaining why a line is worth playing. His work has appeared across major betting and sports media platforms, including Covers, VSiN, BetMGM Network, and SportsGrid, where he’s delivered sharp analysis on both mainstream and niche markets. At Covers, he contributes to major tournament coverage and daily betting content, with a particular focus on soccer. He also runs the Game Day Wagers YouTube channel, where he shares daily picks and betting insights tailored for serious bettors.

Popular Content

Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo