Den scores a lot less since Lawson is out. He is their run n gun motor.
Utah is fighting for the 8th seed, so u expect them to fight and bring effort to the game ( though i really didnt see it tonight). Denver looked like they wanted that win more and they inforced their style of game. Utah shouldnt try to run with them, they should try and slow them down.
Den scores a lot less since Lawson is out. He is their run n gun motor.
Utah is fighting for the 8th seed, so u expect them to fight and bring effort to the game ( though i really didnt see it tonight). Denver looked like they wanted that win more and they inforced their style of game. Utah shouldnt try to run with them, they should try and slow them down.
I don't know why everybody picked under Utah 204.5 ????????????
I was going to reply to this at 3am but felt it would not be seen until today anyways.
Did you post before the game that this was a terrible choice? If so why was it a bad choice?
The right call was the Under- I had the under in some dollar parlays and got home just in time to book in the over 202.5 because of the game flow and what I saw happening throughout the game.
However Utah should have stepped up and played better D but were out gunned by Denver. All the numbers pointed to the under on this one. It was not until some time in the 3Q that I started to see the flow change.
In the end it was by two baskets that the over hit not to mention non needed fouls at the end of a blowout game. Specially by the team doing the blowout.
I also had a teaser at 209.5 which did not hit because Clips went over- 206 that was a bad call on my part- Mavin got that one right.
Quote Originally Posted by hienkhoi:
I don't know why everybody picked under Utah 204.5 ????????????
I was going to reply to this at 3am but felt it would not be seen until today anyways.
Did you post before the game that this was a terrible choice? If so why was it a bad choice?
The right call was the Under- I had the under in some dollar parlays and got home just in time to book in the over 202.5 because of the game flow and what I saw happening throughout the game.
However Utah should have stepped up and played better D but were out gunned by Denver. All the numbers pointed to the under on this one. It was not until some time in the 3Q that I started to see the flow change.
In the end it was by two baskets that the over hit not to mention non needed fouls at the end of a blowout game. Specially by the team doing the blowout.
I also had a teaser at 209.5 which did not hit because Clips went over- 206 that was a bad call on my part- Mavin got that one right.
I don't know why everybody picked under Utah 204.5 ????????????
I tell you why.
Because what they do basically is just to watch the line movement all day long and follow it, and then they come up with reason like "Lawson out", "playoff-style game", "Denver play good D" to convince themself that the game is going Under 204.5.
That's exactly how they "cap" a game...
One guy here post Under 204.5 and ALL OF THEM pick Under as well.
No brain.
Quote Originally Posted by hienkhoi:
I don't know why everybody picked under Utah 204.5 ????????????
I tell you why.
Because what they do basically is just to watch the line movement all day long and follow it, and then they come up with reason like "Lawson out", "playoff-style game", "Denver play good D" to convince themself that the game is going Under 204.5.
That's exactly how they "cap" a game...
One guy here post Under 204.5 and ALL OF THEM pick Under as well.
Because what they do basically is just to watch the line movement all day long and follow it, and then they come up with reason like "Lawson out", "playoff-style game", "Denver play good D" to convince themself that the game is going Under 204.5.
That's exactly how they "cap" a game...
One guy here post Under 204.5 and ALL OF THEM pick Under as well.
No brain.
Hindsight is always 20/20
Money talks and B ull garbage Waks - So walk!
Quote Originally Posted by Melo7:
I tell you why.
Because what they do basically is just to watch the line movement all day long and follow it, and then they come up with reason like "Lawson out", "playoff-style game", "Denver play good D" to convince themself that the game is going Under 204.5.
That's exactly how they "cap" a game...
One guy here post Under 204.5 and ALL OF THEM pick Under as well.
under 202pts spurs-thunder is looking good if we look at the line mouvment, plus the possible absentees on the spurs side let's wait and see. I also believe Denver will beat the mavs tonight.
under 202pts spurs-thunder is looking good if we look at the line mouvment, plus the possible absentees on the spurs side let's wait and see. I also believe Denver will beat the mavs tonight.
Because they don't know how to calculate the base total with a simple formula.
Because they don't pay attention to what referees officiate the game.
Too many reason that they don't know the game is going Over.
you gonna come here and question a 2 bucket loss on a total lol I thought the Clips game would go under that was a bad call by me - big point diff from actual result lol but to questions a couple of buckets the mere fact that you are here tells me you need serious help... The problem with being big, like this thread is that jerk offs come here for attention and hope someone will notice them and follow them and tout their egos lol the only problem is that you did not post here before the game and said all the ones on the under 204 205 206 whatever it may be were wrong- if you would have come here and given reasons to why over was the call and you managed to get it by 1-2 buckets I still would not give you props because it was a close call you would have made the right call but not enough to hate on the ones on the other side.
Please provide me with a ticket that you went large on the over. I can show you my ticket on how I went on the over on live bet but that did not become apparent until late in the game and it was over 202.5- I also had a teaser for 209.5 under which was my first bet and thought it was in danger so added the over 202.5
show me the call before the game then show me the ticket since your credibility here is not shall we say useful
Quote Originally Posted by Melo7:
Because they don't know how to calculate the base total with a simple formula.
Because they don't pay attention to what referees officiate the game.
Too many reason that they don't know the game is going Over.
you gonna come here and question a 2 bucket loss on a total lol I thought the Clips game would go under that was a bad call by me - big point diff from actual result lol but to questions a couple of buckets the mere fact that you are here tells me you need serious help... The problem with being big, like this thread is that jerk offs come here for attention and hope someone will notice them and follow them and tout their egos lol the only problem is that you did not post here before the game and said all the ones on the under 204 205 206 whatever it may be were wrong- if you would have come here and given reasons to why over was the call and you managed to get it by 1-2 buckets I still would not give you props because it was a close call you would have made the right call but not enough to hate on the ones on the other side.
Please provide me with a ticket that you went large on the over. I can show you my ticket on how I went on the over on live bet but that did not become apparent until late in the game and it was over 202.5- I also had a teaser for 209.5 under which was my first bet and thought it was in danger so added the over 202.5
show me the call before the game then show me the ticket since your credibility here is not shall we say useful
This guy doesn't even have a winning record, wtf. covers and their affiliates must love how people are following his picks. I can show u guys how to win at a 50% clip but that would be a waste of time, kind of like this thread. Can anybody win at 60% nowadays?
This guy doesn't even have a winning record, wtf. covers and their affiliates must love how people are following his picks. I can show u guys how to win at a 50% clip but that would be a waste of time, kind of like this thread. Can anybody win at 60% nowadays?
Nah, I will not offer any pick and formula to this thread.
I don't need clap if I make right call.
I don't do the childish thing to prove who is better.
If you are interested in my picks and want to have a look, check out our daily thread. You know where we are.
Put up or shut up lol
You don't do childish things you mean like going into other peoples threads trying to lure people to get attention.. you know why a baby cries... to get attention quit the crying and man up son... I mean cry baby stick a pacifier in it.
I am new to the NBA capping for the most part but I own what I post...
wont post formula lol how about a ticket let me know how you killed this bet and your reasoning otherwise I will continue to entertain myself with your CHILDISH remarks...
And for the record I don't know where you are- I can't get past bs postings, I don't even click on your name to see what you are up to because I can tell you are up to no good...
I may lose all 3 of my bets today but after my reasoning pre game I also post my post game thoughts (most of the time) I wish others would do that as well, and not just when you win but when you lose also.
You want me to know you are winner, well you would have to prove it here because I am not looking, posting or responding to any other thread you may have or are a part of as bs artist.
Quote Originally Posted by Melo7:
Nah, I will not offer any pick and formula to this thread.
I don't need clap if I make right call.
I don't do the childish thing to prove who is better.
If you are interested in my picks and want to have a look, check out our daily thread. You know where we are.
Put up or shut up lol
You don't do childish things you mean like going into other peoples threads trying to lure people to get attention.. you know why a baby cries... to get attention quit the crying and man up son... I mean cry baby stick a pacifier in it.
I am new to the NBA capping for the most part but I own what I post...
wont post formula lol how about a ticket let me know how you killed this bet and your reasoning otherwise I will continue to entertain myself with your CHILDISH remarks...
And for the record I don't know where you are- I can't get past bs postings, I don't even click on your name to see what you are up to because I can tell you are up to no good...
I may lose all 3 of my bets today but after my reasoning pre game I also post my post game thoughts (most of the time) I wish others would do that as well, and not just when you win but when you lose also.
You want me to know you are winner, well you would have to prove it here because I am not looking, posting or responding to any other thread you may have or are a part of as bs artist.
This guy doesn't even have a winning record, wtf. covers and their affiliates must love how people are following his picks. I can show u guys how to win at a 50% clip but that would be a waste of time, kind of like this thread. Can anybody win at 60% nowadays?
I think 60% is very doable.
Quote Originally Posted by Ezmoney123:
This guy doesn't even have a winning record, wtf. covers and their affiliates must love how people are following his picks. I can show u guys how to win at a 50% clip but that would be a waste of time, kind of like this thread. Can anybody win at 60% nowadays?
This guy doesn't even have a winning record, wtf. covers and their affiliates must love how people are following his picks. I can show u guys how to win at a 50% clip but that would be a waste of time, kind of like this thread. Can anybody win at 60% nowadays?
If the thread is a waste you just posted and became part of the waste, you guys need new material.
If you see a piece of crap on the floor and you step on it you just became crapped- why touch this thread.
This thread stinks so I will also be leaving it soon...
Quote Originally Posted by Ezmoney123:
This guy doesn't even have a winning record, wtf. covers and their affiliates must love how people are following his picks. I can show u guys how to win at a 50% clip but that would be a waste of time, kind of like this thread. Can anybody win at 60% nowadays?
If the thread is a waste you just posted and became part of the waste, you guys need new material.
If you see a piece of crap on the floor and you step on it you just became crapped- why touch this thread.
This thread stinks so I will also be leaving it soon...
The over looks just to easy, I will take my chances and go with the under. The last 3 meetings between these teams stayed under 182 and this matters for me.
BOL!
cormoranul 2-0
Under 187.5 BKN Nets - CHI Bulls
The over looks just to easy, I will take my chances and go with the under. The last 3 meetings between these teams stayed under 182 and this matters for me.
you gonna come here and question a 2 bucket loss on a total lol I thought the Clips game would go under that was a bad call by me - big point diff from actual result lol but to questions a couple of buckets the mere fact that you are here tells me you need serious help... The problem with being big, like this thread is that jerk offs come here for attention and hope someone will notice them and follow them and tout their egos lol 
the only problem is that you did not post here before the game and said all the ones on the under 204 205 206 whatever it may be were wrong- if you would have come here and given reasons to why over was the call and you managed to get it by 1-2 buckets I still would not give you props because it was a close call you would have made the right call but not enough to hate on the ones on the other side.
show me the call before the game then show me the ticket since your credibility here is not shall we say useful 
quit the crying and man up son... I mean cry baby 
stick a pacifier in it.
I am new to the NBA capping for the most part but I own what I post...
Established in 1995,
Reasoning later...
Hot Forum Topics
