So you guys are not concerned that the line is so low? I got burned on HOU LAC last night when Harden was out. This seems very similar. Spurs at home against the team missing top 2 all stars and only 3.5?
i already booked mine when it was spurs-2 so no going back now.. but my thought on your quote is if your not confident in the pick, then i probably wouldn't bet it.. i hardly ever tail just to tail.. i will tail if i also like the pick though.. so if it smells fishy to you maybe not worth it? up to you though of course
Quote Originally Posted by SunsDevils:
So you guys are not concerned that the line is so low? I got burned on HOU LAC last night when Harden was out. This seems very similar. Spurs at home against the team missing top 2 all stars and only 3.5?
i already booked mine when it was spurs-2 so no going back now.. but my thought on your quote is if your not confident in the pick, then i probably wouldn't bet it.. i hardly ever tail just to tail.. i will tail if i also like the pick though.. so if it smells fishy to you maybe not worth it? up to you though of course
i already booked mine when it was spurs-2 so no going back now.. but my thought on your quote is if your not confident in the pick, then i probably wouldn't bet it.. i hardly ever tail just to tail.. i will tail if i also like the pick though.. so if it smells fishy to you maybe not worth it? up to you though of course
I liked it a lot. :) The problem is that the line has been adjusted now to 9.5, so you made a great bet and it looks like that's where it should be. Sucks for me that I didn't get to grab it on time, but good luck to you!
Quote Originally Posted by ashylarrymp:
i already booked mine when it was spurs-2 so no going back now.. but my thought on your quote is if your not confident in the pick, then i probably wouldn't bet it.. i hardly ever tail just to tail.. i will tail if i also like the pick though.. so if it smells fishy to you maybe not worth it? up to you though of course
I liked it a lot. :) The problem is that the line has been adjusted now to 9.5, so you made a great bet and it looks like that's where it should be. Sucks for me that I didn't get to grab it on time, but good luck to you!
I was referring to this- I posted where he did show one push- so that you can make sure the total are up to par including overall group record- here you failed to list the push.
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:
phixer 21-9
Under 208 MIL Bucks - OKC Thunder
BigUnit 38-29
LA Clippers +1.5
MIN Timberwolves +4
Eryximaque 36-31-1
Under 209 MIL Bucks - OKC Thunder
AshyLarryMP 50-46-2:
LA Lakers -2.5
MEM Grizzlies -3
PHO Suns +10.5
washhead 3-0
UTA Jazz -4
LoLITiltU 5-4
UTA Jazz -4.5
Under 208 OKC Thunder at MIL Bucks
Jpaco 39-41-1
ATL Hawks -12
UTA Jazz -4.5
GS Warriors -9.5
greengiants 32-37
MIN Timberwolves +3
Over 186 MIN Timberwolves - MEM Grizzlies
Over 191 UTA Jazz - BKN Nets
Musicmatt1 47-52-1
MIN Timberwolves +3.5
Over 186 MIN Timberwolves - MEM Grizzlies
Over 191 UTAH Jazz - BKN Nets
You went too far- look more recent-
I was referring to this- I posted where he did show one push- so that you can make sure the total are up to par including overall group record- here you failed to list the push.
Pretty good write-ups here already. Toronto not been doing well on the road lately and only 1 win against a bad team in their last 6 games. Wizards sitting on a streak at home. I was won over on the Under after reading few write-ups here.
LB, DW and Chalmers? out for Miami, I just got this one before it changed to -9.5 , hopefully I got myself a bargain here.
BOL everybody
LoLITiltU 6-4-1
WAS Wizards -3.5
Under 192.5 WASH Wizards - TOR Raptors
SA Spurs -2
Pretty good write-ups here already. Toronto not been doing well on the road lately and only 1 win against a bad team in their last 6 games. Wizards sitting on a streak at home. I was won over on the Under after reading few write-ups here.
LB, DW and Chalmers? out for Miami, I just got this one before it changed to -9.5 , hopefully I got myself a bargain here.
Pretty good write-ups here already. Toronto not been doing well on the road lately and only 1 win against a bad team in their last 6 games. Wizards sitting on a streak at home. I was won over on the Under after reading few write-ups here.
LB, DW and Chalmers? out for Miami, I just got this one before it changed to -9.5 , hopefully I got myself a bargain here.
BOL everybody
I can still get Spurs -1 thinking of hedging-
Quote Originally Posted by LoLITiltU:
LoLITiltU 6-4-1
WAS Wizards -3.5
Under 192.5 WASH Wizards - TOR Raptors
SA Spurs -2
Pretty good write-ups here already. Toronto not been doing well on the road lately and only 1 win against a bad team in their last 6 games. Wizards sitting on a streak at home. I was won over on the Under after reading few write-ups here.
LB, DW and Chalmers? out for Miami, I just got this one before it changed to -9.5 , hopefully I got myself a bargain here.
So here's a question: if you were already on the Spurs at -2 or -3, why wouldn't you take Miami after the line jumped to 9.5?
Let's say you have $110 on SA at -2.5. After the line jumps, if you take Miami at +9.5 (also for $110) the worst you can do is lose the juice ($10) since you're guaranteed of winning one of the two bets. You have a 7-point window where you win both ($200 payout). You're basically giving up the initial Spurs bet for a potential 20/1 payout (risking $10 to win $200) if the game hits within that window. To me that seems like a hell of a deal -- am I missing something?
So here's a question: if you were already on the Spurs at -2 or -3, why wouldn't you take Miami after the line jumped to 9.5?
Let's say you have $110 on SA at -2.5. After the line jumps, if you take Miami at +9.5 (also for $110) the worst you can do is lose the juice ($10) since you're guaranteed of winning one of the two bets. You have a 7-point window where you win both ($200 payout). You're basically giving up the initial Spurs bet for a potential 20/1 payout (risking $10 to win $200) if the game hits within that window. To me that seems like a hell of a deal -- am I missing something?
So here's a question: if you were already on the Spurs at -2 or -3, why wouldn't you take Miami after the line jumped to 9.5?
Let's say you have $110 on SA at -2.5. After the line jumps, if you take Miami at +9.5 (also for $110) the worst you can do is lose the juice ($10) since you're guaranteed of winning one of the two bets. You have a 7-point window where you win both ($200 payout). You're basically giving up the initial Spurs bet for a potential 20/1 payout (risking $10 to win $200) if the game hits within that window. To me that seems like a hell of a deal -- am I missing something?
NOPE! done and done!
Quote Originally Posted by washhead:
So here's a question: if you were already on the Spurs at -2 or -3, why wouldn't you take Miami after the line jumped to 9.5?
Let's say you have $110 on SA at -2.5. After the line jumps, if you take Miami at +9.5 (also for $110) the worst you can do is lose the juice ($10) since you're guaranteed of winning one of the two bets. You have a 7-point window where you win both ($200 payout). You're basically giving up the initial Spurs bet for a potential 20/1 payout (risking $10 to win $200) if the game hits within that window. To me that seems like a hell of a deal -- am I missing something?
I suppose the flipside is if you're sure the Spurs are the play and you don't want to give up that initial bet at -2.5. Still, I think that huge window to middle and hit both is worth it.
I suppose the flipside is if you're sure the Spurs are the play and you don't want to give up that initial bet at -2.5. Still, I think that huge window to middle and hit both is worth it.
Remember when the Spurs played with no Duncan, Manu and Parker in Miami this season? Do you remember what happened? This is a payback by Miami and following the live betting - I am favoring Miami to cover as Miami let the Spurs to cover in Miami an overinflated line including the original one
Remember when the Spurs played with no Duncan, Manu and Parker in Miami this season? Do you remember what happened? This is a payback by Miami and following the live betting - I am favoring Miami to cover as Miami let the Spurs to cover in Miami an overinflated line including the original one
Remember when the Spurs played with no Duncan, Manu and Parker in Miami this season? Do you remember what happened? This is a payback by Miami and following the live betting - I am favoring Miami to cover as Miami let the Spurs to cover in Miami an overinflated line including the original one
This smell like total BS on the Heat- if all these players play the next game this was a tough position they put us in. But I was chatting with some of you on how this was just like that game- Heat almost lost it.
If the Heat can do this (with miserable 3pt shooting under 4 min) and with the bench I don't know how you dont back them in the playoffs unless the lines are double digits-
My Home watch still in tact as I thought the low loss teams Nuggets Thunder Spurs and Heat will lose the next home game to one of these teams- Nuggets beat Thunder at OKC ,now Heat beat Spurs at SA.
So that part I got right, the part about the King going all nasty on the spurs that was taken out of my control.
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:
Remember when the Spurs played with no Duncan, Manu and Parker in Miami this season? Do you remember what happened? This is a payback by Miami and following the live betting - I am favoring Miami to cover as Miami let the Spurs to cover in Miami an overinflated line including the original one
This smell like total BS on the Heat- if all these players play the next game this was a tough position they put us in. But I was chatting with some of you on how this was just like that game- Heat almost lost it.
If the Heat can do this (with miserable 3pt shooting under 4 min) and with the bench I don't know how you dont back them in the playoffs unless the lines are double digits-
My Home watch still in tact as I thought the low loss teams Nuggets Thunder Spurs and Heat will lose the next home game to one of these teams- Nuggets beat Thunder at OKC ,now Heat beat Spurs at SA.
So that part I got right, the part about the King going all nasty on the spurs that was taken out of my control.
You are missing the point- I am not worried about phixer's record- he is way better than I am- Its about integrity and keeping the team total correct- we are doing something special here and being discipline and on point is important.
I know that Phixer did not take this the wrong way- I would have done it to the top of the list to the bottom of the list if I notice something. Some one noticed a mistake just recently as well.
Quote Originally Posted by hienkhoi:
why we worry
You are missing the point- I am not worried about phixer's record- he is way better than I am- Its about integrity and keeping the team total correct- we are doing something special here and being discipline and on point is important.
I know that Phixer did not take this the wrong way- I would have done it to the top of the list to the bottom of the list if I notice something. Some one noticed a mistake just recently as well.
Hot Forum Topics
