GRANCO Nice job - so you switched to overs now? The original theory was unders.
Do you bet every single 1H over and then go 2H over double if loses? Just looking for the reasoning behind the overs vs unders. I thought the under theory made sense logically.
GRANCO Nice job - so you switched to overs now? The original theory was unders.
Do you bet every single 1H over and then go 2H over double if loses? Just looking for the reasoning behind the overs vs unders. I thought the under theory made sense logically.
GRANCO Nice job - so you switched to overs now? The original theory was unders.
Do you bet every single 1H over and then go 2H over double if loses? Just looking for the reasoning behind the overs vs unders. I thought the under theory made sense logically.
the under theory would be -3700 so far after 4 games
on the spreadsheet i am tracking the UN/UN on the far right as well
Quote Originally Posted by globalsides201:
GRANCO Nice job - so you switched to overs now? The original theory was unders.
Do you bet every single 1H over and then go 2H over double if loses? Just looking for the reasoning behind the overs vs unders. I thought the under theory made sense logically.
the under theory would be -3700 so far after 4 games
on the spreadsheet i am tracking the UN/UN on the far right as well
that was completely outrageous... i doubted the system and took the under cause that was so many points. thought i was in the clear and then the final score popped up. oof
that was completely outrageous... i doubted the system and took the under cause that was so many points. thought i was in the clear and then the final score popped up. oof