Posted:
#6526
1st half, 2nd half OVER UNDER theory - all tourney long
Posted:
#6528
those requesting access to the spreadsheet please use this group
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/gianfranco1114
the old way of adding people takes forever now
https://groups.google.com/
the old way of adding people takes forever now
those requesting access to the spreadsheet please use this group
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/gianfranco1114
the old way of adding people takes forever now
https://groups.google.com/
the old way of adding people takes forever now
Posted:
#6534
Good theroy !! But teams that have nothing to lose come out slinging 3s and if they are on, you theory holds no water and you'r walet holds no money !!
Good theroy !! But teams that have nothing to lose come out slinging 3s and if they are on, you theory holds no water and you'r walet holds no money !!
Posted:
#6535
Quote Originally Posted by BTCHUR:
Good theroy !! But teams that have nothing to lose come out slinging 3s and if they are on, you theory holds no water and you'r walet holds no money !!
Good theroy !! But teams that have nothing to lose come out slinging 3s and if they are on, you theory holds no water and you'r walet holds no money !!
love your theory except this NBA system was 47,700 last season and 5400 so far this season.
glad your 5th post ever was here but spell check is your friend ("you;r walet) and double negatives in the same sentence is not proper English
Quote Originally Posted by BTCHUR:
Good theroy !! But teams that have nothing to lose come out slinging 3s and if they are on, you theory holds no water and you'r walet holds no money !!
Good theroy !! But teams that have nothing to lose come out slinging 3s and if they are on, you theory holds no water and you'r walet holds no money !!
love your theory except this NBA system was 47,700 last season and 5400 so far this season.
glad your 5th post ever was here but spell check is your friend ("you;r walet) and double negatives in the same sentence is not proper English
Posted:
#6544
One thing I've learned following Gianfranco is that get the number he provides or at least a half point off. Couple plays I had lost even though his number won. I'm talking losing by half a point. For example if he has 81, and the current is 82.5, it would end at 82 with my play losing. Lol just from my past experiences
It's all probabilities
One thing I've learned following Gianfranco is that get the number he provides or at least a half point off. Couple plays I had lost even though his number won. I'm talking losing by half a point. For example if he has 81, and the current is 82.5, it would end at 82 with my play losing. Lol just from my past experiences
Hot Forum Topics
- 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 462,881
- Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,569
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 286,159
- Monday 10/26/2026 777
- I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 62,929
- PART DEUX 162
- BOYS/PHILLY live in game comments welcome 728
- I’m on the Brewers to defeat the Rays in the World Series 3,401
- NFL THREAD * 151 * 29,544
- Week 9 Money 2,367
Warning - External Link
Report User
Thank you for reporting
This content is abusive or harmful
This post is spam
An error has occurred
This post is spam
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
Delete Post
Are you sure you would like to remove this post?
Remove Thread
Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?
Scan Results
Login/Register
Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
