Posted:
#126
Quote Originally Posted by marnypoly:
Kangy, 1st off thanks again for the work.. The C system has been doing pretty good for me lately.
Quick question though, why don't you count CHI under the C system when they were the home team in OT with PIT on Fri?
Kangy, 1st off thanks again for the work.. The C system has been doing pretty good for me lately.
Quick question though, why don't you count CHI under the C system when they were the home team in OT with PIT on Fri?
Hi, I had to do a double take on the schedule in case I had missed something and I didn't. On Friday, Pittsburgh (away team) and Chicago (home team) played an OT game. Both were included in the following day's chase list (see my post from 2/28, above).
Pittsburgh's first game since Friday night was yesterday, therefore its game 1 chase was against Dallas. That game went under 5.5 and won the A,B series.
Chicago's first game since Friday night was yesterday as well. Its game 1 chase was against Los Angeles (which was on a game 3 chase of their own). For Chicago's chase, it would be an A,B,C,D game. Remember, the C,D games are subsets of A,B games. So a win for the C system is also a win for the A system, same goes for the D and B series respectively.
The way the game should have been broken up this way.
LAK (G3) @ CHI - 4U - UNDER 5.5 (A)
LAK @ CHI (G1) - 1U - UNDER 5.5 (A,B,C,D)
The reason I didn't list it was because the loss in the Chicago chase had no bearing on the outcome of any of the systems. Had this game gone the extra few seconds and finished under, both sides would have been listed as wins (you can see why A would have gotten two wins).
So next game, you play Chicago for a game 2 chase (2U) and hopefully we come back winners!! Chicago still qualifies for all 4 systems in this game 2 chase. I hope I didn't confuse you. If I did, let me know, I will try to further explain....
0
Hot Forum Topics
