whew! That was nice that Chicago won. Another victory for the system. One question though, why did you list the Colorado play for monday as G3 in the "game" column of your last posting (right after it says series #92)?
0
whew! That was nice that Chicago won. Another victory for the system. One question though, why did you list the Colorado play for monday as G3 in the "game" column of your last posting (right after it says series #92)?
Okay guys. Sorry I misposted this hou at COL play should be Game 1. This is a 4 game series so I would only play it if you are following the labby lines.
LAD and BOS are very close to being plays. These both have to close higher than -150 to become plays as neither opened at pinnacle higher than -145. Lets keep rolling!
0
Okay guys. Sorry I misposted this hou at COL play should be Game 1. This is a 4 game series so I would only play it if you are following the labby lines.
LAD and BOS are very close to being plays. These both have to close higher than -150 to become plays as neither opened at pinnacle higher than -145. Lets keep rolling!
Guys I ended up playing BOS as it was -150 at my book and looked like it was going to go above -150 on covers. I think us labby players should consider playing these series. I looked back at last year -145 to -149 and would have been 38-2. 7 series would have went to game 3 and were 5-2. 33/40 would have hit in game 1 or 2. Looks like we should have played the cubs earlier today also. Don't want to include this if no one played them. Did not play LAD as the line dropped. Will just include these plays in my spreadsheet and mark as unofficial. If most everyone else also played BOS we can include it.
0
Guys I ended up playing BOS as it was -150 at my book and looked like it was going to go above -150 on covers. I think us labby players should consider playing these series. I looked back at last year -145 to -149 and would have been 38-2. 7 series would have went to game 3 and were 5-2. 33/40 would have hit in game 1 or 2. Looks like we should have played the cubs earlier today also. Don't want to include this if no one played them. Did not play LAD as the line dropped. Will just include these plays in my spreadsheet and mark as unofficial. If most everyone else also played BOS we can include it.
Hey Rizz, I also played BOS but not touching LAD since the line moved over -35. Are you also playing the JM system picks?
Thanks JSCapper. Not seeing anyone else posting they played it so I will just include it in the spreadsheet for tracking. I have not consistently played the JM series.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JSCapper:
Hey Rizz, I also played BOS but not touching LAD since the line moved over -35. Are you also playing the JM system picks?
Thanks JSCapper. Not seeing anyone else posting they played it so I will just include it in the spreadsheet for tracking. I have not consistently played the JM series.
this is a little off subject/thread....just thinking ..can you give the stats if you bet each game where the series qualifies under the filter o/u 9...is it profitable or no....if you dont have time, it is no big deal, just trying to come up with another good angle
0
rizz i was bored so i have a question.
this is a little off subject/thread....just thinking ..can you give the stats if you bet each game where the series qualifies under the filter o/u 9...is it profitable or no....if you dont have time, it is no big deal, just trying to come up with another good angle
this is a little off subject/thread....just thinking ..can you give the stats if you bet each game where the series qualifies under the filter o/u 9...is it profitable or no....if you dont have time, it is no big deal, just trying to come up with another good angle
Playing a home team that meets the o/u filter went to 38-0 tonight I believe. I think you mean by playing all the games in the series as opposed to just playing until you get a win???
0
Quote Originally Posted by jakeandba:
rizz i was bored so i have a question.
this is a little off subject/thread....just thinking ..can you give the stats if you bet each game where the series qualifies under the filter o/u 9...is it profitable or no....if you dont have time, it is no big deal, just trying to come up with another good angle
Playing a home team that meets the o/u filter went to 38-0 tonight I believe. I think you mean by playing all the games in the series as opposed to just playing until you get a win???
Nice sweep tonight Rizz. Things look to be going really good!
Keep up the good work!
thanks Kreatture, hopefully we can stay hot. Laying a lot of chalk seems to be paying off with the aggressive labby. You know its a good night when even my sweep chase system would have swept game 1's. hehe
0
Quote Originally Posted by kreatture:
Nice sweep tonight Rizz. Things look to be going really good!
Keep up the good work!
thanks Kreatture, hopefully we can stay hot. Laying a lot of chalk seems to be paying off with the aggressive labby. You know its a good night when even my sweep chase system would have swept game 1's. hehe
Rizz, I will play IL using labby $$ management I learned from you. Also, I think it is prudent to use the o/u filter. I probably wouldn't play them using martingale. Good luck with IL actions.
0
Rizz, I will play IL using labby $$ management I learned from you. Also, I think it is prudent to use the o/u filter. I probably wouldn't play them using martingale. Good luck with IL actions.
Playing a home team that meets the o/u filter went to 38-0 tonight I believe. I think you mean by playing all the games in the series as opposed to just playing until you get a win???
yes that is correct...it was just a thought..
0
Quote Originally Posted by therizz:
Playing a home team that meets the o/u filter went to 38-0 tonight I believe. I think you mean by playing all the games in the series as opposed to just playing until you get a win???
I am new to betting baseball and sportsbetting as a whole but I have been watching baseball my whole life. I would like to get on your chase system. can you explain to me exactly what you bet as im confused. From what I understand you will bet the first game of a series that the favorite is favored by -150 or more, so lets say you do that to win 1U by risking 1.5 if you lose then you would bet the second game double to make your money back? please explain or someone who knows the system well as i would like to try it
THANKS
Best
0
Rizz,
I am new to betting baseball and sportsbetting as a whole but I have been watching baseball my whole life. I would like to get on your chase system. can you explain to me exactly what you bet as im confused. From what I understand you will bet the first game of a series that the favorite is favored by -150 or more, so lets say you do that to win 1U by risking 1.5 if you lose then you would bet the second game double to make your money back? please explain or someone who knows the system well as i would like to try it
1) HoseyBest, I don't mean to sound rude, but I just finished reading all 29 pages and have no questions
2) Big props to therizz for always being there to provide answers to all questions
3) What do you think about the idea of adding another (yes, another) labby with double the units for those games that qualify under the filter (O/U 9 runs)
4) This thread/system has got me really interested in gettin on a sportsbook because I find this to be a great investment opportunity. But what would you recommend the unit size be? 1% of the bankroll? I'm just worried, because there are cases when the labby can get make Game2's worth 5U a game, and sometimes there are 3-4 Game2's! That's a lot of units to throw around!
0
1) HoseyBest, I don't mean to sound rude, but I just finished reading all 29 pages and have no questions
2) Big props to therizz for always being there to provide answers to all questions
3) What do you think about the idea of adding another (yes, another) labby with double the units for those games that qualify under the filter (O/U 9 runs)
4) This thread/system has got me really interested in gettin on a sportsbook because I find this to be a great investment opportunity. But what would you recommend the unit size be? 1% of the bankroll? I'm just worried, because there are cases when the labby can get make Game2's worth 5U a game, and sometimes there are 3-4 Game2's! That's a lot of units to throw around!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.