Opening Game Favorite Chase 246-7 for 2009
Plays for 4/30:
System record 39-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
Series #40 (G2) 2:20 arz @ CHC -156 ![]()
Series #42 (G2) 10:10 pit @ LAD-250,RL? --pending
Series #43 (G1) 7:05 BOS-155 @ bal 9 ![]()
*Series #44 (G1) 7:05 nym @ PHI -150 10.5 ![]()
*Series #45 (G1) 7:10 was @ FLA -218,RL 9 ![]()
*Series #46 (G1) 7:05 cws @ NYY - 225
, RL
Series #47 (G1) 8:15 cin @ STL -186 ???????
Series #48 (G1) 10:10 tex @ SEA -147 pending
Series #49 (G1) hou @ ATL -210
, RL ![]()
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
BOS -250
PHI -155
NYY -300
FLA -250
STL -320
SEA -240
![]()
Game 1 wins =30
Game 2 wins = 7
Game 3 wins = 2
Plays for 4/30:
System record 39-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
Series #40 (G2) 2:20 arz @ CHC -156 ![]()
Series #42 (G2) 10:10 pit @ LAD-250,RL? --pending
Series #43 (G1) 7:05 BOS-155 @ bal 9 ![]()
*Series #44 (G1) 7:05 nym @ PHI -150 10.5 ![]()
*Series #45 (G1) 7:10 was @ FLA -218,RL 9 ![]()
*Series #46 (G1) 7:05 cws @ NYY - 225
, RL
Series #47 (G1) 8:15 cin @ STL -186 ???????
Series #48 (G1) 10:10 tex @ SEA -147 pending
Series #49 (G1) hou @ ATL -210
, RL ![]()
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
BOS -250
PHI -155
NYY -300
FLA -250
STL -320
SEA -240
![]()
Game 1 wins =30
Game 2 wins = 7
Game 3 wins = 2
Plays for 4/30:
System record 40-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
Series #40 (G2) 2:20 arz @ CHC -156 ![]()
Series #42 (G2) 10:10 pit @ LAD-250,RL? ![]()
Series #43 (G1) 7:05 BOS-155 @ bal 9 ![]()
*Series #44 (G1) 7:05 nym @ PHI -150 10.5 ![]()
*Series #45 (G1) 7:10 was @ FLA -218,RL 9 ![]()
*Series #46 (G1) 7:05 cws @ NYY - 225
, RL
Series #47 (G1) 8:15 cin @ STL -186 ![]()
Series #48 (G1) 10:10 tex @ SEA -147 ![]()
Series #49 (G1) hou @ ATL -210
, RL ![]()
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
BOS -250
PHI -155
NYY -300
FLA -250
STL -320
SEA -240
![]()
Game 1 wins =30
Game 2 wins = 8
Game 3 wins = 2
Plays for 4/30:
System record 40-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
Series #40 (G2) 2:20 arz @ CHC -156 ![]()
Series #42 (G2) 10:10 pit @ LAD-250,RL? ![]()
Series #43 (G1) 7:05 BOS-155 @ bal 9 ![]()
*Series #44 (G1) 7:05 nym @ PHI -150 10.5 ![]()
*Series #45 (G1) 7:10 was @ FLA -218,RL 9 ![]()
*Series #46 (G1) 7:05 cws @ NYY - 225
, RL
Series #47 (G1) 8:15 cin @ STL -186 ![]()
Series #48 (G1) 10:10 tex @ SEA -147 ![]()
Series #49 (G1) hou @ ATL -210
, RL ![]()
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
BOS -250
PHI -155
NYY -300
FLA -250
STL -320
SEA -240
![]()
Game 1 wins =30
Game 2 wins = 8
Game 3 wins = 2
Plays for 5/1:
System record 40-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
Series #43 (G2) 7:05 BOS-162 @ bal
Series #44 (G2) 3:10 nym @ PHI -207, RL
Series #45 (G2) 7:10 was @ FLA -150
Series #47 (G2)1:10 cin @ STL -181
Series #48 (G2) 3:10 tex @ SEA -210 , RL
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
![]()
Game 1 wins =30
Game 2 wins = 8
Game 3 wins = 2
Plays for 5/1:
System record 40-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
Series #43 (G2) 7:05 BOS-162 @ bal
Series #44 (G2) 3:10 nym @ PHI -207, RL
Series #45 (G2) 7:10 was @ FLA -150
Series #47 (G2)1:10 cin @ STL -181
Series #48 (G2) 3:10 tex @ SEA -210 , RL
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
![]()
Game 1 wins =30
Game 2 wins = 8
Game 3 wins = 2
If a player were to play the Labouchere System the same way with the exception being that the player always added half of the wager lost to the bottom of the list twice for every wager lost the player would actually have to win in excess of 50% of the time in order to complete the list, or more than the player could actually be expected to win.. The reason this is so is because the player is adding two numbers (which both will be crossed out in the event of wins where only one loss was sustained.)
Im thinking we should decrease our unit size to 1/3 of our original size and play all the games using a SINGLE line Labouchere. This way we would only need to hit 33.34% to eventually complete the list.
Thoughts??
If a player were to play the Labouchere System the same way with the exception being that the player always added half of the wager lost to the bottom of the list twice for every wager lost the player would actually have to win in excess of 50% of the time in order to complete the list, or more than the player could actually be expected to win.. The reason this is so is because the player is adding two numbers (which both will be crossed out in the event of wins where only one loss was sustained.)
Im thinking we should decrease our unit size to 1/3 of our original size and play all the games using a SINGLE line Labouchere. This way we would only need to hit 33.34% to eventually complete the list.
Thoughts??
Guys kkirby99 got me thinking about the PSIC method of Labouchere and why it may not be effective. According to Wiki:
If a player were to play the Labouchere System the same way with the exception being that the player always added half of the wager lost to the bottom of the list twice for every wager lost the player would actually have to win in excess of 50% of the time in order to complete the list, or more than the player could actually be expected to win.. The reason this is so is because the player is adding two numbers (which both will be crossed out in the event of wins where only one loss was sustained.)
Im thinking we should decrease our unit size to 1/3 of our original size and play all the games using a SINGLE line Labouchere. This way we would only need to hit 33.34% to eventually complete the list.
Thoughts??
Might be a good idea. Personally, I play this more aggressive and only add a new line when I lose a series. So, I add half on line 1 and half on line 2, but instead of adding a new number I add that to the last number in the line. Simple example
5-5-5-5
5-5-5-5
5-5-5-5 say we bet 15 to win 10 on a game 1 play my lines would go to
5-5-5-12.5
5-5-5-12.5
5-5-5-5
This can get you playing higher amounts pretty quickly but I believe it avoids the problem you are alluding to.. The only time I add a new number is when I lose a game 3, but I think a single line could be a good idea also. CDMOP do you want to try it on one line and keep track, see how it goes, and let us know?
Guys kkirby99 got me thinking about the PSIC method of Labouchere and why it may not be effective. According to Wiki:
If a player were to play the Labouchere System the same way with the exception being that the player always added half of the wager lost to the bottom of the list twice for every wager lost the player would actually have to win in excess of 50% of the time in order to complete the list, or more than the player could actually be expected to win.. The reason this is so is because the player is adding two numbers (which both will be crossed out in the event of wins where only one loss was sustained.)
Im thinking we should decrease our unit size to 1/3 of our original size and play all the games using a SINGLE line Labouchere. This way we would only need to hit 33.34% to eventually complete the list.
Thoughts??
Might be a good idea. Personally, I play this more aggressive and only add a new line when I lose a series. So, I add half on line 1 and half on line 2, but instead of adding a new number I add that to the last number in the line. Simple example
5-5-5-5
5-5-5-5
5-5-5-5 say we bet 15 to win 10 on a game 1 play my lines would go to
5-5-5-12.5
5-5-5-12.5
5-5-5-5
This can get you playing higher amounts pretty quickly but I believe it avoids the problem you are alluding to.. The only time I add a new number is when I lose a game 3, but I think a single line could be a good idea also. CDMOP do you want to try it on one line and keep track, see how it goes, and let us know?
Might be a good idea. Personally, I play this more aggressive and only add a new line when I lose a series. So, I add half on line 1 and half on line 2, but instead of adding a new number I add that to the last number in the line. Simple example
5-5-5-5
5-5-5-5
5-5-5-5 say we bet 15 to win 10 on a game 1 play my lines would go to
5-5-5-12.5
5-5-5-12.5
5-5-5-5
This can get you playing higher amounts pretty quickly but I believe it avoids the problem you are alluding to.. The only time I add a new number is when I lose a game 3, but I think a single line could be a good idea also. CDMOP do you want to try it on one line and keep track, see how it goes, and let us know?
Yeah I will try and keep track im extremely busy but ill try. One problem that could occur w/ 1 line is what do we do when we have 5 plays at the same time? Im thinking maybe we take 5 numbers worth of wagers and play the average for all games?
For instance:
5-5-5-5-7-12-19-24-29-33
average of 5 plays is 28.8...play this for all 5 games instead of 38.
Might be a good idea. Personally, I play this more aggressive and only add a new line when I lose a series. So, I add half on line 1 and half on line 2, but instead of adding a new number I add that to the last number in the line. Simple example
5-5-5-5
5-5-5-5
5-5-5-5 say we bet 15 to win 10 on a game 1 play my lines would go to
5-5-5-12.5
5-5-5-12.5
5-5-5-5
This can get you playing higher amounts pretty quickly but I believe it avoids the problem you are alluding to.. The only time I add a new number is when I lose a game 3, but I think a single line could be a good idea also. CDMOP do you want to try it on one line and keep track, see how it goes, and let us know?
Yeah I will try and keep track im extremely busy but ill try. One problem that could occur w/ 1 line is what do we do when we have 5 plays at the same time? Im thinking maybe we take 5 numbers worth of wagers and play the average for all games?
For instance:
5-5-5-5-7-12-19-24-29-33
average of 5 plays is 28.8...play this for all 5 games instead of 38.
Yeah I will try and keep track im extremely busy but ill try. One problem that could occur w/ 1 line is what do we do when we have 5 plays at the same time? Im thinking maybe we take 5 numbers worth of wagers and play the average for all games?
For instance:
5-5-5-5-7-12-19-24-29-33
average of 5 plays is 28.8...play this for all 5 games instead of 38.
yeah just depends on how aggressive you want to be. Most would probably play them all at 38, can cost you or clear your lines more quickly depending on your luck that day...![]()
Yeah I will try and keep track im extremely busy but ill try. One problem that could occur w/ 1 line is what do we do when we have 5 plays at the same time? Im thinking maybe we take 5 numbers worth of wagers and play the average for all games?
For instance:
5-5-5-5-7-12-19-24-29-33
average of 5 plays is 28.8...play this for all 5 games instead of 38.
yeah just depends on how aggressive you want to be. Most would probably play them all at 38, can cost you or clear your lines more quickly depending on your luck that day...![]()
Red Sox
Have faith!! thebosox are coming back lets keep the faith I would hate to have to play a c- bet tommorrow thats alot of cash lets go sox!!!
Red Sox
Have faith!! thebosox are coming back lets keep the faith I would hate to have to play a c- bet tommorrow thats alot of cash lets go sox!!!
Results for 5/1:
System record 43-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
Series #43 (G2) 7:05 BOS-162 @ bal
Series #44 (G2) 3:10 nym @ PHI -207
, RL
Series #45 (G2) 7:10 was @ FLA -150 ![]()
Series #47 (G2)1:10 cin @ STL -181 ![]()
Series #48 (G2) 3:10 tex @ SEA -210 , RL ![]()
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
![]()
Game 1 wins =30
Game 2 wins = 11
Game 3 wins = 2
Results for 5/1:
System record 43-0-1
Additional series 3-0-0
Series Game Time Teams o/u TR diff
Series #43 (G2) 7:05 BOS-162 @ bal
Series #44 (G2) 3:10 nym @ PHI -207
, RL
Series #45 (G2) 7:10 was @ FLA -150 ![]()
Series #47 (G2)1:10 cin @ STL -181 ![]()
Series #48 (G2) 3:10 tex @ SEA -210 , RL ![]()
**meet o/u filter of 9+
TR diffs(for reference only)
Series Prices (for future reference only)
![]()
Game 1 wins =30
Game 2 wins = 11
Game 3 wins = 2
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,480
-
Monday 09/21/2026
459
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,167
-
Giants vs Rams MNF in-game live
2,381
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
99,544
-
***Macwesties * Mon. Sept. 21, 2026 * Birthday * NFL * MNF * Football Play***
4,019
-
New York Giants @ Los Angeles Rams
5,046
-
Where are they getting enough explosive offense to separate from New York by more than a touchdown
2,532
-
?? KBO Plays 🥎
14,763
-
Take the Giants Moneyline tonight - Really
2,793
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
