Posted:
#1026
Anyone need the spread sheet go to therx forum and look in college football under the post "best tool to help cappers win in NCAAF and NFL".....GL....
New YPPT Method
Posted:
#1027
Hey VGPOP & ROGH what filters are you using...are you still using the original formula and sos from usa today from the schedl column? i just wanna be on the same track as you guys on here...i posted the numbers and sos that i got for todays ncaa...your help and input would be greatly appreciated...thanks in advanced...
Posted:
#1030
Quote Originally Posted by UsaSurfer:
Aaah!!! Maybe I boasted and miami did find their passing game. I guess you win some and lose some!!! If I didn't have to go to dinner, I would have seen roughshods predictions and he would have saved me a loss. It is funny how a better can get on a winning streak and can't lose. Then all of a sudden get on a losing streak where you can't even pick one winner out of 100 games. ODD!!! Even still thanks roughshod for the predictions. Will be home tonight waiting for tonights. Still up a lot for the year!Teasing Temple from 17.5 to 11.5 is not a terrible thing, and its certainly tempting, but I promise you that you are not receiving the same value that you are paying for. I won't argue too much on this point though because 6 points can often play a big part in a side.
However one guarantee that I will make extremely adamantly is that if you are adding or subtracting 6 points from any total, you are throwing your money away in the long run. The six points you are adding or subtracting to a total will never impact your pick at a high enough rate to offset the price you are paying.
If you are having long term success teasing college football sides I applaude you. You are obviously good at picking games, and my hunch is that you would be hitting even higher rates if you were just betting those games individually. Go back and check your last 100 bets and see if the 6 point teasers really added value to your bankroll, or if you would be even more successful without them.
Posted:
#1034
Mudshark-
I agree completely with Dallas, as it certainly fit's Rough and VG's system, as well as when i capped it it was a pick. My only concern is the game itself, as it is a huge division rival game, with both teams playing for the divisional leader position. That's the only reason i left the Dallas pick out. Still a system pick though.
I agree completely with Dallas, as it certainly fit's Rough and VG's system, as well as when i capped it it was a pick. My only concern is the game itself, as it is a huge division rival game, with both teams playing for the divisional leader position. That's the only reason i left the Dallas pick out. Still a system pick though.
Posted:
#1037
Quote Originally Posted by Airmail26:
So you have got V Tech -13 as a system play last night...but according to VG N. Illinois would have been a system play.
Two people using the same system with different plays.
So will the results show a win for NIU or a push for VT?
It's good of you to keep track of these plays seeing how busy you are with your " Wannabe Tout Threads"
Page 1 in the Tout Handbook ;
Thanks to all who are bookmarking the blog....saw many hits last night...these picks will eventually be exclusively on the blog
Posted:
#1039
Quote Originally Posted by Airmail26:
So you have got V Tech -13 as a system play last night...but according to VG N. Illinois would have been a system play.
Two people using the same system with different plays.
So will the results show a win for NIU or a push for VT?
Airmail26
If you had been reading VG and my posts you would know that we are using different variations of the same system. Hence some different results. I am showing a push for the system last night with V Tech -13.0 although I myself got a win because my book had it @ -12.5 when I got there. I am not sure what your problem is no where have I ever said or seen on this sight where you must play every selection that some of us are willing to GIVE you. If you CHOOSE to play our selections do so , if not then don't but don't come on here whining about how my numbers do not match VG's or someone elses. We have encouraged all to take the system starting point and alter it to THEIR personal preferences.
Tonights Projections
Boise St. 47
Louisiana Tech 14
System Play: Boise St. -21.0
GL
Posted:
#1040
To say that Louisiana Tech is a little dinged up is an understatement. It’s unknown if any of these six starting players will be in the starting lineup. The biggest injury concern is Porter, who has 640 rushing yards (5.2 yds/carry) and seven touchdowns.
Posted:
#1041
Roughshod 31
Airmail doesnt even deserve a response from you. You guys on here are busting your asses with this system and we all appreciate what you're all doing for us. ive been winning alot more games because of your system. Id like to help oout with the numbers but i dont get where you guys get some of your numbers. I know you and many other have explained many times so i wont beat a dead horse and ask again. thanks again for what all you guys are doing here
Posted:
#1045
Quote Originally Posted by XTC907:
Butta01,
Anyone need the spread sheet go to therx forum and look in college football under the post "best tool to help cappers win in NCAAF and NFL".....GL....
Where's this spreadsheet u talking about? I can find it in any forum. Can u clearify?
1 go to the rxforum (google it)
2 then go to college football forum
3 look for a thread with the "Best to help cappers win in NCAAF & NFL"
4 look for the download link on page one in that thread...
GL....
Posted:
#1046
Quote Originally Posted by butta01:
1 go to the rxforum (google it)
2 then go to college football forum
3 look for a thread with the "Best to help cappers win in NCAAF & NFL"
4 look for the download link on page one in that thread...
GL....
1 go to the rxforum (google it)
2 then go to college football forum
3 look for a thread with the "Best to help cappers win in NCAAF & NFL"
4 look for the download link on page one in that thread...
GL....
I downloaded this spread sheet to check it out and it is very well done! There are two small things I changed about it.
1. On cell 45 A I changed the name to Home Team.
2. On cell 39 B I changed the cell from =G 16 to =G 14. The reason for this is the original was setup to only take into account the "home team" rushing yards instead "all" rushing yards.
Some of you might haved figured this out already. I just thought I would post the info.
Hot Forum Topics
