• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Moneyline Picks
      • NFL AI Predictions
      • NFL Underdogs
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Systems & Strategies

    New YPPT Method

    «First Previous 343536 ... 505152 Next Last»
    AChigurh
    NFL_NUT
    GSHawk20
    PrimeTimeBoys
    jesterr
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 253699
    Posts: 1286
    «First Previous 343536 ... 505152 Next Last»
     
    AChigurh
    AChigurh
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 833
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 11:52 AM ET #826

    Quote Originally Posted by CallMeBruce:



    Should it not be if you lose by 4 as a +7 dog then your action point would be +4 since if you win by 3 your action point is +10. 

    Also, what are you suppose to do with these action points?  If a team is very positive do you bet them the next game or what? And are the action points cumulative or single game?

    My mistake.

    If you bet a -7 team and the team win by 10 you are +3 action points. because you beat the psread by 3.  If win by 4 you are -3 action points.  Little different than the post but you get it. 

    It is a way to predict the accuracy of a system and much more accurate than your win loss record ATS when the system meets your criteria (7 points off).  This was you keep track of the action points for all the bets you would be making, if the sytem meets your criteria.  Your goal is to be as positive as possible.  You could go 120-80 over 200 bets that meet your criteria but if you are negative action points your system is a long term loser and you are just getting lucky. 

    Like i said market argeeance is even stronger but none of you guys are going to run those tests.  Figured someone might not be lazy enought to run the action points test tho.  I wont be however.  I have ran almost every variation of the dudley, and i deffinatly consider this a variation of the dudley with a few simple additions, and they do not give a long term edge.  Especially in the NFL.  Regression and averages are great from showing how a team as performed.  They are not nessearily good for predicting how a team will perform. 

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by CallMeBruce:



    Should it not be if you lose by 4 as a +7 dog then your action point would be +4 since if you win by 3 your action point is +10. 

    Also, what are you suppose to do with these action points?  If a team is very positive do you bet them the next game or what? And are the action points cumulative or single game?

    My mistake.

    If you bet a -7 team and the team win by 10 you are +3 action points. because you beat the psread by 3.  If win by 4 you are -3 action points.  Little different than the post but you get it. 

    It is a way to predict the accuracy of a system and much more accurate than your win loss record ATS when the system meets your criteria (7 points off).  This was you keep track of the action points for all the bets you would be making, if the sytem meets your criteria.  Your goal is to be as positive as possible.  You could go 120-80 over 200 bets that meet your criteria but if you are negative action points your system is a long term loser and you are just getting lucky. 

    Like i said market argeeance is even stronger but none of you guys are going to run those tests.  Figured someone might not be lazy enought to run the action points test tho.  I wont be however.  I have ran almost every variation of the dudley, and i deffinatly consider this a variation of the dudley with a few simple additions, and they do not give a long term edge.  Especially in the NFL.  Regression and averages are great from showing how a team as performed.  They are not nessearily good for predicting how a team will perform. 

     

     
    NFL_NUT
    NFL_NUT
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2007
    Posts: 21
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 12:06 PM ET #827

    Quote Originally Posted by AChigurh:

    My mistake.

    If you bet a -7 team and the team win by 10 you are +3 action points. because you beat the psread by 3.  If win by 4 you are -3 action points.  Little different than the post but you get it. 

    It is a way to predict the accuracy of a system and much more accurate than your win loss record ATS when the system meets your criteria (7 points off).  This was you keep track of the action points for all the bets you would be making, if the sytem meets your criteria.  Your goal is to be as positive as possible.  You could go 120-80 over 200 bets that meet your criteria but if you are negative action points your system is a long term loser and you are just getting lucky. 

    Like i said market argeeance is even stronger but none of you guys are going to run those tests.  Figured someone might not be lazy enought to run the action points test tho.  I wont be however.  I have ran almost every variation of the dudley, and i deffinatly consider this a variation of the dudley with a few simple additions, and they do not give a long term edge.  Especially in the NFL.  Regression and averages are great from showing how a team as performed.  They are not nessearily good for predicting how a team will perform. 

     

     

    Correction, none of us (or at least not me) are smart enough to run those tests.  Laziness has little to do with it.  After I can wrap my head around what is going on with this system, perhaps a guy can test it for flaws/improvements.

    Good luck

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by AChigurh:

    My mistake.

    If you bet a -7 team and the team win by 10 you are +3 action points. because you beat the psread by 3.  If win by 4 you are -3 action points.  Little different than the post but you get it. 

    It is a way to predict the accuracy of a system and much more accurate than your win loss record ATS when the system meets your criteria (7 points off).  This was you keep track of the action points for all the bets you would be making, if the sytem meets your criteria.  Your goal is to be as positive as possible.  You could go 120-80 over 200 bets that meet your criteria but if you are negative action points your system is a long term loser and you are just getting lucky. 

    Like i said market argeeance is even stronger but none of you guys are going to run those tests.  Figured someone might not be lazy enought to run the action points test tho.  I wont be however.  I have ran almost every variation of the dudley, and i deffinatly consider this a variation of the dudley with a few simple additions, and they do not give a long term edge.  Especially in the NFL.  Regression and averages are great from showing how a team as performed.  They are not nessearily good for predicting how a team will perform. 

     

     

    Correction, none of us (or at least not me) are smart enough to run those tests.  Laziness has little to do with it.  After I can wrap my head around what is going on with this system, perhaps a guy can test it for flaws/improvements.

    Good luck

     
    GSHawk20
    GSHawk20
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 593
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 12:25 PM ET #828

      Are these the correct no.'s ? or what ?

    S.F. 7

    Ind. 35

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

      Are these the correct no.'s ? or what ?

    S.F. 7

    Ind. 35

     
    NFL_NUT
    NFL_NUT
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2007
    Posts: 21
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 12:56 PM ET #829

    I agree with Recon168's numbers of 31 to 14.  I'll try to paste part of the sheet here and hopefully it works.

    Great work on it Recon, I think it looks solid.  SF is the first paste

    R-Diff-6.90-3.60
    P-Diff YPPT-Diff Rush Pass YPPT Tot R Tot P Tot YPPT Points
    -66.50 -3.70 94.70 148.20 17.40 108.94 142.72 16.53 15.22
    -25.50 5.10 104.90 113.30 19.00

     

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    I agree with Recon168's numbers of 31 to 14.  I'll try to paste part of the sheet here and hopefully it works.

    Great work on it Recon, I think it looks solid.  SF is the first paste

    R-Diff-6.90-3.60
    P-Diff YPPT-Diff Rush Pass YPPT Tot R Tot P Tot YPPT Points
    -66.50 -3.70 94.70 148.20 17.40 108.94 142.72 16.53 15.22
    -25.50 5.10 104.90 113.30 19.00

     

     

     
    NFL_NUT
    NFL_NUT
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2007
    Posts: 21
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 12:56 PM ET #830

    Indy's calculations

    R-Diff-5.50-5.10
    P-Diff YPPT-Diff Rush Pass YPPT Tot R Tot P Tot YPPT Points
    55.20 -0.70 86.60 314.40 14.20 92.73 330.52 13.40 31.59
    3.60 0.70 83.30 291.20 15.30

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Indy's calculations

    R-Diff-5.50-5.10
    P-Diff YPPT-Diff Rush Pass YPPT Tot R Tot P Tot YPPT Points
    55.20 -0.70 86.60 314.40 14.20 92.73 330.52 13.40 31.59
    3.60 0.70 83.30 291.20 15.30

     
    PrimeTimeBoys
    PrimeTimeBoys
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2007
    Posts: 13343
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 1:02 PM ET #831

    Quote Originally Posted by AChigurh:

    My mistake.

    If you bet a -7 team and the team win by 10 you are +3 action points. because you beat the psread by 3.  If win by 4 you are -3 action points.  Little different than the post but you get it. 

    It is a way to predict the accuracy of a system and much more accurate than your win loss record ATS when the system meets your criteria (7 points off).  This was you keep track of the action points for all the bets you would be making, if the sytem meets your criteria.  Your goal is to be as positive as possible.  You could go 120-80 over 200 bets that meet your criteria but if you are negative action points your system is a long term loser and you are just getting lucky. 

    Like i said market argeeance is even stronger but none of you guys are going to run those tests.  Figured someone might not be lazy enought to run the action points test tho.  I wont be however.  I have ran almost every variation of the dudley, and i deffinatly consider this a variation of the dudley with a few simple additions, and they do not give a long term edge.  Especially in the NFL.  Regression and averages are great from showing how a team as performed.  They are not nessearily good for predicting how a team will perform. 

     

    Exactly!

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by AChigurh:

    My mistake.

    If you bet a -7 team and the team win by 10 you are +3 action points. because you beat the psread by 3.  If win by 4 you are -3 action points.  Little different than the post but you get it. 

    It is a way to predict the accuracy of a system and much more accurate than your win loss record ATS when the system meets your criteria (7 points off).  This was you keep track of the action points for all the bets you would be making, if the sytem meets your criteria.  Your goal is to be as positive as possible.  You could go 120-80 over 200 bets that meet your criteria but if you are negative action points your system is a long term loser and you are just getting lucky. 

    Like i said market argeeance is even stronger but none of you guys are going to run those tests.  Figured someone might not be lazy enought to run the action points test tho.  I wont be however.  I have ran almost every variation of the dudley, and i deffinatly consider this a variation of the dudley with a few simple additions, and they do not give a long term edge.  Especially in the NFL.  Regression and averages are great from showing how a team as performed.  They are not nessearily good for predicting how a team will perform. 

     

    Exactly!

     
    jesterr
    jesterr
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 25
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 1:21 PM ET #832

    Quote Originally Posted by Gator11:

     

     Nice! Did anyone post the formula on tonights play(WV at So Fla)? GLTA



    West Virginia
    South Florida  24 21

    no play.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Gator11:

     

     Nice! Did anyone post the formula on tonights play(WV at So Fla)? GLTA



    West Virginia
    South Florida  24 21

    no play.
     
    lou4062
    lou4062
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 60
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 2:06 PM ET #833

    Quote Originally Posted by NFL_NUT:

    I agree with Recon168's numbers of 31 to 14.  I'll try to paste part of the sheet here and hopefully it works.

    Great work on it Recon, I think it looks solid.  SF is the first paste

    R-Diff-6.90-3.60
    P-Diff YPPT-Diff Rush Pass YPPT Tot R Tot P Tot YPPT Points
    -66.50 -3.70 94.70 148.20 17.40 108.94 142.72 16.53 15.22
    -25.50 5.10 104.90 113.30 19.00

     

     

    Hey nflnut.

    Some of your starting numbers are different than mine.  I got the following:

    sfo  98.3 ry  173.7 py 12.3 yppt

    ind 91.7 ry   310.8 py  13.5 yppt

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by NFL_NUT:

    I agree with Recon168's numbers of 31 to 14.  I'll try to paste part of the sheet here and hopefully it works.

    Great work on it Recon, I think it looks solid.  SF is the first paste

    R-Diff-6.90-3.60
    P-Diff YPPT-Diff Rush Pass YPPT Tot R Tot P Tot YPPT Points
    -66.50 -3.70 94.70 148.20 17.40 108.94 142.72 16.53 15.22
    -25.50 5.10 104.90 113.30 19.00

     

     

    Hey nflnut.

    Some of your starting numbers are different than mine.  I got the following:

    sfo  98.3 ry  173.7 py 12.3 yppt

    ind 91.7 ry   310.8 py  13.5 yppt

     
    jesterr
    jesterr
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 25
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 2:06 PM ET #834

    @mrweed13

    you're accepting PM from friends only, so add me (or simply write your e-mail to me). I'll send you my spreadsheet. Just to know, I've made some changes to original rough's sheet as VGPOP suggested.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    @mrweed13

    you're accepting PM from friends only, so add me (or simply write your e-mail to me). I'll send you my spreadsheet. Just to know, I've made some changes to original rough's sheet as VGPOP suggested.
     
    recon168
    recon168
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 163
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 2:07 PM ET #835

    Hey Lou4062 and NFLNut and Rob,

    The number for SF is correct, but I was pointed out that I used the wrong SOS numbers for INDY, so instead of 31, like I originally got, I also have 21.9, like Lou4062, then after adding/subtracting the HFA, I have a final number of SF 13.9 Indy 23.2, so basically 14 to 24, it could be 14 to 23 as those numbers are denitely possible.

    And thanks again Lou4062 for the SOS, that's exactly how I calculated it, just used the wrong numbers.  Now to add more games and test it out further.

    Now not that confused!

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Hey Lou4062 and NFLNut and Rob,

    The number for SF is correct, but I was pointed out that I used the wrong SOS numbers for INDY, so instead of 31, like I originally got, I also have 21.9, like Lou4062, then after adding/subtracting the HFA, I have a final number of SF 13.9 Indy 23.2, so basically 14 to 24, it could be 14 to 23 as those numbers are denitely possible.

    And thanks again Lou4062 for the SOS, that's exactly how I calculated it, just used the wrong numbers.  Now to add more games and test it out further.

    Now not that confused!

     
    lou4062
    lou4062
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 60
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 2:15 PM ET #836

    Quote Originally Posted by NFL_NUT:

    Indy's calculations

    R-Diff-5.50-5.10
    P-Diff YPPT-Diff Rush Pass YPPT Tot R Tot P Tot YPPT Points
    55.20 -0.70 86.60 314.40 14.20 92.73 330.52 13.40 31.59
    3.60 0.70 83.30 291.20 15.30

    For indy I got (after sos applied)

    352.3 ty  and 16.1 tl yppt for 21.9 pts 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by NFL_NUT:

    Indy's calculations

    R-Diff-5.50-5.10
    P-Diff YPPT-Diff Rush Pass YPPT Tot R Tot P Tot YPPT Points
    55.20 -0.70 86.60 314.40 14.20 92.73 330.52 13.40 31.59
    3.60 0.70 83.30 291.20 15.30

    For indy I got (after sos applied)

    352.3 ty  and 16.1 tl yppt for 21.9 pts 

     
    lou4062
    lou4062
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 60
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 2:20 PM ET #837

    Quote Originally Posted by recon168:

    Hey Lou4062 and NFLNut and Rob,

    The number for SF is correct, but I was pointed out that I used the wrong SOS numbers for INDY, so instead of 31, like I originally got, I also have 21.9, like Lou4062, then after adding/subtracting the HFA, I have a final number of SF 13.9 Indy 23.2, so basically 14 to 24, it could be 14 to 23 as those numbers are denitely possible.

    And thanks again Lou4062 for the SOS, that's exactly how I calculated it, just used the wrong numbers.  Now to add more games and test it out further.

    Now not that confused!

     

    No problem recon, I'm glad you got it straghtened out. This is all fun for me!

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by recon168:

    Hey Lou4062 and NFLNut and Rob,

    The number for SF is correct, but I was pointed out that I used the wrong SOS numbers for INDY, so instead of 31, like I originally got, I also have 21.9, like Lou4062, then after adding/subtracting the HFA, I have a final number of SF 13.9 Indy 23.2, so basically 14 to 24, it could be 14 to 23 as those numbers are denitely possible.

    And thanks again Lou4062 for the SOS, that's exactly how I calculated it, just used the wrong numbers.  Now to add more games and test it out further.

    Now not that confused!

     

    No problem recon, I'm glad you got it straghtened out. This is all fun for me!

     
    recon168
    recon168
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 163
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 2:27 PM ET #838

    Hey guys I found this, interesting:

    Home Field Advantage in the NFL

    In the NFL, home field advantage (HFA) also increases from the regular season to the playoffs even though the league’s single-game playoff format provides no incentive to prolong a series. One big reason for the difference is due to the relative strength of opponents.

    The NFL’s regular season HFA is 57%--the home team wins 57 out of 100 times. But in the playoffs it’s 68%. The biggest difference between regular season games and playoff games is the relative strength of opponents. Regular season games can feature mismatches, but playoff games feature only opponents who are relatively close in ability.

    When teams are well-matched in ability, other factors such as HFA, which are normally small, appear more decisive. There are fewer cases of games that feature a strong visitor against a weak home team in the playoffs. The winning percentage of the home team would therefore naturally increase.

    Home Court Advantage in the NBA

    In the NBA, HCA is even stronger than the NFL’s HFA. Think of home advantage not as a game-long effect, but as a tiny advantage on each possession. The NBA plays quickly with a short shot clock and long 48 minute games. It’s a sport on speed. Each team gets about 100 possessions per game. Over the course of each possession, a HCA effect accrues into a very large game-long effect. HCA in the NBA is unusually strong for natural reasons having nothing to do with bias.

    In the NBA playoffs, HCA is magnified by the same process at work in the NFL. Teams are closer in ability, and therefore other factors such as HCA appear to be more decisive.

    https://www.advancednflstats.com/2008/06/bias-and-home-advantage-in-nba-vs-nfl.html

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Hey guys I found this, interesting:

    Home Field Advantage in the NFL

    In the NFL, home field advantage (HFA) also increases from the regular season to the playoffs even though the league’s single-game playoff format provides no incentive to prolong a series. One big reason for the difference is due to the relative strength of opponents.

    The NFL’s regular season HFA is 57%--the home team wins 57 out of 100 times. But in the playoffs it’s 68%. The biggest difference between regular season games and playoff games is the relative strength of opponents. Regular season games can feature mismatches, but playoff games feature only opponents who are relatively close in ability.

    When teams are well-matched in ability, other factors such as HFA, which are normally small, appear more decisive. There are fewer cases of games that feature a strong visitor against a weak home team in the playoffs. The winning percentage of the home team would therefore naturally increase.

    Home Court Advantage in the NBA

    In the NBA, HCA is even stronger than the NFL’s HFA. Think of home advantage not as a game-long effect, but as a tiny advantage on each possession. The NBA plays quickly with a short shot clock and long 48 minute games. It’s a sport on speed. Each team gets about 100 possessions per game. Over the course of each possession, a HCA effect accrues into a very large game-long effect. HCA in the NBA is unusually strong for natural reasons having nothing to do with bias.

    In the NBA playoffs, HCA is magnified by the same process at work in the NFL. Teams are closer in ability, and therefore other factors such as HCA appear to be more decisive.

    https://www.advancednflstats.com/2008/06/bias-and-home-advantage-in-nba-vs-nfl.html

     
    NFL_NUT
    NFL_NUT
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2007
    Posts: 21
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 2:35 PM ET #839

    Why wouldn't we use the road stats for SF and the home stats for Indy and ignore any Home Field Advantage adjustment ?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Why wouldn't we use the road stats for SF and the home stats for Indy and ignore any Home Field Advantage adjustment ?

     
    jesterr
    jesterr
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 25
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 2:45 PM ET #840

    Quote Originally Posted by NFL_NUT:

    Why wouldn't we use the road stats for SF and the home stats for Indy and ignore any Home Field Advantage adjustment ?



    Also thought about it. I think the main reason for rough was that there wasn't enough games (only 1-3) at the moment he was doing spreadsheet. But now I think that we might try it. Will do calc and see how it goes...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by NFL_NUT:

    Why wouldn't we use the road stats for SF and the home stats for Indy and ignore any Home Field Advantage adjustment ?



    Also thought about it. I think the main reason for rough was that there wasn't enough games (only 1-3) at the moment he was doing spreadsheet. But now I think that we might try it. Will do calc and see how it goes...
     
    jesterr
    jesterr
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 25
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 2:47 PM ET #841

    ...
    but then we have a problem with SOS calculating.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    ...
    but then we have a problem with SOS calculating.
     
    NFL_NUT
    NFL_NUT
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2007
    Posts: 21
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 2:53 PM ET #842

    Quote Originally Posted by jesterr:

    ...
    but then we have a problem with SOS calculating.

     

    Using road and home stats only (not all games), no HFA index of 1.36, and no strenght of schedule, SF 13 (13.86) to Indy 23 (23.35)

    HFA index used = SF 13 (12.5) to Indy 24 (24.71)

     

    Any glaring holes in that thougth process ?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by jesterr:

    ...
    but then we have a problem with SOS calculating.

     

    Using road and home stats only (not all games), no HFA index of 1.36, and no strenght of schedule, SF 13 (13.86) to Indy 23 (23.35)

    HFA index used = SF 13 (12.5) to Indy 24 (24.71)

     

    Any glaring holes in that thougth process ?

     
    mrweed13
    mrweed13
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2009
    Posts: 657
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 3:14 PM ET #843

    Quote Originally Posted by jesterr:

    @mrweed13

    you're accepting PM from friends only, so add me (or simply write your e-mail to me). I'll send you my spreadsheet. Just to know, I've made some changes to original rough's sheet as VGPOP suggested.

    Thanks Jesterr...I just PM'd my email address.

     

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by jesterr:

    @mrweed13

    you're accepting PM from friends only, so add me (or simply write your e-mail to me). I'll send you my spreadsheet. Just to know, I've made some changes to original rough's sheet as VGPOP suggested.

    Thanks Jesterr...I just PM'd my email address.

     

     

     
    mrweed13
    mrweed13
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2009
    Posts: 657
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 3:20 PM ET #844

    Couple general questions for those in the know on this sheet:

    1. One key calculation seems to be yardage differential, and then strength of schedule yardage differential. Given that a team's efficiency at defending the run against a stronger schedule seems like it ought to weigh more heavily than their opponents relative ability to gain yards against a weaker schedule, why just average the two? I know I explained that poorly, but put simply, it seems we just "average" some data points where it seems that more sophisticated conideration might be due. Thoughts?

    2. It seems Yards per Point is this model's way of considering turnovers. Are we weighing it appropriately per the typical correlation of turnover ratio's to victories or points scored? In other words, it would seem that if you used historical data, turnover differential is a key predictor for a game's result, even more so than yard differential. So is our use of YPPT appropriate in these calculations?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Couple general questions for those in the know on this sheet:

    1. One key calculation seems to be yardage differential, and then strength of schedule yardage differential. Given that a team's efficiency at defending the run against a stronger schedule seems like it ought to weigh more heavily than their opponents relative ability to gain yards against a weaker schedule, why just average the two? I know I explained that poorly, but put simply, it seems we just "average" some data points where it seems that more sophisticated conideration might be due. Thoughts?

    2. It seems Yards per Point is this model's way of considering turnovers. Are we weighing it appropriately per the typical correlation of turnover ratio's to victories or points scored? In other words, it would seem that if you used historical data, turnover differential is a key predictor for a game's result, even more so than yard differential. So is our use of YPPT appropriate in these calculations?

     
    recon168
    recon168
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 163
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 3:34 PM ET #845

    Quote Originally Posted by NFL_NUT:

    Why wouldn't we use the road stats for SF and the home stats for Indy and ignore any Home Field Advantage adjustment ?

    Hi NFLNut,

    Do you mean for example for SF/Indy, using SF's Off Road Game numbers and using Indy's Off Home Game numbers?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by NFL_NUT:

    Why wouldn't we use the road stats for SF and the home stats for Indy and ignore any Home Field Advantage adjustment ?

    Hi NFLNut,

    Do you mean for example for SF/Indy, using SF's Off Road Game numbers and using Indy's Off Home Game numbers?

     
    recon168
    recon168
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 163
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 3:37 PM ET #846

    NFLNut, that's a good point, let me try modifying my spreadsheet and see what the numbers are.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    NFLNut, that's a good point, let me try modifying my spreadsheet and see what the numbers are.

     
    recon168
    recon168
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 163
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 3:53 PM ET #847

    Using the Road Games and Home Games Averages, I get

    SF 16.66, Ind 19.44

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Using the Road Games and Home Games Averages, I get

    SF 16.66, Ind 19.44

     
    recon168
    recon168
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 163
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 3:57 PM ET #848

    Ari 27.23

    NO 37.65

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Ari 27.23

    NO 37.65

     
    Gator11
    Gator11
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2004
    Posts: 1666
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 4:15 PM ET #849

    Quote Originally Posted by jesterr:



    West Virginia
    South Florida  24 21

    no play.
     Thanks jesterr for the reply. BOL to ya
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by jesterr:



    West Virginia
    South Florida  24 21

    no play.
     Thanks jesterr for the reply. BOL to ya
     
     
    recon168
    recon168
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 163
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2009 - 4:55 PM ET #850

    Okay guys, whoever was working on the Home/Road game stats, let me know if you got the right numbers:

    SF 16.66
    IND 19.44

    Min 21.62
    GB 17.60

    Den 15.40
    Balt 15.36

    Cle 8.60
    Chi 26.67

    Hou 23.66
    Buf 16.64

    Mia 8.94
    NYJ 12.47

    StL 6.40
    Det 20.77

    Oak 10.81
    SD 28.45

    Jac 14.35
    Ten 37.39

    Car 13.17
    Ari 31.42

    NYG 52.07
    Phi 23.98

    Atl 27.23
    NO 37.65

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Okay guys, whoever was working on the Home/Road game stats, let me know if you got the right numbers:

    SF 16.66
    IND 19.44

    Min 21.62
    GB 17.60

    Den 15.40
    Balt 15.36

    Cle 8.60
    Chi 26.67

    Hou 23.66
    Buf 16.64

    Mia 8.94
    NYJ 12.47

    StL 6.40
    Det 20.77

    Oak 10.81
    SD 28.45

    Jac 14.35
    Ten 37.39

    Car 13.17
    Ari 31.42

    NYG 52.07
    Phi 23.98

    Atl 27.23
    NO 37.65

    All Forums | Systems & Strategies
    «First Previous 343536 ... 505152 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 449,188 Covers arrow
    • Saturday 09/19/2026 651 Covers arrow
    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,158 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 259,084 Covers arrow
    • The Three-Day Money Train 5,242 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 254 Covers arrow
    • Trump's legacy? 25,517 Covers arrow
    • Week 3 Money 10,656 Covers arrow
    • Public Indicator Calculations 2026 13,726 Covers arrow
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 22,802 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.