If you had done that with the 11/11 Golden State A bet you would have a win. I bought two points on the JM bet and lost. Those who got in early and bought the three points had a push.
Perhaps using a labby with these anti-JM plays would be useful also since you do not buy any points with the anti-JM system?
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=79&sub=100563169
The reason the anti-JM system may work and backtesting may not provide a prediction of the future is that the JM system is being used now by so many people and the books are setting the lines in response to the JM system and that is why you are winning now with the anti-JM system and in the past the anti-JM system would not have worked because the lines were not being set in the past in response to the JM sytem.
....that is an EXCELLENT idea
...and an excellent avatar...
The only thing you guys are forgetting.
The AJM hasn't been backtested for A,B,C wins. If JM has won on the "C" it means unless the 3 points came into affect, those games will be AJM losses. Any JM wins A,B,C which won buying the points will still be AJM losses
As mentioned in an earlier post, I backtested only a handful of teams and found 7 AJM losses (where the JM team won the 3 games by the regular pointspread.) and I hadn't even gone thru half of the league.
I just don't think it is as easy as it is made to seem.
It will be interesting to monitor how the system pans out as the season moves forward.
Best of Luck
The only thing you guys are forgetting.
The AJM hasn't been backtested for A,B,C wins. If JM has won on the "C" it means unless the 3 points came into affect, those games will be AJM losses. Any JM wins A,B,C which won buying the points will still be AJM losses
As mentioned in an earlier post, I backtested only a handful of teams and found 7 AJM losses (where the JM team won the 3 games by the regular pointspread.) and I hadn't even gone thru half of the league.
I just don't think it is as easy as it is made to seem.
It will be interesting to monitor how the system pans out as the season moves forward.
Best of Luck
I fully understand this " I backtested only a handful of teams and found 7 AJM losses (where the JM team won the 3 games by the regular pointspread.) and I hadn't even gone thru half of the league"
But your first paragraph confuses me. If we are chasing the AJM teams then the only eventual losses are when the JM team wins all 3 games with regular spreads. All others will be eventual AJM winners. If it took a C bet to win a JM game then the AJM was a winner at the A level.
Rogue,
You are correct, Originally didn't have the 1st parargraph in and began overthinking. My Bad. Thank you for helping me clarify.
I like everyone am just trying to find the best way to make this work.
There will be some JM wins which would also be AJM wins at A level. The only way AJM will lose a series is when JM wager wins all 3 games without buying the points which happened more often than I would have thought.
Like Smitler stated lets see hopw it plays out and we can all learn.
Best of Luck to all.
Bucks almost pulled it out.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
