All Forums | Systems & Strategies

Anti-JM NBA Thread

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 48263
Posts: 619
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 2387
Posted: #551
spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=0AhVKY8GzoikLdFBsbUl0T2NFX2hncGQ0QnJ4QnhuRlE&hl=en&output=html
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 1460
Posted: #552
Quote Originally Posted by gentruchi:

I'm interested in following Anti JM or JM V4 for this season..but i guess I'm leaning towards Anti JM since you don't have to buy any points.
Can someone provide the final numbers for 2009 season??

Thanks in advance...


Oops i guess it was 80-2

Nice numbers...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 2387
Posted: #553
spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=0AhVKY8GzoikLdFBsbUl0T2NFX2hncGQ0QnJ4QnhuRlE&hl=en&output=html
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 1460
Posted: #554
Quote Originally Posted by smitler:

spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=0AhVKY8GzoikLdFBsbUl0T2NFX2hncGQ0QnJ4QnhuRlE&hl=en&output=html



 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 395
Posted: #555
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 7616
Posted: #556
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 833
Posted: #557
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 19229
Posted: #558

I stopped doing the JM mid season to test my skills capping the games straight up...not bad, ended up around 50%....thinking of getting back into it this season.

What version worked the best?
What is v4?  Never heard of that, no plays till Dec!
What money mgmt works the best (laborchere, series, etc...)?  Was buying the points effective?

Sorry I should probably sent e-mail to Smitler or somebody but I already started typing....

 - JJ


 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 2256
Posted: #559
Playing v1 and v2 i think is best...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 1094
Posted: #560

v4 Labourchere

You'll win 70%, and cover any losses using the Labby lines

There's also around 150 total bets

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 2153
Posted: #561
smitler, u make me want to cry. you make it too ez.  totally appreciate the cheatsheet with th spreadsheet. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 1094
Posted: #562
(B) bet on N.J. tonight correct?  No point buying
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 815
Posted: #563
anyone know how many times thhe ANTI JM WENT TO A "C" BET??
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4
Posted: #564

v1, v2, and so on are the version's of the jm system?? should i or we only use the most updated version?

and my book doesnt allow me to buy 3 points on games anyways so i was looking for a way around it and anti jm sounds perfect...so basically take all the plays from the jm system play and take the home team instead for a chase of 3? or should we be chasing only the last 2 games? bet b and c?? any help would be apprectiated...thank...

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 202
Posted: #565
Guys are  knicks and cleveland a play on AJM? since por and sac won the "A" bet on JM?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 2387
Posted: #566
pokerpro40 has a thread now.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 121
Posted: #567
Do we play Chicago on the spread as a B game AJM version 1 and a C game for AJM version 2? I'm asking because Portland and New York pushed on the spread on 10/30/10.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 186
Posted: #568
I am going to play Chi as the next bet. I suppose I am playing it as a B bet as I did not lose any more on the 2nd bet since it was a push. I don't know that there are any specific rules for a push in the AJM. If anyone knows, please fill us in. If this "B" bet loses tonight, I will have to make a decision on going against them for a quasi-"C" bet tomorrow @ Milwaukee, or just taking a 2-game loss (at least it's not 3).
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 2387
Posted: #569
I see it as a free "B" tonight with Chi.  Two game chase loss max.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 7616
Posted: #570
Quote Originally Posted by smitler:

I see it as a free "B" tonight with Chi.  Two game chase loss max.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 121
Posted: #571
Portland at Chicago is a AJM Version 2 "C" game too???
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 2153
Posted: #572
Free game my ass! I had NYK @ -4.5. Bastards were down by 3with 9 seconds remaining. Win sum, lose sum. Go ChiTown.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 2153
Posted: #573
uh, meant +4.5.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 71
Posted: #574

sorry if this has already been asked, but is AJM version 3 a play? (lakers tnite)

i know its up to me to play it if i want, just wondering if you guys do..

thanks

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 1460
Posted: #575
Quote Originally Posted by movado12080:

sorry if this has already been asked, but is AJM version 3 a play? (lakers tnite)

i know its up to me to play it if i want, just wondering if you guys do..

thanks



The record for last year's AJM only counts V1 and V2 so it's not an official play, and like you said is up to you. Good luck tho
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.