what a sickening way to lose a bet........if the saints fake the handoff ...brees walks in
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
what a sickening way to lose a bet........if the saints fake the handoff ...brees walks in
what a sickening way to lose a bet........if the saints fake the handoff ...brees walks in
I agree especially since ingram isn't exactly a "big" back like kuhn or brandan jacobs. Its easy to stop his momentum and there offensive line was getting man handled all day. I agree the a qb sneak or a quick pitch to sporles on the outside would have been a better play.
I agree especially since ingram isn't exactly a "big" back like kuhn or brandan jacobs. Its easy to stop his momentum and there offensive line was getting man handled all day. I agree the a qb sneak or a quick pitch to sporles on the outside would have been a better play.
Finally, even as the play was run the way that it was, it appeared that Mark Ingram could have gone lower and bulldozed his way into a dive for the score. I saw him do that at Alabama countless times and I'm not sure if I ever saw him attempt to go in upright the way he did last night. Hindsight is 20/20 and I'm sure the play developed so fast that they all did the best they could. Those are the breaks, I guess. Geaux Saints!
Finally, even as the play was run the way that it was, it appeared that Mark Ingram could have gone lower and bulldozed his way into a dive for the score. I saw him do that at Alabama countless times and I'm not sure if I ever saw him attempt to go in upright the way he did last night. Hindsight is 20/20 and I'm sure the play developed so fast that they all did the best they could. Those are the breaks, I guess. Geaux Saints!
I'm just happy to start the season with a "W"
I'm just happy to start the season with a "W"
The only thing I don't like is the fact that Wade Davis is 0-2 with a 11.12 ERA in three career starts against Boston. Davis has been lights out in his last seven home starts, however. They have resulted in six wins for the Rays. He has gone 2-1 with a 2.90 ERA in those home starts.
As you can tell, I put a lot of thought into this game. I decided Tampa was the way to go, but I didn't pull the trigger.
I went with the Los Angeles Dodgers as the small road dog tonight. I am backing Kershaw, even against Tim Lincecum. Lincecum has dropped his last two starts in a row and his team is 1-6 versus Clayton Kershaw.. Timmy the Freak has been getting rocked lately and Kershaw has been dominant. The already light-hitting Giants can't seem to solve Kershaw, who is 4-0 with a 1.01 ERA in his last five starts against them. During that stretch, he has fanned 38 batters across 35 2/3 innings! He has yet to allow a run in 23 2/3 innings en route to winning his lat three starts in a row at AT&T Park. Kershaw was dazzling in his last visit to AT&T Park on July 20, fanning a season-high 12 while yielding three hits in eight innings of a 1-0 win over Lincecum. He also beat the two-time NL Cy Young Award winner on opening day March 31, when Kershaw worked seven scoreless innings in a 2-1 victory.
Kershaw has also been rolling against other opposition, as well. He is 4-0 with a .090 ERA in his last five starts. He is 17-5 with a 2.45 ERA on the saeason and is making a strong case for the NL Cy Young Award. I can certainly live with it if I lose backing Kershaw. His Dodgers are on quite a run, winning 13 of their last 16 games overall. I simply feel that the line is an oddsmakers error and the wrong team is favored.
The only thing I don't like is the fact that Wade Davis is 0-2 with a 11.12 ERA in three career starts against Boston. Davis has been lights out in his last seven home starts, however. They have resulted in six wins for the Rays. He has gone 2-1 with a 2.90 ERA in those home starts.
As you can tell, I put a lot of thought into this game. I decided Tampa was the way to go, but I didn't pull the trigger.
I went with the Los Angeles Dodgers as the small road dog tonight. I am backing Kershaw, even against Tim Lincecum. Lincecum has dropped his last two starts in a row and his team is 1-6 versus Clayton Kershaw.. Timmy the Freak has been getting rocked lately and Kershaw has been dominant. The already light-hitting Giants can't seem to solve Kershaw, who is 4-0 with a 1.01 ERA in his last five starts against them. During that stretch, he has fanned 38 batters across 35 2/3 innings! He has yet to allow a run in 23 2/3 innings en route to winning his lat three starts in a row at AT&T Park. Kershaw was dazzling in his last visit to AT&T Park on July 20, fanning a season-high 12 while yielding three hits in eight innings of a 1-0 win over Lincecum. He also beat the two-time NL Cy Young Award winner on opening day March 31, when Kershaw worked seven scoreless innings in a 2-1 victory.
Kershaw has also been rolling against other opposition, as well. He is 4-0 with a .090 ERA in his last five starts. He is 17-5 with a 2.45 ERA on the saeason and is making a strong case for the NL Cy Young Award. I can certainly live with it if I lose backing Kershaw. His Dodgers are on quite a run, winning 13 of their last 16 games overall. I simply feel that the line is an oddsmakers error and the wrong team is favored.
I agree with what you guys said about the end of the game. Here is one more observation about the Saints last play. I believe that even though the call to run up the gut was a bad one, that Ingram himself could have spun and bounced around to the outside.The Packers sold out and crashed the middle and would not have reacted in time to stop the explosive quickness of Ingram, nor his power in getting across the goaline. I commend Ingram for not doing this. He is a rookie and knew the "right" thing to do was follow the play as scripted. If rookies try to improvise, they find the bench quickly in this league.
Finally, even as the play was run the way that it was, it appeared that Mark Ingram could have gone lower and bulldozed his way into a dive for the score. I saw him do that at Alabama countless times and I'm not sure if I ever saw him attempt to go in upright the way he did last night. Hindsight is 20/20 and I'm sure the play developed so fast that they all did the best they could. Those are the breaks, I guess. Geaux Saints!
i saw a replay of the 1st 4th down play, he had the fullback open....brees hesitated and the play got blown up..........also on the last play if your going up the middle why not give it to sproles and let him fly over the top..........but they had a chance and it cost me but you can fall behind 14zip to start the game.........just glad football is back
I agree with what you guys said about the end of the game. Here is one more observation about the Saints last play. I believe that even though the call to run up the gut was a bad one, that Ingram himself could have spun and bounced around to the outside.The Packers sold out and crashed the middle and would not have reacted in time to stop the explosive quickness of Ingram, nor his power in getting across the goaline. I commend Ingram for not doing this. He is a rookie and knew the "right" thing to do was follow the play as scripted. If rookies try to improvise, they find the bench quickly in this league.
Finally, even as the play was run the way that it was, it appeared that Mark Ingram could have gone lower and bulldozed his way into a dive for the score. I saw him do that at Alabama countless times and I'm not sure if I ever saw him attempt to go in upright the way he did last night. Hindsight is 20/20 and I'm sure the play developed so fast that they all did the best they could. Those are the breaks, I guess. Geaux Saints!
i saw a replay of the 1st 4th down play, he had the fullback open....brees hesitated and the play got blown up..........also on the last play if your going up the middle why not give it to sproles and let him fly over the top..........but they had a chance and it cost me but you can fall behind 14zip to start the game.........just glad football is back
Hey Smooth,
Can't believe you would bet against my Packers...lol. The lock today to get me to W6 is Wisconsin -20.5. Ohio St and Iowa look good also. Everyone stay away from Michigan St. Best of luck to all. ![]()
Hey Smooth,
Can't believe you would bet against my Packers...lol. The lock today to get me to W6 is Wisconsin -20.5. Ohio St and Iowa look good also. Everyone stay away from Michigan St. Best of luck to all. ![]()
It's -46.5! When I thought the spreads could not get any bigger guess what LSU's is against Northwestern State? -49! Imagine starting a pick in a 7 touchdown deficit however it's these games that could end 70-0. With that being said It's Standford -20 over Duke that I'm going for.
It's -46.5! When I thought the spreads could not get any bigger guess what LSU's is against Northwestern State? -49! Imagine starting a pick in a 7 touchdown deficit however it's these games that could end 70-0. With that being said It's Standford -20 over Duke that I'm going for.
Hey Smooth,
Can't believe you would bet against my Packers...lol. The lock today to get me to W6 is Wisconsin -20.5. Ohio St and Iowa look good also. Everyone stay away from Michigan St. Best of luck to all. ![]()
You get it twisted Lindeb I took Green Bay in that game. But as Viking fan I can't wait to you boys a little visit.
Hey Smooth,
Can't believe you would bet against my Packers...lol. The lock today to get me to W6 is Wisconsin -20.5. Ohio St and Iowa look good also. Everyone stay away from Michigan St. Best of luck to all. ![]()
You get it twisted Lindeb I took Green Bay in that game. But as Viking fan I can't wait to you boys a little visit.
I want to start a post on some strategies for the Streak Survivor. It's time we put our minds together and start putting together some serious streaks. There have only been a couple of serious streaks this year. My definition of serious is anything over 17. My goal is to hit 21 for that $25K mark and then set my eyes on the big one. Please post any systems or ideas that you have to help the other players on the site build up serious streaks.
I want to start a post on some strategies for the Streak Survivor. It's time we put our minds together and start putting together some serious streaks. There have only been a couple of serious streaks this year. My definition of serious is anything over 17. My goal is to hit 21 for that $25K mark and then set my eyes on the big one. Please post any systems or ideas that you have to help the other players on the site build up serious streaks.
Hot Forum Topics
- 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 463,216
- BEAT Your book 126,983
- Friday 11/06/2026 499
- I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 63,532
- JACK/BALT live in game COMMENTS welcome 566
- ::Thursday:: 11/5 (23-3-0) +19.7 units 6,363
- 7:00 Large 3,287
- Florida Man Friday 1,536
- NCAA WEEK # 10 *** 151 *** 6,167
- Lamar Jackson 4,488
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
