RostosThats all what u do mate, all what u do.
When u CANT asnwer the question, u just throw an Emoticon.
I throw one of thise as well.
When one resorts to these things, they know they are defeated.
Cmon ACE< give me a market for the Roosters Sharks game i mentioned above.
The (55-21) Lakers taking on the (36-41) Jazz tonight.
The laks are paying $1.02 and the Jazz are paying $11....
Hirscfelder sighting team records as a reason why odds differ significantly between NBA and MLB.
Hircshfelder
I know the Jazz have injuries...........BUT.....
There is no way on earth if the Phillies played the Blue Jays (a ROUGH equivalent) of the Jazz and the Jays had there worst pitcher on the mound and had there 4 best players out they would be more thn $4 for the win against Doc...NO way........
And the Jazz are $11.........Why?
Cause the game of baskeball is majority (95%) determined by skill and attitude where as baseball is 80-85% luck.
Mathematical proof right there 
ROSTOS
The (55-21) Lakers taking on the (36-41) Jazz tonight.
The laks are paying $1.02 and the Jazz are paying $11....
Hirscfelder sighting team records as a reason why odds differ significantly between NBA and MLB.
Hircshfelder
I know the Jazz have injuries...........BUT.....
There is no way on earth if the Phillies played the Blue Jays (a ROUGH equivalent) of the Jazz and the Jays had there worst pitcher on the mound and had there 4 best players out they would be more thn $4 for the win against Doc...NO way........
And the Jazz are $11.........Why?
Cause the game of baskeball is majority (95%) determined by skill and attitude where as baseball is 80-85% luck.
Mathematical proof right there
The NRL has a salary cap, the MLB doesnt.
Have u seen the Red Sox and Phillies rosters this year? They are like the QLD origin team.
A comp that has no salary cap and owners that spend as much as it takes should result in dynasties and back to backs and 3 peats.
Phillies 2010 Payroll $144 million
Pirates 2010 Payroll $35 million.
The $35 mill payroll beats the $144 million 4 times out fo 6.
U are an idiot, that just FURTHER proves its all luck.
Lets equivacate this and build a similar (model) scenario in the NRL.
Lets get the 2010 Roosters and add a few Adjustments. The purpose of this roosters team is to try and equivaocate the 2010 Phillies IN terms of talent.
Roosters lineup
Slater, Hayne, Inglis, Kenny Dow, Perret, Carney, Pearce, Anasta, Creagh, Pritchard, Martin Kennedy, Cam Smith, Frank Paul.
Ace trying to say, that if that team played the 2010 Sharks (equivalent to the Pirates), the Sharks would beat this team 4 out of 6 times?
U ARE A DEADSET IDIOT. U ARE AN IDIOT.
In all honesty, in all honesty, if that lineup i gave above played the 2010 sharks, what would the H2H market be? Seriously, what would be it? Would the Sharks be $4 as the Pirates were against the Phils?
Ace thinking that the Sharks would be $4 against the Roosters lineup i have above.
ACE.....
Ace
Arent u capable of understanding? Is it hard for you?
My Roosters lineup in terms of TALENT and SALARY is equivalent to the 2010 Phils lineup.
The 2010 Sharks team in terms of talent and Salary is equivalent to the 2010 Pirates team.
Cmon ace, what would the Odds be?
Ace would give $4 for the Sharks against my Shit hot roosters team.
I cant believe how much u just confused yourself with what i am trying to say.
U are looking at results then ..........i dont even know what u trying to say.
WOULD THE SHARKS BEAT MY ROOSTERS 4 times out 6 games?
JUST ANSWER THAT QUESTION............
Dont say anything else.
U are one confused person, BIG time.
U dont even know it, but u r just schooling yourself everytime u open your mouth.
U just showed everyone that the pirates beat the Phils 4 out of 6 times last year, even though the Pirates payroll is 1/4 of the Phills.
What does that show?
U just backed up my argument, u dont even know it, but u backed it up.............
IF the Phils beat the pirates 6-0, then it would workd against me, but it just further proves my point
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
