Super Saturday

Rostos wants 11/1 about the Astros and Pirates when they play the Phillies

The last time the Pirates and Yankees played against each other was in 2008 when they played 3 times and the Pirates won 2 of those games







Rostos wants 11/1 about the Pirates

If Rostos was a bookmaker

Yankees $1.04
Pirates $11.00

Phillies 2010 Payroll $144 million

Pirates 2010 Payroll $35 million.

The $35 mill payroll beats the $144 million 4 times out fo 6.

U are an idiot, that just FURTHER proves its all luck.

Lets equivacate this and build a similar (model) scenario in the NRL.

Lets get the 2010 Roosters and add a few Adjustments. The purpose of this roosters team is to try and equivaocate the 2010 Phillies IN terms of talent.

Roosters lineup 

Slater, Hayne, Inglis, Kenny Dow, Perret, Carney, Pearce, Anasta, Creagh, Pritchard, Martin Kennedy, Cam Smith, Frank Paul.

Ace trying to say, that if that team played the 2010 Sharks (equivalent to the Pirates), the Sharks would beat this team 4 out of 6 times?

U ARE A DEADSET IDIOT. U ARE AN IDIOT.

In all honesty, in all honesty, if that lineup i gave above played the 2010 sharks, what would the H2H market be? Seriously, what would be it? Would the Sharks be $4 as the Pirates were against the Phils?

Ace thinking that the Sharks would be $4 against the Roosters lineup i have above.

ACE.....

Ace

 

God your dumb

Rostos

Spring training,162 games,little rest in between games,playoffs,non  stop




Offering 11/1 about teams in a league where they play every single day




Rostos think the Yankees can maintain brilliance every single day all year round just because they get payed a lot







If the Yankees play 5 games in one week Rostos wants them to be $1.04 and the Pirates $11

U are one confused person, BIG time.

U dont even know it, but u r just schooling yourself everytime u open your mouth.

U just showed everyone that the pirates beat the Phils 4 out of 6 times last year, even though the Pirates payroll is 1/4 of the Phills.

What does that show?

U just backed up my argument, u dont even know it, but u backed it up.............

IF the Phils beat the pirates 6-0, then it would workd against me, but it just further proves my point

Doesnt matter, the percentages are still roughly the same.

Play once, twice, 3 times a day, it doesnt matter, the winning % are still roughly the same.

 

Rostos and his LUCK talk

 NBA teams somnetimes play 4 games in 5 days.

 

yes, the Yankees play 162 games a year, so do the Pirates.

You said teams like the Pirates should be $11 and then i owned you and said the Pirates had beaten those teams you mentioned regularly




Pirates should be $11




Then you start rambling on about the salary or something

[Quote: Originally Posted by Rostos]

Phillies 2010 Payroll $144 million

Pirates 2010 Payroll $35 million.

The $35 mill payroll beats the $144 million 4 times out fo 6.

U are an idiot, that just FURTHER proves its all luck.

Lets equivacate this and build a similar (model) scenario in the NRL.

Lets get the 2010 Roosters and add a few Adjustments. The purpose of this roosters team is to try and equivaocate the 2010 Phillies IN terms of talent.

Roosters lineup 

Slater, Hayne, Inglis, Kenny Dow, Perret, Carney, Pearce, Anasta, Creagh, Pritchard, Martin Kennedy, Cam Smith, Frank Paul.

Ace trying to say, that if that team played the 2010 Sharks (equivalent to the Pirates), the Sharks would beat this team 4 out of 6 times?

U ARE A DEADSET IDIOT. U ARE AN IDIOT.

In all honesty, in all honesty, if that lineup i gave above played the 2010 sharks, what would the H2H market be? Seriously, what would be it? Would the Sharks be $4 as the Pirates were against the Phils?

Ace thinking that the Sharks would be $4 against the Roosters lineup i have above.

ACE.....

Ace

 

[/Quote

Still waiting, Cmon Ace, what would the H2H be in the game above, My roosters lineup v Sharks.

Cmon ACE, what would the odds be?

Ace as bookmaker gives $4 for the Sharks against a shit hot lineup.

I am waiting.