All Forums | Pro Football

St. Louis at New York (09/19/2011)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 12310
Posts: 86
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 6128
Posted: #76
Thank God no more BS TDS! Nite all
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 191
Posted: #77
 congrats to all teaser players wins all around!!  way more squeezing on the under than I wanted but will take the win!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 370
Posted: #78
Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah:

Listen wiseguy, you want to compare notes? O.K., I may have exaggerated a little, but seriously, on www.betus.com - even if you parlayed these 2 together you would still have to bet $100.00 just to win $49.60 - that's more than half of your wager lost.

Now, first of all, you let me know where you can get this same wager for just -130 - - - second of all, since when is a minus -130 bet "not costing you anything"?????????????? Simple math tells you that you still have to bet $130 to win $100 (or, $13 to win $10) - - sounds like a loss to me............

Like I said, go read a book on how to bet and what wagers mean, then come back in here - and maybe you can school me on how betting is done. Until then keep your mouth shut.

BTW - just because of your comments, here's my wager for you - Rams +7.5 and your precious over 37 - - $100 to win a total of $223.16 - - now THAT'S a positive bet, and maybe that's what you should be doing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



SOoooOOOoooo lets compare our notes now lol and we will pretend somehow you got a combination of the straight rams line and teased total...how'd that work out for ya

Not meaning to gloat...but ok I guess I am.  I also put money on NO there won't be three consecutive scores...which paid +160 since you love the payouts and are a math expert THAT was how money was made!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 174
Posted: #79
Can somebody please tell me why the rams punted there at the end with less than 2 minutes left and no timeouts.  I know they were deep in their own territory and it was 4th and long but if you give the ball up, you will surely lose, unless the return man muffs the punt, but all the giants had to do was let the ball go to avoid that.  They were only down by 12, not 50.  I don't get it, why concede a game like that?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 370
Posted: #80
Quote Originally Posted by bankjob:

 congrats to all teaser players wins all around!!  way more squeezing on the under than I wanted but will take the win!!


Thanks Bankjob - nice sweaty backdoor cover, just as I suspected :D will a little bit of prop money on the side.  That's how money is made!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 191
Posted: #81
Quote Originally Posted by FreeMoneyInc:



Thanks Bankjob - nice sweaty backdoor cover, just as I suspected :D will a little bit of prop money on the side.  That's how money is made!
agreed I actualy backed off on my teaser cuse I had so much BLK pending as our freind would say I hie big +$2200 with only 900 layed out.. ill t
WON: 964 Yankees -1½ (-135) LP(Burnett, A J & Diamond, S) risk 350 win 259 (MLB) Score: 6-4LOST: INTERNET: 5 Team Parlay risk 25 win 334WON: 964 Yankees -1½ (-135) LP(Burnett, A J & Diamond, S) (MLB) Score: 6-4
WON: 968 D2 Red Sox (-250) AT (MLB) Score: 18-9
LOST: 972 D1 Red Sox (-163) AT (MLB) Score: 5-6
LOST: TOT UND 972 D1 Red Sox/D1 Orioles under 10 (-105) AT (MLB) Score: 5-6
WON: INTERNET: 3 Team Parlay risk 235 win 986WON: 964 Yankees -1½ (-135) LP(Burnett, A J & Diamond, S) (MLB) Score: 6-4
WON: 968 D2 Red Sox -1½ (-135) LP(Lackey, J & Matusz, B) (MLB) Score: 18-9
WON: INTERNET: 3 Team Parlay risk 75 win 172WON: 968 D2 Red Sox (-250) AT (MLB) Score: 18-9
WON: 964 Yankees (-270) AT (MLB) Score: 6-4
WON: INTERNET: 2 Team 2T SP TEASER Teaser(ties no action) risk 495 win 450WON: TOT UND 228 Giants/Rams under 49½ (NFL) (6.0 pts) Score: 28-16
WON: INTERNET: 3 Team Parlay risk 114 win 621PUSHED: TOT UND 228 Giants/Rams under 44 Buy ½ (-120) (NFL) Score: 28-16
WON: 959 Padres (+102) AT (MLB) Score: 8-2