Posted:
#326
Public plays may be smaller than pros indeed, but during the Superbowl, the cumulative amount wagered by public is much greater...
Seattle at Denver (02/02/2014)
Posted:
#327
Are You Experienced ?
Have you ever been experienced ?
Underestimating Super Bowl experience , Road Pressure experience,
Media experience, Coach Experience ?
Who's Defense is flying under Radar ?
One that was tops last year,
One's who strength is stopping run more than pass.
Seattle's game plan ?
Beastin' it as long as possible . Reducing Kid Wilson
Big game, road inexperience faux pas via comeback mode =
INTS
Seattle's Speed n' Hyped up D can shut down Broncs down to 6 Halftime Pts.
Unfortunately for Seattle ,haltime show lasts 30 Min.
None better way Icing inexperienced team with momentum lead.
Who's THE best @ no Huddle , Audibles ?
Watch the best at work around Legion of Boom ?
Where was Road Boom on the road this year vs similar yet less formidable QB ?
Does anyone realize Saints averaged 18 pts on the road ?
Frisco's offense was well off TY ?
Zona ?
Carson Palmer ?
Seahawks 0 - 2 on the road TY vs Playoff teams...
One should check n' see when the last time Seattle beat an AFC ( out of division foe ) on the road ...
Bills don't count.
Seattle D got carved up on the road last year by Matty Ice's Falcoons Playoff Team . A team having a substantially less potent D than Denver . Broncs that fell victim to a Flacco Hail Mary .A Ravens team with defensive Boom of it's own that Manning outplayed . A ravens team who won it all .
Was that close for Denver.
Broncos soft white underbelly ?
Same as last year : Their secondary.
However , keep in mind Coach Fox ability and success engineering one sided Running Tebow QB attack .
Wilson's more talented but Seattle's offense is just as one dimensional.
For Seattle to win , they must ambush Fox's D via balanced Run and pass attack ,exploiting Broncs weak secondary.
Unfortunately for Seattle , that should result in a costly Wilson INT ,who has a long way to go understanding
BIG GAME pressure.
Something P. Manning understands, Lives and Breaths
in his sleep .
Posted:
#330
Quote Originally Posted by holtnt:
Some of you Covers
members who have posted multiple write-ups touting Denver are extreme “Homers”
or have a vested interest in a sportsbook somewhere; either way Seattle it is
Ladies and Gentlemen! Put me down for
Seattle ML (+113) for a Dime please.
Thanks! 
Hummmm ...Were'nt you a BIG time Frisco Homer in last year's SuperBowl ?
Posted:
#333
Quote Originally Posted by holtnt:
Some of you Covers
members who have posted multiple write-ups touting Denver are extreme “Homers”
or have a vested interest in a sportsbook somewhere; either way Seattle it is
Ladies and Gentlemen! Put me down for
Seattle ML (+113) for a Dime please.
Thanks!
Still reaching for carrot at stick's end ?
Suspicions gone astray once more Holtnt ?
Do however suspect you being suspiciously ignorant n' delusional.
How about picking winner$ over baseless theories?
GLuck
Posted:
#334
Not a Seattle homer sicsemper, but look at uncommon opponents in this tilt. Seattle had to play defending NFC champ SF 3 times this year, and could have won all three hadn't it been for a late breakaway run by Gore in SF. Then they dismantled the Saints as well as defeating the Panthers for a second consecutive year in their own back yard. Throw in the Cardinals this year who bolstered a top 5 defense minus a self induced fumble by Corbin setting up the game winner, and one could argue that Seattle should've swept em.
The Rams were no slouches either, just ask Indy... There's nine tough games right there and a 7-2 record against. If one analyzes Seattle's losses this year, one would see that they were literally seconds away from going 16-0. Throw in 2-0 in the playoffs and for laughs 4-0 in the preseason including a beat down of the Broncos 40-10 and it looks like 22-0 from one perspective eh?
Denver on the other hand was clearly the best AFC team, but their resume pales in comparison. The Pats were a mash unit all season, losing Talib in the first quarter of the AFC championship game which was the death blow as Manning exposed the backup repeatedly. If you look at Denver's tough opponents, SD, Indy and NE, Denver's record is 3-3. If you think KC is in the conversation ...5-3. Outside of that who did they play?
If we are talking battle tested, my money is on the table, in fact I booked Seattle 10-1 last February before the Harvin deal. Since then, I've hedged my bet, but would still go with the battle tested Seahawks hands down. GL.
Posted:
#337
Quote Originally Posted by forkball:
Not a Seattle homer sicsemper, but look at uncommon opponents in this tilt. Seattle had to play defending NFC champ SF 3 times this year, and could have won all three hadn't it been for a late breakaway run by Gore in SF. Then they dismantled the Saints as well as defeating the Panthers for a second consecutive year in their own back yard. Throw in the Cardinals this year who bolstered a top 5 defense minus a self induced fumble by Corbin setting up the game winner, and one could argue that Seattle should've swept em.
Not a Seattle homer sicsemper, but look at uncommon opponents in this tilt. Seattle had to play defending NFC champ SF 3 times this year, and could have won all three hadn't it been for a late breakaway run by Gore in SF. Then they dismantled the Saints as well as defeating the Panthers for a second consecutive year in their own back yard. Throw in the Cardinals this year who bolstered a top 5 defense minus a self induced fumble by Corbin setting up the game winner, and one could argue that Seattle should've swept em.
The Rams were no slouches either, just ask Indy... There's nine tough games right there and a 7-2 record against. If one analyzes Seattle's losses this year, one would see that they were literally seconds away from going 16-0. Throw in 2-0 in the playoffs and for laughs 4-0 in the preseason including a beat down of the Broncos 40-10 and it looks like 22-0 from one perspective eh?
Denver on the other hand was clearly the best AFC team, but their resume pales in comparison. The Pats were a mash unit all season, losing Talib in the first quarter of the AFC championship game which was the death blow as Manning exposed the backup repeatedly. If you look at Denver's tough opponents, SD, Indy and NE, Denver's record is 3-3. If you think KC is in the conversation ...5-3. Outside of that who did they play?
If we are talking battle tested, my money is on the table, in fact I booked Seattle 10-1 last February before the Harvin deal. Since then, I've hedged my bet, but would still go with the battle tested Seahawks hands down. GL.
Based on Holtnt 's theories , We are guilty of 1 st degree Homerizing my friend.
? 
?
? Dare you bet on IF Factors,
Then Good Luck To you...
However all your comments neglect to mention Seattle's inexperience n' Sub Par play
ON THE ROAD
Barely beating Carolina on the road , first game of the year impresses ?
Try this for $ize :
Name the second toughest venue to play in the NFL ?
That would be KC...
In very few words, Denver has proven success in last 2 years where Seattle struggles :
WINNING ON THE ROAD under Adverse conditions.
That's indisputable.
GL
Posted:
#338
Quote Originally Posted by holtnt:
Some of you Covers
members who have posted multiple write-ups touting Denver are extreme “Homers”
or have a vested interest in a sportsbook somewhere; either way Seattle it is
Ladies and Gentlemen! Put me down for
Seattle ML (+113) for a Dime please.
Thanks!
Regardless of sides always appreciate your write ups Holt. GL today!
Go Hawks!
Posted:
#339
Quote Originally Posted by Louis_IV:
where are you seeing where the money is? No one tells you that. You may see 70% of people picking a side but not the dollar amounts. Line moves (unless they are being manipulated by the books) determine where the coin is, not % of public.
So 65%-70% of the people bet 10 bucks for Denver, while Seahawks bettors bet millions? More people bet one side it means more money 9 times out of 10 is on the side that has been bet up. The books are taking a risk because they will make money on the props. I know that the line moves based on the coin but the books have took a side clearly.
Posted:
#343
Quote Originally Posted by easypics:
Based on Holtnt 's theories , We are guilty of 1 st degree Homerizing my friend.
? ?
? Dare you bet on IF Factors,
Then Good Luck To you...
However all your comments neglect to mention Seattle's inexperience n' Sub Par play
ON THE ROAD
Barely beating Carolina on the road , first game of the year impresses ?
Try this for $ize :
Name the second toughest venue to play in the NFL ?
That would be KC...
In very few words, Denver has proven success in last 2 years where Seattle struggles :
WINNING ON THE ROAD under Adverse conditions.
That's indisputable.
GL
Beating the Chiefs at Arrowhead, weren't they 4-12 last year?
Both teams 6-2 on the road. No home field advantage for either, but I would cite the weather and type of field are home cooking for Seattle. Those don't sound like adverse conditions for Seattle do they?
Both teams 6-2 on the road. No home field advantage for either, but I would cite the weather and type of field are home cooking for Seattle. Those don't sound like adverse conditions for Seattle do they?
Posted:
#346
Las Vegas gave this one to us . When they released seattle minus 2.5 they were begging every idiot in the world to take denver,and it worked.I am not a crazy person who thinks nfl is fixed it isnt ,I am also not one of these guys that thinks I have enough intell to break down this game by x and o's ,I dont care who is injured, heck I dont care who is playing.THE LINESMAN DOES ALL THE WORK FOR ME .What is he trying to do ,who is he trying to get me to bet then go the opposite .My god are they greeddy denver mines 4 from the start would of got a ton of action on both sides ,thats not what the wanted .If you bet denver because of manning or your pathetic analysis of a football game your an idiot.Peyton will leave this game the way most of the greatest ever leave ,too late ,champions like him just can't walk away so before they leave you witness that they are human.They may win but i can get seattle plus 3.5 and its a gift i am positve it will come in .I will also do medium sized parley on seattle and over 46.5 . This would mean i am betting whith the house they dont have all those building from losing.
Posted:
#350
Quote Originally Posted by mellowman7883:
IT wouldnt surprise me at all to see Denver win by one point.
IT wouldnt surprise me at all to see Denver win by one point.
That's what I said way back on page 1......
If you're Seahawks +1.5, 2, 2.5, even 3 - you might get lucky. But Broncos M/L, that's the wager......
You'll see, you'll all see the "drama" unfold like a daytime afternoon soap opera.....
Quad out - going to a SB party. See y'all on the other side.....
GOOD LUCK ALL!!!!!!!!!
Hot Forum Topics
