Posted:
#76
[Quote: Originally Posted by duffield550]
hahahahaah
hahahahaah
Philadelphia at Washington (11/15/2010)
Posted:
#77
Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah:
Um. Sandman, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but you didn't win that Bills/Lions bet - let me know if my math is correct, but 14 minus 12 equals 2, not 3 - Just FYI, thank you. Here's your post
QUOTE Originally Posted by Sandman23:
Gents...save all your money and wager only on this game. This is the week.
and here's where you posted it, post #30
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=65?=100874793&page=2
Um. Sandman, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but you didn't win that Bills/Lions bet - let me know if my math is correct, but 14 minus 12 equals 2, not 3 - Just FYI, thank you. Here's your post
QUOTE Originally Posted by Sandman23:
Gents...save all your money and wager only on this game. This is the week.
Buffalo -2.5 LARGE
| Nov 14 7:25am | Football - Pending | 10000 to win 9520 | |
| 1. Football - Buffalo Bills - spread -2½ (-105) for the entire game held on Nov 14 at 1:00pm [pending] | |||
and here's where you posted it, post #30
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=65?=100874793&page=2
lmao, that's funny shit. Gotta watch the whole game. He must have missed that back door cover with no time left. They scored the TD but missed the 2 pt conversion. Now he's saying he bought a point but that is not what it said. But whatever, it's his money, not ours so let's drop it.
Seems like everyone is on Philly and the over. Same here. I hate being on the public side but really no choice tonight. Philly is a much improved team since the last meeting and Washington has regressed a bit. Stats guys will tell you it lands around 3+ points and a total of 46 and change. It is what it is. Sometimes the public wins.
Gl all,
Tex
Posted:
#79
Quote Originally Posted by 12albert:
just look at the stats....mcnabb comming off a bench destoroyed...redskins comming off a by ,,,,covered....i know its the eagles,but skins are going after vick like the first game...be aware of the dogs,, they are going to bite..
its getting better and better...ill go with the under
just look at the stats....mcnabb comming off a bench destoroyed...redskins comming off a by ,,,,covered....i know its the eagles,but skins are going after vick like the first game...be aware of the dogs,, they are going to bite..
Posted:
#80
Washington as a home dog coming off a road loss is money. I know there was a bye mixed in there, but the last thing people remember about the Skins was that beatdown by Detroit (who just lost to Buffalo). Washington looks like a desparate team (see Miami, Jax and Denver this week). Philly is good as a road favorite, but not when they are laying 3.5-6.5.
With that being said, you have to consider that Philly is money on MNF and the Skins are awful on MNF. Both defenses have been struggling against the pass. Both offenses have playmakers.
The play is the over 43.5
Posted:
#82
Low scoring game last time out. An extra week to prepare for both. MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL. A contract extension for McNabb after being benched 2 weeks ago.Washington may very well win this game. Factors are lined up which make it likely. This is very hard for me, because i'm a fan of Michael Vick and I want to see him succeed. This will be a hard fought, fun game to watch.........and McNabb shows Dan Snyder that he just made a great investment.
REDSKINS + 160 and OVER 44
2 team parlay
Posted:
#100
Quote Originally Posted by buckeye61:
I'll take Philly ATS but if Wash had only a 5% chance of winning and 0% chance of covering (which could only be the opposite), I'd lay my house or your trailer on it. I agree with others, you cheapen this site with inaccurate figures and analysis...if we could call it analysis.
'
I'll take Philly ATS but if Wash had only a 5% chance of winning and 0% chance of covering (which could only be the opposite), I'd lay my house or your trailer on it. I agree with others, you cheapen this site with inaccurate figures and analysis...if we could call it analysis.
Kill me because I hurriedly typed what I had to say backwards. Where do you get off with your holier-than -thou attitude, pal. With your capping over the years, you leave a lot to be desired with your analysis. I cheapen the site - SH**!
Hot Forum Topics
