Pack -4.5 is a little shaky, but I just can't back the Vikings. I just can't bring myself to do it. I don't even think I could tease them in this game......
"Daaaaaable Check" or not - Pack minus whatever
Pack -4.5 is a little shaky, but I just can't back the Vikings. I just can't bring myself to do it. I don't even think I could tease them in this game......
Pack -4.5 is a little shaky, but I just can't back the Vikings. I just can't bring myself to do it. I don't even think I could tease them in this game......
"Daaaaaable Check" or not - Pack minus whatever
Hmmmm....that is what I am wondering Quad. Is Minnesota even safe to tease here at +14? I remember last time I went against Flynn in GB when the Lions were in town. I got screwed pretty badly. He threw for like almost 600 yards, doing better than even Aaron Rodgers would have. Green Bay was dogs in that game though.
Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah:
Pack -4.5 is a little shaky, but I just can't back the Vikings. I just can't bring myself to do it. I don't even think I could tease them in this game......
"Daaaaaable Check" or not - Pack minus whatever
Hmmmm....that is what I am wondering Quad. Is Minnesota even safe to tease here at +14? I remember last time I went against Flynn in GB when the Lions were in town. I got screwed pretty badly. He threw for like almost 600 yards, doing better than even Aaron Rodgers would have. Green Bay was dogs in that game though.
Why in the Heck would they start Tolzien and not Flynn? They said for "An element of surprise" so they can insert Flynn at the last moment. I think that's stupid. The Vikings could easily find the same info I just did. So what the heck is going on here? I don't understand why GB is only +2.5 on the BIG teaser cards here in vegas and Minnesota is +17.5. It all points to a GB win here, (They need to win to stay in the race) and I have to admit I have a gut feeling all along that Minnesota will be blown out here. I mean, Green Bay should win this by AT LEAST 7 pts but I need confirmation before I touch this one.
Will flynn be starting, and if not, what are the Vikings chances here of pulling the upset? Green Bay has NOT looked good since Rodgers absence.
Why in the Heck would they start Tolzien and not Flynn? They said for "An element of surprise" so they can insert Flynn at the last moment. I think that's stupid. The Vikings could easily find the same info I just did. So what the heck is going on here? I don't understand why GB is only +2.5 on the BIG teaser cards here in vegas and Minnesota is +17.5. It all points to a GB win here, (They need to win to stay in the race) and I have to admit I have a gut feeling all along that Minnesota will be blown out here. I mean, Green Bay should win this by AT LEAST 7 pts but I need confirmation before I touch this one.
Will flynn be starting, and if not, what are the Vikings chances here of pulling the upset? Green Bay has NOT looked good since Rodgers absence.
As much as I want to bet Green Bay here, I am going to have to say for now....THIS IS A FREAKIN NO PLAY!!
Green Bay has just been terrible. According to covers they havent lost 3 straight at home since 06 which was 7 years ago but I still don't think that's enough to pull the trigger here.
As much as I want to bet Green Bay here, I am going to have to say for now....THIS IS A FREAKIN NO PLAY!!
Green Bay has just been terrible. According to covers they havent lost 3 straight at home since 06 which was 7 years ago but I still don't think that's enough to pull the trigger here.
Tolzien is so good then why did I read that he threw THREE Picks and ZERO interceptions in his game at NY?
And Flynn threw for almost 500 yards (better than A Rodgers) in his last GB game.
What is your logic? I haven't ever seen Tolzien play but I just read the stats. He doesn't sound good at all to me, getting blown out by a crap team like the Giants
Tolzien is so good then why did I read that he threw THREE Picks and ZERO interceptions in his game at NY?
And Flynn threw for almost 500 yards (better than A Rodgers) in his last GB game.
What is your logic? I haven't ever seen Tolzien play but I just read the stats. He doesn't sound good at all to me, getting blown out by a crap team like the Giants
Vue, how the heck do you have only 2812 posts since 2008? I see you posting in these threads all the time!
One time I posted over 700 messages in one day (No joke) and then they banned me from the message board. Ever since then I try to go easy and I still get people who complain about me.
Yeah I know I need to get a life.
Vue, how the heck do you have only 2812 posts since 2008? I see you posting in these threads all the time!
One time I posted over 700 messages in one day (No joke) and then they banned me from the message board. Ever since then I try to go easy and I still get people who complain about me.
The Quad is equally as shocking with only a lousy 1499 posts in over 3 years, and I see that mofo in these things like a virus.
LOL
Ever heard of "Quality" over "Quantity"??
Just like this post you're reading right now = "Quality"
But I'd say, (and I'm rounding down - giving you the benefit of the doubt) 575 of your 600 posts are completely unnecessary. Just pure nonsense.....
To relate this to something you might know about (because, judging by your "all hours of the night" posts, and ranting and raving about nothing) - Cocaine, I would be the pure, unstepped on, 100% Coca - not even the synthetic stuff....
You, on the other hand, would be the baby laxative that the common street dealer puts in at the last minute to get an extra $10 out of some junkie - just pure filler with no "medicinal" benefits....
See, just like that, "Quality" over "Quantity"
Quote Originally Posted by mgmprofits:
The Quad is equally as shocking with only a lousy 1499 posts in over 3 years, and I see that mofo in these things like a virus.
LOL
Ever heard of "Quality" over "Quantity"??
Just like this post you're reading right now = "Quality"
But I'd say, (and I'm rounding down - giving you the benefit of the doubt) 575 of your 600 posts are completely unnecessary. Just pure nonsense.....
To relate this to something you might know about (because, judging by your "all hours of the night" posts, and ranting and raving about nothing) - Cocaine, I would be the pure, unstepped on, 100% Coca - not even the synthetic stuff....
You, on the other hand, would be the baby laxative that the common street dealer puts in at the last minute to get an extra $10 out of some junkie - just pure filler with no "medicinal" benefits....
Just like this post you're reading right now = "Quality"
But I'd say, (and I'm rounding down - giving you the benefit of the doubt) 575 of your 600 posts are completely unnecessary. Just pure nonsense.....
To relate this to something you might know about (because, judging by your "all hours of the night" posts, and ranting and raving about nothing) - Cocaine, I would be the pure, unstepped on, 100% Coca - not even the synthetic stuff....
You, on the other hand, would be the baby laxative that the common street dealer puts in at the last minute to get an extra $10 out of some junkie - just pure filler with no "medicinal" benefits....
See, just like that, "Quality" over "Quantity"
LMFAO!! That's the funniest s.hit I've read in a while! Thanks for this quality post.
Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah:
Ever heard of "Quality" over "Quantity"??
Just like this post you're reading right now = "Quality"
But I'd say, (and I'm rounding down - giving you the benefit of the doubt) 575 of your 600 posts are completely unnecessary. Just pure nonsense.....
To relate this to something you might know about (because, judging by your "all hours of the night" posts, and ranting and raving about nothing) - Cocaine, I would be the pure, unstepped on, 100% Coca - not even the synthetic stuff....
You, on the other hand, would be the baby laxative that the common street dealer puts in at the last minute to get an extra $10 out of some junkie - just pure filler with no "medicinal" benefits....
See, just like that, "Quality" over "Quantity"
LMFAO!! That's the funniest s.hit I've read in a while! Thanks for this quality post.
And remember it was me who defended your "Cuntler" write up.
Everyone else was bashing you. I saw the value in the Bears ML, as I heard the "voice" tell me DA BEARS before I even read your post.
You were like "You heard it here first" but really you were the 2nd place I heard it. So I put 2 and 2 together (or rather 1 and 1) and Boy...you wouldn't believe the underdog parlay I had.
And remember it was me who defended your "Cuntler" write up.
Everyone else was bashing you. I saw the value in the Bears ML, as I heard the "voice" tell me DA BEARS before I even read your post.
You were like "You heard it here first" but really you were the 2nd place I heard it. So I put 2 and 2 together (or rather 1 and 1) and Boy...you wouldn't believe the underdog parlay I had.
Hot Forum Topics
