Seattle is good! Maybe just as good as the Pack! They play tough at home! Having said that.....why aren't they favored by 3? I'm going to treat this as a suspicious line, and vegas knows. Take the Pack tonight. And.....you know it's going over!
Packers 34 Seahawks 23
Seattle is good! Maybe just as good as the Pack! They play tough at home! Having said that.....why aren't they favored by 3? I'm going to treat this as a suspicious line, and vegas knows. Take the Pack tonight. And.....you know it's going over!
Seattle is good! Maybe just as good as the Pack! They play tough at home! Having said that.....why aren't they favored by 3? I'm going to treat this as a suspicious line, and vegas knows. Take the Pack tonight. And.....you know it's going over!
Packers 34 Seahawks 23
Seattle is good! Maybe just as good as the Pack! They play tough at home! Having said that.....why aren't they favored by 3? I'm going to treat this as a suspicious line, and vegas knows. Take the Pack tonight. And.....you know it's going over!
Last minute pick for those interested. It is important to take a look at the trends and recent history I agree. But many of you have even admitted the Hawks and Packers will try and establish a running game. Running the ball repeatedly as the Hawks and Packers have been doing= UNDER. Also, SEA is 2-0 on the UNDER in last 2 games. Packers have gone UNDER in last 13 OF 19 ROAD games. Trends say Packers at SEA has gone over 5 of the last 7. But I would beg to differ these teams are different. It is also important to note that Rodgers and Co. are coming off an extended week of practice and are well rested. If this were in GB itd be a -7 or -6 line for GB but because it is in SEA it is sitting at -4.
I made the mistake last week taking the Bears against this GB team who came off a loss and that was a BIG mistake. No the Hawks are not the BEARS but they are not the Packers either. Look for Rodgers to make some more errors and throw at least 1 INT as well as it being a Defensive battle to move the ball around. I see Rodgers throwing for 2 TDs and 1 INT with Wilson running for his life most the night and throwing 1 TD and 2 INTs.
Won't be surprised to see Lynch get into the endzone and challk up an 85 yard night with 1 TD. It will be close up until the 4th quarter look for Packers to run rampid and drain the clock in the 4th keeping this one UNDER 46. I do not trust the -4 so I'm laying $100 on the UNDER and GB SU (-180)
Prediction: GB 24 SEA 20
PICK: GB
SPREAD: PUSH/SEA +4 (bovada)
TOTAL 46 (bovada): UNDER
Last minute pick for those interested. It is important to take a look at the trends and recent history I agree. But many of you have even admitted the Hawks and Packers will try and establish a running game. Running the ball repeatedly as the Hawks and Packers have been doing= UNDER. Also, SEA is 2-0 on the UNDER in last 2 games. Packers have gone UNDER in last 13 OF 19 ROAD games. Trends say Packers at SEA has gone over 5 of the last 7. But I would beg to differ these teams are different. It is also important to note that Rodgers and Co. are coming off an extended week of practice and are well rested. If this were in GB itd be a -7 or -6 line for GB but because it is in SEA it is sitting at -4.
I made the mistake last week taking the Bears against this GB team who came off a loss and that was a BIG mistake. No the Hawks are not the BEARS but they are not the Packers either. Look for Rodgers to make some more errors and throw at least 1 INT as well as it being a Defensive battle to move the ball around. I see Rodgers throwing for 2 TDs and 1 INT with Wilson running for his life most the night and throwing 1 TD and 2 INTs.
Won't be surprised to see Lynch get into the endzone and challk up an 85 yard night with 1 TD. It will be close up until the 4th quarter look for Packers to run rampid and drain the clock in the 4th keeping this one UNDER 46. I do not trust the -4 so I'm laying $100 on the UNDER and GB SU (-180)
Packer offense poorly balanced (29 straight games without a 100-yd rusher), and clearly not clicking through the air (3 TDs vs 2 picks and 8 sacks... with lotsa dropped passes L2G at Lambeau!). First road game at Seattle (and the infamous 12th man) wouldn't seem to be what the proverbial doctor would order. Solid Seahawk D allowing just 46 ypg TY and less than 16 ppg 5 of L6G on this field.Packers 5th in total D and 2nd vs the pass and lead league in sacks with 11… BUT, they CAN be run on and Seattle is a strong running team, which fits nicely into my template tonight as they’ll wanna eat clock and keep pressure off rookie QB Wilson. Green Bay gets RB Starks back tonight and after finding their running game a bit LW with Benson (81 yds ), I look for them to also try to establish the run. Green Bay stated LW that they abandoned the running game too early versus San Fran and I look for a big dose of Starks and Benson tonight.This game screams ball control to me... and that spells money.
Green Bay/SEATTLE Under 46
Looks good so far. GJ sniffing it out.
Quote Originally Posted by RandyandShirl:
My money's on the UNDER tonight.
Packer offense poorly balanced (29 straight games without a 100-yd rusher), and clearly not clicking through the air (3 TDs vs 2 picks and 8 sacks... with lotsa dropped passes L2G at Lambeau!). First road game at Seattle (and the infamous 12th man) wouldn't seem to be what the proverbial doctor would order. Solid Seahawk D allowing just 46 ypg TY and less than 16 ppg 5 of L6G on this field.Packers 5th in total D and 2nd vs the pass and lead league in sacks with 11… BUT, they CAN be run on and Seattle is a strong running team, which fits nicely into my template tonight as they’ll wanna eat clock and keep pressure off rookie QB Wilson. Green Bay gets RB Starks back tonight and after finding their running game a bit LW with Benson (81 yds ), I look for them to also try to establish the run. Green Bay stated LW that they abandoned the running game too early versus San Fran and I look for a big dose of Starks and Benson tonight.This game screams ball control to me... and that spells money.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
