• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 7
      NFL Week 7
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Patriots-Bears Picks
      • NFL ATS Picks
      • Survivor Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    US Army Begging Soldiers to Come Back!

    12 Next Last»
    sundance
    Raiders22
    joe pockets
    UNIMAN
    wallstreetcappers
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 163
    Posts: 43
    12 Next Last»
     
    sundance
    sundance
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2002
    Posts: 16805
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 9:33 AM ET #1

    The United States Army under the leadership of joe biden can not recruit young and fit Americans into its Army. How are they trying to fix this issue? They are sending letters out to wrongfully discharged soldiers who stood up proudly and refused to inject graphene oxide and spike protein into their body! The United States Army is begging highly trained former soldiers to return to an entity that forced them out and onto the street without a severance package!

     

    This is the evil Left in action. Would any of you go running back to the very woke Army under the leadership of 2 very much overweight individuals named Austin and Milley? Highly unlikely. The short version of the story is the woke US Army destroyed itself by forcing soldiers to take the very ineffective and very unsafe vaccine. The link below includes the letter sent to former soldiers. It is ironically signed by a person with the 1st name of Hope! Say what!  The question of the morning is. How is the United States going to fight a 3 front war while at the same time defend our homeland under liberal, woke and unpatriotic leadership? Here you go!

    Brad Miller on X: "Many have seen this letter. I just got mine. When I resigned from the Army, it was clear DoD was breaking the law (and senior leaders were likely engaged in treason). Why doesn't the Army ask me if I want my resignation converted into a retirement dated with the release date… https://t.co/BMscmhoVkB" / X (twitter.com)

    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.

    The United States Army under the leadership of joe biden can not recruit young and fit Americans into its Army. How are they trying to fix this issue? They are sending letters out to wrongfully discharged soldiers who stood up proudly and refused to inject graphene oxide and spike protein into their body! The United States Army is begging highly trained former soldiers to return to an entity that forced them out and onto the street without a severance package!

     

    This is the evil Left in action. Would any of you go running back to the very woke Army under the leadership of 2 very much overweight individuals named Austin and Milley? Highly unlikely. The short version of the story is the woke US Army destroyed itself by forcing soldiers to take the very ineffective and very unsafe vaccine. The link below includes the letter sent to former soldiers. It is ironically signed by a person with the 1st name of Hope! Say what!  The question of the morning is. How is the United States going to fight a 3 front war while at the same time defend our homeland under liberal, woke and unpatriotic leadership? Here you go!

    Brad Miller on X: "Many have seen this letter. I just got mine. When I resigned from the Army, it was clear DoD was breaking the law (and senior leaders were likely engaged in treason). Why doesn't the Army ask me if I want my resignation converted into a retirement dated with the release date… https://t.co/BMscmhoVkB" / X (twitter.com)

     
    sundance
    sundance
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2002
    Posts: 16805
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 9:38 AM ET #2

    Will the 'Bookburner's inside the power structure of Covers unceremoniously move this important thread to the PB? Only time will tell.

    Reply

    Will the 'Bookburner's inside the power structure of Covers unceremoniously move this important thread to the PB? Only time will tell.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34784
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 12:37 PM ET #3

    I saw this the other day also.  The issue is a lot of folks are saying it is not nearly enough without backpay and time served added in.

    But it was a complete disaster to have put those folks through that.  But the Left will never completely admit being wrong on this issue.

    Maybe this will somehow help the folks that were not in the military that lost jobs in some way as well.  I never see a big class-action or anything monetarily being done.  I would have to be positive and hope the USA and the Western World have learned from this and might not make some of these types of mistakes on something of this sort in the future.

    You are very correct that it was very political.

    As one of the guys said: "And once again the democrats were on the wrong side of history".

    Maybe this will help to start to turn around the perception some folks have of the government and the military after this debacle.

    peace_5

    Reply

    I saw this the other day also.  The issue is a lot of folks are saying it is not nearly enough without backpay and time served added in.

    But it was a complete disaster to have put those folks through that.  But the Left will never completely admit being wrong on this issue.

    Maybe this will somehow help the folks that were not in the military that lost jobs in some way as well.  I never see a big class-action or anything monetarily being done.  I would have to be positive and hope the USA and the Western World have learned from this and might not make some of these types of mistakes on something of this sort in the future.

    You are very correct that it was very political.

    As one of the guys said: "And once again the democrats were on the wrong side of history".

    Maybe this will help to start to turn around the perception some folks have of the government and the military after this debacle.

    peace_5

     
    joe pockets
    joe pockets
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2000
    Posts: 5544
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 1:18 PM ET #4

    @Raiders22

    They will be leaving in droves because of Tommy Tuberville and his ridiculous stance on tying abortions to promoting career military personnel!

     

    Reply

    @Raiders22

    They will be leaving in droves because of Tommy Tuberville and his ridiculous stance on tying abortions to promoting career military personnel!

     

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34784
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 2:15 PM ET #5

    Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets:

    @Raiders22 They will be leaving in droves because of Tommy Tuberville and his ridiculous stance on tying abortions to promoting career military personnel!

    No.  They will not, as it does not affect them.  peace_5

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets:

    @Raiders22 They will be leaving in droves because of Tommy Tuberville and his ridiculous stance on tying abortions to promoting career military personnel!

    No.  They will not, as it does not affect them.  peace_5

     
    UNIMAN
    UNIMAN
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2014
    Posts: 10454
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 4:04 PM ET #6

    Military Times; 

    With a woke military, whose most senior officer is concerned about ‘white rage,’ searching for a tattle tale process to discover and discharge white ‘extremists,’ blaming it on toxic masculinity, discharging real warriors for not getting vaccinated, having a two-day stand down to discuss white extremism, the promotion and expansion of women in combat, lowering physical fitness standards to accommodate naturally weaker women, recruiting with social justice and diversity ads, stating we need more female and minority pilots, promotions based on the color of one’s skin or genitalia, lowering recruiting standards, blaming the military for 247 years of institutional racism, is not the military I was in for 26 years,” wrote Dale Papworth, who said he was a retired Marine Corps lieutenant colonel.

     

     

    Reply

    Military Times; 

    With a woke military, whose most senior officer is concerned about ‘white rage,’ searching for a tattle tale process to discover and discharge white ‘extremists,’ blaming it on toxic masculinity, discharging real warriors for not getting vaccinated, having a two-day stand down to discuss white extremism, the promotion and expansion of women in combat, lowering physical fitness standards to accommodate naturally weaker women, recruiting with social justice and diversity ads, stating we need more female and minority pilots, promotions based on the color of one’s skin or genitalia, lowering recruiting standards, blaming the military for 247 years of institutional racism, is not the military I was in for 26 years,” wrote Dale Papworth, who said he was a retired Marine Corps lieutenant colonel.

     

     

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58436
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 4:34 PM ET #7

    Wow another partisan finger pointing thread by sundance, who would have thought?

    Yes Tommy is an extremist, yes he is being a partisan jerk in the way he is handling his position and yes religion should be out of politics completely.

    Here is my thought on the military issue, not that I think sundance made the thread because he cares about the military rather that he can throw more religion garbage and partisan nonsense to his pedigree.

    The issue with the military numbers dropping is much more about society and the fact that draconian measures are not being allowed compared to the past, even in the military. You cannot abuse, degrade, embarrass, humiliate, segregate and persecute like the military has to "toughen up" the enlistment members. My brother has been serving as an enlistment rep for the Marines for the last 25 years and he has said over time it has been more and more difficult to get people to enlist. People are not wanting to take the risk of going to war at the compensation being offered AND the toxic environment that existed in the past. Now with the horrid practices being reduced you see the people joining and the level of base being reduced. 

    This isnt about Biden it isnt about Trump it isnt about Obama it is about society and the fact that people do not want to be in the military. If this IS a left issue, then it is the complete responsibility of the right to get out there and sign up all the religious loyalists that would make Tommy proud and make George Bush proud, get them in the military and get our numbers UP. Get the soft sissy left losers out of the military and lets get the real men and women, those who want to read the bible and will vote against abortion, get the real Americans in the military and make this country great!

    an_roll_laugh

    Reply

    Wow another partisan finger pointing thread by sundance, who would have thought?

    Yes Tommy is an extremist, yes he is being a partisan jerk in the way he is handling his position and yes religion should be out of politics completely.

    Here is my thought on the military issue, not that I think sundance made the thread because he cares about the military rather that he can throw more religion garbage and partisan nonsense to his pedigree.

    The issue with the military numbers dropping is much more about society and the fact that draconian measures are not being allowed compared to the past, even in the military. You cannot abuse, degrade, embarrass, humiliate, segregate and persecute like the military has to "toughen up" the enlistment members. My brother has been serving as an enlistment rep for the Marines for the last 25 years and he has said over time it has been more and more difficult to get people to enlist. People are not wanting to take the risk of going to war at the compensation being offered AND the toxic environment that existed in the past. Now with the horrid practices being reduced you see the people joining and the level of base being reduced. 

    This isnt about Biden it isnt about Trump it isnt about Obama it is about society and the fact that people do not want to be in the military. If this IS a left issue, then it is the complete responsibility of the right to get out there and sign up all the religious loyalists that would make Tommy proud and make George Bush proud, get them in the military and get our numbers UP. Get the soft sissy left losers out of the military and lets get the real men and women, those who want to read the bible and will vote against abortion, get the real Americans in the military and make this country great!

    an_roll_laugh

     
    UNIMAN
    UNIMAN
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2014
    Posts: 10454
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 4:47 PM ET #8

    Since 2014, the military has been reporting that because of obesity, adverse criminal history, physical problems, drug use, or lack of a high school degree, only 29% of Americans qualify to join the military without a waiver.

    At face value, that alone is an appalling statement about U.S. public health and schooling since military standards don’t require a candidate to be a superman or superwoman, just healthy and educated.

    Reply

    Since 2014, the military has been reporting that because of obesity, adverse criminal history, physical problems, drug use, or lack of a high school degree, only 29% of Americans qualify to join the military without a waiver.

    At face value, that alone is an appalling statement about U.S. public health and schooling since military standards don’t require a candidate to be a superman or superwoman, just healthy and educated.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34784
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 5:30 PM ET #9

    @wallstreetcappers

     Did you want to address his post at all?  He was posting about the issue with forcing enlistees to take the Covid shot, which was a Leftist issue.  This post was about trying to recruit those particular folks back now.  A de facto admission of being wrong at the time.

    All of you guys on the Left want it to be about whatever you want it to be about, like abortion and religion.

    The Left will never admit being wrong but you guys were wrong on the forced Covid shots and that is all his post seemed to be about.

    Of course, it is partisan.  As almost all of the threads in here are -- Left and Right.

    What should they now do if they want these guys affected by this Leftist policy to come back?  

    Should they have even reached out at all?

    Reply

    @wallstreetcappers

     Did you want to address his post at all?  He was posting about the issue with forcing enlistees to take the Covid shot, which was a Leftist issue.  This post was about trying to recruit those particular folks back now.  A de facto admission of being wrong at the time.

    All of you guys on the Left want it to be about whatever you want it to be about, like abortion and religion.

    The Left will never admit being wrong but you guys were wrong on the forced Covid shots and that is all his post seemed to be about.

    Of course, it is partisan.  As almost all of the threads in here are -- Left and Right.

    What should they now do if they want these guys affected by this Leftist policy to come back?  

    Should they have even reached out at all?

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58436
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 5:47 PM ET #10

    @Raiders22

     Did you read my post at all? 

    He wasnt making a thread about the state of the military he was making another left vs right partisan blame thread, read his paragraph two and then try and come back and tell me it is an issue about a Covid booster requirement. What does WOKE have to do with a Covid booster? Covid vacc is not WOKE and is not a left partisan tool.

    You are little different, why are you replying when you are partisan yourself? His messages are never about content and always about partisan complaining.

    Reply

    @Raiders22

     Did you read my post at all? 

    He wasnt making a thread about the state of the military he was making another left vs right partisan blame thread, read his paragraph two and then try and come back and tell me it is an issue about a Covid booster requirement. What does WOKE have to do with a Covid booster? Covid vacc is not WOKE and is not a left partisan tool.

    You are little different, why are you replying when you are partisan yourself? His messages are never about content and always about partisan complaining.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34784
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 6:09 PM ET #11

    @wallstreetcappers

    This is the paragraph: 

     

    This is the evil Left in action. Would any of you go running back to the very woke Army under the leadership of 2 very much overweight individuals named Austin and Milley? Highly unlikely. The short version of the story is the woke US Army destroyed itself by forcing soldiers to take the very ineffective and very unsafe vaccine. The link below includes the letter sent to former soldiers. It is ironically signed by a person with the 1st name of Hope! Say what!  The question of the morning is. How is the United States going to fight a 3 front war while at the same time defend our homeland under liberal, woke and unpatriotic leadership? Here you go!

     

    It is very obvious what he is saying.  They forced folks out that would not take the Covid shot.  At the same time they are having a recruitment problem because, in part, of their 'woke policies'.

    Now they are trying to at least get those back in that had been in before.  At no point did I take from his post that the forced Covid shot was a 'woke policy'.  They are separate issues altogether --but combined they have caused the lack of recruitment to be an issue.

    It is not that hard to comprehend if you focus on his point.

    Again -- would you like to address the main point of the attempt at 'recalling' those that were forced out because of a POLITICAL LEFTIST policy in order to help make up for the drop in recruitment due, in part, to the WOKE POLICIES?  Even if you want to say following all of this nonsense pushed by the Left on Covid to include the nonsensical Leftist Woke agenda -- okay, maybe; but not even necessarily.  You can make an obvious correlation by seeing who was pushing both and the pushback when the policies were not quickly adapted and strictly followed -- I can see that.  But take that out if you like and the point he made still stands.

    I am replying because you were conflating the issues and missed the target with your post while bringing in abortion and religion.  

    What do you think -- that once a person from the Right starts a post only those from the Left should reply?

    So, what are your feelings on the Covid issue and why do you not think it is partisan?  What should they do about it? Nothing?

    Reply

    @wallstreetcappers

    This is the paragraph: 

     

    This is the evil Left in action. Would any of you go running back to the very woke Army under the leadership of 2 very much overweight individuals named Austin and Milley? Highly unlikely. The short version of the story is the woke US Army destroyed itself by forcing soldiers to take the very ineffective and very unsafe vaccine. The link below includes the letter sent to former soldiers. It is ironically signed by a person with the 1st name of Hope! Say what!  The question of the morning is. How is the United States going to fight a 3 front war while at the same time defend our homeland under liberal, woke and unpatriotic leadership? Here you go!

     

    It is very obvious what he is saying.  They forced folks out that would not take the Covid shot.  At the same time they are having a recruitment problem because, in part, of their 'woke policies'.

    Now they are trying to at least get those back in that had been in before.  At no point did I take from his post that the forced Covid shot was a 'woke policy'.  They are separate issues altogether --but combined they have caused the lack of recruitment to be an issue.

    It is not that hard to comprehend if you focus on his point.

    Again -- would you like to address the main point of the attempt at 'recalling' those that were forced out because of a POLITICAL LEFTIST policy in order to help make up for the drop in recruitment due, in part, to the WOKE POLICIES?  Even if you want to say following all of this nonsense pushed by the Left on Covid to include the nonsensical Leftist Woke agenda -- okay, maybe; but not even necessarily.  You can make an obvious correlation by seeing who was pushing both and the pushback when the policies were not quickly adapted and strictly followed -- I can see that.  But take that out if you like and the point he made still stands.

    I am replying because you were conflating the issues and missed the target with your post while bringing in abortion and religion.  

    What do you think -- that once a person from the Right starts a post only those from the Left should reply?

    So, what are your feelings on the Covid issue and why do you not think it is partisan?  What should they do about it? Nothing?

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58436
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 6:24 PM ET #12

    What does WOKE have to do with a Covid booster? 

    My thoughts about the Covid booster is it has nothing to do with partisan right vs left, I stated that above. So are you as mad that foreign travel regularly requires booster updates and vacc specifications? Is foreign travel a WOKE left agenda too?

    Sundance does not care about making the military stronger, he is all about saying WOKE and LEFT vs RIGHT and forcing partisan narratives.

    Reply

    What does WOKE have to do with a Covid booster? 

    My thoughts about the Covid booster is it has nothing to do with partisan right vs left, I stated that above. So are you as mad that foreign travel regularly requires booster updates and vacc specifications? Is foreign travel a WOKE left agenda too?

    Sundance does not care about making the military stronger, he is all about saying WOKE and LEFT vs RIGHT and forcing partisan narratives.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34784
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 6:42 PM ET #13

    @wallstreetcappers

     What does WOKE have to do with a Covid booster? 

    In his post?  Probably nothing more than the fact that the same group that are pushing the Woke policies were the ones pushing the Covid policies.  But I did not take his post to be ABOUT anything but the fact that BOTH are having an effect on numbers in recruitment.

     

    My thoughts about the Covid booster is it has nothing to do with partisan right vs left, I stated that above. So are you as mad that foreign travel regularly requires booster updates and vacc specifications? Is foreign travel a WOKE left agenda too?

    Who cares what your thoughts are about the 'Covid Booster'?  No one asked you that.  I asked you how you felt about them reaching out to the guys/gals they forced out for refusing the Covid shot?

    Again try not to confuse the issues to avoid addressing this thread's point.  But a short answer is YES, if it is related to Covid and NO if it is related to longheld and adapted standards before.  Many countries have always required this sort of thing and is was not split along political lines and, by definition, not a Woke issue.

    Sundance does not care about making the military stronger, he is all about saying WOKE and LEFT vs RIGHT and forcing partisan narratives.

    Who cares?  What does that matter in order to make his point?  But how would you know his thoughts?  But it certainly seems he is interested in a stronger military from that first post.  Maybe you should reread it.  Questioning the Covid shots and forcing folks out at a time they knew enlistment was going down due to other issues as well.  Then he questions how you guys could fight a war with all of that going on?  That seems like legitimate points, if not concern.

    And yet again, you continue to avoid answering the questions?

    Should the military have reached out to the ones they forced out with the Covid shots?  And was that wrong to start with?

    Reply

    @wallstreetcappers

     What does WOKE have to do with a Covid booster? 

    In his post?  Probably nothing more than the fact that the same group that are pushing the Woke policies were the ones pushing the Covid policies.  But I did not take his post to be ABOUT anything but the fact that BOTH are having an effect on numbers in recruitment.

     

    My thoughts about the Covid booster is it has nothing to do with partisan right vs left, I stated that above. So are you as mad that foreign travel regularly requires booster updates and vacc specifications? Is foreign travel a WOKE left agenda too?

    Who cares what your thoughts are about the 'Covid Booster'?  No one asked you that.  I asked you how you felt about them reaching out to the guys/gals they forced out for refusing the Covid shot?

    Again try not to confuse the issues to avoid addressing this thread's point.  But a short answer is YES, if it is related to Covid and NO if it is related to longheld and adapted standards before.  Many countries have always required this sort of thing and is was not split along political lines and, by definition, not a Woke issue.

    Sundance does not care about making the military stronger, he is all about saying WOKE and LEFT vs RIGHT and forcing partisan narratives.

    Who cares?  What does that matter in order to make his point?  But how would you know his thoughts?  But it certainly seems he is interested in a stronger military from that first post.  Maybe you should reread it.  Questioning the Covid shots and forcing folks out at a time they knew enlistment was going down due to other issues as well.  Then he questions how you guys could fight a war with all of that going on?  That seems like legitimate points, if not concern.

    And yet again, you continue to avoid answering the questions?

    Should the military have reached out to the ones they forced out with the Covid shots?  And was that wrong to start with?

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58436
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 6:55 PM ET #14

    I think you are forcing a point just to try and start up with me again, his point isnt that it is GOOD OR BAD that they reach out to those who decided not to stay with the military and that they might come back. That is how you are spinning a fight with me.

    I take what he says because it is all he says as this- the REASON for the exodus in the first place was due to a WOKE LEFTIST Covid booster narrative, that is the topic of the thread not if it is good or bad to reach out to bring people back.

    100% the difference to me to your faulty narrative is the way he wrote it and concluded it. If he seriously was going down your fake path then the thread would have been that there is an opportunity to increase the enlistment numbers and potentially we could be stronger with our military forces if the booster requirement was lifted or removed and that there was potential to change declining numbers. That is not at ALL what he said, so spin all you want that is not the direction of HIS thread, that is never ever the case. His threads are always left vs right, any partisan way he can try and poke the left side or elevate the right side.

    You are so funny even attempting to portray him that he was saying should we reach out to those who did not get the shot...and at the time that requirement was in place that was determined to be the proper approach. BUT as things change so can approaches. Lets not play silly games and try to spin that sundance has a constructive thing to say about making things better and not have it be completely yet another partisan garbage thread...which is exactly all this is.

    If someone wants to be unifying and try to be inviting and welcome and considerate there are 100 ways this thread could have gone, he has no desire for that, nor do you really.

    Reply

    I think you are forcing a point just to try and start up with me again, his point isnt that it is GOOD OR BAD that they reach out to those who decided not to stay with the military and that they might come back. That is how you are spinning a fight with me.

    I take what he says because it is all he says as this- the REASON for the exodus in the first place was due to a WOKE LEFTIST Covid booster narrative, that is the topic of the thread not if it is good or bad to reach out to bring people back.

    100% the difference to me to your faulty narrative is the way he wrote it and concluded it. If he seriously was going down your fake path then the thread would have been that there is an opportunity to increase the enlistment numbers and potentially we could be stronger with our military forces if the booster requirement was lifted or removed and that there was potential to change declining numbers. That is not at ALL what he said, so spin all you want that is not the direction of HIS thread, that is never ever the case. His threads are always left vs right, any partisan way he can try and poke the left side or elevate the right side.

    You are so funny even attempting to portray him that he was saying should we reach out to those who did not get the shot...and at the time that requirement was in place that was determined to be the proper approach. BUT as things change so can approaches. Lets not play silly games and try to spin that sundance has a constructive thing to say about making things better and not have it be completely yet another partisan garbage thread...which is exactly all this is.

    If someone wants to be unifying and try to be inviting and welcome and considerate there are 100 ways this thread could have gone, he has no desire for that, nor do you really.

     
    thirdperson
    thirdperson
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2005
    Posts: 9493
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 6:57 PM ET #15

    For years, recruiting for US military has been difficult.  Especially in strong job markets.  Normally, 90% of young people are unlikely to consider military as a career path.  US defense department poll reveals the top reasons why young people aren't interested.  70% risk of death or injury.  65% psychological problems.  58% leaving family or friends.  46% other career interests.  40% dislike military life.  36% too long commitment.  35% interference with college education.  33% risk of sexual harassment.

    Reply

    For years, recruiting for US military has been difficult.  Especially in strong job markets.  Normally, 90% of young people are unlikely to consider military as a career path.  US defense department poll reveals the top reasons why young people aren't interested.  70% risk of death or injury.  65% psychological problems.  58% leaving family or friends.  46% other career interests.  40% dislike military life.  36% too long commitment.  35% interference with college education.  33% risk of sexual harassment.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34784
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 7:02 PM ET #16

    I think you are forcing a point just to try and start up with me again, his point isnt that it is GOOD OR BAD that they reach out to those who decided not to stay with the military and that they might come back. That is how you are spinning a fight with me.

    Not picking a fight as much as saying you jumped automatically into other issues.

    Whenever someone from your side posts a new thread you are not jumping in to say it is another partisan thread -- but when the side opposite you posts one you gleefully do this.  There are far more -- and many redundant -- threads from your side being posted.

    That is my issue about that -- but I would not call it 'trying to start a fight'.

    His point was that they put the policy in place to start with -- which was a bad idea.  Do you think so?

    Then his point is now they are reaching out to bring them in again because they cannot get recruits.  Should they do that?

    Reply

    I think you are forcing a point just to try and start up with me again, his point isnt that it is GOOD OR BAD that they reach out to those who decided not to stay with the military and that they might come back. That is how you are spinning a fight with me.

    Not picking a fight as much as saying you jumped automatically into other issues.

    Whenever someone from your side posts a new thread you are not jumping in to say it is another partisan thread -- but when the side opposite you posts one you gleefully do this.  There are far more -- and many redundant -- threads from your side being posted.

    That is my issue about that -- but I would not call it 'trying to start a fight'.

    His point was that they put the policy in place to start with -- which was a bad idea.  Do you think so?

    Then his point is now they are reaching out to bring them in again because they cannot get recruits.  Should they do that?

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58436
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 7:12 PM ET #17

    @Raiders22

     You cant look back and claim that something was a BAD idea, part of the reason why the whole thing happened is the narrative that Trump walked down and that Biden continued down, it was a global narrative and so how can you say it was good or bad? It was decided at that time and that is how it went. Its like me saying the idea of the UN to take land from Palestine and give it to Israel was a bad idea...the way they handled it and it has been an awful idea and should not have happened as it did. I believe that is the case but what the crap good does it do to try and play arm chair QB after the fact? It serves no value or purpose. 

    Your complaint about threads is completely partisan and erroneous, I dont care if someone makes a thread about the GOP and topics of any kind, I care about the rules of the site and the consistency of posters to repeat behavior over and over. We move threads constantly in all forum areas from certain posters who repeatedly break the rules and are combative, antagonistic and not attempting to add value. Sundance adds little value to civil discussion in the politics forum and it has nothing to do with his political position. When threads contain combative, negative, divisive content those tend to get moved more than threads which are not. That is all there is to discuss. He needs to make threads and replies that keep the rules of the site and are adding value, not dividing and partisan just for the purpose of instigating or provoking.

    If the military wants to remove the covid requirements then go ahead but as third mentioned and I mentioned, it is not the miracle pill for the woes of the military. My brother mentioned issues back a decade plus ago, society is not suited for military service as it was say 30-40 years ago. If the military wants current society to enlist then that comes with a dramatic landscape change to what old school politicians and military servicemen consider.

    Reply

    @Raiders22

     You cant look back and claim that something was a BAD idea, part of the reason why the whole thing happened is the narrative that Trump walked down and that Biden continued down, it was a global narrative and so how can you say it was good or bad? It was decided at that time and that is how it went. Its like me saying the idea of the UN to take land from Palestine and give it to Israel was a bad idea...the way they handled it and it has been an awful idea and should not have happened as it did. I believe that is the case but what the crap good does it do to try and play arm chair QB after the fact? It serves no value or purpose. 

    Your complaint about threads is completely partisan and erroneous, I dont care if someone makes a thread about the GOP and topics of any kind, I care about the rules of the site and the consistency of posters to repeat behavior over and over. We move threads constantly in all forum areas from certain posters who repeatedly break the rules and are combative, antagonistic and not attempting to add value. Sundance adds little value to civil discussion in the politics forum and it has nothing to do with his political position. When threads contain combative, negative, divisive content those tend to get moved more than threads which are not. That is all there is to discuss. He needs to make threads and replies that keep the rules of the site and are adding value, not dividing and partisan just for the purpose of instigating or provoking.

    If the military wants to remove the covid requirements then go ahead but as third mentioned and I mentioned, it is not the miracle pill for the woes of the military. My brother mentioned issues back a decade plus ago, society is not suited for military service as it was say 30-40 years ago. If the military wants current society to enlist then that comes with a dramatic landscape change to what old school politicians and military servicemen consider.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34784
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 7:12 PM ET #18

    @wallstreetcappers

     

    I take what he says because it is all he says as this- the REASON for the exodus in the first place was due to a WOKE LEFTIST Covid booster narrative, that is the topic of the thread not if it is good or bad to reach out to bring people back.

    No, I explained that above.  However, even if you merge them, the point stands.

    100% the difference to me to your faulty narrative is the way he wrote it and concluded it. If he seriously was going down your fake path then the thread would have been that there is an opportunity to increase the enlistment numbers and potentially we could be stronger with our military forces if the booster requirement was lifted or removed and that there was potential to change declining numbers. That is not at ALL what he said, so spin all you want that is not the direction of HIS thread, that is never ever the case. His threads are always left vs right, any partisan way he can try and poke the left side or elevate the right side.

    Okay--maybe he can come in and clear up what he meant.  But most on the Right clearly see it this way.  The numbers and the questionnaires also tend to indicate that.

    There is very little doubt what effect the Woke policies have had. 

    You are so funny even attempting to portray him that he was saying should we reach out to those who did not get the shot...and at the time that requirement was in place that was determined to be the proper approach. BUT as things change so can approaches. Lets not play silly games and try to spin that sundance has a constructive thing to say about making things better and not have it be completely yet another partisan garbage thread...which is exactly all this is.

    Not saying he said that -- that was my followup to clarify where I had seen it before and it was the obvious followup to you on it.

    It follows naturally if they feel it is worth pursuing them to reenlist -- should they at least admit being wrong?  That is not funny -- that is folk's livelihoods.

    If someone wants to be unifying and try to be inviting and welcome and considerate there are 100 ways this thread could have gone, he has no desire for that, nor do you really.

    Yessir -- you took the thread right to the non-unifying direction with your very first statement.

    You chose to see it the way you chose to see it.  The you chose to try to cloud it with religion and abortion.

    IF YOU wanted to unify -- you could address whether they should have admitted it might have been an overreaction to dismiss folks the way they did.

    Will you at least attempt to answer the obvious questions that this brings up?

    Was it wrong to have done this in the first place?  Because it does now seem to have backfired somewhat?

    So, therefore, should they have attempted to bring them back or just forge ahead?

     

    Reply

    @wallstreetcappers

     

    I take what he says because it is all he says as this- the REASON for the exodus in the first place was due to a WOKE LEFTIST Covid booster narrative, that is the topic of the thread not if it is good or bad to reach out to bring people back.

    No, I explained that above.  However, even if you merge them, the point stands.

    100% the difference to me to your faulty narrative is the way he wrote it and concluded it. If he seriously was going down your fake path then the thread would have been that there is an opportunity to increase the enlistment numbers and potentially we could be stronger with our military forces if the booster requirement was lifted or removed and that there was potential to change declining numbers. That is not at ALL what he said, so spin all you want that is not the direction of HIS thread, that is never ever the case. His threads are always left vs right, any partisan way he can try and poke the left side or elevate the right side.

    Okay--maybe he can come in and clear up what he meant.  But most on the Right clearly see it this way.  The numbers and the questionnaires also tend to indicate that.

    There is very little doubt what effect the Woke policies have had. 

    You are so funny even attempting to portray him that he was saying should we reach out to those who did not get the shot...and at the time that requirement was in place that was determined to be the proper approach. BUT as things change so can approaches. Lets not play silly games and try to spin that sundance has a constructive thing to say about making things better and not have it be completely yet another partisan garbage thread...which is exactly all this is.

    Not saying he said that -- that was my followup to clarify where I had seen it before and it was the obvious followup to you on it.

    It follows naturally if they feel it is worth pursuing them to reenlist -- should they at least admit being wrong?  That is not funny -- that is folk's livelihoods.

    If someone wants to be unifying and try to be inviting and welcome and considerate there are 100 ways this thread could have gone, he has no desire for that, nor do you really.

    Yessir -- you took the thread right to the non-unifying direction with your very first statement.

    You chose to see it the way you chose to see it.  The you chose to try to cloud it with religion and abortion.

    IF YOU wanted to unify -- you could address whether they should have admitted it might have been an overreaction to dismiss folks the way they did.

    Will you at least attempt to answer the obvious questions that this brings up?

    Was it wrong to have done this in the first place?  Because it does now seem to have backfired somewhat?

    So, therefore, should they have attempted to bring them back or just forge ahead?

     

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34784
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 7:14 PM ET #19

    @wallstreetcappers

     You cant look back and claim that something was a BAD idea,

    Absolutely you can.  People do it all the time; governments do it all the time.  Only a hard-headed person will not adjust to new information or admit when something does not work.

    People correct bad policy all the time. peace_5

    Reply

    @wallstreetcappers

     You cant look back and claim that something was a BAD idea,

    Absolutely you can.  People do it all the time; governments do it all the time.  Only a hard-headed person will not adjust to new information or admit when something does not work.

    People correct bad policy all the time. peace_5

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34784
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 7:17 PM ET #20

    Your complaint about threads is completely partisan and erroneous, I dont care if someone makes a thread about the GOP and topics of any kind,

    Not my complaint -- my observation.

    It is your complaint; you came in and said it -- not me. 

    Reply

    Your complaint about threads is completely partisan and erroneous, I dont care if someone makes a thread about the GOP and topics of any kind,

    Not my complaint -- my observation.

    It is your complaint; you came in and said it -- not me. 

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34784
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 7:22 PM ET #21

    When threads contain combative, negative, divisive content those tend to get moved more than threads which are not. That is all there is to discuss. He needs to make threads and replies that keep the rules of the site and are adding value, not dividing and partisan just for the purpose of instigating or provoking.

    You continue saying this as if it makes sense.  Politics are always going to have heated discussions.  I would prefer it be a somewhat back and forth -- something akin to this; instead of name calling or derision.

    But visit any other political forum and you can see that they get heated -- sure some get out of hand.  I realize it is your job to do monitor that.

    But if everyone is just on here to cheerlead each other that does not work for good discussion/debate.

    I much prefer to debate someone with an opposite view, especially if they have information to make me view things in a different light; I do not need cheerleaders just to reinforce my opinions.

    Reply

    When threads contain combative, negative, divisive content those tend to get moved more than threads which are not. That is all there is to discuss. He needs to make threads and replies that keep the rules of the site and are adding value, not dividing and partisan just for the purpose of instigating or provoking.

    You continue saying this as if it makes sense.  Politics are always going to have heated discussions.  I would prefer it be a somewhat back and forth -- something akin to this; instead of name calling or derision.

    But visit any other political forum and you can see that they get heated -- sure some get out of hand.  I realize it is your job to do monitor that.

    But if everyone is just on here to cheerlead each other that does not work for good discussion/debate.

    I much prefer to debate someone with an opposite view, especially if they have information to make me view things in a different light; I do not need cheerleaders just to reinforce my opinions.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34784
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 7:26 PM ET #22

    If the military wants to remove the covid requirements then go ahead but as third mentioned and I mentioned, it is not the miracle pill for the woes of the military

     

    So, what does that even mean?  You are for them if they are for them; you are against them if they are against them?  

    Why that type of ambivalent attitude on something that affected many people very deeply?

    There is nothing wrong with admitting being wrong.  They did this before with vaccines when people started dying, etc.

    But sure, the they added this on top of the other things that cut enlistments they can put a decent spin on it.  But admit you were wrong.  Just like they may have to one day admit they were wrong with the Woke policies as well.

    Even with your tacit openness to change I notice you couch it by saying 'but' and going into why it is not the issue of recruitment.

    BUT it WAS the reason for the drop in personnel who hey WERE FORCED out.  That added to their recruitment problem.  There are also some that will not join if they know they HAVE to get the Covid shot.

    Reply

    If the military wants to remove the covid requirements then go ahead but as third mentioned and I mentioned, it is not the miracle pill for the woes of the military

     

    So, what does that even mean?  You are for them if they are for them; you are against them if they are against them?  

    Why that type of ambivalent attitude on something that affected many people very deeply?

    There is nothing wrong with admitting being wrong.  They did this before with vaccines when people started dying, etc.

    But sure, the they added this on top of the other things that cut enlistments they can put a decent spin on it.  But admit you were wrong.  Just like they may have to one day admit they were wrong with the Woke policies as well.

    Even with your tacit openness to change I notice you couch it by saying 'but' and going into why it is not the issue of recruitment.

    BUT it WAS the reason for the drop in personnel who hey WERE FORCED out.  That added to their recruitment problem.  There are also some that will not join if they know they HAVE to get the Covid shot.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34784
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 7:32 PM ET #23

    @wallstreetcappers

     My brother mentioned issues back a decade plus ago, society is not suited for military service as it was say 30-40 years ago. If the military wants current society to enlist then that comes with a dramatic landscape change to what old school politicians and military servicemen consider.

    So, he thinks the 'change' should be to change to the Woke policies?  He thinks that will get more 'suited' folks to enlist?

    Reply

    @wallstreetcappers

     My brother mentioned issues back a decade plus ago, society is not suited for military service as it was say 30-40 years ago. If the military wants current society to enlist then that comes with a dramatic landscape change to what old school politicians and military servicemen consider.

    So, he thinks the 'change' should be to change to the Woke policies?  He thinks that will get more 'suited' folks to enlist?

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58436
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 7:49 PM ET #24

    @Raiders22

     A decade ago he was visiting and made comments about the challenges of recruiting for the military. His job was to go to colleges, high schools and general events set up to generate signing on for the military. 

    His view was that the requirements for the military are higher than many meet and the recruiting goals are very difficult to meet. Finding people who are both interested and able to be accepted has been increasingly difficult and I am sure now it is even much worse.

    Woke is a silly term in this case since the issues have less to do with partisan positioning and more to do with the lack of interest and capability of citizens to serve in the military. 

    Reply

    @Raiders22

     A decade ago he was visiting and made comments about the challenges of recruiting for the military. His job was to go to colleges, high schools and general events set up to generate signing on for the military. 

    His view was that the requirements for the military are higher than many meet and the recruiting goals are very difficult to meet. Finding people who are both interested and able to be accepted has been increasingly difficult and I am sure now it is even much worse.

    Woke is a silly term in this case since the issues have less to do with partisan positioning and more to do with the lack of interest and capability of citizens to serve in the military. 

     
     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34784
    Posted: Nov. 19, 2023 - 7:50 PM ET #25

    Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:

    For years, recruiting for US military has been difficult.  Especially in strong job markets.  Normally, 90% of young people are unlikely to consider military as a career path.  US defense department poll reveals the top reasons why young people aren't interested.  70% risk of death or injury.  65% psychological problems.  58% leaving family or friends.  46% other career interests.  40% dislike military life.  36% too long commitment.  35% interference with college education.  33% risk of sexual harassment.

    What does all of this matter?  And yet they still were able to meet their goals before.

    The eligibility numbers even went up from a low around 2009 until 2019.  I think they only poor groups were the mentally-affected ones.

    Before, they were needing high school dropouts to meet goals, now a diploma is almost required because they have so many eligible.

    What does this have to do with the Covid force outs?  Since recruitment is always 'difficult' according to you -- it is okay to add to the problem by forcing out folks already enlisted and recruited and trained?  I imagine I know your stance on this -- whatever the Leftist politicians want to do is fine with you and you support it and you will find an obscure source online to back it up.

    I am not even sure the Woke policies affect enlistment enough to matter.  But why make an already 'difficult' job more 'difficult' by discouraging a few others that might have been interested.  These kids are now exposed to the Woke policies all through school and do not know a world without them.

    The Covid policies I am certain dissuaded some.  So why add a double whammy to an already 'difficult' situation.

    Then just say, 'Oh well, it has always been difficult.'  

    This is an example, of the Left never admitting they were/are wrong on issue(s).

    Instead they will doubledown and compound the problem.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:

    For years, recruiting for US military has been difficult.  Especially in strong job markets.  Normally, 90% of young people are unlikely to consider military as a career path.  US defense department poll reveals the top reasons why young people aren't interested.  70% risk of death or injury.  65% psychological problems.  58% leaving family or friends.  46% other career interests.  40% dislike military life.  36% too long commitment.  35% interference with college education.  33% risk of sexual harassment.

    What does all of this matter?  And yet they still were able to meet their goals before.

    The eligibility numbers even went up from a low around 2009 until 2019.  I think they only poor groups were the mentally-affected ones.

    Before, they were needing high school dropouts to meet goals, now a diploma is almost required because they have so many eligible.

    What does this have to do with the Covid force outs?  Since recruitment is always 'difficult' according to you -- it is okay to add to the problem by forcing out folks already enlisted and recruited and trained?  I imagine I know your stance on this -- whatever the Leftist politicians want to do is fine with you and you support it and you will find an obscure source online to back it up.

    I am not even sure the Woke policies affect enlistment enough to matter.  But why make an already 'difficult' job more 'difficult' by discouraging a few others that might have been interested.  These kids are now exposed to the Woke policies all through school and do not know a world without them.

    The Covid policies I am certain dissuaded some.  So why add a double whammy to an already 'difficult' situation.

    Then just say, 'Oh well, it has always been difficult.'  

    This is an example, of the Left never admitting they were/are wrong on issue(s).

    Instead they will doubledown and compound the problem.

    All Forums | Politics
    12 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Claiming Prizes 57,806
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,310
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 61,604
    • PART DEUX 164
    • Congrats to ltdsks - 20 wins in a row! 5,083
    • Tuesday 10/20/2026 868
    • Lies, Inaccuracies & Stupidity 33,170
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 26,104
    • Wednesday 10/21/2026 595
    • NCAA WEEK 7 *** Railroad to Paradise *** 14,302

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.