@wallstreetcappers
Of course I will dismiss it, if you cannot provide it.
If you can then we can discuss it.
Otherwise, as you say, it is just your opinion.
There are just too many studies and data that I have seen that would counter that.
But if you know of some studies showing otherwise, I would like to look at them.
Maybe there are some that do say they feel treated unfairly.
But I would be amazed because the overwhelming evidence shows them to be more empathetic and happier.
So, why would they feel treated more unfairly than the group that is demonstrated to be more close-minded and depressed?
@Raiders22
See you cannot even help yourself, every reply has to be empirical or stomped on. Facts are not empirical to your perspective and sources there are facts and data for pretty much any perspective and yet for your condescending approach there is only one path and one end to a discussion.
Your third line in #26 is so closed minded and condescending you should do better than to speak to others in such a poor way. Ive never called you uninformed, but you for sure are biased as is every single human on the earth.
@UNIMAN
So show me where there is a rule infraction and/or a direct member to member interaction? Go ahead you are invited and welcomed to show me where based on the site rules one of the side you want dealt with has member to member broken the rules. If we moderated based on your parameters you would have been gone long long ago. You cannot complain about general political comments when you make the same content yourself, you are as guilty as any other member you are trying to point out.
You are fortunate that the approach you suggest is not how we moderate...
@wallstreetcappers
I am very biased and usually do it with data to back it up.
You do not is all I am saying. You used your 'opinion' to justify your moderating behavior.
So, I asked what made you 'believe' what you believe.
I can quote data and give you studies to back up my 'biased' opinion.
@Raiders22
Post 30 why is this a shock? Your data set and sources are partisan, how are you surprised that you do not see data and facts based on data in which you are not looking?
I do not throw down as you do and minimize your conclusions, I might not agree and most often I do not agree with you but I do not reply in such a condescending empirical way and demand the way you do. I am not in the slightest ever going to engage in conversation with you, it is a trap and you are not interested in dialogue and discord you are interested in condescending demanding partisan conclusions, that to me is the furthest thing from discussion and it has absolutely no value.
this guy is going to get those liberal marxists into a full nelson
then jump off the top rope with a flying elbow
for the easy 1,2,3 victory .
those liberal/marxist/criminal crime family/evidence tampering/bribe receiving/soon to be felons are hiding under their beds
now that this guy is on
the job 
@wallstreetcappers
The data is NOT partisan or biased.
They are basically independent studies to find out which side is truly more empathetic and happier, etc.
You can easily look them up yourself and review who did the studies. They have no reason to be biased.
Once you look over them and see their reasoning behind their findings you might actually change your mind.
That's not the issue here. SHOW US ALL WHERE SLIM COMMITTED AN INFRACTION. 
You accused him of "pecking" at another member. Yet that member responded over and over with antagonizing responses. Slim even agreed with and actually engaged the poster unlike most here who reply only to their own with the same repeated colored, bolded, enlarged, repeated insults. His question to the member was the same he asked everyone in post #17.
I don't want anyone boxed.
no semantics with this guy . He just says what he means . No dilly . And no dally . No nitpicking and switching the definitions of what he’s spitting and overtly disparaging . His Vocabulary explosive and corrosive to the parry . You try to sway to evade what’s being spoken . you get corrosion . and then you’re carried . To the junkyard . Where you’re crushed and then compacted . The political office is for justice juggernauts . not actors . Not for the ones that were scum . And bought . and then highly sought after . To talk what they were taught . and to pass laws to help the cause . of these lying wrong bastards . There’s seismic and strong laughter . And raucous applause from the studio audience in awe at the audacity of the dawg in this man’s work . And I hate to throw salt in your wounds but I’m talkin’ to you . Pausing for the standard . Two to three seconds . This dude’s gonna boom right through the usual deceptions . It’s futile . Just Accept it .
really excited about this hire
Put away the broad brush. It makes you sound foolish.
@Midnight1
You have to be pretty out there to get banned by YouTube but he was for promoting bullshit conspiracies.
actually, no, no you don't have to be "pretty out there" at all.
I could give you dozens of examples of people being banned from youtube by saying simple truthful things about covid or the covid vaxx back in 2021 up to now.
Come on now, you know the only difference between the truth and a conspiracy theory is time....
Wow.
https://www.amazon.com/AmazonBasics-Vanity-Mirror-Magnification-Gold/dp/B07T3SNDHQ/ref=sr_1_1_ffob_sspa?crid=1K351IF51881Q&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.eAtdtKz91TYyehsbnZ0_R_hIu35xbNTs1ZezF1YUnjjUZKstbza5Eim5LzDnIOg9Lz5VgapJ_JlXz7lXUqH-Yyic-eJtEIDzkOg39yQ7VP4PThcUFENPT-MaTp4w5gXj-lSMu9fH0NUmglDraZjgUyIYi3wtPZPqvuLhyYuPwkigTlC7QZkmAy1B7JR24fVAhrJKr13zhGS50utePOobfQvDccwzA5W48rbNUug8o90YXfQCFW4m8UW1HTanev1mkPSZwKV7kPhB0hKgGJ8OQgOGns3mO7xslfynNZl1xz8.It_uo59kqvjYcWEQ-jTDkfk5bdLNaQPSWog4Fa5SC9w&dib_tag=se&keywords=mirror+for+desk&qid=1740495290&sprefix=mirror+%2Caps%2C127&sr=8-1-spons&sp_csd=d2lkZ2V0TmFtZT1zcF9hdGY&psc=1
Was thinking the same thing.
I'm sure the new FBI leadership will be investigating all these participants. If you DID anything Wrong, watch out. There are going to be so many prosecutions, 
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
