Posted:
#1
Patel, Bondi and now Bongino as Deputy Director of the FBI! This will certainly be a very entertaining 4 years!
The Trifecta
This could not have been better! It’s a shame Roger Moore has passed away the Director of CIA was in his reach!
Posted:
#5
I’m not clear on the rules here in the political forum .
Aren’t opposing sides not allowed in each other’s threads ?
and weren’t they told to stay in their own partisan thinking threads ?
that are better suited for them ?
and tailored for them if you will ?
if they’re gonna make trouble ?
it seems the inseam is being violated here . By some accounts and measures . And people are acting to crotchety because of it . It feels dirty man .
wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
Posted:
#8
@spockgato
This is fake news, your repeated complaining misses the issue completely (as usual). We allow plenty of back and forth on topic and even fringe sarcasm that has to do with non-member to member content. His reply was not an attack towards sundance, if anything the thread served no purpose..why the need to make a thread about a cabinet selection when there are others to use instead is a repeated droning approach he has. The comment was not about a member it was about the hilarity of the selection and what exactly, precisely was inaccurate about his comment?
Trumps selections are hilarious, they are partisan inexperienced unqualified extremists so what is off about what he said? Then the comments about trans and the other stuff made later is the usual retort and way off the actual post they are complaining about.
You need to understand the issue and the rules before you go off on your rhyme whining, there was absolutely nothing wrong with his message and you are welcome to post in ANY thread even those who are not replying back, that issue AGAIN is not about content, you want to go in and interject yourself in a partisan thread then get snippy when they ignore you. Nobody said you are not allowed to post in those threads, if your message is ON TOPIC and not an attempt to provoke, go right ahead but they wont reply back or engage and they are not required to so it is your choice but it is a waste of time.
Last thing, the member who posted actually does engage with others, he is not exclusive to his posting, so you are missing the mark in that regard as well.
Posted:
#9
@wallstreetcappers
No need to try and put me down by saying that rhyme whining stuff . Or that I miss the issue completely ( as usual ) . that’s your opinion . And that’s childish .
As far as everything else . Meh . You should save some of those thousands of words that you just wrote and instead use them to chime in once in a while when necessary towards posters from your own side . Because moderating is not a one way street .
wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
Posted:
#10
@spockgato
Moderating is 100% a one way street, it is only about the points I make over and over and over and that you ignore or deflect or rhyme about. You do miss the point as you make everything partisan when that is not the issue.
So what in his reply was a member to member insult and thus breaking the rules? I do not need to enforce imaginary rules on a side to keep things even that is not at all what we are here for it is not about a political party or a partisan agenda, it is about member to member interaction AND keeping the general rules, nothing else.
If you have a specific direct rule breaking item to discuss regarding the other member then do so right here and now but keep the other stuff out it has no value and will not be part of any conversation regarding rules or moderating.
Posted:
#11
If you’re happy with the moderating job that you’re doing that’s all that really matters .
I won’t play your game of semantics because I respect language , translation , and communication too much to do that .
I do not need to engage with you further .
wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
Posted:
#14
I've seen Pam Bondi do some good work but it still bothers me that after receiving 25k from Dipshit Donnie, her investigation into Trump University stopped immediately in Florida.
However, Kash Patel is a fraud & a self promoter whose claim to fame was the pushing of bullshit conspiracies. It's no surprise that he wants a similar fraud as his wingman in Bongino.
Bongino is another loser having run for for Congress three & losing all 3 times. It's a common past with others in the administration having lost their runs for Congress. He's admitted his goal in life was "to own the libs." He has failed to do that as well. He was pegged to replace the voice of Rush Limpballs but once again failed.
You have to be pretty out there to get banned by YouTube but he was for promoting bullshit conspiracies. To this day, he's an election denier who stoked the fire of deplorables with like thinking. He pushed for the pardoning of the J6 traitors, so we have a good idea of his stance on law & order.
As you can tell, I'm not a fan of his.
Posted:
#15
@UNIMAN
You dont get it obviously and there is good reason that stats show conservatives feel they are more unfairly treated than liberals and we see that here on Covers in the same relation. You blast liberals and your pals blast liberals all day long and it never stops. Your content is not relevant to the discussion, so why do you keep posting the same nonsense? We are not going to drop the hammer and if we did you would probably be the first to be banned. The partisan non-member stuff we allow MORE latitude and that goes for both sides. For example I find it in very very poor taste the way your side generalizes DEI as trans and that is the way you describe it, that is such a lousy generalization and in such poor taste for a multitude of reasons. We allow that tripe the same way we allow other stuff you post and stuff other people post.
Why are you hunting down a path which has zero value and is not part of any discussion of importance? We are not going to partisan censor the other side for non-member to member reasons and you should be thankful for that because you would have been banned by the very sword you want used against the other side.
Posted:
#16
@spockgato
So is this your case for the member abuses you tiraded about above? The deflection and diversion is that your response?
Dont bring partisan complaints that have no merit as a means of trying to debase moderating, you also would have been banned if we followed the path you and several of your side are suggesting.
Posted:
#18
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
Do you think that Patel and Bongino know anything about the Deep State that tried to destroy The King during the last 9-10 years? CCBHetEey8a6.jpeg (1012×1024)
Do you think that Patel and Bongino know anything about the Deep State that tried to destroy The King during the last 9-10 years? CCBHetEey8a6.jpeg (1012×1024)
they probably do . You know those liberals and their Marxist agendas 
wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
Posted:
#20
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
The Deep State according to Kash Patel. RyanMatta ???? ?? on X: "Kash Patel just released a list of government gangsters who are about to feel the full wait of the justice system come crashing down on them! https://t.co/Iox2oVGvVB" / X
The Deep State according to Kash Patel. RyanMatta ???? ?? on X: "Kash Patel just released a list of government gangsters who are about to feel the full wait of the justice system come crashing down on them! https://t.co/Iox2oVGvVB" / X
liberal liar Marxist fakers and wannabe gangsters are shaking in their boots right now .
Patel means business 
time to clean up this town .
wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
Posted:
#21
@wallstreetcappers
stats show conservatives feel they are more unfairly treated than liberals
No they do not
If anything they show that Conservatives are generally more happier and for sure show more empathy toward Liberals than Liberals show towards Conservatives -- all due more or less from their perceived 'treatment'.
That is what the studies and 'stats' show.
Posted:
#24
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
When he showed up at UFC with Trump, you knew he would be involved. I think it's a good addition, considering the directive. Only recently started listening to his show and he's balanced, reasoned, but also doesn't mess around.
When he showed up at UFC with Trump, you knew he would be involved. I think it's a good addition, considering the directive. Only recently started listening to his show and he's balanced, reasoned, but also doesn't mess around.
it was for sure a knockout . The lying and cheating and stealing that has been going on will be forced to submit
wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
Posted:
#25
@Raiders22
Ha the difference between you and me is I do not take issue with your pocket experts and consider them empirical nor dismiss them if they are NOT said experts. Notice that my reply stated you are entitled to your view per your sources the same way I am entitled to mine.
Why in the world would I follow your instructor based edicts when you will dismiss any and all sources that do not agree with you? Talk about insanity, you think your sources and data are the only which have merit, how could you ever consider that someone would have discord with you? It is humorous the way you throw down and then are shocked when people do not want to deal with your condescending approach.
I dont care if you have partisan sources and views, I am not asking for a thesis with full documentation to validate your position, what good is that?
Hot Forum Topics
