Posted:
#26
Post Deleted
Don't let the book set the number
Same Same But Different- Adam Schiff Version
Posted:
#27
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
@StumpTownStu "Mugg and my states are literally controlled by two cities and that sucks." Pennsylvania is very similar in that regard. In the Poconos we routinely deal with NYC and North Jersey moving here, driving up real estate, complaining about why they left, and then attempting to add 342 rules and fees to the HOA's.
The states of WA & Oregon are 95% red, geographically........but WA has three counties around Seattle that fuck up the the entire state.
@StumpTownStu "Mugg and my states are literally controlled by two cities and that sucks." Pennsylvania is very similar in that regard. In the Poconos we routinely deal with NYC and North Jersey moving here, driving up real estate, complaining about why they left, and then attempting to add 342 rules and fees to the HOA's.
Posted:
#28
Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN:
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem: @MrWhatsItToYa #17 On the surface sure, but in reality not really. Uni's points are valid and the collection of missteps taken in Trump's case will in the future be the pinnacle of prosecutorial malfeasance. Many at the time voiced the many clear violations of due process, legal theory, evidence, judicial conduct, etc. However it was Trump and the lefts best chance at preventing re-election so everyone went with it. Its spelled out pretty clear but now the shoe is on the other foot. Again, likely a BS charge....but also again.....nobody's above the law. His "case" was always campaigning via the courts. Democrats knew they had nothing of substance, and really just wanted to be able to call him "a convicted felon" on the campaign trail. Even now, they play with words, saying things like, "the convicted felon rapist," as if he was convicted of rape. And after all of that Trump wins the election. What's that tell ya? Schiff will never get charged with anything, IMO. Tubberville?, not in Bama, maybe they can get a DC court to get him. I really don't care either way. The fact that Dems are taking him to court should mean Schiff should be taken to court.
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem: @MrWhatsItToYa #17 On the surface sure, but in reality not really. Uni's points are valid and the collection of missteps taken in Trump's case will in the future be the pinnacle of prosecutorial malfeasance. Many at the time voiced the many clear violations of due process, legal theory, evidence, judicial conduct, etc. However it was Trump and the lefts best chance at preventing re-election so everyone went with it. Its spelled out pretty clear but now the shoe is on the other foot. Again, likely a BS charge....but also again.....nobody's above the law. His "case" was always campaigning via the courts. Democrats knew they had nothing of substance, and really just wanted to be able to call him "a convicted felon" on the campaign trail. Even now, they play with words, saying things like, "the convicted felon rapist," as if he was convicted of rape. And after all of that Trump wins the election. What's that tell ya? Schiff will never get charged with anything, IMO. Tubberville?, not in Bama, maybe they can get a DC court to get him. I really don't care either way. The fact that Dems are taking him to court should mean Schiff should be taken to court.
Tells me the American people don't care about bullshit.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
Posted:
#30
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
@THEMUGG Did that one area make any progress trying to join Idaho?
That was eastern Oregon......& no, they didn't which is no surprise. I think the whole idea was just to make people aware of how sick the rest of the state is of the libs on the other side of the mountains.
@THEMUGG Did that one area make any progress trying to join Idaho?
Posted:
#31
Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN:
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: @unplucked_gem Name one other person who has even been tried for the supposed law that Trump was convicted of? NAME ONE. How about give me names of elected prosecutors who campaigned on "I will find something and get Joe Biden (insert any past president) and throw him in jail if elected"
What's the difference between the "supposed law",and the real law that trump was charged with breaking,is there a difference?If it is a law and trump breaks that law,then he should be charged,simple as that.Sounds like you wanna stick to your hypocritical view of ignoring the law cause it's someone you support,or in your mind it's a "supposed law",and not a real law.
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa: @unplucked_gem Name one other person who has even been tried for the supposed law that Trump was convicted of? NAME ONE. How about give me names of elected prosecutors who campaigned on "I will find something and get Joe Biden (insert any past president) and throw him in jail if elected"
NAME ONE time it matters if someone else was even tried for breaking the law that trump was convicted of.I didn't know it mattered on determining if someone broke a particular law,by if someone else had ever been charged with breaking that law.But I'm no lawyer,so I asked Siri if it matters if you are to be charged with committing a crime,dependant on if anyone else had ever been charged for doing that particular crime.Siri replied "What are you some kind of f*ckin dumb-ass,of course that has nothing to do with if a person gets charged for breaking a law".If that's the case,then the 1st person ever tried for committing murder (or any other crime for that matter),using your logic should of never been charged for that crime,cause nobody else had ever been charged with murder before that.
trump himself said while campaigning for reelection,that if he wins,on day 1 he will appoint a special prosecutor to investigate President Joe Biden and his family.
Hot Forum Topics
