More Evidence of Liberal's Mismanaging our Tax $
Lifelink program is funded by subscribers of telecommunications companies. Also Federal Commissions Commission is funded by regulatory fees. NOT TAXPAYERS.
Obama has nothing to do with Lifelink program run by FCC which is independent of President's control. Contrary to rumours, majority of applicants provide documentation to prove eligibility. But private sector employees can make mistakes in accepting customers.
Lifelink is Reagan's program and not Obama's because it was started in 1984 to help provide discounted phone service to low income Americans.
Lifelink program is funded by subscribers of telecommunications companies. Also Federal Commissions Commission is funded by regulatory fees. NOT TAXPAYERS.
Obama has nothing to do with Lifelink program run by FCC which is independent of President's control. Contrary to rumours, majority of applicants provide documentation to prove eligibility. But private sector employees can make mistakes in accepting customers.
Lifelink is Reagan's program and not Obama's because it was started in 1984 to help provide discounted phone service to low income Americans.
Lifelink program is funded by subscribers of telecommunications companies. Also Federal Commissions Commission is funded by regulatory fees. NOT TAXPAYERS.
Obama has nothing to do with Lifelink program run by FCC which is independent of President's control. Americans.
Hi.
The President appoints every member of the FCC. And every member is confirmed by the Senate - currently run by the President's party.
As to your (false) contention about the "taxpayers" and FCC funding:
Washington, D.C. -- The President has submitted a budget to Congress that proposes fiscal year
2013 funding for the Federal Communications Commission of $346.78 million.
The requested FY 2013 funding level would include: continuing efforts to accelerate broadband
deployment throughout the nation; implementing the FCC’s reforms to the Universal Service
Fund programs; improving the FCC’s information technology infrastructure and continuing to
enhance the security of its systems; investing in the FCC’s technical and engineering capabilities
to detect interference issues, plan for interoperability needs, and test new technologies; and
studying participation in the communications industry.
The complete copy of the Commission’s FY 2013 budget submission is available on the FCC’s
Web site at: https://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/fcc-strategic-plan.
I don't know where you get this type of information, but I'd look at other sources.
![]()
Lifelink program is funded by subscribers of telecommunications companies. Also Federal Commissions Commission is funded by regulatory fees. NOT TAXPAYERS.
Obama has nothing to do with Lifelink program run by FCC which is independent of President's control. Americans.
Hi.
The President appoints every member of the FCC. And every member is confirmed by the Senate - currently run by the President's party.
As to your (false) contention about the "taxpayers" and FCC funding:
Washington, D.C. -- The President has submitted a budget to Congress that proposes fiscal year
2013 funding for the Federal Communications Commission of $346.78 million.
The requested FY 2013 funding level would include: continuing efforts to accelerate broadband
deployment throughout the nation; implementing the FCC’s reforms to the Universal Service
Fund programs; improving the FCC’s information technology infrastructure and continuing to
enhance the security of its systems; investing in the FCC’s technical and engineering capabilities
to detect interference issues, plan for interoperability needs, and test new technologies; and
studying participation in the communications industry.
The complete copy of the Commission’s FY 2013 budget submission is available on the FCC’s
Web site at: https://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/fcc-strategic-plan.
I don't know where you get this type of information, but I'd look at other sources.
![]()
Created under Reagan,, subsidization of phones began under President Clinton and use and abuse began under Obama..
So why are they call Obama Phones?
The name "Obama phone" was coined during the last presidential campaign, as to appear it was personal gift from President Obama..
If you have a wireless or landline phone, you’re paying for millions of people ( FCC says 6 million) to get a free phone. People who pay a monthly phone bill get an added fee of around $2.50 called the Universal Service Fund fee to their bill.
Created under Reagan,, subsidization of phones began under President Clinton and use and abuse began under Obama..
So why are they call Obama Phones?
The name "Obama phone" was coined during the last presidential campaign, as to appear it was personal gift from President Obama..
If you have a wireless or landline phone, you’re paying for millions of people ( FCC says 6 million) to get a free phone. People who pay a monthly phone bill get an added fee of around $2.50 called the Universal Service Fund fee to their bill.
Hi.
The President appoints every member of the FCC. And every member is confirmed by the Senate - currently run by the President's party.
As to your (false) contention about the "taxpayers" and FCC funding:
Washington, D.C. -- The President has submitted a budget to Congress that proposes fiscal year
2013 funding for the Federal Communications Commission of $346.78 million.
The requested FY 2013 funding level would include: continuing efforts to accelerate broadband
deployment throughout the nation; implementing the FCC’s reforms to the Universal Service
Fund programs; improving the FCC’s information technology infrastructure and continuing to
enhance the security of its systems; investing in the FCC’s technical and engineering capabilities
to detect interference issues, plan for interoperability needs, and test new technologies; and
studying participation in the communications industry.
The complete copy of the Commission’s FY 2013 budget submission is available on the FCC’s
Web site at: https://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/fcc-strategic-plan.
I don't know where you get this type of information, but I'd look at other sources.
![]()
Not exactly right.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Communications_Commission
Hi.
The President appoints every member of the FCC. And every member is confirmed by the Senate - currently run by the President's party.
As to your (false) contention about the "taxpayers" and FCC funding:
Washington, D.C. -- The President has submitted a budget to Congress that proposes fiscal year
2013 funding for the Federal Communications Commission of $346.78 million.
The requested FY 2013 funding level would include: continuing efforts to accelerate broadband
deployment throughout the nation; implementing the FCC’s reforms to the Universal Service
Fund programs; improving the FCC’s information technology infrastructure and continuing to
enhance the security of its systems; investing in the FCC’s technical and engineering capabilities
to detect interference issues, plan for interoperability needs, and test new technologies; and
studying participation in the communications industry.
The complete copy of the Commission’s FY 2013 budget submission is available on the FCC’s
Web site at: https://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/fcc-strategic-plan.
I don't know where you get this type of information, but I'd look at other sources.
![]()
Not exactly right.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Communications_Commission
Thread was titled liberals mismanaged tax dollars..
I agree the program should exist as it benefits those that don't have the means to have a phone. but as the article I referenced in post #1 demonstrates, the lack of oversight basically encourages fraud. the carriers main focus is to give out as many phones as they can! not to identify those that need phones! this is where the fraud occurs. do you not think this is wasteful? I asked you that in post #22. you would not answer the question directly.
6 times you have made a reply in this thread and 6 times you have not made a statement agreeing that there is fraud and that it is wasteful. your reasoning is:
Thread was titled liberals mismanaged tax dollars..
I agree the program should exist as it benefits those that don't have the means to have a phone. but as the article I referenced in post #1 demonstrates, the lack of oversight basically encourages fraud. the carriers main focus is to give out as many phones as they can! not to identify those that need phones! this is where the fraud occurs. do you not think this is wasteful? I asked you that in post #22. you would not answer the question directly.
6 times you have made a reply in this thread and 6 times you have not made a statement agreeing that there is fraud and that it is wasteful. your reasoning is:
Wall, stiln makes 10 threads a day with the same crap, but I never see you chim in and say its a waste of thread
Wall, stiln makes 10 threads a day with the same crap, but I never see you chim in and say its a waste of thread
Wall, look at post 4 by you in the Arizona Republican thread. You are so biased, there isno way yyou sshould be a mod.
Wall, look at post 4 by you in the Arizona Republican thread. You are so biased, there isno way yyou sshould be a mod.
The members ...their the ones, that see whats going on in other Forums.There has been three CT requesting to help remove touts in different Forums in the last 22 hours..
One has to wonder... why controlling touting at Covers would not take a higher priority...esp.over certain political comments,that are analyzed in depth for the intentions of the members comment and then weighted by their past posting history..
The members ...their the ones, that see whats going on in other Forums.There has been three CT requesting to help remove touts in different Forums in the last 22 hours..
One has to wonder... why controlling touting at Covers would not take a higher priority...esp.over certain political comments,that are analyzed in depth for the intentions of the members comment and then weighted by their past posting history..
Perhaps sarasotaSnitch will go rushing to the help section like he did last time...
Seems like his AppleCart got upset and he is back to his old routine...
Perhaps sarasotaSnitch will go rushing to the help section like he did last time...
Seems like his AppleCart got upset and he is back to his old routine...
You know who see's what's going on around here ?
The members ...their the ones, that see whats going on in other Forums.There has been three CT requesting to help remove touts in different Forums in the last 22 hours..
One has to wonder... why controlling touting at Covers would not take a higher priority...esp.over certain political comments,that are analyzed in depth for the intentions of the members comment and then weighted by their past posting history..
You know who see's what's going on around here ?
The members ...their the ones, that see whats going on in other Forums.There has been three CT requesting to help remove touts in different Forums in the last 22 hours..
One has to wonder... why controlling touting at Covers would not take a higher priority...esp.over certain political comments,that are analyzed in depth for the intentions of the members comment and then weighted by their past posting history..
.
As to your (false) contention about the "taxpayers" and FCC funding:
Washington, D.C. -- The President has submitted a budget to Congress that proposes fiscal year
2013 funding for the Federal Communications Commission of $346.78 million.
![]()
FCC has made changes to Lifelink program to stop fraud. According to FCC and consumerreports, millions of dollars have already been saved by eliminating thousands of duplicate subscriptions. Millions of accounts are currently under review.
.
As to your (false) contention about the "taxpayers" and FCC funding:
Washington, D.C. -- The President has submitted a budget to Congress that proposes fiscal year
2013 funding for the Federal Communications Commission of $346.78 million.
![]()
FCC has made changes to Lifelink program to stop fraud. According to FCC and consumerreports, millions of dollars have already been saved by eliminating thousands of duplicate subscriptions. Millions of accounts are currently under review.
I did and they sorta suggested,that Mr.L was planning a major shake-up with lower staff members at Covers ...to try and halt the shrinking membership..
I did and they sorta suggested,that Mr.L was planning a major shake-up with lower staff members at Covers ...to try and halt the shrinking membership..
Who cares about what the program is, the point is that waste occurs in most any and all government programs.
it is a political forum. my complaint and the topic of the thread was specific to the fraud of the obamaphone program. so according to you, basically all threads should be general and shouldn't target one specific government shortcoming? funny you don't respond in a similar tone on all political threads.
So when you are talking ANY aspect of government involvement then you are talking about all..its not pick and choose which program or area to complain about
ok fidel, I mean wallstreet... let me know which topics I can talk about.
Who cares about what the program is, the point is that waste occurs in most any and all government programs.
it is a political forum. my complaint and the topic of the thread was specific to the fraud of the obamaphone program. so according to you, basically all threads should be general and shouldn't target one specific government shortcoming? funny you don't respond in a similar tone on all political threads.
So when you are talking ANY aspect of government involvement then you are talking about all..its not pick and choose which program or area to complain about
ok fidel, I mean wallstreet... let me know which topics I can talk about.
14daroad is confused again. CHAIRMAN of Federal Communication Committee submitted budget proposal. NOT Obama. According to djbrow and wikipedia, FCC is entirely funded by regulatory fees.
14daroad is confused again. CHAIRMAN of Federal Communication Committee submitted budget proposal. NOT Obama. According to djbrow and wikipedia, FCC is entirely funded by regulatory fees.
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,017
-
PART DEUX
241
-
Friday 09/18/2026
758
-
The Three-Day Money Train
4,042
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
258,437
-
Trump's legacy?
25,432
-
NCAA FOOTBALL. 151
21,319
-
Week 3 Money
5,748
-
NCAA WEEK 3 ***Click here for GREATNESS***
6,868
-
We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever
29,073
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
