@THEMUGG
That's truth right there![]()
@THEMUGG
Huge difference in your childish retort..there are a few of you that use others threads and messages as an excuse for trash that many here create. The largest difference and this has been stated so many times is that those other members you whine about are not crossing over to your lane to incite and annoy, they keep to themselves.
There are several in your group who are extremely partisan like the other side is but engage in a negative way with the other side AND have in the past trolled here and in the main forums. THIS is the issue...
@THEMUGG
Huge difference in your childish retort..there are a few of you that use others threads and messages as an excuse for trash that many here create. The largest difference and this has been stated so many times is that those other members you whine about are not crossing over to your lane to incite and annoy, they keep to themselves.
There are several in your group who are extremely partisan like the other side is but engage in a negative way with the other side AND have in the past trolled here and in the main forums. THIS is the issue...
@Raiders22
Oh I know exactly what you did and why, you have no retort or actual content to discuss so you do childish jabs like this and do it quite regularly. So congrats on gutter surfing even though there was nothing to try and condescendingly turn your nose up on but if it makes you feel extra cool then you did a great job.
@Raiders22
Oh I know exactly what you did and why, you have no retort or actual content to discuss so you do childish jabs like this and do it quite regularly. So congrats on gutter surfing even though there was nothing to try and condescendingly turn your nose up on but if it makes you feel extra cool then you did a great job.
@wallstreetcappers
It was just funny. Because obviously no one incites a peaceful protest.
It wasn’t meant to be condescending. Sorry you took it that way.
All about the connotation.
![]()
@wallstreetcappers
It was just funny. Because obviously no one incites a peaceful protest.
It wasn’t meant to be condescending. Sorry you took it that way.
All about the connotation.
![]()
@wallstreetcappers
So, now can you go back and answer the questions about your posts?
How are they targeting those opposed to conservative thinking?
Who is being improperly prosecuted in each case?
![]()
@wallstreetcappers
So, now can you go back and answer the questions about your posts?
How are they targeting those opposed to conservative thinking?
Who is being improperly prosecuted in each case?
![]()
@Cho_Oyu
@Cho_Oyu
@Raiders22
You interjected as you always do and now you are trying to tell me how to interact with you and I never was interested in doing so. If you want to have conversation and discussion with others then you need to be better at how you interact and might want to quit being a pesty jerk like you were to me (again).
The term I used is a verb, it was used in proper context and meaning. You got it and yet you still decided to act like a child and be your usual combative self. I am not forced or interested in being instructed to engage with you and what motivation is there when you act so poorly and intentionally bait like that?
No thanks...
@Raiders22
You interjected as you always do and now you are trying to tell me how to interact with you and I never was interested in doing so. If you want to have conversation and discussion with others then you need to be better at how you interact and might want to quit being a pesty jerk like you were to me (again).
The term I used is a verb, it was used in proper context and meaning. You got it and yet you still decided to act like a child and be your usual combative self. I am not forced or interested in being instructed to engage with you and what motivation is there when you act so poorly and intentionally bait like that?
No thanks...
@wallstreetcappers
It is still funny. You have never seen it used that way before either. That is just not the connotation you see with it.
So, get over it. We all make funny slipups. It was obvious what you meant. But still funny because it is never seen used that way.
Almost as funny as you bringing up the whole issue in the post instead of answering the questions about your first posts and trying to connect the two issues.
So, for the third time — can you make the connections or not?
Or is this the same thing you always do? Deflect and change the subject to something you prefer and ask all sorts of questions about that — but never answer any questions about what you said?
@wallstreetcappers
It is still funny. You have never seen it used that way before either. That is just not the connotation you see with it.
So, get over it. We all make funny slipups. It was obvious what you meant. But still funny because it is never seen used that way.
Almost as funny as you bringing up the whole issue in the post instead of answering the questions about your first posts and trying to connect the two issues.
So, for the third time — can you make the connections or not?
Or is this the same thing you always do? Deflect and change the subject to something you prefer and ask all sorts of questions about that — but never answer any questions about what you said?
@THEMUGG
You have no answers to simple questions. Follow your thread here and see if you actually engaged in discussion. You get miffed because I call out your partisan rantings and offer actual truth and perspective. You never are able to discuss anything that counters your partisan wanderings. If you are not wanting interaction then I would suggest not posting OR find a political partisan website where you can hobnob with your bros about how crappy democrats are.
You have crossed the median too many times to try and deflect about other members and in doing so that means you are open to actual replies and discussion. What you call constructive is just agreeing with you, that is the actual opposite of constructive. Context and balance is constructive and that is what I bring and what you dislike.
@THEMUGG
You have no answers to simple questions. Follow your thread here and see if you actually engaged in discussion. You get miffed because I call out your partisan rantings and offer actual truth and perspective. You never are able to discuss anything that counters your partisan wanderings. If you are not wanting interaction then I would suggest not posting OR find a political partisan website where you can hobnob with your bros about how crappy democrats are.
You have crossed the median too many times to try and deflect about other members and in doing so that means you are open to actual replies and discussion. What you call constructive is just agreeing with you, that is the actual opposite of constructive. Context and balance is constructive and that is what I bring and what you dislike.
Let get this right, So now comments are answered by invitation only ? It appears some of our more conservative cover members prefer restricted posting! I always wonder if tested through DNA what would a MAGA supporter I assume you would have a percentage of andamanese in them, because of there love of isolation beliefs on the island of North Sentinel! They are famous for greeting guests with arrows & spears and there leaderis also a kings!
Let get this right, So now comments are answered by invitation only ? It appears some of our more conservative cover members prefer restricted posting! I always wonder if tested through DNA what would a MAGA supporter I assume you would have a percentage of andamanese in them, because of there love of isolation beliefs on the island of North Sentinel! They are famous for greeting guests with arrows & spears and there leaderis also a kings!
@wallstreetcappers
You have added nothing to this discussion.
@joe pockets
Had you followed along from the beginning you'd get the gist of the comment. You post a lot of partisan stuff......maybe you can explain it to wall.
@wallstreetcappers
You have added nothing to this discussion.
@joe pockets
Had you followed along from the beginning you'd get the gist of the comment. You post a lot of partisan stuff......maybe you can explain it to wall.
Of course I didnt because to you discussion is agreeing with your partisan take. So barring me giving you a beer mug emoticon you consider it of no value. A different approach would be to actually discuss your point compared to what the other person says but no you just say literally nothing and have no ability to discuss topics that YOU start.
This happens literally every time you make one of your partisan right wing threads/comments you never can carry a conversation that is not from your view. Maybe you can actually TRY to do more than just post a headline then run for cover, this is a discussion forum not a partisan headline blog website.
Shock the world and engage in respectful and detailed conversation, I might keel over in amazement.
Of course I didnt because to you discussion is agreeing with your partisan take. So barring me giving you a beer mug emoticon you consider it of no value. A different approach would be to actually discuss your point compared to what the other person says but no you just say literally nothing and have no ability to discuss topics that YOU start.
This happens literally every time you make one of your partisan right wing threads/comments you never can carry a conversation that is not from your view. Maybe you can actually TRY to do more than just post a headline then run for cover, this is a discussion forum not a partisan headline blog website.
Shock the world and engage in respectful and detailed conversation, I might keel over in amazement.
@wallstreetcappers
"Shock the world and engage in respectful and detailed conversation, I might keel over in amazement."
Back atcha....you never engage in any discussion of topics, you just try to create your own by attacking conservative posters for their threads/posts/opinions. As I've said before......as you've said before......if you have nothing to offer then just abstain from posting in someone's thread.
@wallstreetcappers
"Shock the world and engage in respectful and detailed conversation, I might keel over in amazement."
Back atcha....you never engage in any discussion of topics, you just try to create your own by attacking conservative posters for their threads/posts/opinions. As I've said before......as you've said before......if you have nothing to offer then just abstain from posting in someone's thread.
So follow this thread Mugg...I asked a question regarding your thread creation and you never answered it. You consider a different perspective as an attack, I never said you cannot have your opinion never have said that....which would be an attack. I question partisan narratives and ask questions or give perspective to counter the partisan nonsense. Now if you consider that an attack it might be due to your complete inability to have a conversation. You just want to post TNC blasts and make jabs at nasty liberal democrats, that is not discussion and it really serves no purpose here. Again and for the X number of times, try to discuss what the other person says that is why we have these forums. Another member asked a direct question to you and did you answer that? I know you refuse to answer anything I ask but as long as you post stuff here it is open for discussion given that you cross lanes often and that means you are open to the same done to you.
So follow this thread Mugg...I asked a question regarding your thread creation and you never answered it. You consider a different perspective as an attack, I never said you cannot have your opinion never have said that....which would be an attack. I question partisan narratives and ask questions or give perspective to counter the partisan nonsense. Now if you consider that an attack it might be due to your complete inability to have a conversation. You just want to post TNC blasts and make jabs at nasty liberal democrats, that is not discussion and it really serves no purpose here. Again and for the X number of times, try to discuss what the other person says that is why we have these forums. Another member asked a direct question to you and did you answer that? I know you refuse to answer anything I ask but as long as you post stuff here it is open for discussion given that you cross lanes often and that means you are open to the same done to you.
@THEMUGG
Last I looked Trump and his Justice department let all the scumbags involved on January 6th go to! So I’m not surprised they ruled in his favor but I am surprised it wasn’t for a billion or two to make it front page news! America has survived the Red Scare & Senator Joe McCarthy of the 50’s which promoted fear directed at Democrats and it didn’t flush! Time will take MAGA and Trump will go down the same smelly hole! That where turds end up!
@THEMUGG
Last I looked Trump and his Justice department let all the scumbags involved on January 6th go to! So I’m not surprised they ruled in his favor but I am surprised it wasn’t for a billion or two to make it front page news! America has survived the Red Scare & Senator Joe McCarthy of the 50’s which promoted fear directed at Democrats and it didn’t flush! Time will take MAGA and Trump will go down the same smelly hole! That where turds end up!

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.