@wallstreetcappers
Yessir. But what you started off with an incorrect thesis. Call it straw-manning, call it setting up something you want to knock down, etc.
So, of course you stand by it.
I can quote the whole thing. But it does not take away from the fact that your starting point was wrong.
is a servant to the common citizen period and the lowest common citizen
Are two very different things. One implies someone that enjoys having the opportunity to live and get ahead and be rewarded. The other simply infers that the government should be helping all of the idlers that refuse to attempt to get going on their own.
One thesis Trump is using, the other he is flat-out denying.
"Providing good for the common citizen" and providing bets opportunity for the citizen is vastly different.
At no point has Trump indicated the folks work for him. That is another abuse of freedom in the thesis.
the majority of US citizens are at and below median income
This is totally incorrect just by the definition of the word 'median'.
The thesis should be to provide the best opportunity for the folks to better themselves NOT to simply provide for them.
Another overriding fault with your thesis is that the folks stay at that tier. They do not.
People are constantly moving up and down -- largely thought efforts of their own (or lack thereof). They make plenty fuse of the opportunity that is provided to them. Some do not and stagnate.
But Trump hiring self-starters and ambitious people and folks that expect results is not a bad things.
For far too long bureaucrats and politicians that have very little real world experience have made it worse for the 'common citizen'.
It is time to see if people with experience in other aspects will work or not.
See how that works?
Hot Forum Topics
