• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 7
      NFL Week 7
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Patriots-Bears Picks
      • NFL ATS Picks
      • Survivor Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    GOP will have to run a special candidate in 28

    «First Previous 123
    Sidehatch
    StumpTownStu
    Barbarossa
    soup-can
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 762
    Posts: 68
    «First Previous 123
     
    Sidehatch
    Sidehatch
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 3247
    Posted: Jul. 30, 2025 - 11:12 PM ET #51

    Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN:

    @StumpTownStu  Stu, it's just the flavor of the day. They don't have much else.

    Why did Epstein have 14 different phone numbers for Trump? 
    Why did Trump write Epstein a creepy birthday letter?

    Why are there so many pictures of Trump with Epstein, and later on with Diddy?

    Why did Pam Bondi say the list was on her desk, only to say the list doesn’t exist at all?

    Why is Congress adjourning early to avoid having to vote on Epstein files? (This one is easy, they are spineless cowards who don’t want to be seen as calling for justice for pedophiles.)

    Why did Trump brag about judging beauty pageants with MINORS BELOW THE AGE OF 16?

    WHY DID TRUMP ADMIT TO EMPLOYING A 16-YEAR-OLD IN HIS SPA, THEN GET REALLY MAD WHEN EPSTEIN "STOLE HER"? Why was Epstein a regular at the Mar-a-Lago spa, and why was he so close to Trump's underage employees? Gee, no red flags there.

    GAETZ/JORDAN 2028 (no punishment for pedos!)

     

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN:

    @StumpTownStu  Stu, it's just the flavor of the day. They don't have much else.

    Why did Epstein have 14 different phone numbers for Trump? 
    Why did Trump write Epstein a creepy birthday letter?

    Why are there so many pictures of Trump with Epstein, and later on with Diddy?

    Why did Pam Bondi say the list was on her desk, only to say the list doesn’t exist at all?

    Why is Congress adjourning early to avoid having to vote on Epstein files? (This one is easy, they are spineless cowards who don’t want to be seen as calling for justice for pedophiles.)

    Why did Trump brag about judging beauty pageants with MINORS BELOW THE AGE OF 16?

    WHY DID TRUMP ADMIT TO EMPLOYING A 16-YEAR-OLD IN HIS SPA, THEN GET REALLY MAD WHEN EPSTEIN "STOLE HER"? Why was Epstein a regular at the Mar-a-Lago spa, and why was he so close to Trump's underage employees? Gee, no red flags there.

    GAETZ/JORDAN 2028 (no punishment for pedos!)

     

     
    StumpTownStu
    StumpTownStu
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 22236
    Posted: Jul. 30, 2025 - 11:52 PM ET #52

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN: @StumpTownStu  Stu, it's just the flavor of the day. They don't have much else. Why did Epstein have 14 different phone numbers for Trump? Why did Trump write Epstein a creepy birthday letter? Why are there so many pictures of Trump with Epstein, and later on with Diddy? Why did Pam Bondi say the list was on her desk, only to say the list doesn’t exist at all? Why is Congress adjourning early to avoid having to vote on Epstein files? (This one is easy, they are spineless cowards who don’t want to be seen as calling for justice for pedophiles.) Why did Trump brag about judging beauty pageants with MINORS BELOW THE AGE OF 16? WHY DID TRUMP ADMIT TO EMPLOYING A 16-YEAR-OLD IN HIS SPA, THEN GET REALLY MAD WHEN EPSTEIN "STOLE HER"? Why was Epstein a regular at the Mar-a-Lago spa, and why was he so close to Trump's underage employees? Gee, no red flags there. GAETZ/JORDAN 2028 (no punishment for pedos!)

    What does having multiple numbers have to do with anything? A man with multiple offices, multiple residences, offices within residences, probably multiple cellphones. Who cares how many numbers a someone has for their friend?

    The card being circulated online is a fake, based on a description of a card that supposedly exist. Why did he write him a note? They were friends.

    There are pictures of them, again, because they were friends. They were both part of the same wealthy New Yorker scene. All their pictures together or at social events.

    I have no idea what makes Pam Bondi tick, or from where she gets her marching orders.

    Congress always adjourns early and avoids work. It's one of the things I hate most about politicians.

    Trump never bragged about hosting beauty pageants with minors. He made an admittedly creepy comment about owning beauty pageants and the media, years later during an election, seized on the fact that one of the pageants he owned was Miss Teen USA.

    Mar a Lago, like any resort, is prone to have a few teenage employees. I promise you Trump isn't personally hiring staff at his properties. Epstein recruited a then 17 year old employee from Mar a Lago. This was a major factor in their friendship ending.

    Here is an unavoidable fact. Before her untimely death, that women implicated several high profile men, rich and powerful men. She never named Trump.

    Here are more facts. There are over 80 identified victims of Epstein. None have ever implicated Trump. Epsteins crimes started in the early 2000s. Trumpvand Epsteins friendship ended in the early 2000s. No victims exist from the days when they were close friends.

    R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN: @StumpTownStu  Stu, it's just the flavor of the day. They don't have much else. Why did Epstein have 14 different phone numbers for Trump? Why did Trump write Epstein a creepy birthday letter? Why are there so many pictures of Trump with Epstein, and later on with Diddy? Why did Pam Bondi say the list was on her desk, only to say the list doesn’t exist at all? Why is Congress adjourning early to avoid having to vote on Epstein files? (This one is easy, they are spineless cowards who don’t want to be seen as calling for justice for pedophiles.) Why did Trump brag about judging beauty pageants with MINORS BELOW THE AGE OF 16? WHY DID TRUMP ADMIT TO EMPLOYING A 16-YEAR-OLD IN HIS SPA, THEN GET REALLY MAD WHEN EPSTEIN "STOLE HER"? Why was Epstein a regular at the Mar-a-Lago spa, and why was he so close to Trump's underage employees? Gee, no red flags there. GAETZ/JORDAN 2028 (no punishment for pedos!)

    What does having multiple numbers have to do with anything? A man with multiple offices, multiple residences, offices within residences, probably multiple cellphones. Who cares how many numbers a someone has for their friend?

    The card being circulated online is a fake, based on a description of a card that supposedly exist. Why did he write him a note? They were friends.

    There are pictures of them, again, because they were friends. They were both part of the same wealthy New Yorker scene. All their pictures together or at social events.

    I have no idea what makes Pam Bondi tick, or from where she gets her marching orders.

    Congress always adjourns early and avoids work. It's one of the things I hate most about politicians.

    Trump never bragged about hosting beauty pageants with minors. He made an admittedly creepy comment about owning beauty pageants and the media, years later during an election, seized on the fact that one of the pageants he owned was Miss Teen USA.

    Mar a Lago, like any resort, is prone to have a few teenage employees. I promise you Trump isn't personally hiring staff at his properties. Epstein recruited a then 17 year old employee from Mar a Lago. This was a major factor in their friendship ending.

    Here is an unavoidable fact. Before her untimely death, that women implicated several high profile men, rich and powerful men. She never named Trump.

    Here are more facts. There are over 80 identified victims of Epstein. None have ever implicated Trump. Epsteins crimes started in the early 2000s. Trumpvand Epsteins friendship ended in the early 2000s. No victims exist from the days when they were close friends.

     
    Barbarossa
    Barbarossa
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2009
    Posts: 279986
    Posted: Jul. 30, 2025 - 11:59 PM ET #53

    @StumpTownStu

     peace_5 the Democratic Party and their remaining base , somewhat like a 25% approval , has nothing else but to go after Trump , unfortunately , after hundreds of attempts , it will fail again , and again ... 

    The Pastor of Disaster
    Reply

    @StumpTownStu

     peace_5 the Democratic Party and their remaining base , somewhat like a 25% approval , has nothing else but to go after Trump , unfortunately , after hundreds of attempts , it will fail again , and again ... 

     
    StumpTownStu
    StumpTownStu
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 22236
    Posted: Jul. 31, 2025 - 12:10 AM ET #54

    Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa:

    @StumpTownStu   the Democratic Party and their remaining base , somewhat like a 25% approval , has nothing else but to go after Trump , unfortunately , after hundreds of attempts , it will fail again , and again ...

     

    If Trump is guilty of heinous acts with minors, he should be punished. However, most of these women are still around. How come Democrats aren't just asking them. If they actually cared about the victims, where is the vitriol for Prince Andrew, Bill Gates, Stephen Hawking (deceased), or damn Bill Clinton.

    Bill Clinton has been accused of sexual assault/rape multiple times, had sexual encounters with a young intern in the damn oval office, and made multiple trips to Rpstein Island. When he dies, Democrats will remember him as a hero.

    R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa:

    @StumpTownStu   the Democratic Party and their remaining base , somewhat like a 25% approval , has nothing else but to go after Trump , unfortunately , after hundreds of attempts , it will fail again , and again ...

     

    If Trump is guilty of heinous acts with minors, he should be punished. However, most of these women are still around. How come Democrats aren't just asking them. If they actually cared about the victims, where is the vitriol for Prince Andrew, Bill Gates, Stephen Hawking (deceased), or damn Bill Clinton.

    Bill Clinton has been accused of sexual assault/rape multiple times, had sexual encounters with a young intern in the damn oval office, and made multiple trips to Rpstein Island. When he dies, Democrats will remember him as a hero.

     
    Sidehatch
    Sidehatch
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 3247
    Posted: Aug. 2, 2025 - 3:05 AM ET #55

    Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa:

    @Sidehatch perhaps , just perhaps you should not worry about a future Republican ticket but focus on the disaster called the Democratic Party and whom they got

    Who said I’m worried? Just trying to cap the game, man. Vance ain’t it, the sofas are scared of him. Dude can’t even hold a trophy without breaking it.

     

    Instead, we get pedo-promoters like Gym Jordan, Matt Gaetz (for AG no less), and Donald “Air Epstein, what Epstein file” Trump? It’s like if they could just revive Dennis Hastert in the “good old days” everything would be fine and dandy.

    You can put lipstick on this pig all you want, but at the end of the day you’re happy to spit shine the trailer hitch of Jeffrey Epstein’s best friend.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa:

    @Sidehatch perhaps , just perhaps you should not worry about a future Republican ticket but focus on the disaster called the Democratic Party and whom they got

    Who said I’m worried? Just trying to cap the game, man. Vance ain’t it, the sofas are scared of him. Dude can’t even hold a trophy without breaking it.

     

    Instead, we get pedo-promoters like Gym Jordan, Matt Gaetz (for AG no less), and Donald “Air Epstein, what Epstein file” Trump? It’s like if they could just revive Dennis Hastert in the “good old days” everything would be fine and dandy.

    You can put lipstick on this pig all you want, but at the end of the day you’re happy to spit shine the trailer hitch of Jeffrey Epstein’s best friend.

     
    StumpTownStu
    StumpTownStu
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 22236
    Posted: Aug. 2, 2025 - 10:57 AM ET #56

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa: @Sidehatch perhaps , just perhaps you should not worry about a future Republican ticket but focus on the disaster called the Democratic Party and whom they got Who said I’m worried? Just trying to cap the game, man. Vance ain’t it, the sofas are scared of him. Dude can’t even hold a trophy without breaking it.   Instead, we get pedo-promoters like Gym Jordan, Matt Gaetz (for AG no less), and Donald “Air Epstein, what Epstein file” Trump? It’s like if they could just revive Dennis Hastert in the “good old days” everything would be fine and dandy. You can put lipstick on this pig all you want, but at the end of the day you’re happy to spit shine the trailer hitch of Jeffrey Epstein’s best friend.

    Spit shine the trailer hitch? Is that an oral sex reference? Directed personally at another poster? Why are you allowed to post this way?

    R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa: @Sidehatch perhaps , just perhaps you should not worry about a future Republican ticket but focus on the disaster called the Democratic Party and whom they got Who said I’m worried? Just trying to cap the game, man. Vance ain’t it, the sofas are scared of him. Dude can’t even hold a trophy without breaking it.   Instead, we get pedo-promoters like Gym Jordan, Matt Gaetz (for AG no less), and Donald “Air Epstein, what Epstein file” Trump? It’s like if they could just revive Dennis Hastert in the “good old days” everything would be fine and dandy. You can put lipstick on this pig all you want, but at the end of the day you’re happy to spit shine the trailer hitch of Jeffrey Epstein’s best friend.

    Spit shine the trailer hitch? Is that an oral sex reference? Directed personally at another poster? Why are you allowed to post this way?

     
    Sidehatch
    Sidehatch
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 3247
    Posted: Aug. 3, 2025 - 2:30 AM ET #57

    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa: @Sidehatch perhaps , just perhaps you should not worry about a future Republican ticket but focus on the disaster called the Democratic Party and whom they got Who said I’m worried? Just trying to cap the game, man. Vance ain’t it, the sofas are scared of him. Dude can’t even hold a trophy without breaking it.   Instead, we get pedo-promoters like Gym Jordan, Matt Gaetz (for AG no less), and Donald “Air Epstein, what Epstein file” Trump? It’s like if they could just revive Dennis Hastert in the “good old days” everything would be fine and dandy. You can put lipstick on this pig all you want, but at the end of the day you’re happy to spit shine the trailer hitch of Jeffrey Epstein’s best friend. Spit shine the trailer hitch? Is that an oral sex reference? Directed personally at another poster? Why are you allowed to post this way?
    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa: @Sidehatch perhaps , just perhaps you should not worry about a future Republican ticket but focus on the disaster called the Democratic Party and whom they got Who said I’m worried? Just trying to cap the game, man. Vance ain’t it, the sofas are scared of him. Dude can’t even hold a trophy without breaking it.   Instead, we get pedo-promoters like Gym Jordan, Matt Gaetz (for AG no less), and Donald “Air Epstein, what Epstein file” Trump? It’s like if they could just revive Dennis Hastert in the “good old days” everything would be fine and dandy. You can put lipstick on this pig all you want, but at the end of the day you’re happy to spit shine the trailer hitch of Jeffrey Epstein’s best friend. Spit shine the trailer hitch? Is that an oral sex reference? Directed personally at another poster? Why are you allowed to post this way?

    I agree, you will come up with any excuse possible to deflect from the fact that Donald Trump let his best friend Jeffrey Epstein lurk in the Mar-a-lago spa where underage girls were working. In fact, in another thread, you just blamed the victim (who was only 16 at the time). 
    Great job! You must be so proud.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa: @Sidehatch perhaps , just perhaps you should not worry about a future Republican ticket but focus on the disaster called the Democratic Party and whom they got Who said I’m worried? Just trying to cap the game, man. Vance ain’t it, the sofas are scared of him. Dude can’t even hold a trophy without breaking it.   Instead, we get pedo-promoters like Gym Jordan, Matt Gaetz (for AG no less), and Donald “Air Epstein, what Epstein file” Trump? It’s like if they could just revive Dennis Hastert in the “good old days” everything would be fine and dandy. You can put lipstick on this pig all you want, but at the end of the day you’re happy to spit shine the trailer hitch of Jeffrey Epstein’s best friend. Spit shine the trailer hitch? Is that an oral sex reference? Directed personally at another poster? Why are you allowed to post this way?
    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa: @Sidehatch perhaps , just perhaps you should not worry about a future Republican ticket but focus on the disaster called the Democratic Party and whom they got Who said I’m worried? Just trying to cap the game, man. Vance ain’t it, the sofas are scared of him. Dude can’t even hold a trophy without breaking it.   Instead, we get pedo-promoters like Gym Jordan, Matt Gaetz (for AG no less), and Donald “Air Epstein, what Epstein file” Trump? It’s like if they could just revive Dennis Hastert in the “good old days” everything would be fine and dandy. You can put lipstick on this pig all you want, but at the end of the day you’re happy to spit shine the trailer hitch of Jeffrey Epstein’s best friend. Spit shine the trailer hitch? Is that an oral sex reference? Directed personally at another poster? Why are you allowed to post this way?

    I agree, you will come up with any excuse possible to deflect from the fact that Donald Trump let his best friend Jeffrey Epstein lurk in the Mar-a-lago spa where underage girls were working. In fact, in another thread, you just blamed the victim (who was only 16 at the time). 
    Great job! You must be so proud.

     
    StumpTownStu
    StumpTownStu
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 22236
    Posted: Aug. 3, 2025 - 9:13 AM ET #58

    @Sidehatch

     

     I know WSC allows for your personal attacks, because the moderation in this forum is a joke, but I won't stand for it. Let's get one thing straight. I have never, and will never, blame a victim. If you're gonna make accusations like that, have the decency to cite where. Don't simply write, "...in another thread."

    Now to facts. He wasn't allowed to lurk. He was a member. He could afford a membership. I'm sure Donald Trump didn't hand out freebies. The deceased, and may she rest in peace, was recruited by Maxwell, which means she was probably an attendant in a female only area of the spa. She didn't meet Epstein at Mar a Lago.

    It is mind blowing to me that some people on this site are so easily boxed while you are allowed to post with impunity. I'm actually starting to appreciate your posts because as long as you continue to start your ridiculous hyperbolic threads (the kind that get people like sundance boxed) and sling your personal attacks (while many of us are boxed for less), as long as this is all the case, the notion of unbiased moderation will always be a joke.

    R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
    Reply

    @Sidehatch

     

     I know WSC allows for your personal attacks, because the moderation in this forum is a joke, but I won't stand for it. Let's get one thing straight. I have never, and will never, blame a victim. If you're gonna make accusations like that, have the decency to cite where. Don't simply write, "...in another thread."

    Now to facts. He wasn't allowed to lurk. He was a member. He could afford a membership. I'm sure Donald Trump didn't hand out freebies. The deceased, and may she rest in peace, was recruited by Maxwell, which means she was probably an attendant in a female only area of the spa. She didn't meet Epstein at Mar a Lago.

    It is mind blowing to me that some people on this site are so easily boxed while you are allowed to post with impunity. I'm actually starting to appreciate your posts because as long as you continue to start your ridiculous hyperbolic threads (the kind that get people like sundance boxed) and sling your personal attacks (while many of us are boxed for less), as long as this is all the case, the notion of unbiased moderation will always be a joke.

     
    Sidehatch
    Sidehatch
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 3247
    Posted: Aug. 4, 2025 - 12:01 AM ET #59

    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:

    @Sidehatch    I know WSC allows for your personal attacks, because the moderation in this forum is a joke, but I won't stand for it. Let's get one thing straight. I have never, and will never, blame a victim. If you're gonna make accusations like that, have the decency to cite where. Don't simply write, "...in another thread." Now to facts. He wasn't allowed to lurk. He was a member. He could afford a membership. I'm sure Donald Trump didn't hand out freebies. The deceased, and may she rest in peace, was recruited by Maxwell, which means she was probably an attendant in a female only area of the spa. She didn't meet Epstein at Mar a Lago. It is mind blowing to me that some people on this site are so easily boxed while you are allowed to post with impunity. I'm actually starting to appreciate your posts because as long as you continue to start your ridiculous hyperbolic threads (the kind that get people like sundance boxed) and sling your personal attacks (while many of us are boxed for less), as long as this is all the case, the notion of unbiased moderation will always be a joke.

     

    Wow, you disingenuous liar.

    Where did I ever say Trump gave his best bud Epstein freebies? 

    Epstein - a known pedo, per Trump himself - was hanging around Mar-a-lago spa. Trump had the power to stop it, and of course he didn’t. We know he didn’t stop it because just last week, Trump admitted that he let Epstein “steal” his 16-year-old spa worker “Giuffre” who was a victim of pedo Epstein, again Trump’s best friend.

    Trump should have to testify under penalty of perjury for this, in light of his new admissions.

    I understand you want to whine about moderators and try to get those who call out Trump for his heinous acts permabanned, but that is merely a distraction to avoid talking about:

    Trump allowing his best friend Epstein

    to cruise Trump’s spa for16 year olds

    employed by Trump 

    only to “steal” said 16 year olds

    and sell them to sex offenders

    Epstein later dies under very suspicious circumstances while Trump is president

     Trump promises to release the files, but later refuses

    Trump releases edited video of Epstein with a whole minute being deleted 

    Now Trump’s personal attorney is interceding in the case 

    Now Trump is talking about a pardon for Epstein’s convicted accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell

     

    Why is it so hard for you to understand that fact pattern - which Trump has already admitted exists - has a million red flags? Why shouldn’t Trump have to testify under penalty of perjury for this entire fact pattern?

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:

    @Sidehatch    I know WSC allows for your personal attacks, because the moderation in this forum is a joke, but I won't stand for it. Let's get one thing straight. I have never, and will never, blame a victim. If you're gonna make accusations like that, have the decency to cite where. Don't simply write, "...in another thread." Now to facts. He wasn't allowed to lurk. He was a member. He could afford a membership. I'm sure Donald Trump didn't hand out freebies. The deceased, and may she rest in peace, was recruited by Maxwell, which means she was probably an attendant in a female only area of the spa. She didn't meet Epstein at Mar a Lago. It is mind blowing to me that some people on this site are so easily boxed while you are allowed to post with impunity. I'm actually starting to appreciate your posts because as long as you continue to start your ridiculous hyperbolic threads (the kind that get people like sundance boxed) and sling your personal attacks (while many of us are boxed for less), as long as this is all the case, the notion of unbiased moderation will always be a joke.

     

    Wow, you disingenuous liar.

    Where did I ever say Trump gave his best bud Epstein freebies? 

    Epstein - a known pedo, per Trump himself - was hanging around Mar-a-lago spa. Trump had the power to stop it, and of course he didn’t. We know he didn’t stop it because just last week, Trump admitted that he let Epstein “steal” his 16-year-old spa worker “Giuffre” who was a victim of pedo Epstein, again Trump’s best friend.

    Trump should have to testify under penalty of perjury for this, in light of his new admissions.

    I understand you want to whine about moderators and try to get those who call out Trump for his heinous acts permabanned, but that is merely a distraction to avoid talking about:

    Trump allowing his best friend Epstein

    to cruise Trump’s spa for16 year olds

    employed by Trump 

    only to “steal” said 16 year olds

    and sell them to sex offenders

    Epstein later dies under very suspicious circumstances while Trump is president

     Trump promises to release the files, but later refuses

    Trump releases edited video of Epstein with a whole minute being deleted 

    Now Trump’s personal attorney is interceding in the case 

    Now Trump is talking about a pardon for Epstein’s convicted accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell

     

    Why is it so hard for you to understand that fact pattern - which Trump has already admitted exists - has a million red flags? Why shouldn’t Trump have to testify under penalty of perjury for this entire fact pattern?

     
    Sidehatch
    Sidehatch
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 3247
    Posted: Aug. 4, 2025 - 12:06 AM ET #60

    Again, the liars’ attempts to cover this up are easily disproven by Trump’s latest comments:

    President Donald Trump said Thursday he didn't know why a convicted sex offender was taking women from his Mar-a-Lago club, which, he said, had caused him to break off relations with his longtime friend Jeffrey Epstein.

    Asked by ABC News at an executive order signing if he knew why the disgraced financier was taking women from his club, the president replied, "No, I don't know really why, but I said, if he's taken anybody from Mar-a-Lago, he's hiring or whatever he's doing, I didn't like it. And we threw him out

    Reply

    Again, the liars’ attempts to cover this up are easily disproven by Trump’s latest comments:

    President Donald Trump said Thursday he didn't know why a convicted sex offender was taking women from his Mar-a-Lago club, which, he said, had caused him to break off relations with his longtime friend Jeffrey Epstein.

    Asked by ABC News at an executive order signing if he knew why the disgraced financier was taking women from his club, the president replied, "No, I don't know really why, but I said, if he's taken anybody from Mar-a-Lago, he's hiring or whatever he's doing, I didn't like it. And we threw him out

     
    StumpTownStu
    StumpTownStu
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 22236
    Posted: Aug. 4, 2025 - 1:13 AM ET #61

    @Sidehatch

      Nothing you write is factual. It's conjecture, at best. It's hyperbolic. It's inflammatory. Whatever it is you're dealing with, good luck with it.

    R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
    Reply

    @Sidehatch

      Nothing you write is factual. It's conjecture, at best. It's hyperbolic. It's inflammatory. Whatever it is you're dealing with, good luck with it.

     
    Sidehatch
    Sidehatch
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 3247
    Posted: Aug. 12, 2025 - 2:00 AM ET #62

    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:

    @Sidehatch   Nothing you write is factual. It's conjecture, at best. It's hyperbolic. It's inflammatory. Whatever it is you're dealing with, good luck with it.


    It’s amazing to see that I bring accurate quotes to the conversation, I am criticized as “conjecture” and “hyperbolic” lmao. Couldn’t find any evidence to disprove my point, so turns to lazy ad hominem attacks. Yay! You win the Ted Cruz award! 

    You can keep on lying to us, but it doesn’t make any of your blather true

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:

    @Sidehatch   Nothing you write is factual. It's conjecture, at best. It's hyperbolic. It's inflammatory. Whatever it is you're dealing with, good luck with it.


    It’s amazing to see that I bring accurate quotes to the conversation, I am criticized as “conjecture” and “hyperbolic” lmao. Couldn’t find any evidence to disprove my point, so turns to lazy ad hominem attacks. Yay! You win the Ted Cruz award! 

    You can keep on lying to us, but it doesn’t make any of your blather true

     
    StumpTownStu
    StumpTownStu
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 22236
    Posted: Aug. 12, 2025 - 2:39 AM ET #63

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: @Sidehatch   Nothing you write is factual. It's conjecture, at best. It's hyperbolic. It's inflammatory. Whatever it is you're dealing with, good luck with it. It’s amazing to see that I bring accurate quotes to the conversation, I am criticized as “conjecture” and “hyperbolic” lmao. Couldn’t find any evidence to disprove my point, so turns to lazy ad hominem attacks. Yay! You win the Ted Cruz award! You can keep on lying to us, but it doesn’t make any of your blather true

    Just because you posted a quote, it doesn't make the content of your posts any more factual. It's just a quote surrounded by falsehoods. I'll say it again. Little, if anything you have written, is factual. Hardly anything you ever write is factual.

    R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: @Sidehatch   Nothing you write is factual. It's conjecture, at best. It's hyperbolic. It's inflammatory. Whatever it is you're dealing with, good luck with it. It’s amazing to see that I bring accurate quotes to the conversation, I am criticized as “conjecture” and “hyperbolic” lmao. Couldn’t find any evidence to disprove my point, so turns to lazy ad hominem attacks. Yay! You win the Ted Cruz award! You can keep on lying to us, but it doesn’t make any of your blather true

    Just because you posted a quote, it doesn't make the content of your posts any more factual. It's just a quote surrounded by falsehoods. I'll say it again. Little, if anything you have written, is factual. Hardly anything you ever write is factual.

     
    Sidehatch
    Sidehatch
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 3247
    Posted: Aug. 18, 2025 - 8:10 PM ET #64

    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: @Sidehatch   Nothing you write is factual. It's conjecture, at best. It's hyperbolic. It's inflammatory. Whatever it is you're dealing with, good luck with it. It’s amazing to see that I bring accurate quotes to the conversation, I am criticized as “conjecture” and “hyperbolic” lmao. Couldn’t find any evidence to disprove my point, so turns to lazy ad hominem attacks. Yay! You win the Ted Cruz award! You can keep on lying to us, but it doesn’t make any of your blather true Just because you posted a quote, it doesn't make the content of your posts any more factual. It's just a quote surrounded by falsehoods. I'll say it again. Little, if anything you have written, is factual. Hardly anything you ever write is factual.

    Meanwhile, this is all easily verifiable. 

    Again, the liars’ attempts to cover this up are easily disproven by Trump’s latest comments:

     

    President Donald Trump said Thursday he didn't know why a convicted sex offender was taking women from his Mar-a-Lago club, which, he said, had caused him to break off relations with his longtime friend Jeffrey Epstein.

    Asked by ABC News at an executive order signing if he knew why the disgraced financier was taking women from his club, the president replied, "No, I don't know really why, but I said, if he's taken anybody from Mar-a-Lago, he's hiring or whatever he's doing, I didn't like it. And we threw him out

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: @Sidehatch   Nothing you write is factual. It's conjecture, at best. It's hyperbolic. It's inflammatory. Whatever it is you're dealing with, good luck with it. It’s amazing to see that I bring accurate quotes to the conversation, I am criticized as “conjecture” and “hyperbolic” lmao. Couldn’t find any evidence to disprove my point, so turns to lazy ad hominem attacks. Yay! You win the Ted Cruz award! You can keep on lying to us, but it doesn’t make any of your blather true Just because you posted a quote, it doesn't make the content of your posts any more factual. It's just a quote surrounded by falsehoods. I'll say it again. Little, if anything you have written, is factual. Hardly anything you ever write is factual.

    Meanwhile, this is all easily verifiable. 

    Again, the liars’ attempts to cover this up are easily disproven by Trump’s latest comments:

     

    President Donald Trump said Thursday he didn't know why a convicted sex offender was taking women from his Mar-a-Lago club, which, he said, had caused him to break off relations with his longtime friend Jeffrey Epstein.

    Asked by ABC News at an executive order signing if he knew why the disgraced financier was taking women from his club, the president replied, "No, I don't know really why, but I said, if he's taken anybody from Mar-a-Lago, he's hiring or whatever he's doing, I didn't like it. And we threw him out

     
    Sidehatch
    Sidehatch
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 3247
    Posted: Aug. 20, 2025 - 2:00 AM ET #65

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: @Sidehatch   Nothing you write is factual. It's conjecture, at best. It's hyperbolic. It's inflammatory. Whatever it is you're dealing with, good luck with it. It’s amazing to see that I bring accurate quotes to the conversation, I am criticized as “conjecture” and “hyperbolic” lmao. Couldn’t find any evidence to disprove my point, so turns to lazy ad hominem attacks. Yay! You win the Ted Cruz award! You can keep on lying to us, but it doesn’t make any of your blather true Just because you posted a quote, it doesn't make the content of your posts any more factual. It's just a quote surrounded by falsehoods. I'll say it again. Little, if anything you have written, is factual. Hardly anything you ever write is factual. Meanwhile, this is all easily verifiable.  Again, the liars’ attempts to cover this up are easily disproven by Trump’s latest comments:   President Donald Trump said Thursday he didn't know why a convicted sex offender was taking women from his Mar-a-Lago club, which, he said, had caused him to break off relations with his longtime friend Jeffrey Epstein. Asked by ABC News at an executive order signing if he knew why the disgraced financier was taking women from his club, the president replied, "No, I don't know really why, but I said, if he's taken anybody from Mar-a-Lago, he's hiring or whatever he's doing, I didn't like it. And we threw him out

     

    Again, I posted a direct quote to Stu’s favorite Epstein-pedo-buddy. He says it’s fake, I repost it and crickets

    Facts don’t matter to these zealots. All they care about is fascism, even if it means transferring convicted sex trafficker Ghizzy Maxwell (who has MANY pics with DJT) to a low security prison and doing her favors. Disgusting how low the Epstein pedo-defenders have gone

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: @Sidehatch   Nothing you write is factual. It's conjecture, at best. It's hyperbolic. It's inflammatory. Whatever it is you're dealing with, good luck with it. It’s amazing to see that I bring accurate quotes to the conversation, I am criticized as “conjecture” and “hyperbolic” lmao. Couldn’t find any evidence to disprove my point, so turns to lazy ad hominem attacks. Yay! You win the Ted Cruz award! You can keep on lying to us, but it doesn’t make any of your blather true Just because you posted a quote, it doesn't make the content of your posts any more factual. It's just a quote surrounded by falsehoods. I'll say it again. Little, if anything you have written, is factual. Hardly anything you ever write is factual. Meanwhile, this is all easily verifiable.  Again, the liars’ attempts to cover this up are easily disproven by Trump’s latest comments:   President Donald Trump said Thursday he didn't know why a convicted sex offender was taking women from his Mar-a-Lago club, which, he said, had caused him to break off relations with his longtime friend Jeffrey Epstein. Asked by ABC News at an executive order signing if he knew why the disgraced financier was taking women from his club, the president replied, "No, I don't know really why, but I said, if he's taken anybody from Mar-a-Lago, he's hiring or whatever he's doing, I didn't like it. And we threw him out

     

    Again, I posted a direct quote to Stu’s favorite Epstein-pedo-buddy. He says it’s fake, I repost it and crickets

    Facts don’t matter to these zealots. All they care about is fascism, even if it means transferring convicted sex trafficker Ghizzy Maxwell (who has MANY pics with DJT) to a low security prison and doing her favors. Disgusting how low the Epstein pedo-defenders have gone

     
    StumpTownStu
    StumpTownStu
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 22236
    Posted: Aug. 20, 2025 - 2:22 AM ET #66

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: @Sidehatch   Nothing you write is factual. It's conjecture, at best. It's hyperbolic. It's inflammatory. Whatever it is you're dealing with, good luck with it. It’s amazing to see that I bring accurate quotes to the conversation, I am criticized as “conjecture” and “hyperbolic” lmao. Couldn’t find any evidence to disprove my point, so turns to lazy ad hominem attacks. Yay! You win the Ted Cruz award! You can keep on lying to us, but it doesn’t make any of your blather true Just because you posted a quote, it doesn't make the content of your posts any more factual. It's just a quote surrounded by falsehoods. I'll say it again. Little, if anything you have written, is factual. Hardly anything you ever write is factual. Meanwhile, this is all easily verifiable.  Again, the liars’ attempts to cover this up are easily disproven by Trump’s latest comments:   President Donald Trump said Thursday he didn't know why a convicted sex offender was taking women from his Mar-a-Lago club, which, he said, had caused him to break off relations with his longtime friend Jeffrey Epstein. Asked by ABC News at an executive order signing if he knew why the disgraced financier was taking women from his club, the president replied, "No, I don't know really why, but I said, if he's taken anybody from Mar-a-Lago, he's hiring or whatever he's doing, I didn't like it. And we threw him out   Again, I posted a direct quote to Stu’s favorite Epstein-pedo-buddy. He says it’s fake, I repost it and crickets Facts don’t matter to these zealots. All they care about is fascism, even if it means transferring convicted sex trafficker Ghizzy Maxwell (who has MANY pics with DJT) to a low security prison and doing her favors. Disgusting how low the Epstein pedo-defenders have gone

    Your mama.

    R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: @Sidehatch   Nothing you write is factual. It's conjecture, at best. It's hyperbolic. It's inflammatory. Whatever it is you're dealing with, good luck with it. It’s amazing to see that I bring accurate quotes to the conversation, I am criticized as “conjecture” and “hyperbolic” lmao. Couldn’t find any evidence to disprove my point, so turns to lazy ad hominem attacks. Yay! You win the Ted Cruz award! You can keep on lying to us, but it doesn’t make any of your blather true Just because you posted a quote, it doesn't make the content of your posts any more factual. It's just a quote surrounded by falsehoods. I'll say it again. Little, if anything you have written, is factual. Hardly anything you ever write is factual. Meanwhile, this is all easily verifiable.  Again, the liars’ attempts to cover this up are easily disproven by Trump’s latest comments:   President Donald Trump said Thursday he didn't know why a convicted sex offender was taking women from his Mar-a-Lago club, which, he said, had caused him to break off relations with his longtime friend Jeffrey Epstein. Asked by ABC News at an executive order signing if he knew why the disgraced financier was taking women from his club, the president replied, "No, I don't know really why, but I said, if he's taken anybody from Mar-a-Lago, he's hiring or whatever he's doing, I didn't like it. And we threw him out   Again, I posted a direct quote to Stu’s favorite Epstein-pedo-buddy. He says it’s fake, I repost it and crickets Facts don’t matter to these zealots. All they care about is fascism, even if it means transferring convicted sex trafficker Ghizzy Maxwell (who has MANY pics with DJT) to a low security prison and doing her favors. Disgusting how low the Epstein pedo-defenders have gone

    Your mama.

     
    soup-can
    soup-can
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2003
    Posts: 9450
    Posted: Aug. 20, 2025 - 2:56 AM ET #67

    you have bumped the last 5 threads on the list here in the last hour, all of them are your threads

     

    this reminds us of someone is making up for something else, like those pickup trucks with 6 inch lift kits and 38 inch mudders

    why?

    Reply

    you have bumped the last 5 threads on the list here in the last hour, all of them are your threads

     

    this reminds us of someone is making up for something else, like those pickup trucks with 6 inch lift kits and 38 inch mudders

    why?

     
     
    Sidehatch
    Sidehatch
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 3247
    Posted: Dec. 12, 2025 - 11:16 PM ET #68

    Just a friendly reminder that Trump’s best bud, Ghizzy Maxwell, was transferred to a low security country club prison courtesy of Donald J Trump. 

    Looking forward to the Gym Jordan/Ghizzy Maxwell ticket in ‘28!

    Reply

    Just a friendly reminder that Trump’s best bud, Ghizzy Maxwell, was transferred to a low security country club prison courtesy of Donald J Trump. 

    Looking forward to the Gym Jordan/Ghizzy Maxwell ticket in ‘28!

    All Forums | Politics
    «First Previous 123

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Claiming Prizes 57,804
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,299
    • Tuesday 10/20/2026 865
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 61,603
    • PART DEUX 162
    • Congrats to ltdsks - 20 wins in a row! 5,083
    • Lies, Inaccuracies & Stupidity 33,169
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 26,101
    • How low can Trump go ? 29,775
    • I Thought Trump Campaigned on Lowering Prices!?!? 32,431

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.