• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 7
      NFL Week 7
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    Ginsburg has passed .

    «First Previous 123 ... 567 Next Last»
    sundance
    THEMUGG
    uncoolbear
    scooby-doos
    djbrow
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 452
    Posts: 172
    «First Previous 123 ... 567 Next Last»
     
    sundance
    sundance
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2002
    Posts: 16806
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2020 - 11:19 AM ET #126

    Correcting the record. My daughter's annual responsibility was $8,800. Not $10,200.

    peace_5

    Reply

    Correcting the record. My daughter's annual responsibility was $8,800. Not $10,200.

    peace_5

     
    THEMUGG
    THEMUGG
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 38241
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2020 - 12:27 PM ET #127

    Quote Originally Posted by sundance:

    The legacy of O's Affordable Care Act. My daughter is a person who will dutifully (spelled correctly djbrow) comply. The long story short  First. The definition of a deductible is 'responsiblity.' My daughter's ACA plan had a monthly premium of $150 with a deductible of $7,000. Her annual responsibility before she 'might' be allotted coverage was $10,200! The intellectual (spelled correctly djbrow) Left calls this an insurance policy!  This is what they call a legacy! Gimme a break!
    I know a few people that got screwed by Owebamacare. But the poor libs that profited from it will always tout it as the greatest thing ever. peace_5

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by sundance:

    The legacy of O's Affordable Care Act. My daughter is a person who will dutifully (spelled correctly djbrow) comply. The long story short  First. The definition of a deductible is 'responsiblity.' My daughter's ACA plan had a monthly premium of $150 with a deductible of $7,000. Her annual responsibility before she 'might' be allotted coverage was $10,200! The intellectual (spelled correctly djbrow) Left calls this an insurance policy!  This is what they call a legacy! Gimme a break!
    I know a few people that got screwed by Owebamacare. But the poor libs that profited from it will always tout it as the greatest thing ever. peace_5

     
    uncoolbear
    uncoolbear
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 296
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2020 - 1:04 PM ET #128

    Does anybody believe for one second that the scumbag DC Dems would wait until the election is over before filling the seat if the roles were reversed?  The same Dems that spied on an incoming opposition party, pushed a false Russian collusion narrative, pushed through a "somber" impeachment and worked with the MSM to push a 24/7 negative (and often dishonest) news cycle?  The Republicans dont owe them shit at this point.  

    Reply

    Does anybody believe for one second that the scumbag DC Dems would wait until the election is over before filling the seat if the roles were reversed?  The same Dems that spied on an incoming opposition party, pushed a false Russian collusion narrative, pushed through a "somber" impeachment and worked with the MSM to push a 24/7 negative (and often dishonest) news cycle?  The Republicans dont owe them shit at this point.  

     
    uncoolbear
    uncoolbear
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 296
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2020 - 1:11 PM ET #129

    I asked a few of my lib friends if they thought Biden would step down if he got elected and let Harris take over, most of them said yes.  I asked how they felt about that, they said they were ok with it because its still better than Trump.  So the ppl that have cried the last 4 years about Trump undermining our democracy (even though they can never specify what he is doing to undermine it) are ok with LITERALLY undermining our democracy as long as it helps their party.  The people didnt vote for Harris or she would have been the nominee, yet the left is ok with subverting the will of the people as long as orange bad man is out of office.  Talk about hypocrisy.

    Reply

    I asked a few of my lib friends if they thought Biden would step down if he got elected and let Harris take over, most of them said yes.  I asked how they felt about that, they said they were ok with it because its still better than Trump.  So the ppl that have cried the last 4 years about Trump undermining our democracy (even though they can never specify what he is doing to undermine it) are ok with LITERALLY undermining our democracy as long as it helps their party.  The people didnt vote for Harris or she would have been the nominee, yet the left is ok with subverting the will of the people as long as orange bad man is out of office.  Talk about hypocrisy.

     
    scooby-doos
    scooby-doos
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2010
    Posts: 3194
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2020 - 1:18 PM ET #130

    people don't like his personality.... 

    Reply

    people don't like his personality.... 

     
    djbrow
    djbrow
    Covers Referee
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2004
    Posts: 15759
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2020 - 3:01 PM ET #131

    Quote Originally Posted by uncoolbear:

    I asked a few of my lib friends if they thought Biden would step down if he got elected and let Harris take over, most of them said yes.  I asked how they felt about that, they said they were ok with it because its still better than Trump.  So the ppl that have cried the last 4 years about Trump undermining our democracy (even though they can never specify what he is doing to undermine it) are ok with LITERALLY undermining our democracy as long as it helps their party.  The people didnt vote for Harris or she would have been the nominee, yet the left is ok with subverting the will of the people as long as orange bad man is out of office.  Talk about hypocrisy.

     

    an_roll_laughan_roll_laugh

    This is my new favorite post ever. Congrats uncoolbear. an_cheers

     

    So just to understand, you asked some random 'friends' if they cared what Biden did after elected and then concluded that all people who support Biden wouldn't care what he did if elected. Absolutely priceless. 

     

    Just a comparison, I asked my Trump supporting friend Mitch if he would care if Trump killed a peaceful protestor and he said no., Therefore, I cannot believe you would support Trump killing a peaceful protestor. an_roll_laugh

     

    You might want to use a smaller brush when you paint. cool

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by uncoolbear:

    I asked a few of my lib friends if they thought Biden would step down if he got elected and let Harris take over, most of them said yes.  I asked how they felt about that, they said they were ok with it because its still better than Trump.  So the ppl that have cried the last 4 years about Trump undermining our democracy (even though they can never specify what he is doing to undermine it) are ok with LITERALLY undermining our democracy as long as it helps their party.  The people didnt vote for Harris or she would have been the nominee, yet the left is ok with subverting the will of the people as long as orange bad man is out of office.  Talk about hypocrisy.

     

    an_roll_laughan_roll_laugh

    This is my new favorite post ever. Congrats uncoolbear. an_cheers

     

    So just to understand, you asked some random 'friends' if they cared what Biden did after elected and then concluded that all people who support Biden wouldn't care what he did if elected. Absolutely priceless. 

     

    Just a comparison, I asked my Trump supporting friend Mitch if he would care if Trump killed a peaceful protestor and he said no., Therefore, I cannot believe you would support Trump killing a peaceful protestor. an_roll_laugh

     

    You might want to use a smaller brush when you paint. cool

     
    chadebennett
    chadebennett
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2011
    Posts: 614
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2020 - 3:10 PM ET #132

    Quote Originally Posted by uncoolbear:

    I asked a few of my lib friends if they thought Biden would step down if he got elected and let Harris take over, most of them said yes.  I asked how they felt about that, they said they were ok with it because its still better than Trump.  So the ppl that have cried the last 4 years about Trump undermining our democracy (even though they can never specify what he is doing to undermine it) are ok with LITERALLY undermining our democracy as long as it helps their party.  The people didnt vote for Harris or she would have been the nominee, yet the left is ok with subverting the will of the people as long as orange bad man is out of office.  Talk about hypocrisy.

    goodpost

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by uncoolbear:

    I asked a few of my lib friends if they thought Biden would step down if he got elected and let Harris take over, most of them said yes.  I asked how they felt about that, they said they were ok with it because its still better than Trump.  So the ppl that have cried the last 4 years about Trump undermining our democracy (even though they can never specify what he is doing to undermine it) are ok with LITERALLY undermining our democracy as long as it helps their party.  The people didnt vote for Harris or she would have been the nominee, yet the left is ok with subverting the will of the people as long as orange bad man is out of office.  Talk about hypocrisy.

    goodpost

     
    uncoolbear
    uncoolbear
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 296
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2020 - 4:48 PM ET #133

    Glad I could help get your sense of humor back DJ, u seem like such a stiff, but im sure you are a real hit at parties.  Ive seen this over and over on Twitter also, so yes its a bit anecdotal but there definitely seems to be this shared attitude of "get orange man out at any cost".  When the Democrats cant win they just try to change the rules (lower the voting age, eliminate the EC, expand the SC, vote by mail).  So anyway back to my original question, do you think for a second that Democrats would wait until after the election to fill the seat?

     

    Reply

    Glad I could help get your sense of humor back DJ, u seem like such a stiff, but im sure you are a real hit at parties.  Ive seen this over and over on Twitter also, so yes its a bit anecdotal but there definitely seems to be this shared attitude of "get orange man out at any cost".  When the Democrats cant win they just try to change the rules (lower the voting age, eliminate the EC, expand the SC, vote by mail).  So anyway back to my original question, do you think for a second that Democrats would wait until after the election to fill the seat?

     

     
    djbrow
    djbrow
    Covers Referee
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2004
    Posts: 15759
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2020 - 7:49 PM ET #134

    Quote Originally Posted by uncoolbear:

    Glad I could help get your sense of humor back DJ, u seem like such a stiff, but im sure you are a real hit at parties.  Ive seen this over and over on Twitter also, so yes its a bit anecdotal but there definitely seems to be this shared attitude of "get orange man out at any cost".  When the Democrats cant win they just try to change the rules (lower the voting age, eliminate the EC, expand the SC, vote by mail).  So anyway back to my original question, do you think for a second that Democrats would wait until after the election to fill the seat?

     

    Well why didn't you say so. If I had known that in addition to your few liberal friends, some unknown person on twitter thinks Biden will step down and let Harris take over, I never would have commented on your logical fallacy (it is actually numbers 3-15 of logical fallacies, see below). 

     

    I have answered this before. I don't fault Trump for appointing a Justice. In fact, I have said I believe he is required to do so. My point has always been that no Republican who argued that they needed to wait until the 2016 election to replace Scalia can support the appointment now without being labelled a hypocrite. I realize that doesn't bother you which is fine. an_cheers

     

    https://thebestschools.org/magazine/15-logical-fallacies-know/

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by uncoolbear:

    Glad I could help get your sense of humor back DJ, u seem like such a stiff, but im sure you are a real hit at parties.  Ive seen this over and over on Twitter also, so yes its a bit anecdotal but there definitely seems to be this shared attitude of "get orange man out at any cost".  When the Democrats cant win they just try to change the rules (lower the voting age, eliminate the EC, expand the SC, vote by mail).  So anyway back to my original question, do you think for a second that Democrats would wait until after the election to fill the seat?

     

    Well why didn't you say so. If I had known that in addition to your few liberal friends, some unknown person on twitter thinks Biden will step down and let Harris take over, I never would have commented on your logical fallacy (it is actually numbers 3-15 of logical fallacies, see below). 

     

    I have answered this before. I don't fault Trump for appointing a Justice. In fact, I have said I believe he is required to do so. My point has always been that no Republican who argued that they needed to wait until the 2016 election to replace Scalia can support the appointment now without being labelled a hypocrite. I realize that doesn't bother you which is fine. an_cheers

     

    https://thebestschools.org/magazine/15-logical-fallacies-know/

     
    uncoolbear
    uncoolbear
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2016
    Posts: 296
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2020 - 8:13 PM ET #135

    Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:

    Quote Originally Posted by uncoolbear: Glad I could help get your sense of humor back DJ, u seem like such a stiff, but im sure you are a real hit at parties.  Ive seen this over and over on Twitter also, so yes its a bit anecdotal but there definitely seems to be this shared attitude of "get orange man out at any cost".  When the Democrats cant win they just try to change the rules (lower the voting age, eliminate the EC, expand the SC, vote by mail).  So anyway back to my original question, do you think for a second that Democrats would wait until after the election to fill the seat?   Well why didn't you say so. If I had known that in addition to your few liberal friends, some unknown person on twitter thinks Biden will step down and let Harris take over, I never would have commented on your logical fallacy (it is actually numbers 3-15 of logical fallacies, see below).    I have answered this before. I don't fault Trump for appointing a Justice. In fact, I have said I believe he is required to do so. My point has always been that no Republican who argued that they needed to wait until the 2016 election to replace Scalia can support the appointment now without being labelled a hypocrite. I realize that doesn't bother you which is fine.    https://thebestschools.org/magazine/15-logical-fallacies-know/

     

    Smug, arrogant liberals are my favorite.  They are so much smarter than anyone yet they seem to be wrong about pretty much everything.  Just do us a favor and post a picture of your face when they announce the election results so us dumb, uneducated Trump voters can point and laugh.... again.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:

    Quote Originally Posted by uncoolbear: Glad I could help get your sense of humor back DJ, u seem like such a stiff, but im sure you are a real hit at parties.  Ive seen this over and over on Twitter also, so yes its a bit anecdotal but there definitely seems to be this shared attitude of "get orange man out at any cost".  When the Democrats cant win they just try to change the rules (lower the voting age, eliminate the EC, expand the SC, vote by mail).  So anyway back to my original question, do you think for a second that Democrats would wait until after the election to fill the seat?   Well why didn't you say so. If I had known that in addition to your few liberal friends, some unknown person on twitter thinks Biden will step down and let Harris take over, I never would have commented on your logical fallacy (it is actually numbers 3-15 of logical fallacies, see below).    I have answered this before. I don't fault Trump for appointing a Justice. In fact, I have said I believe he is required to do so. My point has always been that no Republican who argued that they needed to wait until the 2016 election to replace Scalia can support the appointment now without being labelled a hypocrite. I realize that doesn't bother you which is fine.    https://thebestschools.org/magazine/15-logical-fallacies-know/

     

    Smug, arrogant liberals are my favorite.  They are so much smarter than anyone yet they seem to be wrong about pretty much everything.  Just do us a favor and post a picture of your face when they announce the election results so us dumb, uneducated Trump voters can point and laugh.... again.

     
    djbrow
    djbrow
    Covers Referee
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2004
    Posts: 15759
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2020 - 8:40 PM ET #136

    Interesting. You haven't done anything to distinguish yourself here so I cannot say what your politics are, other than the post you made above. I also didn't make any comment about your lack of education; rather you did. Don't be insecure!  I am certain you have far exceeded expectations. peace_5

     

    As for me, I must be doing something right when those on the right call me liberal and those on the left call me conservative. Right where I want to be. Thanks for checking in. an_roll_laugh

    Reply

    Interesting. You haven't done anything to distinguish yourself here so I cannot say what your politics are, other than the post you made above. I also didn't make any comment about your lack of education; rather you did. Don't be insecure!  I am certain you have far exceeded expectations. peace_5

     

    As for me, I must be doing something right when those on the right call me liberal and those on the left call me conservative. Right where I want to be. Thanks for checking in. an_roll_laugh

     
    gambleholic63
    gambleholic63
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 4412
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2020 - 9:51 PM ET #137

    I guess I just don't understand what "moderators" are supposed to do. Covers employees seem to be guilty of behaviors that require moderating. Maybe they just need more moderators? 2020 is so confusing.

    Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
    Reply

    I guess I just don't understand what "moderators" are supposed to do. Covers employees seem to be guilty of behaviors that require moderating. Maybe they just need more moderators? 2020 is so confusing.

     
    djbrow
    djbrow
    Covers Referee
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2004
    Posts: 15759
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2020 - 10:14 PM ET #138

    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:

    I guess I just don't understand what "moderators" are supposed to do. Covers employees seem to be guilty of behaviors that require moderating. Maybe they just need more moderators? 2020 is so confusing.

     

    I’m sure this post was necessary as opposed to discussing the topic at hand peace_5

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:

    I guess I just don't understand what "moderators" are supposed to do. Covers employees seem to be guilty of behaviors that require moderating. Maybe they just need more moderators? 2020 is so confusing.

     

    I’m sure this post was necessary as opposed to discussing the topic at hand peace_5

     
    gambleholic63
    gambleholic63
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 4412
    Posted: Sep. 22, 2020 - 12:38 AM ET #139

    Just calling it as I see it. 

    Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
    Reply

    Just calling it as I see it. 

     
    DogbiteWilliams
    DogbiteWilliams
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2015
    Posts: 6497
    Posted: Sep. 22, 2020 - 2:03 AM ET #140

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    No significant change overall since August 13: The good guys are 3 net seats short of a 50/50 split in the Senatewhich they would effectively control with tie votes cast by Kamala Harris.Dems likely lose a seat in ruby-red Alabama to popular Tuberville.So DEMS must win 4 others.Here's how those other key SENATE races are shaping up: +6.7 ARIZONA - Mark Kelly (D) over loser *Martha McSally+3.6 N.CAROLINA - Cunningham (D) over *Tillis+5.2 MAINE - Sara Gideon (D) over outdated *Susan Collins+8.0 COLORADO - Gov. Hickenlooper (D) over *Gardner +0.2 IOWA - Greenfield (D) vs *Joni Ernst - 2 MONTANA - Governor Bullock (D) vs *Daines - 1 KANSAS - Bollier (D) vs Marshall (R)

    Thanks for that recap, fubah2.  It just might be tight Senate races that keep us political junkies up late on November 3rd.

    Go Blue Tsunami!

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    No significant change overall since August 13: The good guys are 3 net seats short of a 50/50 split in the Senatewhich they would effectively control with tie votes cast by Kamala Harris.Dems likely lose a seat in ruby-red Alabama to popular Tuberville.So DEMS must win 4 others.Here's how those other key SENATE races are shaping up: +6.7 ARIZONA - Mark Kelly (D) over loser *Martha McSally+3.6 N.CAROLINA - Cunningham (D) over *Tillis+5.2 MAINE - Sara Gideon (D) over outdated *Susan Collins+8.0 COLORADO - Gov. Hickenlooper (D) over *Gardner +0.2 IOWA - Greenfield (D) vs *Joni Ernst - 2 MONTANA - Governor Bullock (D) vs *Daines - 1 KANSAS - Bollier (D) vs Marshall (R)

    Thanks for that recap, fubah2.  It just might be tight Senate races that keep us political junkies up late on November 3rd.

    Go Blue Tsunami!

     
    sundance
    sundance
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2002
    Posts: 16806
    Posted: Sep. 22, 2020 - 8:54 AM ET #141

    Senator Lindsay Graham-We have the votes to confirm the next justice on the floor of the Senate before the election

    Reply

    Senator Lindsay Graham-We have the votes to confirm the next justice on the floor of the Senate before the election

     
    I_Need_A_Detox
    I_Need_A_Detox
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2011
    Posts: 27139
    Posted: Sep. 22, 2020 - 9:06 AM ET #142

    Obviously you confirm a justice if you can get the votes in the Senate. 

    Anyone that says otherwise is ignorant. 

    peace_5

    Reply

    Obviously you confirm a justice if you can get the votes in the Senate. 

    Anyone that says otherwise is ignorant. 

    peace_5

     
    sundance
    sundance
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2002
    Posts: 16806
    Posted: Sep. 22, 2020 - 9:20 AM ET #143

    Senator Graham basically going 'Hammer time' on the Dems.

    U Can't Touch This!

    Fill the seat!

    Reply

    Senator Graham basically going 'Hammer time' on the Dems.

    U Can't Touch This!

    Fill the seat!

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 54133
    Posted: Sep. 22, 2020 - 9:21 AM ET #144

    Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: No significant change overall since August 13: The good guys are 3 net seats short of a 50/50 split in the Senatewhich they would effectively control with tie votes cast by Kamala Harris.Dems likely lose a seat in ruby-red Alabama to popular Tuberville.So DEMS must win 4 others.Here's how those other key SENATE races are shaping up: +6.7 ARIZONA - Mark Kelly (D) over loser *Martha McSally+3.6 N.CAROLINA - Cunningham (D) over *Tillis+5.2 MAINE - Sara Gideon (D) over outdated *Susan Collins+8.0 COLORADO - Gov. Hickenlooper (D) over *Gardner +0.2 IOWA - Greenfield (D) vs *Joni Ernst - 2 MONTANA - Governor Bullock (D) vs *Daines - 1 KANSAS - Bollier (D) vs Marshall (R) Thanks for that recap, fubah2.  It just might be tight Senate races that keep us political junkies up late on November 3rd. Go Blue Tsunami!

    Agreed.  Will be a very long night.

    But here is something interesting I posted in a thread on Monday:

    speculation is we likely won't know the  winner for days, and possibly weeks.

    And if trump refuses to conceed he lost, then it could be tied up in the courts.

    OR, if the Dems contest the results in the courts, likewise it could be tied up for MONTHS!

    The article stated something I did not relize:  if there is no president declared by Inauguration Day

    then by default the Speaker of the House becomes interim president.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: No significant change overall since August 13: The good guys are 3 net seats short of a 50/50 split in the Senatewhich they would effectively control with tie votes cast by Kamala Harris.Dems likely lose a seat in ruby-red Alabama to popular Tuberville.So DEMS must win 4 others.Here's how those other key SENATE races are shaping up: +6.7 ARIZONA - Mark Kelly (D) over loser *Martha McSally+3.6 N.CAROLINA - Cunningham (D) over *Tillis+5.2 MAINE - Sara Gideon (D) over outdated *Susan Collins+8.0 COLORADO - Gov. Hickenlooper (D) over *Gardner +0.2 IOWA - Greenfield (D) vs *Joni Ernst - 2 MONTANA - Governor Bullock (D) vs *Daines - 1 KANSAS - Bollier (D) vs Marshall (R) Thanks for that recap, fubah2.  It just might be tight Senate races that keep us political junkies up late on November 3rd. Go Blue Tsunami!

    Agreed.  Will be a very long night.

    But here is something interesting I posted in a thread on Monday:

    speculation is we likely won't know the  winner for days, and possibly weeks.

    And if trump refuses to conceed he lost, then it could be tied up in the courts.

    OR, if the Dems contest the results in the courts, likewise it could be tied up for MONTHS!

    The article stated something I did not relize:  if there is no president declared by Inauguration Day

    then by default the Speaker of the House becomes interim president.

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 54133
    Posted: Sep. 22, 2020 - 9:37 AM ET #145

    Quote Originally Posted by sundance:

    Senator Graham basically going 'Hammer time' on the Dems. U Can't Touch This! Fill the seat!

    Absolutely!!

    We need 9 Justices and now, unfortunately, there is a vacancy.

    FILL THE SEAT!!!

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by sundance:

    Senator Graham basically going 'Hammer time' on the Dems. U Can't Touch This! Fill the seat!

    Absolutely!!

    We need 9 Justices and now, unfortunately, there is a vacancy.

    FILL THE SEAT!!!

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 54133
    Posted: Sep. 22, 2020 - 9:43 AM ET #146

    Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:

    Obviously you confirm a justice if you can get the votes in the Senate.  Anyone that says otherwise is ignorant.

    Obviously.

    But having the votes or not is NOT the motive to confirm a nomination for the bench.

    It is because there is a vacancy on the bench.  Having 9 is customary and there is a vacancy.

    We worry about "getting the votes" later.

    FILL THE SEAT!!! 

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:

    Obviously you confirm a justice if you can get the votes in the Senate.  Anyone that says otherwise is ignorant.

    Obviously.

    But having the votes or not is NOT the motive to confirm a nomination for the bench.

    It is because there is a vacancy on the bench.  Having 9 is customary and there is a vacancy.

    We worry about "getting the votes" later.

    FILL THE SEAT!!! 

     
    Europa
    Europa
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2003
    Posts: 42786
    Posted: Sep. 22, 2020 - 10:47 AM ET #147

    Quote Originally Posted by Europa:

    Quote Originally Posted by Europa: Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R) becomes the second senator, Maine's Susan Collins to express first opposition, on filling the vacancy of the SCOTUS seat left by the passing of RGB.  Down to 51 GOP majority in the Senate, this will make Mitch McConnell a little tougher to fill the vacancy accordingly before the Nov. election. My guess is, there are more GOP senator defections to come.

    It appears I am wrong about that. Sen. Mitt Romney is backing the nomination of RGB seat replacement before the election. 6:3 conservative SCOTUS majority will likely materialize before Nov. election. 

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Europa:

    Quote Originally Posted by Europa: Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R) becomes the second senator, Maine's Susan Collins to express first opposition, on filling the vacancy of the SCOTUS seat left by the passing of RGB.  Down to 51 GOP majority in the Senate, this will make Mitch McConnell a little tougher to fill the vacancy accordingly before the Nov. election. My guess is, there are more GOP senator defections to come.

    It appears I am wrong about that. Sen. Mitt Romney is backing the nomination of RGB seat replacement before the election. 6:3 conservative SCOTUS majority will likely materialize before Nov. election. 

     
    KellyM_1964
    KellyM_1964
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 16793
    Posted: Sep. 22, 2020 - 11:16 AM ET #148

    Quote Originally Posted by Europa:

    Quote Originally Posted by Europa: Quote Originally Posted by Europa: Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R) becomes the second senator, Maine's Susan Collins to express first opposition, on filling the vacancy of the SCOTUS seat left by the passing of RGB.  Down to 51 GOP majority in the Senate, this will make Mitch McConnell a little tougher to fill the vacancy accordingly before the Nov. election. My guess is, there are more GOP senator defections to come. It appears I am wrong about that. Sen. Mitt Romney is backing the nomination of RGB seat replacement before the election. 6:3 conservative SCOTUS majority will likely materialize before Nov. election.

    possibly . i think that they r really going to pressed for time tho with only 40 days left .

    rump wants it before the election for two reasons

    one, he can claim a victory of sorts

    and two by stacking the bench before the election then he will probably get a favorable ruling after the election when he contests bidens victory !

    dems know this .  so they can and should tell mcconnell they refuse to fund the government extension due at the end of sept and they will refuse to negotiate a new stimulus deal if the gop ram thru a confirmation before the results r known  and it is indisputable by any lawsuits .

    yes  the gop will then use that to blame the dems . but the dems r just as good at using counter-narratives as the liars on the gop , tit for tat .

    i say hunker down

    and if a conservative is confirmed , increase SCOTUS to 12 justices

    confirm warren , buttigieg , booker , to the bench and see how much the gop like it when dirty politics is tossed right back in their faces

    "I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Europa:

    Quote Originally Posted by Europa: Quote Originally Posted by Europa: Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R) becomes the second senator, Maine's Susan Collins to express first opposition, on filling the vacancy of the SCOTUS seat left by the passing of RGB.  Down to 51 GOP majority in the Senate, this will make Mitch McConnell a little tougher to fill the vacancy accordingly before the Nov. election. My guess is, there are more GOP senator defections to come. It appears I am wrong about that. Sen. Mitt Romney is backing the nomination of RGB seat replacement before the election. 6:3 conservative SCOTUS majority will likely materialize before Nov. election.

    possibly . i think that they r really going to pressed for time tho with only 40 days left .

    rump wants it before the election for two reasons

    one, he can claim a victory of sorts

    and two by stacking the bench before the election then he will probably get a favorable ruling after the election when he contests bidens victory !

    dems know this .  so they can and should tell mcconnell they refuse to fund the government extension due at the end of sept and they will refuse to negotiate a new stimulus deal if the gop ram thru a confirmation before the results r known  and it is indisputable by any lawsuits .

    yes  the gop will then use that to blame the dems . but the dems r just as good at using counter-narratives as the liars on the gop , tit for tat .

    i say hunker down

    and if a conservative is confirmed , increase SCOTUS to 12 justices

    confirm warren , buttigieg , booker , to the bench and see how much the gop like it when dirty politics is tossed right back in their faces

     
    Europa
    Europa
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2003
    Posts: 42786
    Posted: Sep. 22, 2020 - 11:46 AM ET #149

    Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:

    Quote Originally Posted by Europa: Quote Originally Posted by Europa: Quote Originally Posted by Europa: Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R) becomes the second senator, Maine's Susan Collins to express first opposition, on filling the vacancy of the SCOTUS seat left by the passing of RGB.  Down to 51 GOP majority in the Senate, this will make Mitch McConnell a little tougher to fill the vacancy accordingly before the Nov. election. My guess is, there are more GOP senator defections to come. It appears I am wrong about that. Sen. Mitt Romney is backing the nomination of RGB seat replacement before the election. 6:3 conservative SCOTUS majority will likely materialize before Nov. election. possibly . i think that they r really going to pressed for time tho with only 40 days left . rump wants it before the election for two reasons one, he can claim a victory of sorts and two by stacking the bench before the election then he will probably get a favorable ruling after the election when he contests bidens victory ! dems know this .  so they can and should tell mcconnell they refuse to fund the government extension due at the end of sept and they will refuse to negotiate a new stimulus deal if the gop ram thru a confirmation before the results r known  and it is indisputable by any lawsuits . yes  the gop will then use that to blame the dems . but the dems r just as good at using counter-narratives as the liars on the gop , tit for tat . i say hunker down and if a conservative is confirmed , increase SCOTUS to 12 justices confirm warren , buttigieg , booker , to the bench and see how much the gop like it when dirty politics is tossed right back in their faces

    Yeah but first thing first, let's see if Dems could sweep the Nov. election. 12 justices probably won't cut it, Dems need the tie breaker, increase SCOTUS to 13 justices if Dems should sweep. 7-6 will break the tie.  

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:

    Quote Originally Posted by Europa: Quote Originally Posted by Europa: Quote Originally Posted by Europa: Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R) becomes the second senator, Maine's Susan Collins to express first opposition, on filling the vacancy of the SCOTUS seat left by the passing of RGB.  Down to 51 GOP majority in the Senate, this will make Mitch McConnell a little tougher to fill the vacancy accordingly before the Nov. election. My guess is, there are more GOP senator defections to come. It appears I am wrong about that. Sen. Mitt Romney is backing the nomination of RGB seat replacement before the election. 6:3 conservative SCOTUS majority will likely materialize before Nov. election. possibly . i think that they r really going to pressed for time tho with only 40 days left . rump wants it before the election for two reasons one, he can claim a victory of sorts and two by stacking the bench before the election then he will probably get a favorable ruling after the election when he contests bidens victory ! dems know this .  so they can and should tell mcconnell they refuse to fund the government extension due at the end of sept and they will refuse to negotiate a new stimulus deal if the gop ram thru a confirmation before the results r known  and it is indisputable by any lawsuits . yes  the gop will then use that to blame the dems . but the dems r just as good at using counter-narratives as the liars on the gop , tit for tat . i say hunker down and if a conservative is confirmed , increase SCOTUS to 12 justices confirm warren , buttigieg , booker , to the bench and see how much the gop like it when dirty politics is tossed right back in their faces

    Yeah but first thing first, let's see if Dems could sweep the Nov. election. 12 justices probably won't cut it, Dems need the tie breaker, increase SCOTUS to 13 justices if Dems should sweep. 7-6 will break the tie.  

     
     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 54133
    Posted: Sep. 22, 2020 - 11:52 AM ET #150

    Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:

    possibly . i think that they r really going to pressed for time tho with only 40 days left . rump wants it before the election for two reasons one, he can claim a victory of sorts and two by stacking the bench before the election then he will probably get a favorable ruling after the election when he contests bidens victory ! dems know this .  so they can and should tell mcconnell they refuse to fund the government extension due at the end of sept and they will refuse to negotiate a new stimulus deal if the gop ram thru a confirmation before the results r known  and it is indisputable by any lawsuits . yes  the gop will then use that to blame the dems . but the dems r just as good at using counter-narratives as the liars on the gop , tit for tat . i say hunker down and if a conservative is confirmed , increase SCOTUS to 12 justices confirm warren , buttigieg , booker , to the bench and see how much the gop like it when dirty politics is tossed right back in their faces

        goodpost  an_cheers

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:

    possibly . i think that they r really going to pressed for time tho with only 40 days left . rump wants it before the election for two reasons one, he can claim a victory of sorts and two by stacking the bench before the election then he will probably get a favorable ruling after the election when he contests bidens victory ! dems know this .  so they can and should tell mcconnell they refuse to fund the government extension due at the end of sept and they will refuse to negotiate a new stimulus deal if the gop ram thru a confirmation before the results r known  and it is indisputable by any lawsuits . yes  the gop will then use that to blame the dems . but the dems r just as good at using counter-narratives as the liars on the gop , tit for tat . i say hunker down and if a conservative is confirmed , increase SCOTUS to 12 justices confirm warren , buttigieg , booker , to the bench and see how much the gop like it when dirty politics is tossed right back in their faces

        goodpost  an_cheers

    All Forums | Politics
    «First Previous 123 ... 567 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Thursday 10/22/2026 934
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,953
    • Patriots vs Bears in-game live TNF 1,928
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 109,717
    • Patriots@Bears discussion 3,637
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 27,049
    • Thursday”s POD 2,635
    • Public Indicator Calculations 2026 23,651
    • Week 8 Money 7,414
    • Thursday euro plays 1,835

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.