Posted:
#26
this about as close to music I could find for this memory of those two.
Ginsburg has passed .
Posted:
#28
I had the pleasure of meeting RBG in 2003. Gracious and confident, she spoke with a soft and wise voice. She brought the idea that a feminist did not have to shun elegance nor try to showcase it.
As for replacing her, there is no legal argument distinguishing this situation from that of Garland (which I supported waiting until after the election).
Posted:
#29
We must wait to see if those republicans who made that argument were not just being prejudice or are they of principles.
Those asked for.leniency and was given time for an election results. Now can they allow the election the same?
Maybe big money can ask if an ice detention. Center should be encouraged?...
Posted:
#30
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
I had the pleasure of meeting RBG in 2003. Gracious and confident, she spoke with a soft and wise voice. She brought the idea that a feminist did not have to shun elegance nor try to showcase it. As for replacing her, there is no legal argument distinguishing this situation from that of Garland (which I supported waiting until after the election).
I had the pleasure of meeting RBG in 2003. Gracious and confident, she spoke with a soft and wise voice. She brought the idea that a feminist did not have to shun elegance nor try to showcase it. As for replacing her, there is no legal argument distinguishing this situation from that of Garland (which I supported waiting until after the election).
I am sorry for your loss of a friend.
Posted:
#32
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow: I had the pleasure of meeting RBG in 2003. Gracious and confident, she spoke with a soft and wise voice. She brought the idea that a feminist did not have to shun elegance nor try to showcase it. As for replacing her, there is no legal argument distinguishing this situation from that of Garland (which I supported waiting until after the election). I am sorry for your loss of a friend.
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow: I had the pleasure of meeting RBG in 2003. Gracious and confident, she spoke with a soft and wise voice. She brought the idea that a feminist did not have to shun elegance nor try to showcase it. As for replacing her, there is no legal argument distinguishing this situation from that of Garland (which I supported waiting until after the election). I am sorry for your loss of a friend.
Thanks but not a friend. Just an extraordinary person.
Posted:
#40
Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R) becomes the second senator, Maine's Susan Collins to express first opposition, on filling the vacancy of the SCOTUS seat left by the passing of RGB.
Down to 51 GOP majority in the Senate, this will make Mitch McConnell a little tougher to fill the vacancy accordingly before the Nov. election.
Posted:
#42
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
Djbrow Did you feel a heckuva a lot better after you wrote Trump supporters can not spell? Did that very childish, classless quote from you 'make your night?'
Djbrow Did you feel a heckuva a lot better after you wrote Trump supporters can not spell? Did that very childish, classless quote from you 'make your night?'
That should be 'cannot.' Here is some assistance to help you from making this mistake.
https://www.grammarly.com/blog/cannot-or-can-not/#:~:text=Can't%20is%20a%20contraction%20of%20cannot%2C%20and%20it's%20best,.%20.%20.%20but%20also.%E2%80%9D
Posted:
#45
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
I will never need your help djbrow! Your comments on the IQ of Trump supporters was again childish and classless! You are the epitome of the 'smarter than you liberal.
I will never need your help djbrow! Your comments on the IQ of Trump supporters was again childish and classless! You are the epitome of the 'smarter than you liberal.
Far from it. I think I am only smarter than some.
I have complimented you many times for accomplishing many things in life. 
Posted:
#47
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
Quote Originally Posted by sundance: I will never need your help djbrow! Your comments on the IQ of Trump supporters was again childish and classless! You are the epitome of the 'smarter than you liberal. Far from it. I think I am only smarter than some. I have complimented you many times for accomplishing many things in life.
thank you for allowing slim back . Quote Originally Posted by sundance: I will never need your help djbrow! Your comments on the IQ of Trump supporters was again childish and classless! You are the epitome of the 'smarter than you liberal. Far from it. I think I am only smarter than some. I have complimented you many times for accomplishing many things in life.
Posted:
#49
Trump has a constitutional duty to nominate the next Supreme Court justice. His term of office runs from January of 16 through January of 20.
He was elected to fulfill his constitutional duties during that timeframe. Nominate the next justice and send it to the Senate judiciary committee.
Posted:
#50
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
Trump has a constitutional duty to nominate the next Supreme Court justice. His term of office runs from January of 16 through January of 20. He was elected to fulfill his constitutional duties during that timeframe. Nominate the next justice and send it to the Senate judiciary committee.
Trump has a constitutional duty to nominate the next Supreme Court justice. His term of office runs from January of 16 through January of 20. He was elected to fulfill his constitutional duties during that timeframe. Nominate the next justice and send it to the Senate judiciary committee.
I see you skirted the question, can you answer his question? I dont think he asked if Trump has an obligation to blah blah blah, he asked what is the difference in now and 2016?
Hot Forum Topics
