Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare: this reminds me of that one time The irony is, if a person were to say something to the effect of, "...the fascist that moderates this forum..." they would be instantly boxed but now, in his dogged defense of any insult uttered by someone left leaning, he says there's nothing against the rules about it. Do you know how many times guys have been boxed because he didn't like what they said, and when asked what rule they violated, crickets. He did nothing when multiple posters said that anyone who voted for Trump must be pedophiles themselves.
100% correct...you insult or are combative directly with another member and you CAN and LIKELY will be boxed....yup this is exactly the point.
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare: this reminds me of that one time The irony is, if a person were to say something to the effect of, "...the fascist that moderates this forum..." they would be instantly boxed but now, in his dogged defense of any insult uttered by someone left leaning, he says there's nothing against the rules about it. Do you know how many times guys have been boxed because he didn't like what they said, and when asked what rule they violated, crickets. He did nothing when multiple posters said that anyone who voted for Trump must be pedophiles themselves.
100% correct...you insult or are combative directly with another member and you CAN and LIKELY will be boxed....yup this is exactly the point.
"Well, looking at the definition of fascism: It's a far-right authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy," Kelly said.
"So certainly, in my experience, those are the kinds of things that HE thinks would work better in terms of running America … Certainly the former president is in the far-right area, he's certainly an authoritarian, admires people who are dictators — he has said that! So yes, he certainly falls into the general definition of fascist, for sure!"
The New York Times' Michael Schmidt asked
former WH Chief-of-Staff, John Kelly
if he thinks Trump is a fascist...
"Well, looking at the definition of fascism: It's a far-right authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy," Kelly said.
"So certainly, in my experience, those are the kinds of things that HE thinks would work better in terms of running America … Certainly the former president is in the far-right area, he's certainly an authoritarian, admires people who are dictators — he has said that! So yes, he certainly falls into the general definition of fascist, for sure!"
One could argue that using the term fascist is both antagonizing and demoralizing as an American. Although one is entitled to their opinion, using such a term is considered derogatory and history has taught us that such a term is associated with a very negative connotation because it really goes back to the likes of Hitler and Mussolini. The problem is, it's not an accurate term to be used. It really is giving Trump too much credit to be called such a term and in the true essence of the word, it doesn't it. The reality is that Trump and his administration lack the coordination to pull something like fascism off. He often doesn't follow policies, even his own sometimes, his decision making often leaves his own agencies befuddled and looking for guidance and some of his policy making simply do not line up with a fascist government.
To have fascism, it demands a coordinated and driven effort aimed at establishing an authoritarian and nationalist regime at total control. Hasn't Trump undermined his own government coordination which leads to not having a centralized control?
I think people latch on to an idea that they think is evil enough to emphasize their point, but lacks so much merit that it is delusional. It sounds great to talk that way about someone you dislike, but they are so far off it is hilarious and it kind of makes them look foolish. I mean, it's not even remotely accurate if you were to look at the true meaning a fascism. Is Trump a dick and often times inflammatory, yeah, but hardly a fascist. While some of his policies and ideas may be authoritarian, his ideas and lack a structure that would be geared towards an ideology that would be considered a direct correlation of fascism.
I would place Trump as more of a reformist, which is someone who wants to challenge and change the established systems. This guy wants to make a name for himself. That seems pretty clear. He's impulsive not fascist. His is not a politician, so he does not rationalize and think like a traditional politician and that causes many to be opposed to him. Trump is not trying to have a coordinated military effort to suppress the people. He is not trying to consolidate control or focus power simply on himself and for his own good, therefore he falls will short of being fascist. Our government still has checks and balances in place that will not change with any President over a four year term. You cannot form fascism in four years or even eight years. We change President elects often to oppose something like this from ever happening.
To simply over simplify and call Trump fascist is ridiculous, in the true meaning of the term. People that spit this same rhetoric over and over are simply just trying to make another person look bad, but really it lacks merit and definition in the true sense of the term. They think it drives home their point about how bad and terrible Trump is and how can anyone like him and if you do then you are those things as well, but he received half of the populous vote. Regardless of how he did, he did. Don't like him or like him, but just as some are opposed to the right to bear arms in this country and would prefer stricter gun laws, there are as many that think that our freedom of speech may need to be taken a look at as well. You can't yell fire in a crowded theater without breaking the law, so there might be something said about maybe scaling back the speech in areas that are influential to the public. Whether one agrees or disagrees with it, it may be something to consider when the public is talking about a President elected by the people.
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
One could argue that using the term fascist is both antagonizing and demoralizing as an American. Although one is entitled to their opinion, using such a term is considered derogatory and history has taught us that such a term is associated with a very negative connotation because it really goes back to the likes of Hitler and Mussolini. The problem is, it's not an accurate term to be used. It really is giving Trump too much credit to be called such a term and in the true essence of the word, it doesn't it. The reality is that Trump and his administration lack the coordination to pull something like fascism off. He often doesn't follow policies, even his own sometimes, his decision making often leaves his own agencies befuddled and looking for guidance and some of his policy making simply do not line up with a fascist government.
To have fascism, it demands a coordinated and driven effort aimed at establishing an authoritarian and nationalist regime at total control. Hasn't Trump undermined his own government coordination which leads to not having a centralized control?
I think people latch on to an idea that they think is evil enough to emphasize their point, but lacks so much merit that it is delusional. It sounds great to talk that way about someone you dislike, but they are so far off it is hilarious and it kind of makes them look foolish. I mean, it's not even remotely accurate if you were to look at the true meaning a fascism. Is Trump a dick and often times inflammatory, yeah, but hardly a fascist. While some of his policies and ideas may be authoritarian, his ideas and lack a structure that would be geared towards an ideology that would be considered a direct correlation of fascism.
I would place Trump as more of a reformist, which is someone who wants to challenge and change the established systems. This guy wants to make a name for himself. That seems pretty clear. He's impulsive not fascist. His is not a politician, so he does not rationalize and think like a traditional politician and that causes many to be opposed to him. Trump is not trying to have a coordinated military effort to suppress the people. He is not trying to consolidate control or focus power simply on himself and for his own good, therefore he falls will short of being fascist. Our government still has checks and balances in place that will not change with any President over a four year term. You cannot form fascism in four years or even eight years. We change President elects often to oppose something like this from ever happening.
To simply over simplify and call Trump fascist is ridiculous, in the true meaning of the term. People that spit this same rhetoric over and over are simply just trying to make another person look bad, but really it lacks merit and definition in the true sense of the term. They think it drives home their point about how bad and terrible Trump is and how can anyone like him and if you do then you are those things as well, but he received half of the populous vote. Regardless of how he did, he did. Don't like him or like him, but just as some are opposed to the right to bear arms in this country and would prefer stricter gun laws, there are as many that think that our freedom of speech may need to be taken a look at as well. You can't yell fire in a crowded theater without breaking the law, so there might be something said about maybe scaling back the speech in areas that are influential to the public. Whether one agrees or disagrees with it, it may be something to consider when the public is talking about a President elected by the people.
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare: this reminds me of that one time The irony is, if a person were to say something to the effect of, "...the fascist that moderates this forum..." they would be instantly boxed but now, in his dogged defense of any insult uttered by someone left leaning, he says there's nothing against the rules about it. Do you know how many times guys have been boxed because he didn't like what they said, and when asked what rule they violated, crickets. He did nothing when multiple posters said that anyone who voted for Trump must be pedophiles themselves.
I hear what you are saying and you are right. The minute that term is used towards a member you are crossing the line, according to their rules. If you target any one poster than yes, so nothing against the rules that says you cannot state it in generalization. However, when you do, the mod will certainly ask you who you were referring to. I see this happening with one side and not the other. But, you don't have to respond and as long as it is not specifically targeted to one poster but rather used in a generalization you are not breaking the site rules. That's how I interpret the situation. So, keep in general and not specific. Talking about left or right and posters is not specific, but if you say hey ABN you are fascist and a complete dick and yo mama so dumb that she studied for a urine test, then you are most likely crossing the line according to the site. The rules can be dicey, because as rush stated they are not etched exactly how they are interpreted or implemented, so they are almost like an Employee Handbook at work. They have a lot of policies covered but cannot cover every policy.
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare: this reminds me of that one time The irony is, if a person were to say something to the effect of, "...the fascist that moderates this forum..." they would be instantly boxed but now, in his dogged defense of any insult uttered by someone left leaning, he says there's nothing against the rules about it. Do you know how many times guys have been boxed because he didn't like what they said, and when asked what rule they violated, crickets. He did nothing when multiple posters said that anyone who voted for Trump must be pedophiles themselves.
I hear what you are saying and you are right. The minute that term is used towards a member you are crossing the line, according to their rules. If you target any one poster than yes, so nothing against the rules that says you cannot state it in generalization. However, when you do, the mod will certainly ask you who you were referring to. I see this happening with one side and not the other. But, you don't have to respond and as long as it is not specifically targeted to one poster but rather used in a generalization you are not breaking the site rules. That's how I interpret the situation. So, keep in general and not specific. Talking about left or right and posters is not specific, but if you say hey ABN you are fascist and a complete dick and yo mama so dumb that she studied for a urine test, then you are most likely crossing the line according to the site. The rules can be dicey, because as rush stated they are not etched exactly how they are interpreted or implemented, so they are almost like an Employee Handbook at work. They have a lot of policies covered but cannot cover every policy.
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare: this reminds me of that one time The irony is, if a person were to say something to the effect of, "...the fascist that moderates this forum..." they would be instantly boxed but now, in his dogged defense of any insult uttered by someone left leaning, he says there's nothing against the rules about it. Do you know how many times guys have been boxed because he didn't like what they said, and when asked what rule they violated, crickets. He did nothing when multiple posters said that anyone who voted for Trump must be pedophiles themselves. 100% correct...you insult or are combative directly with another member and you CAN and LIKELY will be boxed....yup this is exactly the point.
But calling another member a fascist because they voted for Trump is not an insult?
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare: this reminds me of that one time The irony is, if a person were to say something to the effect of, "...the fascist that moderates this forum..." they would be instantly boxed but now, in his dogged defense of any insult uttered by someone left leaning, he says there's nothing against the rules about it. Do you know how many times guys have been boxed because he didn't like what they said, and when asked what rule they violated, crickets. He did nothing when multiple posters said that anyone who voted for Trump must be pedophiles themselves. 100% correct...you insult or are combative directly with another member and you CAN and LIKELY will be boxed....yup this is exactly the point.
But calling another member a fascist because they voted for Trump is not an insult?
I think what you find is that when the leader sets a standard for himself which is above reproach there are less instances of that person being called out. Most every other president that was white (unfortunately) was not called out to the degree Trump has and that is because they held themselves to a high standard for the position because they were elected to represent this country and all of the people and with that comes great responsibility and leadership. Trump does not hold himself to a higher standard, he has no standards for himself but expects similar media respect given to other presidents and leaders. He wants to be abusive, sexist, insulting, degrading and intimidating yet nobody is allowed to call him on his words and actions...those who challenge him are to be hunted down and prosecuted per HIS own words. This is the definition of a fascist (let alone the reach around on congress which goes against the constitution and that is also fascist).
When Trump holds himself to the highest standards with regards to the office and makes it about leadership and not about POWER and control then you might see the media change their tune. No he wants to send his project 2025 hunt dogs on those who disagree with him, he wants to spew hate and anger and then wonders why he is not respected. Who else in your lifetime has said the hundreds of insulting stupid things Trump says? Who says that he wishes a safe flight but only because HE is on the flight? Who says that women should tough it out and not use OTC pain meds when he got out of military service for a fake medical condition?
Trump deserves even more scrutiny and he really should leave office, he is a disgrace to the country and a very disgusting person.
@ABooksNightmare
I think what you find is that when the leader sets a standard for himself which is above reproach there are less instances of that person being called out. Most every other president that was white (unfortunately) was not called out to the degree Trump has and that is because they held themselves to a high standard for the position because they were elected to represent this country and all of the people and with that comes great responsibility and leadership. Trump does not hold himself to a higher standard, he has no standards for himself but expects similar media respect given to other presidents and leaders. He wants to be abusive, sexist, insulting, degrading and intimidating yet nobody is allowed to call him on his words and actions...those who challenge him are to be hunted down and prosecuted per HIS own words. This is the definition of a fascist (let alone the reach around on congress which goes against the constitution and that is also fascist).
When Trump holds himself to the highest standards with regards to the office and makes it about leadership and not about POWER and control then you might see the media change their tune. No he wants to send his project 2025 hunt dogs on those who disagree with him, he wants to spew hate and anger and then wonders why he is not respected. Who else in your lifetime has said the hundreds of insulting stupid things Trump says? Who says that he wishes a safe flight but only because HE is on the flight? Who says that women should tough it out and not use OTC pain meds when he got out of military service for a fake medical condition?
Trump deserves even more scrutiny and he really should leave office, he is a disgrace to the country and a very disgusting person.
This has also been explained how many times? If you feel a member has broken the rules then please report it and all of the mods and staff will check it out, THAT is how you go about dealing with someone who you feel is breaking the rules.
Again it is quite simple and while many reports are viewed by the site and no action is taken, this is the route set up for that situation. Keep in mind that context, history and past interaction has impact on what the decision is but reporting a generality versus a direct specific member to member interaction will be seen with the post and very often a mod or staff will look at what led up to the comment and try to get the best understanding to properly handle the issue.
@StumpTownStu
This has also been explained how many times? If you feel a member has broken the rules then please report it and all of the mods and staff will check it out, THAT is how you go about dealing with someone who you feel is breaking the rules.
Again it is quite simple and while many reports are viewed by the site and no action is taken, this is the route set up for that situation. Keep in mind that context, history and past interaction has impact on what the decision is but reporting a generality versus a direct specific member to member interaction will be seen with the post and very often a mod or staff will look at what led up to the comment and try to get the best understanding to properly handle the issue.
Ok so is this the way you validate a crappy POTUS? Yeah Biden was a schmuck and many did not like him but was he regularly calling those who saw differently a fascist and that he HATED them? Did Biden have awful nicknames and put downs for the RNC politicians?
Biden was a lousy president Ive said this many times but for all he was poor at, he held respect and leadership to the position that Trump is clearly unable to do. Trump is a selfish obtuse clown who seems completely unable to express a difference without a zero ego insult and put down.
@THEMUGG
Ok so is this the way you validate a crappy POTUS? Yeah Biden was a schmuck and many did not like him but was he regularly calling those who saw differently a fascist and that he HATED them? Did Biden have awful nicknames and put downs for the RNC politicians?
Biden was a lousy president Ive said this many times but for all he was poor at, he held respect and leadership to the position that Trump is clearly unable to do. Trump is a selfish obtuse clown who seems completely unable to express a difference without a zero ego insult and put down.
@StumpTownStu This has also been explained how many times? If you feel a member has broken the rules then please report it and all of the mods and staff will check it out, THAT is how you go about dealing with someone who you feel is breaking the rules. Again it is quite simple and while many reports are viewed by the site and no action is taken, this is the route set up for that situation.
Keep in mind that context, history and past interaction has impact on what the decision is but reporting a generality versus a direct specific member to member interaction will be seen with the post and very often a mod or staff will look at what led up to the comment and try to get the best understanding to properly handle the issue.
@wallstreetcappers
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@StumpTownStu This has also been explained how many times? If you feel a member has broken the rules then please report it and all of the mods and staff will check it out, THAT is how you go about dealing with someone who you feel is breaking the rules. Again it is quite simple and while many reports are viewed by the site and no action is taken, this is the route set up for that situation.
Keep in mind that context, history and past interaction has impact on what the decision is but reporting a generality versus a direct specific member to member interaction will be seen with the post and very often a mod or staff will look at what led up to the comment and try to get the best understanding to properly handle the issue.
Please allow me to state the record. 1. I have never turned in any Covers poster to the mods at Covers. Most notably wallstreetcappers. 2. This leads me to the following question. Who has turned me in and how many times have they done it? MAGA!
"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
Please allow me to state the record. 1. I have never turned in any Covers poster to the mods at Covers. Most notably wallstreetcappers. 2. This leads me to the following question. Who has turned me in and how many times have they done it? MAGA!
At united nations assembly, Trump brags about always being right. But authoritarian expert Ruth Ben Ghiat warns that Trump bragging is from dictator Mussolini's playbook. Promotion of infallible leader or personality cult is among characteristics of fascism. Survey of over 500 political scientists found the vast majority believe US is sliding from democracy to autocracy. The best countries to live in are democratic.
At united nations assembly, Trump brags about always being right. But authoritarian expert Ruth Ben Ghiat warns that Trump bragging is from dictator Mussolini's playbook. Promotion of infallible leader or personality cult is among characteristics of fascism. Survey of over 500 political scientists found the vast majority believe US is sliding from democracy to autocracy. The best countries to live in are democratic.
At united nations assembly, Trump brags about always being right. But authoritarian expert Ruth Ben Ghiat warns that Trump bragging is from dictator Mussolini's playbook. Promotion of infallible leader or personality cult is among characteristics of fascism. Survey of over 500 political scientists found the vast majority believe US is sliding from democracy to autocracy.
@thirdperson
Unfortunately for all Americans, it seems that way under trump's REICH.
But it wasn't tilting that way... until the MAGA-cult decided that a RACIST-asshole/Seditionist/Serial LIAR/sex-offender/convicted FELON republican would be their choice for president...
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
At united nations assembly, Trump brags about always being right. But authoritarian expert Ruth Ben Ghiat warns that Trump bragging is from dictator Mussolini's playbook. Promotion of infallible leader or personality cult is among characteristics of fascism. Survey of over 500 political scientists found the vast majority believe US is sliding from democracy to autocracy.
@thirdperson
Unfortunately for all Americans, it seems that way under trump's REICH.
But it wasn't tilting that way... until the MAGA-cult decided that a RACIST-asshole/Seditionist/Serial LIAR/sex-offender/convicted FELON republican would be their choice for president...
At united nations assembly, Trump brags about always being right. But authoritarian expert Ruth Ben Ghiat warns that Trump bragging is from dictator Mussolini's playbook. Promotion of infallible leader or personality cult is among characteristics of fascism.
And der Fuhrer of the Maga-cult fits the profile.
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
At united nations assembly, Trump brags about always being right. But authoritarian expert Ruth Ben Ghiat warns that Trump bragging is from dictator Mussolini's playbook. Promotion of infallible leader or personality cult is among characteristics of fascism.
Question for the Democrats.......... In my media consumption circles there has been a whole lot of face time for Newsome which leads me to believe at present he is the second coming. I have to be honest with you, the more he talks the more he sounds like Biden. The speech patterns, inflection, seemingly fake rage. My question is whether this is a good idea and whether you're on board with this? Definitely a long way to go, but I believe he'll be on that 16 person debate stage and I cannot imagine he'll be well received by the 56% independent middle. What say you?
and yet trump is such a wonderful human being who has the functioning brain of a 10 year old. Maybe you should actually listen to him talk.
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
Question for the Democrats.......... In my media consumption circles there has been a whole lot of face time for Newsome which leads me to believe at present he is the second coming. I have to be honest with you, the more he talks the more he sounds like Biden. The speech patterns, inflection, seemingly fake rage. My question is whether this is a good idea and whether you're on board with this? Definitely a long way to go, but I believe he'll be on that 16 person debate stage and I cannot imagine he'll be well received by the 56% independent middle. What say you?
and yet trump is such a wonderful human being who has the functioning brain of a 10 year old. Maybe you should actually listen to him talk.
Question for the Democrats.......... In my media consumption circles there has been a whole lot of face time for Newsome which leads me to believe at present he is the second coming. I have to be honest with you, the more he talks the more he sounds like Biden. The speech patterns, inflection, seemingly fake rage. My question is whether this is a good idea and whether you're on board with this? Definitely a long way to go, but I believe he'll be on that 16 person debate stage and I cannot imagine he'll be well received by the 56% independent middle. What say you?
No surprise you got no answer. Newsom is a coward that just panders to the crowd. He has no stance & no morals. He signed a worthless directive about masks on Federal officers, yet says nothing about masked criminals.
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
Question for the Democrats.......... In my media consumption circles there has been a whole lot of face time for Newsome which leads me to believe at present he is the second coming. I have to be honest with you, the more he talks the more he sounds like Biden. The speech patterns, inflection, seemingly fake rage. My question is whether this is a good idea and whether you're on board with this? Definitely a long way to go, but I believe he'll be on that 16 person debate stage and I cannot imagine he'll be well received by the 56% independent middle. What say you?
No surprise you got no answer. Newsom is a coward that just panders to the crowd. He has no stance & no morals. He signed a worthless directive about masks on Federal officers, yet says nothing about masked criminals.
Hot Forum Topics
