All Forums | Poker

F POKER STARS

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 6166
Posts: 203
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 3736
Posted: #76

Quote Originally Posted by spoontaggg:

well, you dont know me and will never know me. all you can address is my argument about online poker. which you seem to be losing track of. the fact is the deal on these sites is rigged beyond belief. especially at pokerstars and full tilt.

i know of pros that have turned down 3000 pounds to wear a pokerstars tshirt and hat at final tables in broadcast tournaments.. and why? because they dont want to be associated with bs sites.



 

More ramblings and "stories" from the shitty player

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 3736
Posted: #77

Quote Originally Posted by spoontaggg:

well, you dont know me and will never know me. all you can address is my argument about online poker. which you seem to be losing track of. the fact is the deal on these sites is rigged beyond belief. especially at pokerstars and full tilt.





 

Ok Buddy one last time :

If its rigged then why am I wining and youre losing? Did the computer just decide to "let" me be a winning players and just "decided" that you wouldnt be. Seriously, and gimme another reason besides your made-up story about me working for the site.

 

Thats why you get ripped so hard on here cuz your reAsoning and logic is ridiculous. Like I said, if its rigged, WHY AM I WINNING???? AND WHY ARENT YOU?????

 

Im sure its just pure luck and Im gonna come crashin back down to earth soon and end up lyin in the shitter righ beside al you "internet is rigged" idiots.

 

CLIFF NOTES  :

Spoontagg has about 1% the online experience of myself yet feels his "experience" is a better guage than mine to speak of the site

 

Spoontagg plays MICRO stakes then wonders how a guy can call an all in with 79 off. You know how, cuz its a buck!!!!!!!

 

Spontagg sees 60 minutes on TV and realizes he can find an excuse as to why he lost his $50 deposit on Stars, ITS RIGGED!!!!! 60 minutes said so you idiot!! All the while not smart enough to realize the cheating NEVER EVER EVER EVER came even close to his tables.

 

Spoontagg realizes he's losing the war here ss stuff up about me sayng "I work forthe site" Like they always say, you know youre winning the argument when the other guy needs to start making shit up cuz he in quicksand

 

Spoontagg refuses to give us his screenname so we can look at his results acting as if his screenname is his SS#. The real reason is he doesnt want us to see how bad he's done online or that he doesnt even have an account at all, the former tho for sure.

 

Spoontagg has watched every episode of WSOP and feels that means he is a good player. NEVER read a book, never got a subscriptin to a instruction site, never tried to improve his game. He watches it on TV, knows what hands beat what, and BAM, he's ready to win!!!!!

 

 

Good luck to you Spoontagg. Its the guys like you that keep lining the guys like me's pockets. I GUARANTEE EVERY time you lose you go home talking about how you got fucked, whether it be online or live. Dont stop though, you'll feel a lot better about yourself if you keep making excuses

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 60
Posted: #78
hahahaha,, your an idiot.... i cant believe the shit you spout!

its obviously rigged and your a joke.
 
according to you, anyone who thinks a poker site is rigged is just a bad player... or has watched 60minutes haha...

or hasnt read a book or watches too much tv... bwahahaha

your stupid and i think you should take a pill.. to relax.. because you are sounding more and more irrational.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1947
Posted: #79
Because there are people that will totally donk off tourney or csh and walk away from the computer thinking they got fuked.  I have no doubt you are one of those players.
 
I would love to see you graph, is tha why you are so afraid to tell us your screen name?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 113
Posted: #80
Quote Originally Posted by SOBLATANT:

relentlessd, you must be the dumbest mf on the planet, or work for one of the rigged sites. get off the forum! 

 

nice avatar...

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 60
Posted: #81
ok listen up dickheads,,, try not to focus on your ASSUMPTIONS of what i am like as a player and instead focus on the ASSERTIONS i have put forth... its always EASY for idiots like you to bad mouth a player, but it is harder for you to put forward any reasonable argument..

in your eyes i am being ripped into... but honestly i dont feel it that way.. there is only 2 people on this forum that have "ripped" into me.. lol, and thats the 2 people i have no respect for...so, ya...

why are you bothering anyway.. if i was someone who believed the poker sites werent rigged i wouldnt be wasting my time arguing with a so called "bitter donk" that watches 60 minutes....lol

really, the more you write the more wierd you sound and the more desperate you are becoming.


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1947
Posted: #82
Two people that are ripping into you are 2 people that are up 25k and 10k in the last year playing about 300 tourneys a month, and you are trying to tell them that the site is rigged.
 
Also, the fact you wouldn't tell us your username for some unknown reason is another reason you come off as a donk.  I have already argued with you that is why I am not anymore, tat is why I am just going to rip on you.
 
I bet you just call and call, donk yourself into a corner and then get a hand and lose.  I bet you will call a large pre flop raise out of position with K5 suited, flop a K and be dominated.  I bet you will call a large flop bet with a draw and then call off on the turn with no pot odds, after you lose your money you walk away thinking the site is against you.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1947
Posted: #83
BTW, spoone, you should post your hand histories from the last 10 tourneys you lost, not just the hand you lost but the entire tourney.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 9205
Posted: #84
its guaranteed that somebodys cheating on every site going. greed is the ruler of all here. since the 60 mins piece im sure people have gotten smarter...those fools won every hand and made it painfully obvious.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 60
Posted: #85
once again, you are now making ASSUMPTIONS about what kind of hands i play and supposedly lose with...

you are soooooooo stoooooopid and desperate.

get a f#$"! ing life

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1947
Posted: #86
Quote Originally Posted by spoontaggg:

once again, you are now making ASSUMPTIONS about what kind of hands i play and supposedly lose with...

you are soooooooo stoooooopid and desperate.

get a f#$"! ing life

Post the hand histories of your last 10 tourneys, not even the ones you lost, just your last 10 tourneys.

Post your screen name from the site you play/played at.

You don't do either one of these because you know you will look like a donk.

Desperate?  I don't give a shit if I change your mind, or anyone elses, I am just ripping into you and others.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 3736
Posted: #87
Quote Originally Posted by dillon24:

its guaranteed that somebodys cheating on every site going. greed is the ruler of all here. since the 60 mins piece im sure people have gotten smarter...those fools won every hand and made it painfully obvious.

 

Noone on this forum has ever been "cheated" out of their $ online. The 60 minutes piece was for the nosebleed games on UB, yet you guys think that means youre little $5 tourney was fixed for you to lose, its ridiculous. Also, the "cheating" was guys who could see your hole cards at like the $100/$200 NOLIMit table yet all of you run with that and the say "OMG the flops are prgrammed, oh the bad beat I just took was planned" Itsjust so wrong and makes you look so stupid to actually be linking that cheating scandal with the $5 sit-n-gos you guys are playing.

 

Then when you "internet is rigged" guys send me hand histories from the tourneis you played its just awful. Bad moves, awful calls, awful folds, and then lose a big hand and just blame your whole shitty session on that "rig job" you just got. Work on your games, quit making excuses

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 1
Posted: #88
Hi,

ive just read this entire thread and have to say.spoontaggg, i do think you sound like a bit of a low stakes donk. and your theory of a pyramid scheme does sound far fetched, although it is basically true when you consider absolute and ulltimate. not sure if that could happen at other sites, but it wouldnt surprise me...

however one thing im totally certain of is that the deals at pstars and fulltilt are totally out of whack with reality. i have played countless hands live and on these sites and the irregularities are obvious.... even a low stakes donk could see that... ;)

one thing spoontagg is right about is the rigging towards the players that have deposited more. when i started playing i lost money on minimal deposits and had terrible bad beads when nearing the busting point. i then reloaded for 10000$ and made all the losses back within 2 days. the cards were very different and i hardly ever got knocked out of 10$ or 20$ coolers and did quite well in the one table tournys too. being conservative, i withdrew and left 500 in there to try and build up. it wasnt long after that i was losing all the time. even though i was playing tighter and less frequently.

anyone who reads this thread dont listen to chancep and electricldy they are obvious schills.... and ofcourse a schill would deny it...
and spoontgg dont give them your details, especially if you still play online sometimes.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 3736
Posted: #89

Quote Originally Posted by spoontaggg:

well, you dont know me and will never know me. all you can address is my argument about online poker. which you seem to be losing track of. the fact is the deal on these sites is rigged beyond belief. especially at pokerstars and full tilt.

i know of pros that have turned down 3000 pounds to wear a pokerstars tshirt and hat at final tables in broadcast tournaments.. and why? because they dont want to be associated with bs sites.



 

 

and we believe you too!!!!!!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 60
Posted: #90
david pomroy, 3rd in the dublin EPT.. turned down the endorsement offer on the final table.. go check it out if you want.

and dont worry skeptik i wont.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1947
Posted: #91
Quote Originally Posted by onlineskeptik:

Hi,

ive just read this entire thread and have to say.spoontaggg, i do think you sound like a bit of a low stakes donk. and your theory of a pyramid scheme does sound far fetched, although it is basically true when you consider absolute and ulltimate. not sure if that could happen at other sites, but it wouldnt surprise me...

however one thing im totally certain of is that the deals at pstars and fulltilt are totally out of whack with reality. i have played countless hands live and on these sites and the irregularities are obvious.... even a low stakes donk could see that... ;)

one thing spoontagg is right about is the rigging towards the players that have deposited more. when i started playing i lost money on minimal deposits and had terrible bad beads when nearing the busting point. i then reloaded for 10000$ and made all the losses back within 2 days. the cards were very different and i hardly ever got knocked out of 10$ or 20$ coolers and did quite well in the one table tournys too. being conservative, i withdrew and left 500 in there to try and build up. it wasnt long after that i was losing all the time. even though i was playing tighter and less frequently.

anyone who reads this thread dont listen to chancep and electricldy they are obvious schills.... and ofcourse a schill would deny it...
and spoontgg dont give them your details, especially if you still play online sometimes.

Ok you are totally wronfg thinking larger deposits=better cards, that's just fuking stupid, also thinking if you withdraw money the site will punish you, or if you deposit money the site will reward you.  That is just fuking stupid and wrong, I've tried it, i've won and lost on them all.

Another thing you fuking idiot, what the fuk can I do with spoontags username?  Every fuking player has their user name at the table, what the fuk would I be able to do with it?  I'm not asking for his password you douche bag.

So, you deposited money and started losing?  OK, you reload and you start winning?  Maybe varience was coming around and you were heating up?  No, that can't be.  I just think you are a losing player, that wins when he runs hot, and loses all the other times, you don't have the skill top be able to out play and grind out money in the tourneys that can go either way.

Hot=win $$$

Cold=lose $$$

up in the air tourney=lose $$$

Sounds about the average losing online poker player.  Few people win money playing poker.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 1408
Posted: #92
obviously chancep is a promoter for one of the rigged poker sites
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1947
Posted: #93
Quote Originally Posted by SOBLATANT:

obviously chancep is a promoter for one of the rigged poker sites

Obviously you are a donk who loses everywhere.  Like I said, there must be A LOT of site promoters since there are a lot of people winnings online.  Your comment shows you just how stupid you are, another reason the donks that think it's rigged are total fuking morons.

I would love to see your hand histories from your last 10 tourneys.  God, it has to be a total donkey show.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 3736
Posted: #94
spoontagg when u create another account (onlineskeptik) you should try to make their posts not grammatically identical to your posts.  . . .  . lol That way it wouldnt be so obvious it was you, LOL


LOL at Spoontagg craeting other accounts so that it looks like people are backing him!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SPOONTAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
DA MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 3736
Posted: #95
Quote Originally Posted by spoontaggg:

ok listen up dickheads,,, try not to focus on your ASSUMPTIONS of what i am like as a player and instead focus on the ASSERTIONS i have put forth... its always EASY for idiots like you to bad mouth a player, but it is harder for you to put forward any reasonable argument..

in your eyes i am being ripped into... but honestly i dont feel it that way.. there is only 2 people on this forum that have "ripped" into me.. lol, and thats the 2 people i have no respect for...so, ya...

why are you bothering anyway.. if i was someone who believed the poker sites werent rigged i wouldnt be wasting my time arguing with a so called "bitter donk" that watches 60 minutes....lol

really, the more you write the more wierd you sound and the more desperate you are becoming.




Look at spoontaggs posts and then look at ONLINESKEPTIKs below and you will see they are written by the same person, hence the way they both use the ". . . " identically. LOL
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 3736
Posted: #96
Quote Originally Posted by onlineskeptik:

Hi,

ive just read this entire thread and have to say.spoontaggg, i do think you sound like a bit of a low stakes donk. and your theory of a pyramid scheme does sound far fetched, although it is basically true when you consider absolute and ulltimate. not sure if that could happen at other sites, but it wouldnt surprise me...

however one thing im totally certain of is that the deals at pstars and fulltilt are totally out of whack with reality. i have played countless hands live and on these sites and the irregularities are obvious.... even a low stakes donk could see that... ;)

one thing spoontagg is right about is the rigging towards the players that have deposited more. when i started playing i lost money on minimal deposits and had terrible bad beads when nearing the busting point. i then reloaded for 10000$ and made all the losses back within 2 days. the cards were very different and i hardly ever got knocked out of 10$ or 20$ coolers and did quite well in the one table tournys too. being conservative, i withdrew and left 500 in there to try and build up. it wasnt long after that i was losing all the time. even though i was playing tighter and less frequently.

anyone who reads this thread dont listen to chancep and electricldy they are obvious schills.... and ofcourse a schill would deny it...
and spoontgg dont give them your details, especially if you still play online sometimes.



Thx Spoontagg, you couldnt make yourslelf look any worse if you tried
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 3736
Posted: #97
never any capitol letters to begin sentences and the " . . . ". jesus spoontagg are u really that fuckin stupid? lol
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 3736
Posted: #98
case closed on Spoontagg's credibility
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 1408
Posted: #99
Quote Originally Posted by ChanceP:

case closed on Spoontagg's credibility

and case closed on you being a rigged poker site promoter, and ditto with electricladyland. however he might just be a ignorant fool. 

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 60
Posted: #100
lol, keep trying dickhead... its very convenient for you to put everyone in the same basket.

fact is more ppl agree with my side of the story than you...there is only two of you on this thread that are backing the sites... and there are many that dont... and there are quite a few that dont use capitals either....
we must all be the same person

go have a look around the web, see how many ppl agree with the fact online poker is rigged and full of shit.. FUKN HEAPS buddy... i guess i am all of those ppl aye... just the one and only donk that loses on pokerstars and full tilt, writing all the bad stuff about those poor little poker sites....awww... you are such a try hard site promoter and a really bad one at that....

im sure you convince many ppl of your arguments..

your in a losing battle.. and why? because the sites you try and back are so obviously fukt that you must be an IDIOT to try and defend them... this is why you will always have ppl against you and why you might as well give up...

and why do you keep coming back for more arguments anyway?

what is your objective?

do you want ppl to believe the sites are 100% fair?

or has now become an ego trip of yours trying to prove your forum savvy and intelligence?

good luck and fuk off

All Forums | Poker
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.